Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
546s Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />
8524 Poster Discussion Session (Board #13), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
A phase II single arm study <strong>of</strong> pazopanib and paclitaxel as first-line<br />
treatment for unresectable stage III and stage IV melanoma: Interim<br />
analysis. Presenting Author: John P. Fruehauf, UCI Comprehensive Cancer<br />
Center, Orange, CA<br />
Background: Metastatic melanoma lacks effective therapy. Pazopanib is a<br />
small-molecule inhibitor <strong>of</strong> VEGFR-1,2,3, PDGFR-B and c-KIT that has<br />
antiangiogenic activity in renal cell cancer as well as inhibition <strong>of</strong><br />
melanoma tumor xenografts. We designed a phase II single arm, open label<br />
clinical trial evaluating pazopanib in combination with metronomic paclitaxel<br />
as first line therapy for subjects with unresectable stage III and stage<br />
IV melanoma. Methods: This protocol utilizes a Simon 2-stage Minimax<br />
design, with a planned interim analysis to confirm �3 responders to move<br />
to the second stage. To date, 20 eligible patients have been enrolled with<br />
17 evaluable for response. All subjects were treatment naïve and received<br />
paclitaxel at 80mg/m2 weekly for three weeks in a 4 week cycle and<br />
pazopanib at 800mg as a continuous daily oral dose. The primary endpoint<br />
is 6 month progression free survival. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker<br />
analysis that may be associated with treatment outcomes (serum<br />
VEGF, soluble VEGF R2, serum HIF, serum TSP1 and BRAF mutation<br />
status). An additional exploratory endpoint includes the in vitro activity <strong>of</strong><br />
pazopanib and paclitaxel on patient biopsy material co-cultured with<br />
vascular endothelial cells. RECIST criteria were used to define treatment<br />
response. Results: For the 17 evaluable patients treated to date the<br />
following results were seen: 1 CR, 6 PR’s, 8 SD’s and 2 PD’s. The overall<br />
RR (CR�PR) was 40%. Total disease control rate was 80% (PR�SD). The<br />
most common AEs/lab abnormalities were nausea (71%), hypertension<br />
(57%), fatigue (57%) and vomiting (43%). Grade 3-4 AEs included<br />
hypertension (28%), transaminitis (21%) and neutropenia (14%). One<br />
patient discontinued for grade 4 transaminitis which subsequently resolved<br />
completely. Dose reductions were required for pazopanib in 5 patients and<br />
for paclitaxel in one patient. Conclusions: Planned interim analysis <strong>of</strong> this<br />
phase II study demonstrated that pazopanib in combination with paclitaxel<br />
was well tolerated and resulted in a 40% response rate, indicating that this<br />
combination is <strong>of</strong> further interest. Accrual will continue to reach a goal <strong>of</strong><br />
60 patients.<br />
8526 Poster Discussion Session (Board #15), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
Targeting hyperactivation <strong>of</strong> the AKT survival pathway to overcome therapy<br />
resistance <strong>of</strong> melanoma brain metastases. Presenting Author: Friedegund<br />
Elke Meier, University <strong>of</strong> Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany<br />
Background: Brain metastases are a major contributor to mortality in stage<br />
IV melanoma patients. In melanoma, the RAF-MEK-ERK (MAPK) and<br />
PI3K-AKT-mTOR (AKT) signaling pathways play a major role in tumor<br />
progression and therapy resistance. On the basis <strong>of</strong> significant improvement<br />
in overall survival, the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib recently gained<br />
FDA approval for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with metastatic BRAFV600E<br />
mutated melanoma. However, ongoing clinical studies suggest short-lived<br />
responses to BRAF inhibitors in melanoma brain metastases. Methods: We<br />
