24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

472s Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers<br />

7084 General Poster Session (Board #40C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Outcomes <strong>of</strong> sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesothelioma, a distinct<br />

clinical entity. Presenting Author: Elisabetta Gattoni, Oncology ASL21,<br />

Casale Monferrato, Italy<br />

Background: Sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesotheliomas (SMPM), accounting<br />

for 10% <strong>of</strong> MPM, are resistant to chemotherapy (CT) with median<br />

survival in the range <strong>of</strong> 6 months. Here we report on clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> a<br />

large series <strong>of</strong> SMPM patients treated at our Oncological Department,<br />

located in a particularly asbestos-polluted area in Piedmont (Italy).<br />

Methods: Patients consecutively diagnosed, treated and included in our<br />

MesoDB between 1993 and 2010 were considered for this study. <strong>Clinical</strong><br />

and pathological data, treatments, response to CT and outcomes were<br />

analyzed for the present study. Diagnosis was always confirmed by the same<br />

expert pathologist. Results: Data <strong>of</strong> 672 patients were considered for the<br />

analysis. Among these, 53 (8%) were diagnosed with SMPM (17F/36M).<br />

Median age was 67,6 years. Asbestos exposure was occupational certain in<br />

12, possible in 15, domestic in 3 and environmental in 23. The predominant<br />

symptom at diagnosis was thoracic pain in 34 patients (64%),<br />

followed by dyspnea in 16 (30%), fatigue and weight loss in 2 and palpable<br />

mass in 1. The predominant radiological finding at diagnosis was diffuse<br />

pleural thickening in 23 patients (43%), pleural effusion in 14 (26%),<br />

pleural effusion and pleural thickening in 10 (19%), localized mass in 4<br />

(8%), unknown in 2 (4%). Forty-eight patients received first line CT with<br />

the following regimens: carboplatin/cisplatin and pemetrexed in29, pemetrexed<br />

in 8, cisplatin and raltitrexed in 3, cisplatin and gemcitabine in 3,<br />

gemcitabine in 2, doxorubicin based combination in 3 patients. The<br />

median number <strong>of</strong> cycles was 4. Overall response rate to first line CT was as<br />

follows: 11 SD (21%), 31 PD (58%) and 6 (11%) patients were not<br />

evaluable for response. Median progression free survival was 3.3 (95%CI<br />

2.6-4.1) months. Eleven patients received a second line CT and no<br />

responses or disease stabilization was observed. Median OS was 7.6<br />

months. Conclusions: This large series <strong>of</strong> SMPM suggests that standard CT<br />

has only negligible impact on the prognosis, underlying a highly unmet<br />

clinical need. SMPM patients should be treated within phase I-II studies<br />

with investigational agents. Research should focus to a deeper knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> tumor biology and to the identification <strong>of</strong> druggable targets.<br />

7086 General Poster Session (Board #40E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase II study <strong>of</strong> amrubicin (AMR) combined with carboplatin (CBDCA) for<br />

refractory relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC): North Japan Lung Cancer<br />

Group 0802. Presenting Author: Ryota Saito, Tohoku University Hospital,<br />

Sendai, Japan<br />

Background: AMR, a new anthracycline agent, has achieved some promising<br />

results for advanced SCLC both in the first-line and the second-line<br />

setting. However the efficacy <strong>of</strong> AMR alone against refractory relapsed<br />

SCLC was relatively low in previous studies. This study was conducted to<br />

evaluate the safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong> AMR plus CBDCA in<br />

patients with refractory relapsed SCLC. Methods: Patients with advanced<br />

SCLC who relapsed within 90 days after the completion <strong>of</strong> first-line<br />

chemotherapy received AMR (30 mg/m2 , day1-3) and CBDCA (AUC 4.0,<br />

day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint <strong>of</strong> this study was overall<br />

response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free<br />

survival (PFS), overall survival and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Assuming that ORR <strong>of</strong><br />

45% in eligible patients would indicate potential usefulness while ORR <strong>of</strong><br />

20% would be the lower limit <strong>of</strong> interest, with alpha � 0.10 and beta �<br />

0.10, at least 24 patients were required. Results: From September 2008 to<br />

May 2011, 30 patients were enrolled from 10 institutions. One patient was<br />

excluded because <strong>of</strong> ineligible histology. Patient characteristics were:<br />

Male/Female 26/3; median age 67 (range 50-81); Performance status<br />

0/1/2 9/16/4. The median number <strong>of</strong> treatment cycles were 4 (range 1-7).<br />

The objective responses evaluated by RECIST were: CR 0, PR 10, SD 14,<br />

PD 5. The ORR was 34% and the disease control rate was 83%. Median<br />

PFS was 3.5 months and median survival time was 7.3 months. Grade 3-4<br />

neutropenia was observed in 23 patients (79%) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia<br />

was observed in 7 patients (24%). One patient (3%) suffered from<br />

grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3 non-hematological toxicities<br />

such as infection, interstitial lung disease, hyponatremia, hypoglycemia,<br />

were observed in 7 patients (24%). No treatment related death was<br />

observed. Conclusions: This is the first prospective study <strong>of</strong> AMR combined<br />

with CBDCA for refractory relapsed SCLC, which was effective and well<br />

tolerated. Further investigation <strong>of</strong> this treatment is warranted.<br />

7085 General Poster Session (Board #40D), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

NGR-hTNF and doxorubicin in relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).<br />

Presenting Author: Raffaele Cavina, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano,<br />

