24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

364s Head and Neck Cancer<br />

5532 Poster Discussion Session (Board #23), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong> extracapsular extension on lymph node staging for patients<br />

with squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the head and neck. Presenting Author:<br />

Megan Ann Baumgart, Yale University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New Haven, CT<br />

Background: Although extracapsular extension (ECE) is a known poor<br />

prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and<br />

recommended to be collected by the current AJCC manual, it currently does<br />

not influence the final stage. We evaluated the prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> ECE in<br />

4 primary sites. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results<br />

(SEER) was queried for patients with squamous cell cancers <strong>of</strong> the oral<br />

cavity (OC), oropharynx (OP), hypopharynx (H) and larynx (L), known ECE<br />

status, M0, and diagnosed between 2004 and 2007. Survival curves were<br />

estimated by the Kaplan-Meier and compared by Cox proportional hazards<br />

models. Results: There were 23,384 patients meeting eligibility criteria,<br />

including 14,664 (62.7%) N0, 6483 (27.7%) N� without ECE (NECE),<br />

and 2237 (9.6%) with ECE. ECE was associated with decreased 3-year<br />

overall survival (OS), compared to NECE, for all lymph node stages<br />

including N1 (52% vs 61%, HR 1.32, p � 0.001), N2a (60% vs 76%, HR<br />

1.82, p�0.001), N2b (44% vs 62%, HR 1.62, p�0.001), N2c (34% vs<br />

47%, HR 1.43, p�0.001), N3 (31% vs 44%, HR 1.38, p�0.012). ECE<br />

was also an independent poor prognostic factor for cancer in the OC (HR<br />

1.43, p � 0.001), OP (HR 1.44, p � 0.001), H (HR 1.58, p � 0.01), and<br />

L (HR 1.28, p � 0.01). The comparison between ECE and NECE with one<br />

additional N degree showed no significant OS difference, except OP N1 and<br />

H N2a ECE, where survival was inferior to OP N2a and H N2b NECE<br />

respectively (Table). Conclusions: ECE is a significant predictor for poor<br />

outcomes in HNSCC, with survival equivalent to one additional degree <strong>of</strong> N<br />

involvement.<br />

N2a NECE vs<br />

N1 ECE<br />

N2b NECE vs<br />

N2a ECE<br />

N2c NECE vs<br />

N2b ECE<br />

N3 NECE vs<br />

N2c ECE<br />

Oral cavity<br />

(n�1,886)<br />

HR 1.19 (0.78-1.8;<br />

p�0.423)<br />

HR 0.77 (0.45-1.31;<br />

p�0.337)<br />

HR 0.96 (0.71-1.29;<br />

p�0.765)<br />

HR 0.98 (0.60- 1.62;<br />

p�0.950)<br />

Oropharynx<br />

(n�4,821)<br />

0.42 (0.30- 0.60;<br />

p��0.0001)<br />

0.85 (0.58-1.23;<br />

p�0.392)<br />

1.22 (0.95-1.56;<br />

p�0.124)<br />

0.72 (0.50-1.03;<br />

p�0.073)<br />

Hypopharynx<br />

(n�687)<br />

0.69 (0.38-1.23;<br />

p�0.208)<br />

0.57 (0.34-0.98;<br />

p�0.040)<br />

1.35 (0.83-2.20;<br />

p�0.222)<br />

0.96 (0.47-1.98;<br />

p�0.920)<br />

Larynx<br />

(n�1,346)<br />

1.30 (0.73-32;<br />

p�0.364)<br />

0.63 (0.35-1.12;<br />

p�0.113)<br />

0.81 (0.57-1.15;<br />

p�0.232)<br />

1.09 (0.66, 1.78;<br />

p�0.738)<br />

5534 General Poster Session (Board #21B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase II study <strong>of</strong> biweekly dose-intense docetaxel plus gemcitabine<br />

(GEM/DOC) in patients with recurrent locoregional or metastatic head and<br />

neck squamous cell carcinoma. Presenting Author: Ammar Sukari, Karmanos<br />

Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI<br />

Background: Patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell<br />

carcinoma (HNSCC) have a poor prognosis, limited treatment options, and<br />

median survival <strong>of</strong> 6 to 9 months. Docetaxel and gemcitabine have both<br />

shown activity in HNSCC. The optimal combination, dosing, and scheduling<br />

<strong>of</strong> both drugs is, however, unknown. Thus, we investigated the efficacy<br />

and safety <strong>of</strong> biweekly dose intense GEM/DOC in patients with recurrent<br />

locoregional or metastatic HNSCC. Methods: An open-label, singleinstitution,<br />

single-arm, phase II study was conducted for patients who were<br />

previously treated with no more than two cytotoxic regimens. The patients<br />

received docetaxel (60 mg/m2IV) and gemcitabine (3000 mg/m2 IV) on day<br />

1. The treatments were repeated every 14 days (one cycle), until disease<br />

progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was response<br />

rate. RECIST-defined response was evaluated every 4 cycles and toxicities<br />

were evaluated at each cycle. Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 36 patients were enrolled<br />

