24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Local-Regional/Small Cell/Other Thoracic Cancers<br />

7022 Poster Discussion Session (Board #14), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Vorinostat (V) intratumoral levels and biomarker response in a window <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunity trial in patients with resectable aerodigestive tract cancer.<br />

Presenting Author: Konstantin H. Dragnev, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical<br />

Center, Lebanon, NH<br />

Background: Aerodigestive tract cancer (ADT) is the leading cause <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer-related death in the US. New effective treatments are needed.<br />

Among a panel <strong>of</strong> drugs causing growth inhibition <strong>of</strong> lung cancer cells and<br />

repression <strong>of</strong> cyclin D1, the histone deacetylase inhibitor V was found most<br />

potent. To translate studies into the clinic, a window <strong>of</strong> opportunity trial <strong>of</strong> V<br />

was conducted. Methods: Pts with resectable ADT received 400 mg V once<br />

daily orally for 7 days prior to surgical resection. Serum samples were<br />

obtained before the last V dose and at the time <strong>of</strong> biopsy. Tumor tissue was<br />

immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, stored at -70°C, homogenized<br />

in three parts PBS (1:3g/v). V was quantitated with a LC-MS/MS assay.<br />

Post- versus pre-treatment tumor biopsies were scored for necrosis, acute<br />

and chronic inflammation, and immunohistochemical changes in Ki-67,<br />

cyclin E, cyclin D1, EGFR, phospho-EGFR, p21, p27 and caspase. Results:<br />

15 pts enrolled, 9 pts took V for a median <strong>of</strong> 7 days (3-9), underwent<br />

resection and had adequate pretreatment samples. Median age 66, 4<br />

women, 4 former, 5 current smokers, 1 squamous cell lung carcinoma, 8<br />

adenocarcinoma (1 esophageal). PK analyses confirmed plasma (8pts) and<br />

tumor (7pts) concentrations above the detection limits. There was considerable<br />

interindividual variation in plasma V concentrations (7.3-192.4<br />

ng/ml; CV 95%), at 178-500 min from last V dose, and in intratumoral V<br />

levels (15.0-80.3 ng/g; CV 59%). All pts had wild-type EGFR, 4 pts had<br />

KRAS codon 12 mutations, 78% showed reduced Ki-67 expression, 50%<br />

had decreased cyclin E, 78% exhibited necrosis, chronic or acute inflammation<br />

in the post-treatment biopsies. Most cases with KRAS mutations<br />

had biomarker responses. Changes in multiple biomarkers were observed<br />

across the range <strong>of</strong> intratumoral V levels. Conclusions: This is the first report<br />

<strong>of</strong> V concentrations in human tumors. Preoperative treatment with V<br />

achieved intratumoral concentrations comparable to serum with evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> necrosis, decreased Ki-67 and cyclin E, and other biomarker responses<br />

in resected ADT. The results demonstrate the value <strong>of</strong> window <strong>of</strong> opportunity<br />

trials in the investigation <strong>of</strong> novel cancer therapeutics.<br />

7024 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Predictors <strong>of</strong> survival after resections <strong>of</strong> synchronous lung cancers located<br />

in mutiple lobes: A multi-institutional pooled analysis. Presenting Author:<br />

Tawee Tanvetyanon, H. Lee M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center & Research Institute,<br />

Tampa, FL<br />

Background: Surgical resection is a treatment option for patients with<br />

multiple primary lung cancers. However, for synchronous disease, it is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten difficult to differentiate this condition from metastatic disease,<br />

especially when cancers are distributed in multiple lobes or in both lungs.<br />

Some people believe that surgery should be avoided when patients have<br />

bilateral cancers or when all cancers have the same histology. To date,<br />

however, available evidences are limited by small sample size. Methods:<br />

Studies (published 2008-2011) <strong>of</strong> curative resection for patients with<br />

synchronous (� 2-year interval) multiple lung cancers located in � 2 lobes,<br />

but without radiographic evidence <strong>of</strong> distant metastasis, were identified<br />

from literature. Corresponding authors were contacted and individual<br />

patient data were obtained. Patients with multiple cancers, but localized<br />

only to one lobe, were not included. Databases were pooled and multivariable<br />

Cox Proportional Hazard models were fit to adjust for confounders.<br />

Results: There were 467 patients included from 6 studies. Median overall<br />

survival was 52.0 months (95% CI: 45.6-63.7). Postoperative (30-day)<br />

mortality rate was 1.9%. In a multivariable model, study site or having<br />

pneumonectomy did not independently impact on survival. However, age,<br />

gender, nodal stage, tumor location, and histological similarity were<br />

independent predictors <strong>of</strong> survival. Advanced age increased mortality<br />

(p�0.012). Male sex increased mortality compared with female: HR 1.64<br />

(95% CI: 1.23-2.19, p�0.0008). N2 or N1 increased mortality over N0:<br />

HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.29-2.66, p�0.0008) and 1.97 (1.43-2.73,<br />

p�0.0001), respectively. Unilateral location increased mortality over<br />

bilateral location: HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.23-2.13, p�0.0002). Different<br />

histology increased mortality over similar histology: HR 1.45 (95% CI<br />

1.11-1.90, p�0.0069). Conclusions: In this largest multi-institutional<br />

database <strong>of</strong> resected multiple lung cancers <strong>of</strong> multiple lobes to date, we<br />

found no evidence <strong>of</strong> inferior survival among patients having bilateral<br />

cancers or having all cancers with the same histology. In fact, the survival<br />

among such patients appears superior to their counterparts.<br />

7023 Poster Discussion Session (Board #15), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> a proliferation-based mRNA signature to predict outcome in<br />

early-stage non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma. Presenting Author: Carmen<br />