Italy<br />

Background: By selectively damaging tumor vasculature, NGR-hTNF (asparagine-glycine-arginine<br />

human tumor necrosis factor) is able to improve<br />

intratumoral uptake <strong>of</strong> doxorubicin (D). A phase I trial selected NGR-hTNF<br />

0.8 �g/m2 /day(d)1 and D 75 mg/m2 /d1 every 3 weeks (q3w) for phase II.<br />

Methods: SCLC pts failing one or more platinum-based regimen received<br />

NGR-hTNF until progressive disease (PD) and D up to 550 mg/m2 . This<br />

phase II trial (n�27 pts) had progression-free survival (PFS) as primary end<br />

point, with tumor response assessed q6w by RECIST, while secondary end<br />

points included adverse events (AEs), disease control rate (DCR), and<br />

overall survival (OS). Results: Among 28 pts enrolled (median age 63 years;<br />

M/F 19/9; PS 0/1-2 13/15; prior lines 1/2-3 20/8), 16 pts had platinumresistant<br />

(R) disease (PD�3 months) and 12 pts platinum-sensitive (S)<br />

disease (PD�3 months). At baseline, median neutrophil to lymphocyte<br />

ratio (NLR) was 4 (range 1-20). A total <strong>of</strong> 114 cycles were given (range<br />

1-10), with 13 pts (46%) having � 4 cycles and 9 pts (32%) � 6 cycles.<br />

No grade 3/4 AEs related to NGR-hTNF were noted, while grade 1/2 AEs<br />

were transient chills (61%). NGR-hTNF did not apparently increase<br />

D-related AEs. Median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.6-3.8) and 1-year<br />

OS rate was 34%. Overall, DCR was 55% (95% CI 35-74), comprising 6<br />

partial responses (22%; median duration: 6.3 months) and 9 stable<br />

diseases (33%; median duration: 4.1 months). Mean changes from<br />

baseline in target tumor size after 2, 4, and 6 cycles were -9%, -29%, and<br />

-32%, respectively for R disease and -11%, -20%, and -43%, respectively<br />

for S disease. In pts pretreated with � 2 lines, DCR was 75%, median PFS<br />

was 5.1 months, and 1-year OS rate was 44%. In pts with R or S disease,<br />

DCR were 50% and 58% (p�.72), median PFS were 2.7 and 4.1 months<br />

(p�.07), and 1-year OS rates were 27% and 42% (p�.65), respectively. At<br />

multivariate analyses, PFS was not related to baseline characteristics,<br />

while an improved OS was associated only with a low NLR. The 1-year OS<br />

rate was 48% in pts with NLR � 4 and 10% in pts with NLR � 4(p�.007),<br />

while in pts with NLR � 4, 1-year OS rate was 46% in R disease and 50%<br />

in S disease. Conclusions: This combination is well tolerated and active in<br />

platinum resistant and sensitive SCLC and further development is <strong>of</strong><br />

interest.<br />

7087 General Poster Session (Board #40F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> trial design in small cell lung cancer: Surrogate endpoints and<br />

statistical evolution. Presenting Author: Myles Nickolich, Case Comprehensive<br />

Cancer Center, Cleveland , OH<br />

Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a devastating disease for<br />

which little recent therapeutic advance has been achieved. SCLC trial<br />

design and reporting may have an impact on the interpretation <strong>of</strong> studies<br />

conducted. Furthermore the use <strong>of</strong> surrogate endpoints in SCLC has not<br />

been explored. Methods: Through examining all phase II and III SCLC trials<br />

published in the Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology (8,471 patients from 66 trials<br />

between 1983-2010), we examined how SCLC trial reporting and design<br />

has evolved, determining if the type I error, power, and sample size<br />

calculations were provided. We assessed primary endpoints for all trials and<br />

sought to discover if response rate (RR) or progression-free survival (PFS)<br />

correlated with overall survival (OS). We analyzed response and survival<br />

outcomes for associations using Pearson correlation coefficient and differences<br />

between data groups by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple<br />

comparison procedure. Results: There were increased reporting trends <strong>of</strong><br />

statistical design in power (16.7% in 1986-1996 to 77.8% <strong>of</strong> trials in<br />

2006-2010 [p�0.001]) and type I error (22.2% in 1986-1996 to 72.2%<br />

in 2006-2010 [p�0.005]). 72.2% <strong>of</strong> trials published in 1986-1996<br />

failed to report a primary endpoint whereas only 5.56% <strong>of</strong> trials in<br />

2006-2010 failed to do so (p�0.004). Of phase II trials, primary endpoint<br />

was identified as RR in 65%, OS in 25%, and PFS in 10% (p�0.0001).<br />

There is a strong correlation between RR and both PFS (p�0.013) and OS<br />

(p�0.012) in extensive-stage disease (ED) but not limited-stage disease<br />

(LD) (p�0.978 for PFS, p�0.193 for OS). This correlation is for partial<br />

response rate (pRR) but not complete response rate. RR (p�0.029)<br />

exhibits a negative trend over time with a dramatic and significant decrease<br />

in RR across all studies starting in 2005. A strong positive correlation exists<br />

between PFS and OS for LD (p�0.036) and ED (p�0.058). We found no<br />

change in median overall survival (p�0.383). Conclusions: Over time there<br />

has been improvement in reporting the essential statistical data for proper<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> SCLC trials. No change in survival was seen over the past<br />

28 years. RR should be evaluated as a surrogate endpoint for OS in ED but<br />

not LD. pRR correlates with OS and PFS in both LD and ED.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!