24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4107 General Poster Session (Board #49B), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced or metastatic hepatocellular cancer (HCC): Final<br />

clinical results <strong>of</strong> a single-arm phase II study <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab and<br />

everolimus. Presenting Author: Gerhard Treiber, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal<br />

Medicine, Zollernalb Clinic, Balingen, Germany<br />

Background: mTOR inhibitors are emerging drugs for treatment (Tx) <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced hepatocellular cancer (HCC), their therapeutic effects may be<br />

potentiated by combination with anti-VEGF partners (Treiber G, Expert Rev<br />

Anticancer Ther 2009). Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed advanced<br />

HCC were included. Tx consisted <strong>of</strong> RAD001 in a daily start dose <strong>of</strong><br />

5 mg orally and bevacizumab 5mg/kg iv every 2 weeks, up to 24 weeks.<br />

Primary endpoint was TTP, secondary endpoints were OS, RR, changes in<br />

biomarkers, and safety and tolerability besides PK analysis. Pts with either<br />

a CPT Score � 9, a CLIP score � 3, or a Performance Status <strong>of</strong> ECOG � 2<br />

were not eligible. Radiological TTP was centrally evaluated by both,<br />

conventional(c)-, and modified(m)-RECIST criteria on a PP basis. Additionally,<br />

we included a combined endpoint (TTPcomb: time to either clinical or<br />

radiological progression leading to termination <strong>of</strong> treatment) as assessed by<br />

the local centers in all recruited patients. Results: 33 pts (ITT) were<br />

recruited (26 with Child A, 7 with Child B; median CLIP score was 2, mean<br />

age 67 y, and mean BMI 28). 17/33 pts. had previous Tx (including<br />

sorafenib � 3 months). Drop out other than PD was due to consent<br />

withdrawl, lost to FU, and AE (n�5), therefore 28 patients had received<br />

study medication �2 wks (PP). There were 65 CTC-AE grade 3/4 events<br />

occuring in 22 pts. Median Tx duration was 69 days on RAD001, and a<br />

median <strong>of</strong> 5 cycles <strong>of</strong> bevacizumab were applied. Dose adjustements for<br />

RAD001 were performed in 20 pts, mean cumulative individual RAD dose<br />

was 334 mg, there was no association between Cmin <strong>of</strong> RAD and TTP or<br />

OS. On ITT, median TTPcomb was 2.0 mo and median OS was 9.0 mo. On<br />

PP, median TTP approached 3.8 mo (conventional RECIST) and median<br />

OS 9.7 mo. Using (m)RECIST, 5 pts. achieved PR within the first 8 wks,<br />

and this was accompanied by a significant VEGF plasma decrease (median<br />

<strong>of</strong> -65%), on (c)RECIST best response seen was SD. Conclusions: Combination<br />

Tx <strong>of</strong> RAD001 and bevazicumab is tolerated acceptably. TTP and OS in<br />

our 1°/2°-line HCC patients on Tx is comparable to sorafenib monotherapy<br />

in the SHARP trial (1° line only).<br />

4109 General Poster Session (Board #49D), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Biliary tract cancer: A large institutional experience. Presenting Author:<br />

Mairead Geraldine McNamara, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON,<br />

Canada<br />

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) encompass both cholangiocarcinoma<br />

(CC), arising in intrahepatic, perihilar (klatskin), or distal biliary tree,<br />

ampulla <strong>of</strong> vater and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). Prognosis is poor for<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> these patients (pts). Aim: To retrospectively review outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />

pts, as practices/treatments evolve, who presented to a multidisciplinary<br />

team at tertiary referral center Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, with a<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> BTC. Methods: 1057 pts were followed from 01/87 - 09/11.<br />

Complete demographics, performance status (PS), disease site, histological<br />

diagnosis, percentage receiving surgery with curative intent, chemotherapy<br />

(CT), radiotherapy (RT), recurrence patterns and overall survival<br />

(OS) were analyzed. Results: The cohort includes 549 (52%) males, PS <strong>of</strong><br />

0-1 in 850 (80%), 2-3 in 87 (8%) pts. A histological diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

adenocarcinoma was confirmed in 885 (84%), 106 (10%) non diagnostic,<br />

66 (6%) other. Definitive surgery was performed in 41% and adjuvant CT or<br />

concurrent CT/RT given in 20% and 8% respectively. CT or CT/RT was<br />

given for unresectable/metastatic disease in first line palliative setting in<br />

395 (37%) and 18 pts (5%) respectively. Response to first line CT in GBC<br />

was 33% vs. 24% in CC (p�0.005) and med survival was 8.4 and 13.1 mo<br />

respectively (p�0.001). The OS for entire cohort <strong>of</strong> 1057 pts was 19.3 mo<br />

with survival for breakdown <strong>of</strong> tumor type, stage detailed in the table. At<br />

this time, 207 (20%) are still alive, 609 (58%) deceased, status unknown/<br />

pending in 241 (22%). Conclusions: This represents a large biliary cancer<br />

cohort with survival benchmarks obtained in modern era <strong>of</strong> multidisciplinary<br />

care. Different subsites clearly present at different stages and have<br />

different prognosis with treatments. Despite better responses for advanced<br />

disease on CT in GBC, survival was better in CC consistent with reported<br />

literature. Therapeutic advancement mandates finding additional drug<br />

options and appropriate adjuvant care.<br />

Location N (%)<br />

Stage I<br />

(%)<br />

Stage II<br />

(%)<br />

Stage III<br />

(%)<br />

Stage IV<br />

(%)<br />

Median<br />

survival<br />

(mo)<br />

Gallbladder 304 (29) 8 12 17 63 13.0<br />

Distal bile duct 248 (23) 32 32 6 30 22.2<br />

Ampulla <strong>of</strong> vater 186 (18) 51 23 13 13 46.8<br />

Klatskin 162 (15) 14 10 24 52 16.5<br />

Intrahepatic 157 (15) 13 18 10 59 20.4<br />

Overall 1,057 (100) 19.3<br />

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer<br />

265s<br />

4108 General Poster Session (Board #49C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase I/II study <strong>of</strong> foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting MET,<br />

