24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

198s Developmental Therapeutics—Experimental Therapeutics<br />

3100 General Poster Session (Board #20B), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase I study <strong>of</strong> S-222611 an oral reversible dual inhibitor <strong>of</strong> EGFR and<br />

HER2, in patients with solid tumors. Presenting Author: Richard D. Baird,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, Department <strong>of</strong> Oncology, Cambridge, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Background: S-222611 is a novel oral, potent, reversible tyrosine kinase<br />

inhibitor with antiproliferative activity in human tumor cell lines expressing<br />

EGFR and/or HER2 in vitro and in mouse xenograft models. We conducted<br />

the first study in patients (pts) with solid tumors expressing EGFR or HER2.<br />

Methods: Daily oral doses <strong>of</strong> S-222611 were escalated in successive<br />

cohorts from 100 mg to a maximum 1600 mg, using a 3 � 3 design. Full<br />

plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) pr<strong>of</strong>iles were obtained in all pts for 7 days<br />

after a single dose on Day 1 and for 24 h following 21 days <strong>of</strong> once daily<br />

dosing (Cycle 1). Trough PK samples were drawn weekly during the first 3<br />

weeks <strong>of</strong> daily dosing. A CT scan was performed at baseline and every 8<br />

weeks post-dose to assess response (RECIST). Results: Of 23 treated pts<br />

(16 male) aged 24-77y, 19 completed Cycle 1. One dose-limiting toxicity<br />

(DLT) has been seen to date, a rash at 1200 mg, which resolved on<br />

interruption and dose reduction. Other adverse events related to drug,<br />

diarrhea, rash, and nausea, were mild (grade 1 or 2) but more frequent at<br />

higher doses. Tumor responses have been seen over a wide range <strong>of</strong> doses.<br />

One complete clinical response was observed at 1200 mg in a pt with<br />

HER2 positive breast carcinoma previously treated with lapatinib and<br />

trastuzumab. Two pts showed confirmed partial responses (one with EGFR<br />

positive renal cell carcinoma at 200 mg daily and one with EGFR and HER2<br />

positive esophageal carcinoma at 400 mg daily); 2 pts showed unconfirmed<br />

partial responses and 3 pts (with vaginal, gastric and pancreatic adenoCa)<br />

showed stable disease for �6 months (mo); 2 pts have been treated for<br />

�12 mo. Plasma Cmax, AUC and steady state concentrations increased with<br />

dose up to 1200 mg, exceeding those eliciting maximal responses in mice.<br />

The plasma t½ is �24 h. Conclusions: S-222611 was generally tolerated<br />

well in doses up to 1200 mg, with only one DLT; rash, diarrhea and nausea<br />

have been readily manageable. PK data support once daily dosing to<br />

achieve highly effective concentrations. A substantial proportion <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

with HER2 or EGFR expressing tumors have shown partial responses<br />

or stable disease (�6 mo) and one patient has shown a complete clinical<br />

response.<br />

3103 General Poster Session (Board #20E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase I study <strong>of</strong> selumetinib (AZD6244/ARRY-142866) in combination<br />

with cetuximab (cet) in refractory solid tumors and KRAS mutant colorectal<br />

cancer (CRC). Presenting Author: Dustin A. Deming, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />

Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI<br />

Background: KRAS mutations have been recognized as clinically important<br />

predictors <strong>of</strong> resistance to EGFR-directed therapies in CRC. Oncogenic<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling cascade mediates proliferation<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> growth factor receptor signaling. We hypothesized that<br />

targeting MEK with selumetinib could overcome resistance to cet in KRAS<br />

mutant CRC. A phase I study (NCT01287130) was undertaken to determine<br />

the tolerability, and pharmacokinetic pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong><br />

selumetinib and cet, with an expanded cohort in KRAS mutant CRC at the<br />

MTD dose to evaluate preliminary anti-tumor activity. Methods: In the dose<br />

escalation portion, patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors received fixed<br />

