24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7561 General Poster Session (Board #47C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

A phase II study <strong>of</strong> erlotinib monotherpay in patients with previously treated<br />

advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without EGFR gene mutation<br />

who have never/light smoking history: NEJ006/TCOG0903. Presenting<br />

Author: Yoshiki Ishii, Dokkyo Medical University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine,<br />

Shimotoga, Japan<br />

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase<br />

inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated good response in NSCLC harboring<br />

EGFR gene mutation. However, survival benefit from erlotinib was observed<br />

also in NSCLC patients with wild type (wt) EGFR gene in subsets <strong>of</strong> several<br />

phase III trials. Additionally, smoking status could be a predictive factor <strong>of</strong><br />

erlotinib efficacy, This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy <strong>of</strong> erlotinib in<br />

Japanese NSCLC patients with wt-EGFR and find a biomarker that predicts<br />

the efficacy <strong>of</strong> erlotinib other than EGFR gene mutation. Methods: The<br />

primary endpoint was an objective response rate. Secondary endpoints<br />

included disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. Advanced NSCLC<br />

patients without EGFR gene mutation who had received one to three prior<br />

chemotherapy regimens and who had never smoked or light smoked<br />

(Brinkman Index: less than200) were eligible in this study. EGFR gene<br />

status was evaluated by the PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. Erlotinib was<br />

administered daily (150mg/day) until disease progression or unacceptable<br />

toxicities. Results: Forty seven patients were enrolled between March 2010<br />

and November 2011. One patient was excluded for evaluation because<br />

having mutation <strong>of</strong> EGFR. Efficacy and safety were evaluated among 46<br />

patients. Best responses were PR 7 (15.2%), SD 12 (26.1%), PD 26<br />

(46.4%), NE 1 (2.2%). Response rate and disease control rate were 15.2%<br />

(95%CI: 4.9-25.5%) and 41.3 % (95%CI 27.1-55.5%) respectively.<br />

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were anorexia (4), skin rash (2), neutropenia<br />

(1), leukopenia (1), anemia (2), elevation <strong>of</strong> AST/ALT (1), rectal ulcer (1),<br />

and cerebral infarction (1).Two patients suffered grade 3 interstitial lung<br />

disease. Conclusions: This is the first report to evaluate Erlotinib efficacy in<br />

selected NSCLC who do not possess EGFR gene mutation. Erlotinib showed<br />

significant anti-tumor activity in pretreated never or light smoked Japanese<br />

NSCLC patients without EGFR gene mutation. The results <strong>of</strong> biomakr<br />

analysis will be presented at the meeting.<br />

7564 General Poster Session (Board #47F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Elderly and younger patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)<br />

derive similar benefit from second-line chemotherapy: A retrospective<br />

subset analysis <strong>of</strong> second-line chemotherapy trials conducted from the<br />

Hellenic Cooperative Research Group (HORG). Presenting Author: S<strong>of</strong>ia<br />

Agelaki, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology, University General Hospital <strong>of</strong><br />

Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece<br />

Background: Elderly patients (pts) achieve a similar survival benefit, with<br />

acceptable toxicity, from first-line chemotherapy for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced NSCLC compared with their younger counterparts. There have<br />

been no second-line trials specifically designed for elderly pts and few data<br />

exist on the efficacy and tolerability <strong>of</strong> second-line therapy in this<br />

population. Moreover, little if any information exists on the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

administration <strong>of</strong> second-line chemotherapy in these pts. Methods: The files<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2004 pts with advanced NSCLC enrolled into first-line chemotherapy<br />

trials performed by HORG from 1995 to 2007 were reviewed. A total <strong>of</strong> 600<br />

pts who received second-line chemotherapy within the context <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

trials were identified. Patients’ data were analysed for efficacy and toxicity<br />

according to age. Results: Second-line chemotherapy was administered in<br />

24% and 34% <strong>of</strong> pts �65 and �65 years old after failure <strong>of</strong> prior therapy<br />

(p�0.0001). A total <strong>of</strong> 219 (24.8%) <strong>of</strong> 600 pts who received second-line<br />

treatment were �65 years old (median age 70 yrs, range 65-82). Response<br />

rates to second-line therapy were 11.9% for older pts compared to 12.3%<br />

for younger pts (p�ns). TTP was 2.8 and 3.1 months for older and younger<br />

pts, respectively (p�ns). Elderly pts receiving second-line chemotherapy<br />

had a median survival <strong>of</strong> 7.7 months compared with 8.2 months for younger<br />

pts (p�ns). Similar rates <strong>of</strong> haematological and non-haematological<br />

toxicities were encountered between the two groups. Conclusions: The<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> elderly pts to second-line chemotherapy trials was lower<br />

compared to younger patients. There was no significant difference in<br />

outcome or toxicity between elderly and younger pts. For elderly pts with<br />

advanced NSCLC and good performance status, second-line chemotherapy<br />

is appropriate. However, specific second-line trials in older pts are required<br />

since those included in the current analysis were probably highly selected<br />

to fit the inclusion criteria.<br />

Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Metastatic<br />

495s<br />

7563 General Poster Session (Board #47E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

First-line gefitinib for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung<br />

cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations: A combined analysis <strong>of</strong> NEJ<br />

studies. Presenting Author: Sodai Narumi, Department <strong>of</strong> Respiratory<br />

Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate school <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Sendai, Japan<br />

Background: The first-line treatment with gefitinib has been established as a<br />

standard <strong>of</strong> care for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation by<br />

previous studies including NEJ002. Since the percentage <strong>of</strong> elderly<br />

population in those studies was lower than that <strong>of</strong> real situation, further<br />

validation <strong>of</strong> its usefulness for elderly patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC<br />

is warranted. Methods: The efficacy and safety data <strong>of</strong> fit elderly patients<br />

(70 years or older with PS 0-2) with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who received<br />

the first-line gefitinib in NEJ001 (phase 2), NEJ002 (phase 3), and<br />

NEJ003 (phase 2) were combined. Same population treated with the<br />

first-line carboplatin plus paclitaxel in NEJ002 (n�34) were also examined<br />

their efficacy and safety for reference. Regarding the toxicity and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

life (QOL), the comparison between elderly patients and younger patients<br />

(� 70 years old) both treated with first-line gefitinib in NEJ002 was also<br />

performed. Results: Data from 71 patients (7 from NEJ001, 33 from<br />

NEJ002, 31 from NEJ003) treated with first-line gefitinib were combined.<br />

Patients’ characteristics were as follows; mean age: 76.8 years (range<br />

70-89), female: 73%, never smoker: 75%, PS 0-1: 92%. Overall response<br />

rate (73.2%) and median progression-free survival (14.3 months) in this<br />

group were significantly better than those in the reference group (26.5%<br />

and 5.7 months, respectively). Despite fewer patients received second-line<br />

chemotherapy in the first-line gefitinib group, its median overall survival<br />

(30.8 months) was not inferior to that <strong>of</strong> reference group (26.4 months).<br />

Regarding toxicities such as liver dysfunction, rash, diarrhea, and pneumonitis,<br />

and QOL examined by self questionnaires, there were no difference<br />

between the elderly patients and younger patients in NEJ002. Conclusions:<br />

First-line gefitinib still achieved high efficacy with acceptable toxicity in fit<br />

elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation. Considering<br />

that elderly patients tend to receive fewer treatment lines compared<br />

with younger patients, first-line gefitinib would be strongly recommended<br />

for this population to avoid the risk <strong>of</strong> missing its administration.<br />

7565 General Poster Session (Board #47G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Randomized phase II trial <strong>of</strong> carboplatin combined with weekly paclitaxel<br />

(CP) and docetaxel alone (D) in elderly patients (pts) with advanced<br />

non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): NJLCG 0801. Presenting Author:<br />

Shunichi Sugawara, Sendai Kousei Hospital, Sendai, Japan<br />

Background: Standard first-line chemotherapy for elderly NSCLC pts has<br />

been considered as a monotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine globally.<br />

However, we have demonstrated the high efficacy <strong>of</strong> CP for elderly pts<br />

in our previous trial (Ann Oncol 2010). Meanwhile, D has been considered<br />

as an alternative option for this population in Japan according to the result<br />

<strong>of</strong> WJTOG9904 (JCO 2006). Thus we compared the two regimens to select<br />

the proper candidate for future phase III trial. Methods: Eligible pts were<br />

aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC; ECOG<br />

performance status 0-1; adequate organ function; written informed consent.<br />

Pts were randomized to receive carboplatin (AUC 6) on day 1 and<br />

paclitaxel (70mg/m2 on day 1, 8, and 15) every 4 weeks or D (60mg/m2 on<br />

day 1) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate<br />

(ORR), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS),<br />

overall survival, and toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Assuming that ORR <strong>of</strong> 40% would be<br />

potential usefulness while ORR <strong>of</strong> 20% would be the lower limit <strong>of</strong> interest,<br />

40 pts in each arm were required if expect 10% loss to follow up. Results:<br />

Between July 2006 and September 2010, 84 pts were enrolled and 41 pts<br />

in CP arm and 42 pts in D arm were eligible (median age, 76 years; 75%<br />

male; 72% stage IV). Median treatment cycle was 4 in each arm (CP, range<br />

1-6; D, range 1-8). ORRs were 51% (95%CI: 36-66%) and 26% (95%CI:<br />

12-39%) in the CP and D arm, respectively. With a median follow-up <strong>of</strong><br />

18.4 months, median PFS were 6.5 and 3.9 months in the CP and D arm,<br />

respectively (Logrank, P�0.0027). Grade 3 or severer toxicities were as<br />

follows: neutropenia (CP, 56% and D, 79%), anemia (CP, 15% and D,<br />

7%), thrombocytopenia (CP, 10% and D, 0%), infection (CP, 20% and D,<br />

25%). One treatment-related death due to neutropenia, pneumonia, and<br />

lethal arrhythmia occurred in D arm but none in CP arm. Conclusions: The<br />

platinum doublet CP achieved higher activity with an acceptable toxicity<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile for elderly pts with advanced NSCLC compared to monotherapy with<br />

D. The superiority <strong>of</strong> CP to the monotherapy in this trial is consistent with<br />

results <strong>of</strong> recent IFCT-0501 trial (Lancet 2011).<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!