RON, AXL, TIE-2, and VEGFR in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma<br />

(HCC). Presenting Author: Thomas Cheung Yau, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery,<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China<br />

Background: Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET signalling plays a pivotal<br />

role in tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion in HCC and<br />

circulating levels <strong>of</strong> HGF correlate with poor prognosis. This phase I/II trial<br />

(MET111645) evaluated foretinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor targeting<br />

MET, RON, AXL, TIE-2 and VEGFR, as first-line therapy in Asian advanced-<br />

HCC patients. Methods: Asian patients with measurable, unresectable/<br />

metastatic HCC, no prior sorafenib or other multi-kinase inhibitors, ECOG<br />

PS 0-1, adequate organ function and Child-Pugh grade A were recruited.<br />

The phase I was a standard 3�3 dose escalation design with a phase II<br />

cohort expansion. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability at the<br />

maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the secondary endpoints included<br />

antitumor activity (objective response rate [ORR], disease stabilization rate<br />

[DSR; confirmed CR/PR or SD for at least 12 weeks], and time to<br />

progression [TTP] evaluated by central review according to modified<br />

RECIST), and overall survival (OS) at the MTD, plus pharmacokinetics<br />

(PK). Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled in phase I. Two dose-limiting<br />

toxicities (DLT) (renal failure, proteinuria) were observed at 45 mg once<br />

daily (QD) but no DLTs were observed at 30 mg QD. Thus, the MTD was<br />

determined to be 30 mg QD. A further 32 patients were enrolled at the<br />

MTD, for a study total <strong>of</strong> 39 patients treated at 30 mg QD. The most<br />

common AEs, independent <strong>of</strong> causality,were hypertension (36%), decreased<br />

appetite (23%), and pyrexia (21%). The most common SAEs were<br />

hepatic encephalopathy (10%) and ascites (8%). Two patients discontinued<br />

foretinib due to AEs. No dose reductions were reported. Thirty-eight<br />

patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 24% (95% CI 11-40),<br />

DSR 79% (95% CI; 63-90), and the median TTP was 4.2 months (95% CI<br />

2.7-7.5). Mature OS data will be presented. Mean steady-state exposures<br />

(AUC/Cmax) were comparable after administration <strong>of</strong> foretinib at 30 and 45<br />

mg. Conclusions: Foretinib has an acceptable safety, tolerability, and PK<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile in an Asian HCC population. It has demonstrated promising<br />

antitumor activity that warrants further testing in a randomized setting.<br />

4110 General Poster Session (Board #49E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Adjuvant chemotherapy following curative intent hepatectomy for intrahepatic<br />

cholangiocarcinoma: Results from a multi-institutional analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

575 patients. Presenting Author: Dario Ribero, Ospedale Mauriziano,<br />

Torino, Italy<br />

Background: Surgical resection alone is the standard <strong>of</strong> care for patients<br />

with resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC). This study evaluates<br />

the benefit <strong>of</strong> adjuvant chemotherapy ( AdjCTx) following curative intent<br />

hepatectomy for IHC. Methods: Clinicopathologic and long-term outcome<br />

data <strong>of</strong> 575 consecutive patients treated with curative intent hepatectomy<br />

for IHC (1995-2011) were extracted from a multi-institutional registry.<br />

After excluding operative mortality and M1 (n�46), Cox regression analysis<br />

was used to identify independent determinants <strong>of</strong> early recurrence (i.e.,<br />

within 3 years). Propensity scores, which are used in observational studies<br />

to reduce selection bias by equating groups on the basis <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />

covariates, were calculated and utilized to match patients who had or had<br />

not AdjCTx (one-to-one match). Cases whose propensity score deviated more<br />

than 0.10 were considered unmatched and excluded from the analysis.<br />

Primary end-point was recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 3-years. Results: At<br />

a median FU <strong>of</strong> 42 months, 247 patients had recurred. Predictors <strong>of</strong><br />

recurrence were LN metastases (HR 1.83 [1.36-2.44]), radical resection<br />

(HR 0.64 [0.45-0.9]), an elevated preoperative CA19.9 (HR 1.54 [1.15-<br />

2.07]), vascular invasion (HR 1.97 [1.49-2.61]), multiple tumors (HR<br />

2.21 [1.71-2.86]), and size (analysed as continuous variable) (HR 1.01<br />

[1.01-1.01]). After matching, no difference was observed between patients<br />

who had or had not AdjCTx (n�155 per group; 3-yrs RFS 28.3% vs. 38.0%,<br />

respectively; p�NS). When the analysis was restricted to patients who had<br />

gemcitabine, GEMOX or FOLFOX for 3 or more cycles (n�64 per group)<br />

again no difference emerged between patients who had or had not AdjCTx<br />

(3-yrs RFS 27.7% vs. 40.0% respectively, p�NS ). Conclusions: Our data<br />

suggest that AdjCTx following resection <strong>of</strong> IHC does not increase 3-years<br />

RFS.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!