24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

638s Sarcoma<br />

10032^ Poster Discussion Session (Board #24), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Phase I trial <strong>of</strong> panobinostat (P) and imatinib (IM) in patients with<br />

treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Presenting<br />

Author: Sebastian Bauer, Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center,<br />

Essen, Germany<br />

Background: Panobinostat (LBH589; P) is a pan-deacetylase-inhibitor that<br />

has preclinical activity in combination with IM in GIST models in vitro and<br />

in vivo. Aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose<br />

(MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) <strong>of</strong> escalating doses <strong>of</strong> P in<br />

combination with IM in patients with GIST who have failed IM and sunitinib<br />

treatment. Methods: This was a two-center phase I study using a 3�3<br />

design with a prespecified expansion <strong>of</strong> the MTD cohort. IM was administered<br />

at a dose <strong>of</strong> 400mg qd. Following a 7 day run-in phase, escalating<br />

doses <strong>of</strong> P were added. The starting dose for P was 20 mg given as a<br />

three-times-per-week (MWF schedule) oral dose for 3 out <strong>of</strong> 4 weeks. Doses<br />

were increased by 10 mg if no dose limiting toxicities emerged. Blood<br />

samples were drawn for PK and biomarker assessments <strong>of</strong> IM, its main<br />

metabolite N-desmethyl-IM, and P using a validated RP-HPLC method.<br />

Acetylation <strong>of</strong> histone A3 was evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear<br />

cells (PBMNC) as pharmacodynamic marker for P activity. Metabolic<br />

response using PET (EORTC-PET study criteria) was assessed on day 7 <strong>of</strong><br />

IM run-in and after 3 weeks <strong>of</strong> combined treatment with IM and P. Results:<br />

In total 12 extensively pretreated (median 5 pretreatments) pts (4 f, 8 m;<br />

median age 56 y, 34-75 y) received study treatment at 2 dose levels (DL). 2<br />

dose-limiting toxicities (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) occurred at DL 2 (30<br />

mg). Most common AEs were thrombocytopenia, anemia, fatigue, nausea,<br />

emesis, diarrhea, creatinine elevation, abdominal cramping, and weight<br />

loss. DL 1 (20mg) was declared MTD, and 5 additional pts were enrolled at<br />

DL1. Analysis <strong>of</strong> P and IM PK revealed mean peak concentration <strong>of</strong> 14.8<br />

�/- 9.5 ng/ml for P (20 mg). IM plasma concentrations with 400 mg<br />

once-daily administration were 2.8 � 1.1 �g/mL at peak and 1.2 � 0.4<br />

�g/mL at trough. Histone A3 acetylation was demonstrated in PBMNC from<br />

pts treated at DL 1. 11 pts were evaluable for PET response: 1 had mPR, 7<br />

had mSD and 3 had mPD. Longest treatment duration was 17 weeks<br />

(median: 6wks). Conclusions: P in combination with IM is moderately<br />

tolerated. Evidence <strong>of</strong> target inhibition at the MTD was associated with<br />

limited clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with GIST.<br />

10034 General Poster Session (Board #46C), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> sarcoma patients with long-term response to gemcitabine<br />

and paclitaxel. Presenting Author: Daniela Katz, Sharette Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel<br />

Background: The combination <strong>of</strong> fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and docetaxel<br />

has demonstrated efficacy in advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma and nonleiomyosarcoma<br />

sarcomas. We evaluated the tolerability and efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

modified taxol-gemcitabine (GemTax) protocol for patient with advanced<br />

sarcoma. The protocol was designed on a weekly basis to reduce toxicity.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this retrospective study was to evaluate the characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> long term-responders (�12 treatments) to weekly GemTax, among<br />

pre-treated advanced high-grade sarcoma patients. Methods: From May<br />

2004 to October 2011, 48 advanced sarcoma patients were treated with<br />

combination paclitaxel (60-90 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (600-900 mg/m2<br />

over 100 min), on days 1,8 <strong>of</strong> every 3-week cycle or on days 1, 8 and 15 <strong>of</strong><br />

every 4-week cycle at a wide-range treatment lines. Two patients are still on<br />

the protocol. Results: Fifteen patients (6 males and 9 females) completed<br />

12 weekly treatments or more (mean 22.3 range 12-37) <strong>of</strong> which 4<br />

completed �30 treatments. These include 5 leiomyosarcomas (one retroperitoneal),<br />

2 uterine leiomyosarcomas, 3 MFH, 2 spindle sarcoma, 1<br />

osteosarcoma, 1 adamantimoma and 1 pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma.<br />

GemTax was administered as 1st or 2nd line treatment in 2 and 8 patients,<br />

respectively, and as 3rd -6th line in 5. Of these patients, none achieved<br />

complete response (CR), 7/15 (47%) achieved a partial response (PR) and<br />

8/15 (53%) had stable disease (SD). Median treatment duration was 10.3<br />

months (range 4-22) Median progression-free survival was 28.85 months<br />

(range 5-84 months), and median overall survival was 51.2 months (range<br />

16-95 months). A lower starting dose <strong>of</strong> paclitaxel (60-70 mg/m2) and<br />

gemcitabine (600-700 mg/m2) characterized the 4 patients with responses<br />

�30 cycles. Only five patients required dose reduction ranging<br />

between 10-40% due to grade 3 hematological toxicity. None <strong>of</strong> these<br />

patients, however, had febrile neutropenia, or bleeding events, and all<br />

non-hematologic toxicities including neurotoxicity were manageable.<br />

Conclusions: GemTax is a reasonable treatment option for patients with<br />

advanced pre-treated high-grade sarcomas. The regimen is well tolerated<br />

and dose adjustments do not seem to impact response.<br />

10033 Poster Discussion Session (Board #25), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Dasatinib first-line treatment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter<br />

phase II trial <strong>of</strong> the SAKK (SAKK 56/07). Presenting Author:<br />