dose cet with escalating doses <strong>of</strong> selumetinib in cohorts <strong>of</strong> 3-6 pts. In the<br />

expansion cohort, 14 pts with KRAS mutant CRC were enrolled at the MTD<br />

level. Results: 15 pts (9 M, 6 F), average age <strong>of</strong> 60 (41-73) years were<br />

treated at 3 dose levels in the dose escalation cohort and 14 pts were<br />

treated in the expansion cohort. Pts had the following tumor types: CRC<br />

73%, NSCLC 13%, and H&N 13%, and had received a median <strong>of</strong> 4 (1-8)<br />

prior lines <strong>of</strong> therapy. 33% (only CRC) had prior EGFR-directed therapies.<br />

ECOG PS 0 (40%), 1 (53%), 2 (7%). 13 <strong>of</strong> 15 pts were evaluable for<br />

tolerability and response. One DLT for grade 4 hypomagnesemia occurred,<br />

and no other grade 4 toxicities were seen. Grade 3 (20%) toxicities<br />

included; rash, hyponatremia, and headache. The most common cycle 1<br />

grade 1 and 2 adverse events included acneiform rash (100%), fatigue<br />

(54%), nausea/vomiting, (54%), diarrhea (54%), dry skin (46%), fever<br />

(23%), and hypomagnesemia (15%). Most pts (60%) required no dose<br />

modifications. The MTD was established at selumetinib 75 mg PO BID and<br />

cet 250 mg/m2 weekly following a 400 mg/m2load. Best response included<br />

2 PR in pts with CRC and SD in 4 pts (1 SCC <strong>of</strong> the tonsil, 1 NSCLC, and 2<br />

CRC). Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> selumetinib and cet is well<br />

tolerated, and preliminary anti-tumor activity was observed in multiple pts.<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the KRAS mutant CRC expansion cohort will be presented.<br />

3101 General Poster Session (Board #20C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase I study <strong>of</strong> the gamma-secretase inhibitor RO4929097 and<br />

capecitabine in refractory solid tumors. Presenting Author: Noelle K.<br />

LoConte, University <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI<br />

Background: RO4929097 is a oral inhibitor <strong>of</strong> gamma-secretase, which<br />

results in Notch signaling inhibition. Prior work has demonstrated that<br />

Notch-signaling inhibition enhances chemosensitivity <strong>of</strong> colon cancer<br />

cells. This study sought to combine RO4929097 with capecitabine (cape)<br />

and determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities and efficacy.<br />

Preclinical and prior phase I work demonstrated possible autoinduction <strong>of</strong><br />

RO4929097, so pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation <strong>of</strong> RO4929097 and<br />

cape was planned. Methods: Adult patients with refractory solid tumors<br />

were eligible and received RO4929097 and cape at a fixed dose <strong>of</strong> 1000<br />

mg/m2 BID with escalating doses <strong>of</strong> RO4929097 on a 21-day cycle<br />

according to a 3�3 design. Cape was administered for 14 days and the<br />

RO49029097 once daily, 3 days per week. RO4929097 plasma concentrations<br />

were evaluated by LC/MS/MS on days 3 and 10 <strong>of</strong> cycle 1, and PK<br />

parameters analyzed with WinNonLin version 5.2. Results: 4 dose levels<br />

have been completed (20, 30, 45 and 68 mg); 18 <strong>of</strong> 19 patients are<br />

evaluable for toxicity and PK data is available for 11 patients. One DLT has<br />

been observed (intolerable grade 2 fatigue) at 68 mg. There have been 2<br />

confirmed partial responses: fluoropyrimide-refractory colon cancer (for 12<br />

cycles) and cervical cancer (for 6 cycles). The half-life, Cmax and AUC <strong>of</strong><br />

