24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

564s Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />

8596 General Poster Session (Board #38F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Detection <strong>of</strong> BRAF mutations in melanoma: Rate <strong>of</strong> mutation detection at<br />

codon 600 using Sanger sequencing as compared to the cobas 4800<br />

method. Presenting Author: Kevin Z. Qu, Nichols Institute, San Juan<br />

Capistrano, CA<br />

Background: Detection <strong>of</strong> BRAF V600 mutations is currently a prerequisite<br />

for approved use <strong>of</strong> vemurafenib in patients with metastatic melanoma. The<br />

cobas 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test (Roche Molecular Diagnostics), a<br />

PCR-based assay approved to aid in selecting patients for vemurafenib<br />

therapy, primarily detects V600E. It is also reported to detect V600K,<br />

which has been associated with vemurafenib response as well. We<br />

compared the mutation detection rate <strong>of</strong> the cobas assay with that <strong>of</strong><br />

Sanger sequencing. Methods: 125 de-identified FFPE tissues submitted for<br />

BRAF mutation analysis that all showed histologically-confirmed melanoma<br />

were tested. BRAF mutations were detected using both the cobas kit<br />

and bidirectional Sanger sequencing using BigDye kits (Applied Biosystems).<br />

DNA was extracted from 5-um sections without macrodissection<br />

using the cobas DNA extraction kit (for the cobas test) or from 5-10-um<br />

sections using Agencourt extraction kits (Beckman Coulter) following<br />

macrodissection. Results: The two methods showed agreement in 104/125<br />

(83.2%) <strong>of</strong> cases (Table). Sanger sequencing detected V600 dinucleotide<br />

mutations in 9 samples that were negative by the cobas assay. Sanger<br />

sequencing produced no results in 10 cases owing to suboptimal PCR,<br />

including 2 that were positive by the cobas assay. The cobas assay<br />

produced 2 invalid results, including 1 that was positive for V600E by<br />

Sanger.The cobas assay detected 7/11 V600K mutations. Conclusions:<br />

Overall agreement between cobas and Sanger sequencing was 83.2%. The<br />

Sanger method had higher analytic sensitivity, resulting in nine additional<br />

V600 mutations not called by cobas compared to the two seen by cobas but<br />

not Sanger sequencing. Thus, 16% (9/57) more patients would be<br />

identified as candidates for vemurafenib therapy using the Sanger method.<br />

Sanger<br />

sequencing<br />

Not detected V600E V600K V600R Non-600 No result Total<br />

Not detected 56 3 a<br />

4 b<br />

2 c<br />

2 d<br />

7 74<br />

cobas detected 40 7 2 49<br />

Invalid 1 1 2<br />

Total 56 44 11 2 2 10 125<br />

a 2/3 had dinucleotide mutations (GTG�GAA) and 1 had V600_K601del. b All had<br />

dinucleotide mutations (GTG�AAG). c Both had GTG�AGG dinucleotide mutations. d 1)<br />

G469R; 2) E501G.<br />

8598 General Poster Session (Board #38H), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Pharmacodynamic activity <strong>of</strong> selumetinib to predict radiographic response<br />

in advanced uveal melanoma. Presenting Author: Richard D. Carvajal,<br />

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Functionally activating mutations (mut) in Gnaq or Gna11,<br />

genes that encode for widely expressed G-protein alpha subunits, are early<br />

oncogenic events in uveal melanoma (UM) development and result in<br />

activation <strong>of</strong> the MAPK pathway. We previously demonstrated effective<br />

pathway inhibition with selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142866) in UM cell<br />

lines, with decreased viability associated with pERK and cyclinD1 suppression<br />

(Ambrosini, AACR 2010). Methods: Using paired metastatic tumor<br />

biopsies from patients (pts) with radiographically progressing UM treated<br />

with selumetinib 75 mg BID on a phase II trial (NCT01143402), we<br />

correlated MAPK pathway inhibition with radiographic tumor regression<br />

and clinical benefit. Biopsies were performed at baseline and after 14 �/-1<br />

days <strong>of</strong> treatment. Western blotting was performed for pERK and cyclinD1,<br />

and quantitated by densitometry. Response (RECIST 1.1) was assessed at<br />

baseline, week (wk) 4, wk 8, and q8wks subsequently. Radiographic<br />

regression was defined as greatest percentage shrinkage from baseline.<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> benefit was defined as RECIST response or stable disease �16wks.<br />

Results: Paired tumor biopsies were assayed from 18 pts: median age 60<br />

(range 47-81), M:F 11:7, median 1 prior therapy (range 0-2), 17 with liver<br />

involvement, Gnaq mut:Gna11 mut:wild-type 8:9:1. Radiographic regression<br />

was observed in 5 pts, with 2 achieving partial responses. 4 pts were<br />

on study �16wks (16�, 20, 25, 31 wks), with one currently on study at<br />

11� wks. Median pERK and cyclinD1 as measured by densitometry<br />

decreased by 48% (p�.03) and 76% (p�.03), respectively. Radiographic<br />

regression correlated with suppression <strong>of</strong> pERK (Spearmen’s rank correlation;<br />

p�0.04) but not cyclinD1 (p�0.38). A trend towards pERK suppression<br />

correlating with clinical benefit was observed (p�.07) with each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

