23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PP-TT15 Training and Testing 15<br />

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT WARM UP INTENSITIES ON POWER OUTPUT AND METABOLISM DURING AND AFTER SHORT<br />

TERM MAXIMAL SPRINT EXERCISE<br />

WAHL, P., ZINNER, C., HAEGELE, M., BLOCH, W., MESTER, J.<br />

GERMAN SPORT UNIVERSITY<br />

Introduction: Despite limited scientific evidence supporting their effectiveness, warm-up (WU) routines prior to exercise are a wellaccepted<br />

practice. As a result, warm-up procedures are usually based on the trial and error experience <strong>of</strong> the athlete or coach, rather<br />

than on scientific study. Several previous studies have demonstrated that a number <strong>of</strong> physiological changes occur with active warm-up,<br />

some <strong>of</strong> which are potentially capable <strong>of</strong> improving performance. The majority <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> warm up have been attributed to temperature-related<br />

mechanisms. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the present study was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> three different WU regimes on metabolism<br />

and performance during and after short term maximal exercise.<br />

Methods: At three subsequent visits to the laboratory, subjects (n=11) performed 30 s lasting maximal sprint tests on a cycle ergometer<br />

(SRM) with different prior warm up (WU) intensities: 1. without prior warming up (W), 2. extensive warm up (E): 12 min cycling at 60% <strong>of</strong> VO2<br />

peak, 3. intensive warm up (I): 12 min cycling at 60% <strong>of</strong> VO2 peak including three 10 s lasting peaks at 200% <strong>of</strong> VO2 peak. After the warming<br />

up, subjects stayed in a sedentary position for 5 min, followed by the sprint test. Blood samples were taken under resting conditions,<br />

after warming up, before sprint exercise (pre M), and in minute intervals during recovery (0 min-15 min) to determine lactate concentrations<br />

[La]. Spirometric data were collected during the whole session.<br />

Results: The peak power (PP) output as well as the mean power (MP) output for the sprint test was significantly lower for W (PP: 951 ± 91 W<br />

& MP: 680 ± 181 W) compared to E & I (PP: 1007 ± 110 W & MP: 738 ± 192 W; E) (PP: 1022 ± 90 W & MP: 740 ± 191 W; I).<br />

[La] after WU were all significantly different from each other. After the 5 min rest only (I) was still significantly elevated. During the recovery<br />

period neither differences in [La] nor in La kinetics were found (only the increment directly after sprint test (pre M-0’) was significantly lower<br />

between (W) vs. (I)). Peak oxygen consumption after sprint tended to be higher after E & I conditions compared to W without reaching<br />

statistical significance.<br />

Discussion: Several possible effects <strong>of</strong> WU (systemic/local) are discussed in literature which might have an effect on performance. Our<br />

results show that performance during 30 s sprint is enhanced by WU irrespective <strong>of</strong> WU intensity. Contrary to previous studies (Gray et al.<br />

2002) we found no differences in blood La accumulation. Improved performance was not related to differences in measured aerobic or<br />

anaerobic metabolism, although VO2 tended to increase higher after exercise (although muscle metabolism might be different). Although<br />

pre exercise [La] were different between the 3 conditions, high [La] had no negative effects on performance in this test, supporting<br />

the new view for La as a metabolite and signaling molecule and not as a factor <strong>of</strong> fatigue.<br />

DEVELOPING BODY COMPOSITION REGRESSION EQUATIONS FOR MALE ADOLESCENT ATHLETES.<br />

KUCUKKUBAS, N., HAZIR, T., ALPAR, R., ACIKADA, C.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF MUSTAFA KEMAL<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> the study is to develop regression equations for the male adolescent athletes at the ages <strong>of</strong> 15-17 years old by using<br />

hydrostatic weighting as a criterion method. 155 male adolescent athletes (basketball, volleyball, football, handball, swimming, track and<br />

field athletes) participated voluntarily in this study. The athletes were training for at least 1 year, 2 hours/3 days/week. Body density (BD),<br />

body fat percentage (%BF), and lean body mass (LBM) were determined by using Hydrostatic Weighting (HW). Oxygen dilution method<br />

was used to determine residual volume. Anthropometric variables; body weight (BW) in kg, height (H) in cm, skinfold thicknesses (mm),<br />

circumferences (cm), width (cm) were measured. Resistance (R)(ohm) and reactance (ohm) measurements were taken by using Bioelectric<br />

Impedance (BIA). Resistance Index (RI) (cm2/ohm) was calculated by dividing H-squared to R. To develop regression equations, dependent<br />

and independent variables were treated to Multiple Stepwise Analysis after Pearson Product Moment correlation coefficient determined<br />

between variables. Highest R-squared (0.77) and lowest SEE (0.00519) BD regression equations for anthropometric measurement<br />

is BD= 1.064 - 0.0001162(H) + 0.002204(age in years) + 0.0001633(BW) - 0.0007809(abdomen skinfold thickness) - 0.0005526(thigh<br />

skinfold thickness); highest R-squared (0.77) and lowest SEE (2.0795) BF% regression equations for anthropometric measurement is BF%<br />

=21.317 - 0.906(age in years) -0.02027(BW) + 0.305(abdomen skinfold thickness) + 0.202(thigh skinfold thickness); highest R-squared<br />

(0.97) and lowest SEE (1.487) LBM regression equations is LBM= -6.918 + 0.886(BW)+ 0.01794(RI) +0.635(age in years) -0.226 (abdomen<br />

skinfold thickness) -0.159(thigh skinfold thickness). All equations were then tested by using cross validation (R-squared for 1st and 2nd<br />

group are 0.79, 0.73; 0.80, 0.70 ;0.97, 0.96 respectively), by dividing the data randomly into two groups. Therefore, these high R-squared<br />

and low SEE regression equations were recommended for use in estimating BD, BF% and FFM <strong>of</strong> adolescent athletes.<br />

14:15 - 15:15<br />

Poster presentations<br />

PP-TT15 Training and Testing 15<br />

CORRELATION BETWEEN ANXIETY AND CARDIAC LOAD IN TEAMGYM PERFORMANCE<br />

DE PERO, R., MINGANTI, C., CAPRANICA, L., AMICI, S., PIACENTINI, M.F.<br />

UNIVERSITY OF ROME<br />

Introduction: Teamgym is a fairly new and popular form <strong>of</strong> Gymnastics including only trampoline, tumbling and floor exercises. Compared<br />

with other categories <strong>of</strong> gymnasts, teamgym athletes reported a significantly higher occurrence <strong>of</strong> injuries (Harringe et al., 2007).<br />

Therefore, anxiety is the psychological factor most commonly linked to motor performance during gymnastics, <strong>of</strong>ten related to heart rate<br />

frequencies (Cottyn et al., 2006; Gramer, Saria, 2007). The aim <strong>of</strong> the present study was to investigate the correlation between anxiety,<br />

heart rate frequency and teamgym performance during National and European Championships.<br />

Methods: Ten Italian elite gymnasts, 5 males and 5 females, (mean age 21 ± 2) performed the same exercise program during National<br />

(NC) and European Teamgym Championships (EC). Gymnasts’ cardiac load (HR) was measured recording heart rate (Polar team System)<br />

624 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!