24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

346s Gynecologic Cancer<br />

5078 General Poster Session (Board #22F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

BRCA mutations and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): Experience<br />

in ethnically diverse groups. Presenting Author: Tamar Safra, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel<br />

Background: EOC patients with BRCA mutations have been reported to have<br />

better prognosis than non-hereditary (NH) matched cases, an advantage<br />

shown especially in the Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) population. We have<br />

analyzed our experience in our ethnically diverse patient cohort from NYC,<br />

Israel and Italy. Methods: A retrospective chart review <strong>of</strong> patients diagnosed<br />

with Stage IC-IV EOC between 1995-2008 at the NYU Cancer Institute, Tel<br />

Aviv Sourasky MC and Padova <strong>Clinical</strong> Cancer Centers. Out <strong>of</strong> �700<br />

patients, 183 were tested for BRCA mutations and evaluated. Results:<br />

Median age was 55.5 (range 31–83 years). Out <strong>of</strong> 183, 86 are carriers <strong>of</strong><br />

BRCA1/2 mutations and 97 tested negative, 67 and 19 are carriers <strong>of</strong><br />

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation respectively. Carrier frequency in EOC<br />

population is 46% (45/97) in AJ’s and 48% (41/86) in non-AJ’s. AJ<br />

patients had the following BRCA1 mutations: 185delAG (29), 5382insC<br />

(5), unknown (UK) (2) and BRCA2 mutations: 6174delT (8), UK (1).<br />

Non-AJ’s were divided by ethnicities into non-AJ, Caucasian, African-<br />

<strong>American</strong>, Hispanic, Middle Eastern or unknown. Non-AJ Jewish patients<br />

had BRCA1 mutations in 185delAG (7) and BRCA2 in 6174delT (1), UK<br />

(1). Non-Jewish Caucasians exhibited the widest variation <strong>of</strong> mutation<br />

types, with the following BRCA1 sites: 185delAG, K1702X (5223A�T),<br />

E1373X, 3829delT, 185delAT, IVS11�1G�A, 5385insC,<br />

5083del19�stop1670, 1720delAF�stop536, 1806C/T�Igu536Ter, del<br />

ex1a-2, cod1486ex14:4575delAstop1504, 5563G7A;Trp1815stop,<br />

5181delGTT(Val1688del) and UK and the following BRCA2 sites: 6174delT<br />

(2), 5301insA (1), 802delAT (1), cod2960ex22:9106C/t (1), cod68ex3:<br />

432delAstop79 (1), 7408A/T;Arg2394stop (1). One African-<strong>American</strong><br />

patient with BRCA1 at 1294del40, 1 Hispanic BRCA1 at 185delAG. OS<br />

was significantly prolonged for BRCA carriers at 93.6 months versus 63.2<br />

months [95% CI: 44.5-91.7] (p�0.0016) for NH. Conclusions: Our data<br />

reports a wide variety <strong>of</strong> BRCA mutations in an ethnically diverse EOC<br />

population and confirms that BRCA mutations carriers have a better<br />

prognosis with a longer median survival compared to NH population. A<br />

larger cohort might manifest prognostic differences between the different<br />

types <strong>of</strong> mutations.<br />

5080 General Poster Session (Board #22H), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A matched pair analysis <strong>of</strong> intra- and postoperative catumaxomab in<br />

patients with ovarian cancer from a multicenter, single-arm phase II trial<br />

versus a consecutive single-center collective <strong>of</strong> ovarian cancer patients<br />

without immunotherapy. Presenting Author: Klaus Pietzner, Charite University<br />

Medicine <strong>of</strong> Berlin, Berlin, Germany<br />

Background: Advanced ovarian cancer is still connected to high mortality<br />

rates due to intraperitoneal tumor cells that survive radical cytoreductive<br />

surgery as well as adjuvant chemotherapy. These persistent tumor cells<br />

need to be targeted in order to improve survival. Catumaxomab has<br />

demonstrated the ability to kill EpCAM-positive intraperitoneal tumor cells<br />

<strong>of</strong> ovarian cancer patients in studies aiming to controll malignant ascites in<br />

the recurrent setting. This analysis was conducted to investigate the<br />

efficacy <strong>of</strong> intraperitoneal catumaxomab at the timepoint <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

cytoreductive surgery and postoperative period, prior to standard adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy. Methods: Ovarian cancer patients undergoing radical surgery<br />

received one intraoperative (10 �g) followed by four subsequent<br />

intraperitoneal (i.p.) dosages (10, 20, 50 and 150 �g) <strong>of</strong> catumaxomab on<br />

days 7, 10, 13, and 16, respectively. Because <strong>of</strong> the single arm design <strong>of</strong><br />

the study, the patients treated with catumaxomab were compared in a<br />

matched pair analysis to consecutive patients with primary ovarian cancer<br />

who received standard treatment without catumaxomab in a large center, in<br />

order to compare survival. The two main prognostic factors <strong>of</strong> stage and<br />

level <strong>of</strong> tumorreduction were chosen as matching criteria. Results: Of 58<br />

patients screened, 41 were treated with catumaxomab and available for<br />

survival evaluation. Median age was 57 years in the catumaxomab group<br />

and 59 years in the matched-pair control group. The most comon histology<br />

was the serous subtype with 70.7 % in the catumaxomab and 80.5 % <strong>of</strong> the<br />

patients in the control group. The median for overall survival was reached<br />

for the historical consecutive matched-pair control collective, but is not yet<br />

reached for the catumaxomab group. However, 3-year survival data were<br />

available for both groups and showed survival <strong>of</strong> 85.4% (35) in the<br />

catumaxomab group and 63.4% (26) in the matched-pair control group<br />

(p-value: 0.041; HR 2.073) Conclusions: There seems to be a trend to<br />

beneficial 3-year survival in the catumaxomab group, suggesting that a<br />

phase III trial is warranted.<br />

5079 General Poster Session (Board #22G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Serum IGFBP4 levels in combination with miliary disease: A candidate<br />

predictor <strong>of</strong> ovarian cancer progression-free survival. Presenting Author:<br />

