23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Friday, June 26th, 2009<br />

THE EFFECT OF STRETCHING ON MUSCLE FORCE PRODUCTION IN HAMSTRING MUSCLES<br />

MOE, V., AUNE, T.K.<br />

NORD TRONDELAG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore the acute effect <strong>of</strong> proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching (PNF) on maximal voluntary<br />

contraction (MVC), rate <strong>of</strong> force development (RFD) and power in both isometric and dynamic contractions <strong>of</strong> hamstring (knee flexion).<br />

10 volunteer male kickboxers participated in the experiment. The subjects underwent two days <strong>of</strong> testing, and randomly the subjects were<br />

tested with or without stretching the first or the second day <strong>of</strong> testing. The day without PNF was used as a control condition for the day<br />

with PNF.<br />

Each experimental condition conducted <strong>of</strong> a 10min warm up on at treadmill at 60% <strong>of</strong> the subjects HFmax. Immediately after warm up<br />

the day without stretching the dependent variables in both the isometric and dynamic contractions <strong>of</strong> the hamstrings were tested. After<br />

warm up the other day the subjects underwent a controlled PNF sequence <strong>of</strong> the hamstring that was immediately followed by a test <strong>of</strong><br />

the dependent variables. The subjects hamstring flexibility was controlled by the “sit and reach test” after warm up both days <strong>of</strong> testing,<br />

and after PNF. Only the dominant leg was tested.<br />

The results indicate that PNF increases hamstring flexibility, but has an acute negative effect on MVC, RFD and power in both isometric<br />

and dynamic contractions <strong>of</strong> hamstring muscles.<br />

Therefore it is concluded that PNF has an acute negative effect on muscle force production measured as MVC, RFD and power in both<br />

isometric and dynamic tasks, and is not a type <strong>of</strong> stretching that should be recommended in before performing activities that require high<br />

force production.<br />

14:15 - 15:15<br />

Poster presentations<br />

PP-PH08 Physiology 8<br />

SCALING OXYGEN CONSUMPTION TO BODY MASS IN REAL ELITE CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING PERFORMANCES<br />

CARLSSON, T., CARLSSON, M., HAMMARSTRÖM, D., TONKONOGI, M.<br />

LIVI<br />

Introduction: Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is a frequently evaluated test parameter in cross-country skiing. Most <strong>of</strong>ten the<br />

units L min(-1) and mL min(-1) kg(-1) are used as performance ability markers, but earlier research have suggested that VO2max divided<br />

by body mass raised to 2/3 power would theoretically better reflect the physiological demands in cross-country skiing (Bergh and Forsberg,<br />

1992). Changes in cross-country skiing in the last decades might place different physiological demands regarding VO2max. The<br />

purpose was therefore to find the optimal body mass exponent for test parameter VO2max for real elite cross-country skiing performances<br />

and ranking points.<br />

Methods: Four to seven days prior to the first ski race twelve highly motivated male Swedish national elite cross-country skiers (age<br />

23.9+/-4.2 years; weight 76.2+/-5.8 kg; VO2max 5.34+/-0.34 L min(-1)) completed an incremental treadmill roller skiing test in diagonal<br />

technique determining VO2max.<br />

Performance data were collected from the Swedish National Championship (SNC) in cross-country skiing (13-17 March 2008): 15-km with<br />

individual start in classical technique (SNC15); 30-km double pursuit with mass-start (SNC30) also divided in the two halves in classical<br />

technique (SNC30:15c) and free-style technique (SNC30:15f); sprint prolog in free-style technique (SNCsprint). In addition to ski races,<br />

overall seasonal ski ranking points were collected from International Ski Federation’s (FIS) 3rd Cross-Country Points List 2007/2008 published<br />

before SNC for distance (FISdist) and sprint (FISsprint) races.<br />

Body mass scaling <strong>of</strong> VO2max for each <strong>of</strong> the skiing performances was determined using Pearson´s correlation analysis. Optimal mass<br />

exponent was set to the scaling value between zero (L min(-1)) and one (mL min(-1) kg(-1)) where Pearson’s product-moment correlation<br />

coefficient showed highest correlation for the relationship between VO2max and the ski performance parameter.<br />

Results: Optimal body mass exponents for VO2max regarding ski performances SNC15, SNC30, SNC30:15c SNC30:15f and SNCsprint<br />

were 0.49, 0.57, 0.55, 0.58 and 0.31, respectively. Optimal scaling factor for FISdist was 0.63 and corresponding value for FISsprint was<br />

0.25.<br />

Discussion: This study indicates that optimal body mass exponents for maximal aerobic power depends mainly on work intensity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

actual skiing performance. Sprint skiing performance places higher metabolic demands than distance races which are reflected by a<br />

lower scaling factor. The fact that SNC15 had a lower optimal body mass exponent than SNC30:15c despite both were performed in the<br />

same course and technique supports the work intensity theory because in double pursuit the physiological resources should be sufficient<br />

to go 15-km more resulting in lower work intensity. Summarizing the reasoning above heavier skiers are favored in shorter race distances<br />

with higher metabolic demands.<br />

References<br />

Bergh U, Forsberg A. (1992). Med Sci Sports Exerc., 24, 1033-9.<br />

PHYSIOLOGICAL DEMANDS OF REAL ELITE CROSS-COUNTRY SKIING PERFORMANCES<br />

CARLSSON, M., CARLSSON, T., HAMMARSTRÖM, D., TONKONOGI, M.<br />

LIVI<br />

Introduction: Which are the main physiological differences between a successful and less successful cross-country skier? To our knowledge<br />

no previous studies have examined a real elite cross-country ski competition. Main purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was therefore to validate<br />

commonly used test parameters to skiing time and to International Ski Federation (FIS) overall seasonal ranking points and to create<br />

multiple regression models to predict skiing performances.<br />

OSLO/NORWAY, JUNE 24-27, 2009 351

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!