24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92s Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology<br />

1525 Poster Discussion Session (Board #14), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the 21-gene recurrence score assay in the setting <strong>of</strong><br />

multifactorial decision making for chemotherapy in early-stage breast<br />

cancer. Presenting Author: Shelby D. Reed, Duke <strong>Clinical</strong> Research<br />

Institute, Durham, NC<br />

Background: The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to incorporate evidence from<br />

two recently-published studies to reevaluate the cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay (Oncotype DX) in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

multifactorial decision making to guide the use <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy for<br />

node-negative, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer in the United<br />

States from the societal and healthcare system perspectives. Methods: We<br />

developed a decision-analytic model to first cross-classify hypothetical<br />

patients by clinicopathologic characteristics according to the Adjuvant!<br />

using risk groups and RS risk groups. We generated estimates <strong>of</strong> long-term<br />

costs, survival, and quality-adjusted survival for the RS-guided and<br />

non–RS-guided strategies using a probabilistic state transition model. In<br />

addition to costs for the 21-gene assay, we assigned attributable costs for<br />

chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, monitoring for disease recurrence, and<br />

distant recurrence. For the societal perspective, we also considered<br />

incremental patient time costs. Costs and survival were discounted at 3%<br />

annually. Results: With the RS-guided strategy, 40.4% <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />

expected to receive chemotherapy relative to 47.3% in the non–RS-guided<br />

strategy. Targeted use <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy in the RS-guided strategy was<br />

expected to increase survival by 0.19 years (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.32) and<br />

0.16 QALYs (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.28). Lifetime direct medical costs were<br />

expected to be $2692 (95% CI, 1546 to 3821) higher with the RS-guided<br />

strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $14,059<br />

per life-year saved (95% CI, $6840-$28,912) and $16,677 per QALY<br />

(95% CI, $7613-$37,219). When incorporating lower indirect costs <strong>of</strong><br />

$950 per patient, the ICERs were $9095 per life-year saved (95% CI,<br />

dominant-$23,397) and $10,788 per QALY (95% CI, $6840-$30,265).<br />

In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, more than 99% <strong>of</strong> the ICERs were less<br />

than $50,000 per life-year saved and per QALY. Conclusions: Our updated<br />

cost-effectiveness estimates are supportive <strong>of</strong> the economic value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

21-gene RS assay in the setting <strong>of</strong> node-negative, estrogen receptor–<br />

positive breast cancer.<br />

1527 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Associations between allergies and risk <strong>of</strong> hematologic malignancies:<br />

Results from the Vitamins and Lifestyle (VITAL) cohort study. Presenting<br />

Author: Mazyar Shadman, University <strong>of</strong> Washington, Seattle, WA<br />

Background: Several case-control studies have suggested a reduced risk <strong>of</strong><br />

hematologic malignancies (HMs) for individuals with allergies, but results<br />

have been inconsistent, and prospective cohort studies have not confirmed<br />

this association. Herein, we used the large prospective VITAL study to<br />

examine this association. Methods: 64,847 men and women, aged 50-76,<br />

completed a baseline questionnaire in 2000-2002 and reported on their<br />

current allergies and history <strong>of</strong> physician-diagnosed asthma. Individuals<br />

with prior cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer were excluded from<br />

this analysis. Incident HMs were identified through December 2009 by<br />

linkage to the SEER registry; those with a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> a non-HM during<br />

follow-up were censored at the time <strong>of</strong> that diagnosis. Multivariable Cox<br />

proportional hazards models were built with adjustment for sex, race/<br />

ethnicity, education, smoking, self-rated health, physical activity, history<br />

<strong>of</strong> anemia in the year before baseline, vegetable use and family history <strong>of</strong><br />

leukemia or lymphoma. Results: Our analysis included 64,839 participants,<br />

among whom 681 (1.03%) incident HMs were found (MDS [69],<br />

AML (41], myeloproliferative disorders [60], mature B-cell neoplasms<br />

[262], chronic lymphocytic leukemia [107], plasma cell disorders [83],<br />

Hodgkin lymphoma [23], T-cell/NK-cell neoplasms [22], and others [14]).<br />

In multivariable analyses, a history <strong>of</strong> any allergy was associated with<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> HM (HR�1.21; 95% CI 1.02-1.43, p�0.02). This<br />

association was seen for current allergies to plants/grass/trees (HR 1.27<br />

[1.06-1.52], p�0.001) but not for allergies to mold/dust, animals, insects,<br />

food, or medications. We did not find an association between a history <strong>of</strong><br />

asthma and incident HMs (HR�0.95 [0.72-1.26]). Conclusions: Our study<br />

indicates a moderately increased risk <strong>of</strong> HMs inindividuals with a history <strong>of</strong><br />

allergy, especially to plant, grass or trees. While no causality can be<br />

inferred, this may suggest a possible carcinogenic role for chronic stimulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the immune system. However, further mechanistic investigations<br />

focusing on the biochemical markers <strong>of</strong> immune system as well as on<br />

possible gene effect modifiers are needed.<br />

1526 Poster Discussion Session (Board #15), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Racial disparities in treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients (pts)<br />

with HER2� metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Presenting Author: Adam Brufsky,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA<br />