RO4929097 all significantly decreased on day 10 compared to day 3, with<br />

an increase in clearance for all doses. The half-life was significantly shorter<br />

in dose level 3 (p�0.0012) and dose level 4 (p�0.0126) compared to<br />

dose level 1. Conclusions: RO4929097 plus cape was well tolerated.<br />

Activity was seen in cervical and colon cancer. Autoinduction <strong>of</strong> RO4929097<br />

was seen both with increasing cycle number and increasing dose. However,<br />

all plasma concentrations <strong>of</strong> RO4929097 were above those needed for<br />

Notch inhibition (1.9 ng/mL based on prior studies). Dose level 1 (cape<br />

1000 mg/m2 BID and RO4929097 20 mg daily) is the recommended<br />

phase II dose.<br />

N�11<br />

Ratio day 10/day 3<br />

Mean (95% CI) P value<br />

Half-life (hr) 0.62 (0.44 – 0.80) � 0.001<br />

Cmax/dose 0.63 (0.44 – 0.82) � 0.001<br />

AUC/dose 0.50 (0.12 – 2.57) 0.016<br />

Vd (mL) 1.88 (1.19 – 2.57) � 0.001<br />

Cl (mL/hr) 3.69 (2.13 – 5.25) � 0.001<br />

3104 General Poster Session (Board #20F), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Phase I trial to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics <strong>of</strong> afatinib and<br />

weekly vinorelbine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Presenting<br />

Author: Antoine Hollebecque, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France<br />

Background: Afatinib (A) is an oral, irreversible ErbB Family Blocker with<br />

activity in a wide range <strong>of</strong> tumor cell lines dependent on ErbB signaling.<br />

Vinorelbine (VNR) interferes with tubulin polymerization and spindle<br />

formation during metaphase. Additive or supra-additive activity <strong>of</strong> A or<br />

EGFR TKI with VNR has been demonstrated in preclinical models. Methods:<br />

This dose-escalation Phase I study established the safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile, MTD and<br />

PK <strong>of</strong> A with i.v. and p.o. VNR using a modified 3�3 design. Eligible<br />

patients (pts) were �18 years with refractory advanced or metastatic<br />

tumors, an ECOG PS 0–1, and adequate organ and bone marrow function.<br />

VNR i.v. (25 mg/m2 )/oral (60 mg/m2 with escalation to 80 mg/m2 after 3<br />

weeks) was administered weekly on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 with escalating<br />

oral daily doses <strong>of</strong> A 20 mg, 40 mg and 50 mg in 28-day treatment courses.<br />

Results: The study treated 55 pts: 30 pts for MTD determination and 25 pts<br />

in the PK expansion cohort (24 M/31 F), median age 54 years (range<br />

34–72). 28/27 pts were included in the VNR i.v./p.o. cohorts, respectively.<br />

Patients had NSCLC, breast, pancreatic (n�13/5/3), head and neck,<br />

stomach or colorectal cancer (n�2 each group); 28 pts had other cancers.<br />

At 20 mg A, no DLTs occurred in the VNR i.v./p.o. cohorts; whereas, at 50<br />

mg A, 4/6 pts and 3/5 pts experienced DLTs. At 40 mg A and VNR i.v./p.o.,<br />

1/6 pts included for MTD determination experienced DLT, as did 7/13 pts<br />

and 2/12 pts in the VNR i.v./p.o. PK expansion cohorts, respectively. Main<br />

DLTs were diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. Median treatment duration<br />

(snapshot date 9 Dec 2011) across all dose groups was 80 days (range<br />

10–687), with 98 and 58 days in the MTD cohorts <strong>of</strong> VNR i.v./p.o.,<br />

respectively. Related AEs observed in most patients were diarrhea, asthenia,<br />

nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, decreased appetite, mucositis and<br />

rash. Five pts had a PR, confirmed in 2 pts. Preliminary PK analyses<br />

suggest no drug–drug interaction between A and i.v. VNR. Conclusions:<br />

Afatinib in combination with weekly i.v./p.o. VNR is tolerated, with<br />

manageable, reversible, target-related side effects and promising signs <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients. The MTD for A for both<br />

combinations is 40 mg daily.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!