5 pts achieving PR or SD �16wks having a decrease <strong>of</strong> �30% in pERK<br />

from baseline. Conclusions: Selumetinib can inhibit pERK and cyclinD1 in<br />

UM and can result in tumor shrinkage. Sustained inhibition <strong>of</strong> pERK<br />

inhibition at day 14 may be predictive <strong>of</strong> benefit. Further evaluation <strong>of</strong> MEK<br />

inhibition in this disease is warranted.<br />

8597 General Poster Session (Board #38G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

MicroRNAs induced in melanoma treated with combination targeted<br />

therapy <strong>of</strong> temsirolimus and bevacizumab. Presenting Author: Aubrey G.<br />

Wagenseller, University <strong>of</strong> Virginia, Charlottesville, VA<br />

Background: Targeted therapies directed at commonly overexpressed pathways<br />

in melanoma have clinical activity in numerous trials. Little is known<br />

about how these therapies influence microRNA expression, particularly<br />

with combination regimens. A better understanding <strong>of</strong> how microRNAs are<br />

altered with treatment may contribute to understanding mechanisms <strong>of</strong><br />

therapeutic effects as well as mechanisms <strong>of</strong> tumor escape from therapy.<br />

Methods: Using microRNA arrays, we analyzed microRNA expression levels<br />

in melanoma samples from a Cancer Therapy Evaluation Programsponsored<br />

phase II trial <strong>of</strong> combination temsirolimus and bevacizumab in<br />

stage III or IV melanoma, which elicited clinical benefit in a subset <strong>of</strong><br />

patients. Seventeen patients were treated with temsirolimus for one week,<br />

then combination <strong>of</strong> both temsirolimus and bevacizumab. Metastatic<br />

melanoma biopsies were evaluated days 1, 2, and 23. Tumor samples were<br />

evaluated from 12 patients. Results: microRNA expression remained<br />

unchanged with temsirolimus alone; however, expression <strong>of</strong> 15 microRNAs<br />

was significantly upregulated (1.4 to 2.5-fold) with combination treatment,<br />

compared to pre-treatment levels. Interestingly, twelve <strong>of</strong> these fifteen<br />

microRNAs have been reported to possess tumor suppressor capabilities in<br />

various cancer types, including melanoma. We identified 15 putative<br />

oncogenes and B7-H3, IGF-1, and IGF-1R as potential targets <strong>of</strong> the 12<br />

tumor suppressor microRNAs, based on published experimental evidence.<br />

For 18 <strong>of</strong> 25 pairings <strong>of</strong> microRNA and target-mRNA, changes in gene<br />

expression from pretreatment to post-combination treatment samples were<br />

inversely correlated with changes in microRNA expression, suggesting a<br />

functional effect <strong>of</strong> the microRNA changes induced by combination<br />

therapy. Clustering analysis based on selected microRNAs revealed signatures<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> clinical response to combination treatment and <strong>of</strong><br />

tumor BRAF mutational status. Conclusions: We have identified microRNAs<br />

that may be involved in the mechanism <strong>of</strong> action <strong>of</strong> combination temsirolimus<br />

and bevacizumab in metastatic melanoma, possibly through inhibition<br />

<strong>of</strong> oncogenic pathways.<br />

8599 General Poster Session (Board #39A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Exhibition <strong>of</strong> a stem-cell like phenotype with the expression <strong>of</strong> CD271 in<br />

drug-resistant melanoma cells. Presenting Author: Elizabeth Ann Teresa<br />

Lieser, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN<br />

Background: Chemotherapy resistance is a common, difficult problem for<br />

melanoma patients needing long term care and those suffering from<br />

recurrence. Neural growth factor receptor (NGFR), also known as CD271, is<br />

commonly expressed on mesenchymal stem cells and is important for<br />

development, survival and differentiation <strong>of</strong> cells. This has previously<br />

shown to be expressed on melanoma stem cells. We hypothesized that<br />

treatment with carboplatin enriches the population <strong>of</strong> tumor cells for<br />

cancer stem cells (CSC) as a mechanism <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy resistance.<br />

Methods: Core tumor samples from 118 patients with metastatic melanoma<br />

were obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded specimens. Slides<br />

were stained using an anti-CD271 antibody for IHC. A375 melanoma cells<br />

were treated with increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> carboplatin for approximately<br />

1 year. WT, 6 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL resistant cells were tagged with<br />

CD271-PE antibody and run on a flow cytometer. These cells were then<br />

tested for gene expression by microarray using an Affymetrix human 133<br />

plus 2.0 chip, and analyzed on <strong>Part</strong>ek s<strong>of</strong>tware. Pathway analysis <strong>of</strong> these<br />

carboplatin resistant cells was preformed using Ingenuity. Results: Virtually<br />

all melanoma tumor samples stained positively for CD271 by IHC, with a<br />

median <strong>of</strong> 50% cells within tumor samples expressing the cytoplasmic<br />

marker. Flow cytometry demonstrated an increase in the percentage <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

expressing CD271 as resistance to carboplatin increased. Wild type A375<br />

cells contained 30% positive CD271, A375 6mg/mL resistant contained<br />

42% positive and A375 10mg/mL resistant showed 66% positive. Microarray<br />

also exhibited a direct correlation between CD271 gene expression with<br />

increasing carboplatin resistance. Functional ontology enrichment revealed<br />

development and regulation <strong>of</strong> the EMT pathway as an important<br />

process impacted by our resistant cell line. Conclusions: The data suggests<br />

that as melanoma cells become resistant to certain chemotherapy drugs<br />

they essentially loose their differentiated phenotype and become more<br />

stem cell-like. Monitoring melanoma expression <strong>of</strong> CD271 could help<br />

individualize therapy and anticipate chemotherapeutic resistance in this<br />

high-risk group <strong>of</strong> patients.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!