23.12.2012 Views

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

european college of sport science

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10:15 - 11:45<br />

Oral presentations<br />

OP-SP01 Sport Management<br />

MOVING BEYOND A PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: A NETWORK OF STAKEHOLDER INFLUENCES<br />

SKIRSTAD, B.<br />

NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF SPORT SCIENCES<br />

OP-SP01 Sport Management<br />

Introduction: The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to explain the presidential election process <strong>of</strong> the Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic Committee<br />

and Confederation <strong>of</strong> Sports (NOC) in 2007. Stakeholder and network theory is used as the theoretical framework in order to understand<br />

the election process and explore the power play between the different stakeholders in <strong>sport</strong> in relation to have their candidate<br />

elected as president. The stakeholder picture is multifaceted and consists <strong>of</strong> several formal and informal stakeholders, <strong>of</strong> whom some<br />

are internal and some are external.The most influential stakeholders are the <strong>sport</strong> federations (55) and the regional <strong>sport</strong> associations<br />

(19), and each group has 75 votes. In addition comes the executive board <strong>of</strong> the NOC. Stakeholder theory is one important example <strong>of</strong> a<br />

theory that develops tools to assess the relative importance <strong>of</strong> different constituents and to find rational strategies for balancing the<br />

attention given to their demands (Mitchell, Agle, & Wood, 1997). Power as conceptualized by Mitchell et al. (1997) refers to abilities to<br />

influence the outcome according to the stakeholders’ desires. Even within a stakeholder group not all members are homogeneous.<br />

Stakeholders lacking sufficient power to influence the organization demonstrated that it may still be able to influence through forming an<br />

alliance with another powerful stakeholder (Frooman, 1999).<br />

Method: Qualitative case-study <strong>of</strong> observations at the GA for three days and field notes, analysis <strong>of</strong> news paper clippings, and seven<br />

semi-structured retrospective interviews with the key-actors (spokesperson for the districts, the <strong>sport</strong> federations, the leader <strong>of</strong> the nomination<br />

committee, two vice-presidents, the elected president, and the major opponent). The interviews were tape-recorded and written<br />

down and analysed according to power, urgency and salience.<br />

Results: The Nomination Committee planted a seed for a female president. This started the chase by the big federations to find a “heavy”<br />

candidate to substitute her. They did not succeed because the downfall <strong>of</strong> the big federations’ power was caused by not playing by the<br />

democratic rules, too many dirty stories about opponents, arrogance, and failure <strong>of</strong> organizing fraction meetings. A troika (president and<br />

two vice-presidents) united just before the finish line by negotiations on divisions <strong>of</strong> power and work areas as well as salary. The theoretical<br />

framework gave more in-depth knowledge <strong>of</strong> the election process and how the different stakeholders operated.<br />

Frooman, J. (1999): Stakeholder influence strategies Academy <strong>of</strong> Management Review.24 (2): 191-205<br />

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R. & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory <strong>of</strong> stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle <strong>of</strong> who<br />

and what really counts. Academy <strong>of</strong> Management. The Academy <strong>of</strong> Management Review, 22, 853-886.<br />

SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR THE ”COACH CAMPAIGN“ IN GERMAN TOP LEVEL SPORTS<br />

POHLMANN, A.<br />

FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF SPORT SCIENCE<br />

INTRODUCTION: Despite their exceptional importance for the athletic and personal development <strong>of</strong> their athletes, systematic research on<br />

analysing the pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile and working conditions <strong>of</strong> coaches working in German top level <strong>sport</strong> has not been done yet. In order<br />

to address the important role <strong>of</strong> top level coaches and to improve their working conditions, in 2006 the German Olympic Sport Federation<br />

has started a so-called “Coach Campaign”. The Federal Institute <strong>of</strong> Sport Science supports this campaign by the initiation and funding <strong>of</strong><br />

two research projects: (a) “coach pr<strong>of</strong>ession pr<strong>of</strong>ile” and (b) “coach information supply“.<br />

The project ”coach pr<strong>of</strong>ession pr<strong>of</strong>ile“ deals with the structural conditions <strong>of</strong> the coaches’ pr<strong>of</strong>ession and explores the following issues:<br />

What are the structural and working conditions <strong>of</strong> coaches in top level <strong>sport</strong>s? What are the conditions for being employed as a coach?<br />

Which measures have to be taken to establish the coach pr<strong>of</strong>ession as a durable, well honoured and dominant pr<strong>of</strong>ession, which is<br />

characterized by well defined and structured job qualification levels and job pr<strong>of</strong>iles?<br />

In order to reach top level performances, coaches depend upon a permanent information supply about the latest training and coaching<br />

methods as well as for being up to date for the high demands put upon them in their job as coaches. In the research project ”coach<br />

information supply“, the common information supplies used and asked for by coaches are investigated. The main purpose <strong>of</strong> this study is<br />

to identify information deficits and information needs in order to optimize the information supply for top level coaches.<br />

METHODOLOGY: Both studies were realized by the Institute <strong>of</strong> Sport Science and the Institute <strong>of</strong> Media Science at the University <strong>of</strong> Tübingen,<br />

Germany. For both research projects, more than 1.500 top level coaches were asked to fill out extensive questionnaires. Moreover,<br />

an analysis <strong>of</strong> literature and documents related to the topics <strong>of</strong> the surveys took place, including the use <strong>of</strong> coach related internet sites, as<br />

well as additional half-standardized interviews with experts were carried out.<br />

RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Both research projects were finished in autumn 2008. The overall response rate was rather high (study a: 47,1 %;<br />

study b: 27 %), especially in consideration <strong>of</strong> questionnaire size in both studies.<br />

Selected findings <strong>of</strong> both studies are<br />

- a high need and interest <strong>of</strong> coaches for improving pr<strong>of</strong>essional and structural working conditions;<br />

- high academic and coaching qualification levels <strong>of</strong> top level coaches, including many years <strong>of</strong> coaching experiences in top level <strong>sport</strong>s<br />

and a former successful individual <strong>sport</strong> career;<br />

- a preference for non-formal methods <strong>of</strong> information supply (particularly the interchange <strong>of</strong> information with other coaches, own observation,<br />

analysis and evaluation) and the use <strong>of</strong> coach training programs.<br />

Additional studies are intended to carry on the improvement <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional pr<strong>of</strong>ile and working conditions <strong>of</strong> coaches working in German<br />

top level <strong>sport</strong>.<br />

330 14 TH<br />

ANNUAL CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF SPORT SCIENCE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!