observed in several melanoma patients that chemotherapeutics or BRAF<br />
inhibitors yielded a significant regression <strong>of</strong> extracerebral metastases while<br />
brain metastases progressed or newly occurred. We therefore aimed at<br />
identifying factors that may contribute to treatment resistance <strong>of</strong> brain<br />
metastases. Results: Immunohistochemistry <strong>of</strong> matched brain and extracerebral<br />
melanoma metastases demonstrated an identical pattern <strong>of</strong> ERK,<br />
p-ERK and AKT staining but a different pattern <strong>of</strong> p-AKT and PTEN<br />
staining with hyperactivation <strong>of</strong> AKT and loss <strong>of</strong> PTEN expression in brain<br />
metastases. Mutation analysis revealed no difference in BRAF, NRAS or<br />
KIT mutation status in matched brain and extracerebral metastases. By<br />
contrast, in monolayer culture expression <strong>of</strong> ERK, p-ERK, AKT, p-AKT and<br />
PTEN was identical in cell lines derived from brain and extracerebral<br />
metastases. Furthermore, melanoma cells stimulated by astrocyteconditioned<br />
medium showed hyperactivation <strong>of</strong> AKT compared to melanoma<br />
cells stimulated by fibroblast-conditioned medium. When inhibiting<br />
the MAPK and AKT signaling pathways at different levels in cells freshly<br />
isolated from melanoma brain metastases, growth inhibition and apoptosis<br />
induction was most pronounced with novel PI3K inhibitors such as<br />
BKM120 and BEZ235. Conclusions: These data suggest that 1) hyperactivation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the AKT survival pathway is brain environment-induced and<br />
relevant for the survival <strong>of</strong> melanoma cells in the brain parenchyma and<br />
that 2) inhibition <strong>of</strong> AKT signaling may be a suitable strategy to enhance<br />
and/or prolong the antitumor effect <strong>of</strong> chemotherapeutics or BRAF inhibitors<br />
in melanoma brain metastases.<br />
8525 Poster Discussion Session (Board #14), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
Phase II trial <strong>of</strong> RO4929097 Notch gamma-secretase inhibitor in metastatic<br />
melanoma: SWOG S0933. Presenting Author: Kim Allyson Margolin,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Washington, Seattle, WA<br />
Background: The Notch pathway regulates expression <strong>of</strong> genes for cell<br />
cycle, tissue-specific differentiation, and vasculogenesis. Notch target<br />
genes affect melanomagenesis, and Notch levels can influence stemlike<br />
versus differentiated tumor cells. Gamma-secretase, which activates intracellular<br />
Notch, can be inhibited to kill melanoma cells. We designed this<br />
trial to test RO4929097 in pts with melanoma and its effects on T<br />
lymphocytes and tumor gene expression. Methods: To assess 6-month<br />
progression-free survival (PFS) and 1-year overall survival (OS) in advanced,<br />
untreated melanoma patients (pts), a 2-stage accrual design was<br />
used. Correlative studies: markers <strong>of</strong> Notch pathway activation in archived<br />
or fresh tumor and T cell functional assays pre-treatment (Rx) and at week<br />
3. Rx dose was 20 mg orally on 3 consecutive days, weekly. Results: 33 pts<br />
were Rx’d in stage 1 (median age 61 [range 32-85]; 70% male; 42%<br />
elevated LDH; 30% unknown primary; 24% bone mets; 36% liver; 55%<br />
lung; 55% lymph node, skin or s<strong>of</strong>t tissue). The clinical outcomes did not<br />
meet criteria for stage 2 accrual. One pt had a confirmed PR <strong>of</strong> 7 months’<br />
(mo) duration. The median PFS was 1.4 mo, [95% confidence interval, c.i.<br />
1.3-2.7], the 6-mo PFS was 11% [95% c.i 3%-33%], and the 1-year OS<br />
was 45% [95% c.i. 23%-90%]. Treatment was well-tolerated with no grade<br />
(gr) 4-5 tox. The most common gr 2 drug tox were fatigue and nausea in 4<br />
patients (12%) each, and only 4 <strong>of</strong> 7 gr 3 tox were considered drug-related<br />
