24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6134 General Poster Session (Board #13D), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Relationship <strong>of</strong> MRI tests and referral <strong>of</strong> malignant adnexal masses to<br />

gynecologic oncologists for surgery. Presenting Author: Rachel Kupets,<br />

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Toronto, ON,<br />

Canada<br />

Background: To evaluate the patterns <strong>of</strong> radiologic imaging by family<br />

physicians and gynecologists in the work up <strong>of</strong> women found to have an<br />

adnexal mass on pelvic ultrasound. To evaluate whether advanced imaging<br />

tests are associated with improved referral <strong>of</strong> high risk adnexal masses to<br />

gynecologic oncologists. Methods: Centralized provincial databases <strong>of</strong><br />

healthcare utilization were used to identify women aged 45 and older who<br />

received a pelvic ultrasound between 2006-2008. Subsequent imaging<br />

tests ordered by physician specialty were identified. Of those women who<br />

proceeded to laparotomy, logistic regression was performed to determine<br />

which imaging tests were associated with referral <strong>of</strong> high risk adnexal<br />

tumors to a gynecologic oncologist. Results: 193, 261 women had a pelvic<br />

ultrasound; 19, 949 (10.3%) had a laparotomy. 2223 and 627 women<br />

were categorized with benign and malignant adnexal masses respectively.<br />

Up to 12% <strong>of</strong> women had a pelvic MRI and 58% <strong>of</strong> women had a CT scan<br />

after a pelvic ultrasound.Family physicians referred 58% and gynecologists<br />

referred 47% <strong>of</strong> high risk ovarian masses to a gynecologic oncologist<br />

respectively after imaging.Gynecologic Oncologists operated on only 55%<br />

<strong>of</strong> women with malignant adnexal masses. On multivariate analysis factors<br />

significant for surgery by a gynecologic oncologist include a preoperative CT<br />

Scan OR 3.58 (p�.001) and CT Scan and MRI OR 7.78 (p�.001).<br />

Preoperative MRI alone had an OR <strong>of</strong> 1.86 (p�0.09) and was not<br />

significant. Mean time to surgery significantly increased when further<br />

imaging tests were performed after a pelvic ultrasound (100 days), CT (131<br />

days), MRI (170 days), CT and MRI (179 days),P 0.002. Conclusions: The<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> a pelvic MRI to a pelvic ultrasound does not improve the referral<br />

<strong>of</strong> high risk adnexal masses to a gynecologic oncologist. A consensus on<br />

appropriate imaging and triage is needed when an adnexal mass is<br />

identified on ultrasound.<br />

6136 General Poster Session (Board #13F), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Relationship between whole-body tumor burden and quality <strong>of</strong> life in<br />

patients with neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis. Presenting Author: Scott Randall Plotkin,<br />

Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA<br />

Background: NF1, NF2, and schwannomatosis are a group <strong>of</strong> related<br />

genetic disorders in which affected individuals share the predisposition to<br />

develop multiple nerve sheath tumors. While previous studies have investigated<br />

the relationship between cutaneous tumor burden and quality <strong>of</strong> life,<br />

the relation between internal tumors and quality <strong>of</strong> life is unknown.<br />

Methods: As part <strong>of</strong> an IRB-approved research study, we performed<br />

whole-body MRI and administered the short form (SF)-36 to 245 adult<br />

subjects with NF. The number and location <strong>of</strong> internal nerve sheath tumors<br />

in each patient was identified by a board-certified radiologist and tumor<br />

volume was calculated using semi-automated volumetric analysis. One<br />

sample t-tests were used to compare subjects’ SF-36 scores to general<br />

population means. Independent linear regression analyses controlling for<br />

age and gender effects were used to relate whole-body tumor count,<br />

volume, and distribution (via Gini coefficient) to each domain <strong>of</strong> the SF-36.<br />

Results: 245 patients (142 with NF1, 53 with NF2, 50 with schwannomatosis)<br />

completed the study. On the SF-36, subjects with NF1 showed<br />

reduced quality <strong>of</strong> life in the physical role, emotional role, and mental<br />

health domains compared to the normal population (p�0.05). Subjects<br />

with NF2 showed reductions in the physical functioning, physical role,<br />

general health, and social functioning domains while subjects with schwannomatosis<br />

showed reductions in the physical role and bodily pain domains<br />

(p�0.05). In linear regression analysis, increased tumor number, increased<br />

tumor volume, and decreased Gini coefficient were correlated with<br />

decreased physical functioning in patients with NF2 (p�0.01). There was<br />

also a trend for increasing tumor volume to be correlated with decreased<br />

physical role and increased bodily pain in patients with NF1 and with<br />

increased bodily pain in patients with schwannomatosis (p�0.10).<br />

Conclusions: In our multi-institutional cohort, patients with all forms <strong>of</strong><br />

neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis show selected deficits in quality <strong>of</strong> life. Internal tumor<br />

burden does not correlate with these deficits, with the exception <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

function in NF2 patients.<br />

Health Services Research<br />

415s<br />

6135 General Poster Session (Board #13E), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Patient-reported toxicity after treatment for cancers <strong>of</strong> the head and neck.<br />