Background: Data examining prognosis and treatment outcomes for black pts<br />

with HER2� MBC are limited. Methods: registHER is a large, observational<br />

cohort <strong>of</strong> pts (N�1,001) with HER2� MBC diagnosed w/in 6 mos <strong>of</strong> enrollment<br />

and followed until death, disenrollment, or 6/09 (median follow-up 27 mos).<br />

Demographics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were described for<br />

black (n�126) and white pts (n�793). Progression Free Survival (PFS) and<br />

Overall Survival (OS) were examined. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline<br />

and treatment factors. Results: Black pts were more likely to be obese (BMI �<br />

30), have diabetes, and a history <strong>of</strong> cardiovascular disease (CVD) than white pts<br />

(Table). Black pts were less likely to have estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone<br />

receptor (PR)� disease and more likely to present with stage IV MBC. In<br />

trastuzumab (T)-treated pts, incidence <strong>of</strong> cardiac safety events (grade �3) was<br />

higher in black (13/119 [10.9%]) than white pts (59/746 [7.9%]). Unadjusted<br />

median OS (mos) was significantly lower (blacks: 27.1, 95%CI 23.2-32.1;<br />

whites: 37.3, 95%CI 34.6-41.1) and median PFS (mos) was lower (blacks: 7.0,<br />

95%CI 5.7-9.7; whites: 10.2, 95%CI 9.3-11.2) in black than white pts. The<br />

adjusted OS hazard ratio (HR) for black vs. white was 1.32 (95%CI 1.04, 1.69);<br />

the adjusted PFS HR was 1.31 (95% CI 1.07, 1.61). Conclusions: These<br />

population-based data show poorer prognostic factors and independently worse<br />

clinical outcomes in black vs. white pts, and represent the largest database to<br />

date with black pts with HER2� MBC. Further research is needed to explore the<br />

basis for the differences noted in this hypothesis-generating analysis.<br />

Demographic and clinical characteristics <strong>of</strong> black and white pts.<br />

Black<br />

White<br />

Variable (%)<br />

(n�126)<br />

(n�793)<br />

Age (y), median (min, max)<br />

BMI (kg/m<br />

50 (20,90) 54 (22,92)<br />

2 )<br />

-<br />

-<br />

30<br />

50.8<br />

32.4<br />

ER/PR status<br />

-<br />

-<br />

ER� or PR�<br />

42.1<br />

54.7<br />

ER- and PR-<br />

54.8<br />

41.5<br />

Unknown<br />

3.2<br />

3.8<br />

Stage, initial diagnosis<br />

-<br />

-<br />

IV<br />

31.0<br />

26.6<br />

I-III, MBC 12 mos<br />

50.8<br />

61.0<br />

Baseline CVD 30.2 15.8<br />

Diabetes 13.5 6.5<br />

T-based 1st-line regimens<br />

(n�102)<br />

(n�670)<br />

C only<br />

77.5<br />

65.4<br />

HT only<br />

4.9<br />

6.3<br />

C and HT<br />

11.8<br />

20.6<br />

T alone<br />

5.9<br />

7.8<br />

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; C, chemotherapy; HT, hormone therapy.<br />

1529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Outcomes from an electronic medical record (EMR)-based standardized<br />

tobacco assessment and cessation program in a NCI-designated comprehensive<br />

cancer center. Presenting Author: Graham Walter Warren, Roswell Park<br />

Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY<br />

Background: Tobacco assessment and cessation is advocated by ASCO and<br />

national clinical oncology guidelines, but there is little information on large<br />

scale clinically efficient models to assess tobacco use and provide<br />

cessation in a structured evidence based manner. Automation through the<br />

electronic medical record (EMR) could reduce subjective interpretation by<br />

clinicians and assist in increasing data tracking accuracy to enhance<br />

meaningful use initiatives. Methods: A standard set <strong>of</strong> evidence based<br />

tobacco assessment questions were incorporated into an annotated fixedvariable<br />

response system in the EMR delivered by nursing at initial consult<br />

and at follow-up. A logic based EMR referral system was developed to<br />

determine patient eligibility for mandatory automated referral to a dedicated<br />

tobacco cessation service. An evidence based institutional clinical<br />

cessation program was developed to provide cessation support to referred<br />

patients. The evidence based screening and referral algorithms will be<br />

presented. Results: Over 13 months, 677 patients were referred and 529<br />

patients were successfully contacted to date for cessation support. In the<br />

529 patients, 21 (3.9%) were inappropriate referrals (never smokers or<br />

long term former smokers), 48 patients (9.1%) did not want to enroll, but<br />

wanted to discuss cessation at a later date. Notably, only 18 patients<br />

(3.4%) refused any intervention. In a total <strong>of</strong> 415 patients enrolled in the<br />

cessation program, 104 patients (25.1%) were thinking about quitting<br />

(contemplation), 134 patients (32.3%) were preparing to quit, 169<br />

patients (40.7%) were quitting (action phase), and 8 patients (1.9%) have<br />

relapsed. Tobacco assessments and automated referrals through the EMR<br />

took a median <strong>of</strong> 4 minutes to complete. Conclusions: A large volume <strong>of</strong><br />

patients were screened and referred to a dedicated cessation program with<br />

low patient refusal for intervention without impeding physician workflow.<br />

These data suggest that this nursing driven EMR based assessment is a<br />

highly efficient clinical model for tobacco assessment and cessation.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!