(1 increased ALT, 1 QTc prolongation, 1 bradycardia, 1 lymphopenia). Preand<br />
week 3 on-Rx peripheral T cell samples assayed for IL-2 (23 pts) and<br />
IFN-� (22 pts) secretion to Staphylococcal enterotoxin A showed no<br />
significant change, in contrast to in vitro gamma-secretase inhibitors which<br />
blocked T cell activation. Pre- and on-Rx tumor biopsies in one pt showed<br />
no decrease in the Notch target Hey1. Conclusions: RO4929097 at this<br />
dose and schedule has limited activity in molecularly-unselected pts with<br />
melanoma. Lack <strong>of</strong> effect on T cell function and tumor Hey1 expression<br />
suggests that sustained target inhibition might not have been achieved.<br />
Supported in part by PHS Cooperative Agreements, NCI, DHHS CA32102<br />
and CA38926. <strong>Clinical</strong>Trials.gov identifier: NCT01120275.<br />
8527 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />
4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />
CNS metastases as a site <strong>of</strong> progression on SWOG intergroup study S0008:<br />
A phase III trial <strong>of</strong> high-dose interferon alpha-2b versus cisplatin, vinblastine,<br />
DTIC plus IL-2 (BCT) versus high-dose interferon (HDI) in patients<br />
with high-risk melanoma. Presenting Author: Wolfram E. Samlowski,<br />
Comprehensive Cancer Centers <strong>of</strong> Nevada, Las Vegas, NV<br />
Background: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases (mets) are common<br />
in stage IV melanoma patients (pts). However, the incidence <strong>of</strong> CNS mets in<br />
pts with high-risk regional melanoma (HRM; stages IIIA-N2a thru IIIC N3)<br />
is not well described. A recent large prospective S0008 trial provided an<br />
opportunity to evaluate the contribution <strong>of</strong> CNS mets to treatment failure<br />
and survival. Methods: All pts had HRM treated with wide excision and full<br />
regional lymphadenectomy. Pts were then randomized to receive treatment<br />
with either BCT or HDI. All eligible pts were included in the analysis.<br />
Relapse/progression in the CNS (PCNS) was retrospectively identified only<br />
if clearly documented in case report forms. The cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
PCNS in the presence <strong>of</strong> the competing hazard <strong>of</strong> death was estimated and<br />
potential risk factors were explored using the methods <strong>of</strong> Fine and Gray.<br />
Survival from PCNS was measured from date <strong>of</strong> PCNS to date <strong>of</strong> death.<br />
Results: 402 patients were evaluated (BCT: 200, HDI: 202), with median<br />
follow (if alive) <strong>of</strong> 6 years. The site <strong>of</strong> progression was identified in 162 (78<br />
%) <strong>of</strong> 208 pts relapsing on study. Clearly documented PCNS occurred in<br />
53/402 pts (13%). PCNS as a component <strong>of</strong> initial relapse/progression<br />
occurred in 34 patients (8%) and an additional 19 patients (5%) had<br />
delayed PCNS following initial systemic relapse. Most PCNS (85%)<br />
occurred within 3 years <strong>of</strong> initial surgery. Differences between arms were<br />
not significant (22 on BCT, and 31 on HDI)(p�0.21). Lymph node<br />
macromets demonstrated a strong correlation with development <strong>of</strong> PCNS<br />
(p�0.01). Neither primary tumor ulceration nor head and neck primary site<br />
were significant risk factors. Survival from diagnosis <strong>of</strong> brain mets was short<br />
(median 6 mo BCS, 5 mo HDI, p�0.93). Conclusions: Although the S0008<br />
trial was not specifically designed to evaluate PCNS, a retrospective<br />
analysis identified a high CNS failure rate (at least 13%) in HRM pts,<br />
including 8% as the initial site <strong>of</strong> relapse. Further studies are needed to<br />
evaluate if screening for CNS mets in high-risk pts is useful and whether<br />
early treatment improves survival.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.