Presenting Author: Christine E. Hill-Kayser, Hospital <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Patients with cancers <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (HNC) may be at<br />

risk for significant late effects after treatment. Quality <strong>of</strong> life may be altered<br />

significantly as a result. This Internet based study evaluates patient<br />

perceptions <strong>of</strong> toxicity after treatment for HNC. Methods: Patient-reported<br />

data were gathered via a convenience sample frame from HNC survivors<br />

voluntarily utilizing a publically available, free, Internet-based tool for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> survivorship care plans. Available at www.livestrongcareplan.com<br />

and through the OncoLinkwebsite, the tool allows survivors to enter data<br />

regarding diagnosis, demographics, and treatments, and provides customized<br />

guidelines for future care. During use <strong>of</strong> the tool, HNC survivors are<br />

queried regarding late effects associated with specific treatments. All data<br />

have been maintained with IRB approval. Results: Of 3866 survivors using<br />

this tool between 4/2010 and 10/2011, 140 (4%) had undergone primary<br />

treatment for HNC. Median diagnosis age was 52y and median current age<br />

56y. When queried regarding treatment received, 88% reported having<br />

undergone radiation, 73% surgery, and 67% chemotherapy. Many patientreported<br />

late effects were associated with local tumor control, and included<br />

difficulty swallowing/speaking (83%), decreased saliva production (88%),<br />

dental problems (49%), thyroid problems (33%), decreased neck mobility<br />

(60%), eye and vision deficits (9%), and tinnitus (40%). In addition, 53%<br />

noted concerns regarding cognitive function. Users <strong>of</strong> the tool reported that<br />

they would share it with their healthcare team in 55% <strong>of</strong> cases. The most<br />

common reasons for not sharing it were “I did not think they would care,”<br />

and “ I did not want to upset or anger them.” Conclusions: Survivors using<br />

this tool anonymously and voluntarily report significant toxicity after<br />

treatment for HNC. Not all survivors appear comfortable discussing these<br />

issues with healthcare providers, despite major potential impact on quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> life. The data reported here may be <strong>of</strong> significant impact in future study<br />

<strong>of</strong> outcomes after HNC, as well as patient counseling and survivor care.<br />

6137 General Poster Session (Board #13G), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Predictive factors on the receipt and completion <strong>of</strong> adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

in a mixed sociodemographic cohort <strong>of</strong> patients. Presenting Author: Blase<br />

N. Polite, The University <strong>of</strong> Chicago , Chicago, IL<br />

Background: African <strong>American</strong>s are more likely to die from breast, colon and<br />

lung cancer compared to whites. They are also less likely to receive and<br />

complete recommended therapy. The reasons for this are unknown.<br />

Methods: Breast, colon, and lung cancer patients eligible for adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy (stage IB-III breast, stage IIB-III colon, and Stage IB, II<br />

lung) and who received surgery at 2 urban medical centers, were approached<br />

between 2008 and 2010 and completed a self-administered<br />

survey focusing on sociodemographic factors, including social support,<br />

anxiety, depression, co-morbidities, trust and God Locus <strong>of</strong> Control (e.g.,<br />

Whatever happens to my cancer is God’s will). These variables were related<br />

to receipt and completion <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy. 191 patients were approached,<br />

161 consented and 30 refused (16%); out <strong>of</strong> the 161, 23 were<br />

deemed ineligible because <strong>of</strong> previous cancers, non-curative stage or<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Results: Final sample<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> 138 pts. Median age: 54; sex:81% F; Race/Ethnicity:47% AA,<br />

38% white, 9% Hispanic, 6% Asian/PI; Cancer Type: 73% Breast, 21%<br />

Colon, 6% Lung. Compared to whites, AA were more likely to have<br />

incomes�20K (35% vs. 10%, p�.0002), have any comorbidities (80% vs.<br />

57%, p�0.006), and have high levels <strong>of</strong> God Locus <strong>of</strong> Control (56% vs<br />

27%, p�0.003). There were no differences by race in chemotherapy<br />

receipt (89% vs. 88%) or relative dose intensity (RDI) <strong>of</strong> chemo��85%<br />

(58% vs. 67%). No factor in our model predicted chemotherapy receipt or<br />

RDI at a significant level. Pts with high God Locus <strong>of</strong> Control were<br />

somewhat more likely to start chemotherapy (OR 1.7, p�0.25) but were<br />

less likely to complete therapy (OR 0.55, p�0.19). The magnitude <strong>of</strong> these<br />

relationships held after controlling for age, race, comorbidities, cancer<br />

type, functional status, and social support. Conclusions: In a mixed<br />

sociodemographic cohort <strong>of</strong> patients, receipt and completion <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy was similar by measured sociodemographic variables. Only<br />

high God Locus <strong>of</strong> Control was suggestive <strong>of</strong> being less likely to complete<br />

chemotherapy. Further attention and research on the role <strong>of</strong> religious<br />

beliefs in the cancer decision making process is warranted.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!