Michael Montemurro, Centre Pluridisciplinaire d’Oncologie, University<br />

Hospital Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland<br />

Background: First line imatinib has improved the outcome <strong>of</strong> patients (pts)<br />

with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), but primary and secondary<br />

resistance remain a problem. Dasatinib is a second generation tyrosine<br />

kinase inhibitor (TKI) and inhibits the activity <strong>of</strong> bcr-abl, src-family kinases<br />

along with a number <strong>of</strong> other oncogenic kinases including kit. In vitro,<br />

dasatinib has shown activity against imatinib-resistant cell lines. Routinely,<br />

pts diagnosed with GIST and treated with TKIs are monitored by<br />

computed tomography (CT). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emissiontomography<br />

(FDG-PET) measures tumor metabolic activity for early response<br />

assessment, which might be <strong>of</strong> particular use in the clinical trial<br />

setting. Methods: This two-stage phase II trial investigated dasatinib in pts<br />

with TKI-naïve GIST. Dasatinib starting dose was 2x70mg/day in pts with<br />

histologically proven, FDG-PET positive GIST. Response evaluation was<br />

done by serial CT and FDG-PET using EORTC PET response criteria (Young<br />

et al. 1999). Elective surgery was allowed after 6 months <strong>of</strong> trial treatment.<br />

Primary endpoint was response (CR�PR) by FDG-PET after one month <strong>of</strong><br />

dasatinib. Results: 47 <strong>of</strong> planned 52 pts have been enrolled from December<br />

2007 to November 2011, when the trial was terminated due to slow<br />

accrual. 43 pts were eligible. Median age was 61 years, 24 pts were male,<br />

19 female and 41 had a performance status <strong>of</strong> 0 or 1. At a median<br />

follow-up <strong>of</strong> 11.9 months, 20 pts were still on treatment. Pts went <strong>of</strong>f trial<br />

for elective surgery (n�6), progression (n�11), toxicity (n�3), and three<br />

patients died (one on-drug). 5% <strong>of</strong> pts experienced G4, and 38% <strong>of</strong> pts G3<br />

toxicity, which were most <strong>of</strong>ten gastrointestinal or pulmonary. 28% had<br />

their dose reduced or interrupted. The primary endpoint, FDG-PET response<br />

rate (CR�PR) at 4 weeks was 67% (13 CR, 16 PR, 7 SD, 3 PD, 4<br />

not evaluable). Median progression-free survival is 11.1 months and<br />

median overall survival not yet reached. Conclusions: Dasatinib shows<br />

promising efficacy in TKI-naïve pts with FDG-PET positive GIST. Mutational<br />

data will be presented at the meeting.<br />

10035 General Poster Session (Board #46D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> metastasis surgery on overall survival in patients (pts) with<br />

advanced s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcoma (ASTS): A subanalysis <strong>of</strong> the PALSAR trials.<br />

Presenting Author: Nuria Kotecki, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France<br />

Background: The role <strong>of</strong> surgery in pts with ASTS remains controversial. We<br />

have conducted an exploratory retrospective analysis <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> metastasis<br />

surgery in ASTS pts receiving 1st-line chemotherapy (CT). Methods: The<br />

database includes all pts enrolled in PALSAR-1 and PALSAR-2 trials<br />

[Fayette 2009; Bui-Nguyen 2011], treated with dose-intensified MAID or<br />

high-dose CT with peripheral blood stem cells support as 1st-line treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> ASTS. In our analysis, the primary endpoint is overall survival (OS).<br />

Log-ranks are used for univariate analysis and Cox model for multivariate<br />

analysis. Impact <strong>of</strong> treatments had been evaluated after adjustment to<br />

confounders (Cox Model). Confounders were defined as parameters with<br />

significantly different distribution in pts who underwent metastasis surgery<br />

and those who did not (p�0.05) and significantly associated with OS<br />

(p�0.05). Results: The database consists <strong>of</strong> 410 pts (160 in PALSAR-1<br />

and 248 in PALSAR-2) with a median age <strong>of</strong> 43. Among them, 77 patients<br />

(18%) underwent metastasis surgery. At the end <strong>of</strong> the treatment, 61 pts<br />

experienced complete response (CR), 45 with CT alone and 16 with<br />

metastasis surgery and CT. The median follow-up was 29 months. The<br />

median OS was 35.7 months (29.9-41.5). The following parameters are<br />

associated with longer OS in univariate analysis: primary location<br />

(p�0.0001), performance status (p�0.010) and absence <strong>of</strong> liver metastasis<br />

(p�0.001). We identified 4 factors associated with metastasis surgery<br />

(n�76): limb/trunk primaries, young age, absence <strong>of</strong> liver metastasis and<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> progression <strong>of</strong> the target lesions after 4 cycles. The sole<br />

identified confounder was primary location. In multivariate analysis the 2<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> patients experiencing significant longer OS are those with CR<br />

without surgery (HR�2.2, [1.7-5.8], p�0.0001) and those with CR<br />

following metastasis surgery (HR�3.8, [2.3-6.2], p�0.0001). Conclusions:<br />

Among the pts with ASTS receiving poly-CT as 1st-line treatment, the OS <strong>of</strong><br />

pts experiencing CR with or without metastasis surgery appears similar.<br />

Metastatis surgery without CR does not <strong>of</strong>fer significant OS advantage.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!