Behrens, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,<br />

TX<br />

Background: Adjuvant treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma<br />

is based on post-surgical pathological staging and patient performance<br />

status. Disparate outcomes within each staging group suggest that<br />

additional prognostic markers could improve our understanding <strong>of</strong> riskbenefit<br />

and potentially lead to better treatment decisions. A proliferationbased,<br />

mRNA expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile was applied to public microarray data <strong>of</strong><br />

surgically treated lung adenocarcinomas and a cohort <strong>of</strong> FFPE samples to<br />

test its potential prognostic utility. Methods: Public expression data<br />

(Director’s Consortium, DC) were derived from Affymetrix HG-U133A<br />

arrays. <strong>Clinical</strong> FFPE samples were assayed by quantitative PCR. A cell<br />

cycle progression (CCP) score was calculated from the expression average<br />

<strong>of</strong> 31 cell cycle genes normalized by 15 housekeeper genes. The prognostic<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the CCP score to predict stage I and II patient outcomes was<br />

evaluated by Cox proportional hazards analysis with disease-related death<br />

as the primary outcome measure. Results: In 256 DC cases, the CCP score<br />

was a significant predictor <strong>of</strong> death in univariate (p�0.0001) and multivariate<br />

analysis (p�0.001, HR 1.57, 95%CI 1.20-2.05) using age, stage,<br />

gender, smoking status and treatment as covariates. Similarly, in a second<br />

data set (GSE31210, n�204) the CCP score was highly associated with<br />

death (univariate, p�0.001; multivariate analysis, p�0.003, HR 1.81,<br />

95% CI 1.24-2.66). Using quantitative PCR, the signature was applied to<br />

381 FFPE samples with a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 5 years collected at the MD<br />

Anderson Cancer Center and the European Institute for Oncology. In the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> clinical covariates (as above and tumor size and pleural<br />

invasion), the CCP score remained the most significant predictor <strong>of</strong> death in<br />

univariate (p�0.0003) and multivariate analysis (p�0.007, HR 1.50,<br />

95% CI 1.11-2.02). Conclusions: A 46 gene mRNA signature is a<br />

significant predictor <strong>of</strong> disease-related death in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma,<br />

providing independent prognostic value in the presence <strong>of</strong> clinical<br />

variables. This molecular predictor <strong>of</strong> cancer survival will be studied in<br />

additional cohorts for its ability to impact clinical treatment decisions.<br />

7025 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> examined lymph nodes (LNs) in<br />

resected node negative (pNo) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presenting<br />

Author: Obiageli Uchenna Ogbata, University <strong>of</strong> Tennessee Health<br />

Science Center, Memphis, TN<br />

Background: In the US, 29% <strong>of</strong> patients undergo curative-intent surgery for<br />

NSCLC. Absence <strong>of</strong> LN metastasis and the extent <strong>of</strong> LN examination<br />

influence survival. 44% <strong>of</strong> patients with pathological node negative (pN0)<br />

disease die within 5 years. There is no consensus on the optimal number <strong>of</strong><br />

LNs to be examined to determine pN0 stage. We hypothesized that patients<br />

with few examined nodes may have missed nodal metastasis and increasing<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> LNs examined would improve survival. Methods: Retrospective<br />

SEER database analysis <strong>of</strong> NSCLC resections from 1998 to 2002, with<br />

survival updated to 2008. Patients with first primary, pN0 NSCLC, with one<br />

or more LNs examined, met our study criteria. Cox regression and<br />

competing risk models were used for survival analysis. A p value �0.05 was<br />

considered statistically significant. Results: 8,137 patients met inclusion<br />

criteria and were evaluated. A median <strong>of</strong> 6 LNs were examined in this<br />

cohort. Patients who underwent pneumonectomy and lobectomy had more<br />

LNs examined than those who had sub-lobar resections. Higher number <strong>of</strong><br />

LNs examined was associated with better overall survival (OS) and lung<br />

cancer specific survival (LCSS), at a plateau <strong>of</strong> 8 LNs for both outcomes<br />

(Table). Having mediastinal LNs examined also resulted in increased OS<br />

and LCSS (p�0.05). Conclusions: The pathologic assessment <strong>of</strong> LNs in<br />

surgical specimens is <strong>of</strong>ten suboptimal. Examining more LNs may have<br />

increased the likelihood <strong>of</strong> correct staging. Lower numbers <strong>of</strong> LNs examined<br />

probably result in understaging. Examining 8 or more total LNs and<br />

mediastinal LNs examined improved both OS and LCSS.<br />

#<strong>of</strong>LN<br />

examined<br />

Hazard<br />

ratio<br />

for OS<br />

P value<br />

for OS<br />

95% CI<br />

for OS<br />

Hazard<br />

ratio<br />

for LCSS<br />

P value<br />

for LCSS<br />

457s<br />

95% CI<br />

for LCSS<br />

2 0.97 0.652 0.85 – 1.11 0.88 0.138 0.74 – 1.04<br />

3 0.93 0.262 0.81 – 1.06 0.87 0.101 0.74 – 1.02<br />

4 0.94 0.342 0.82 – 1.07 0.82 0.026 0.69 – 0.98<br />

5 0.83 0.008 0.72 – 0.95 0.78 0.008 0.66 – 0.94<br />

6 0.82 0.008 0.71 – 0.95 0.77 0.004 0.64 – 0.92<br />

7 0.86 0.052 0.74 – 1.00 0.76 0.005 0.62 – 0.92<br />

8 0.78 0.003 0.66 – 0.92 0.71 0.002 0.58 – 0.88<br />

9 0.85 0.052 0.73 – 1.00 0.79 0.026 0.64 – 0.97<br />

10 0.81 0.022 0.68 – 0.86 0.75 0.016 0.60 – 0.95<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!