Samantha Cohen, Mt Sinai School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New York, NY<br />

Background: Insulin-like growth factor binding protein, IGFBP4, was shown<br />

to be highly expressed across all stages <strong>of</strong> epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)<br />

and serum levels are elevated in EOC. Moreover, IGFBP4 levels are ~3x<br />

greater in women with malignant pelvic masses. We investigated whether<br />

ascites volume and the presence <strong>of</strong> miliary disease in combination with<br />

serum levels <strong>of</strong> IGFBP4 are independent predictors <strong>of</strong> survival. Methods: A<br />

prospective and retrospective analysis was performed. Patients were<br />

enrolled at the time <strong>of</strong> cytoreductive surgery. Ascites volume was either<br />

absent, �500 cc (low), or �� 500 cc (high), and the presence <strong>of</strong> miliary<br />

disease was recorded. The IGFBP4 cut<strong>of</strong>f was 1064.5 ug/ml based upon<br />

previous results. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to<br />

estimate PFS probabilities. The Cox proportional hazards model was used<br />

to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% CI. Results: 57<br />

cases were included in the analysis <strong>of</strong> ascites volume and miliary disease.<br />

Cytoreductive outcomes were complete gross resection (44.8%), optimal<br />

(��1cm residual disease; 44.8%), and suboptimal ( �1cm residual<br />

disease; 10.3%). Histologic subtypes: papillary serous (n�35; 61.4%),<br />

mucinous (n�15; 26.3%), endometrioid (n�4; 7.0%), and clear cell<br />

(n�3; 5.3%). Stage distribution was 21.1% I/II, and 78.9% III/IV. PFS<br />

was unaffected by ascites volume (p�0.341) or miliary disease. Among<br />

this cohort, 29 had IGFBP4 levels available for a separate analysis.<br />

Patients with high IGFBP4 and miliary disease were 5.5 times as likely to<br />

recur compared with patients with miliary disease and low IGFBP4<br />

(HR�5.55 [0.77, 39.82]), and the statistical significance was borderline<br />

(p�0.088). No statistically significant differences were detected between<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> recurrence among patients with high and low IGFBP4 values in<br />

combination with ascites volume. Conclusions: These exploratory studies<br />

suggest that patients with high IGFBP4 serum levels and miliary disease<br />

were � 5 times as likely to recur compared to women with miliary disease<br />

and low IGFBP4 levels. Future studies examining these variables using a<br />

larger population and examining the biologic basis <strong>of</strong> this relationship are<br />

planned.<br />

5081 General Poster Session (Board #23A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Progression-free survival (PFS) as a surrogate end point for overall survival<br />

(OS) in first-line treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).<br />

Presenting Author: Katrin Marie Sjoquist, NHMRC <strong>Clinical</strong> Trials Centre,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Sydney, Australia<br />

Background: The duration and cost <strong>of</strong> clinical trials <strong>of</strong> first-line chemotherapy<br />

in advanced EOC could be reduced if a surrogate endpoint were<br />

used in place <strong>of</strong> OS. The consensus <strong>of</strong> the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup<br />

was that PFS is the preferred primary end point for these trials due to<br />

potential confounding <strong>of</strong> post-progression therapy on OS. We performed a<br />

systematic review to assess the extent to which treatment effect on PFS is<br />

predictive <strong>of</strong> OS in this patient population. Methods: Randomised trials <strong>of</strong><br />

first-line chemotherapy comparing platinum containing regimens in advanced<br />

EOC were identified; trials with non-platinum backbone, maintenance<br />

strategies or biological containing therapies were excluded. Summary<br />

data (hazard ratios (HR), median PFS and OS and the ratios <strong>of</strong> medians<br />

between treatment arms) were extracted. Weighted least-square (WLS) R2 by trial sample size derived using linear regression was used to report<br />

correlation. Results: 15 eligible trials with 19 treatment comparisons were<br />

identified comprising a total <strong>of</strong> 16,598 patients. There was a good<br />

correlation between treatment effect on PFS and OS (correlation <strong>of</strong> HR: r,<br />

0.88, WLS R2 , 0.71; correlation <strong>of</strong> ratios <strong>of</strong> medians: r, 0.84, WLS R2 ,<br />

0.72). Good correlation between treatment effect on PFS and OS was also<br />

observed in various prognostic subgroups (Table). Conclusions: In clinical<br />

trials <strong>of</strong> first-line platinum based chemotherapy without biological agents<br />

in advanced EOC, treatment effect on PFS and OS is highly correlated. PFS<br />

could be considered as a primary end point when evaluating future first line<br />

strategies in advanced EOC.<br />

Prognostic factors across trials<br />

low vs. high split at median Correlation for HR (r) WLS R 2<br />

Stage IV (16%) 0.94 vs. 0.75 0.79 vs. 0.57<br />

Optimal debulking (62.6%) 0.86 vs. 0.95 0.69 vs. 0.83<br />

Age (59 years) 0.93 vs. 0.86 0.77 vs. 0.66<br />

ECOG performance status ECOG 2 and 3 (10.1%) 0.95 vs. 0.89 0.81 vs. 0.76<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!