(M:F 26:10; median age (range), 60 years (46-79); performance status<br />

0-1) , 29 <strong>of</strong> whom were response-evaluable. The patients received a<br />

median <strong>of</strong> 4 cycles (range 0-24). Of these 29 patients, none achieved<br />

complete response (CR) and 6 demonstrated a partial response (PR). Thus,<br />

the overall response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 –<br />

0.38). Ten patients had stable disease (SD), resulting in tumor control (CR<br />

or PR or SD) in 16 <strong>of</strong> 29 patients (55%), whereas 13 patients (45%) had<br />

disease progression. The median response duration was 3.2 months (80%<br />

CI: 2.0 – 6.1 months). For all 36 patients, the median overall survival was<br />

4.2 months (95% CI: 2.4 – 7.0 months). Myelosuppression was the most<br />

common adverse event. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia were observed<br />

in 10 (30%) and 13 (39%) patients, respectively. None <strong>of</strong> these patients,<br />

however, had febrile neutropenia or bleeding events, and there were no<br />

treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> biweekly dose<br />

intense GEM/DOC was tolerable and active regimen in patients with<br />

recurrent locoregional or metastatic HNSCC. Our findings warrant further<br />

investigation in a larger patient population.<br />

5533 General Poster Session (Board #21A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Longitudinal Oncology Registry <strong>of</strong> Head and Neck Carcinoma (LORHAN):<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> African <strong>American</strong> patients. Presenting Author: David N. Hayes,<br />

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC<br />

Background: Previous retrospective analyses show poor outcomes for<br />

African <strong>American</strong> (AA) patients with head and neck carcinoma (HNC). Such<br />

racial disparities are not well understood, but patient (pt) demographics,<br />

comorbidities, tumor site, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status are<br />

suggested to play a role. Methods: The LORHAN registry was used to<br />

identify pts �18 yrs <strong>of</strong> age with de novo, non-metastatic HNC, and a record<br />

<strong>of</strong> survival time. This study evaluated pt and treatment characteristics by<br />

race, and conducted adjusted Cox regression analyses <strong>of</strong> overall survival<br />

(OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to identify prognostic factors and<br />

interactions, and estimate hazard ratios (HRs) <strong>of</strong> AA vs. non-Hispanic white<br />

(NHW). Results: Baseline pt characteristics (see table below). The median<br />

OS/3-yr rate was 41.7 mo/51% in AA vs. 52.9 mo/70% in NHW,<br />

(age-adjusted HR: 1.73 [95% CI: 1.45, 2.08]). The median PFS/3-yr rate<br />

was 29.6 mo/43% in AA and 49.9 mo/62% in NHW, (age-adjusted HR:<br />

1.64 [95%CI: 1.40, 1.93]). Multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> OS and PFS showed<br />

that AA race, stage III and IV, PS 2, and smoking were significantly<br />

associated with a worse HR, while OP demonstrated a favorable HR over<br />

other sites. Significant interaction tests led to subgroup analyses for OS<br />

showing an elevated risk in AA with OP (HR: 2.62 [95%CI: 1.95, 3.52])<br />

and similar risk elevations in male AA as well as in AA with PS 0-1 when<br />

compared to NHW in the corresponding subgroups. Conclusions: Controlling<br />

for other factors like PS and smoking, a worse prognosis was seen in AA<br />

males with OP localized SCCHN. Further investigation to improve the<br />

outcomes in this population is warranted.<br />

AA<br />

n�385<br />

NHW<br />

n�2,733 p value<br />

Age Yrs, mean (SD) 58.9 (10.1) 59.8 (10.8) 0.13<br />

Sex Male 295 (76.6%) 2,143 (78.4%) 0.43<br />

Smoking Yes 341 (88.6%) 2,133 (78.1%) �0.0001<br />

Alcohol Yes 331 (86.0%) 2,278 (83.4%) 0.19<br />

Site Hypopharynx 32 (8.3%) 102 (3.7%) �0.0001<br />

Larynx 134 (34.8%) 549 (20.1%)<br />

Oral cavity 43 (11.7%) 439 (16.1%)<br />

Oropharynx (OP) 143 (37.1%) 1,290 (47.2%)<br />

Stage I, II 155 (41.5%) 1,399 (52.1%) �0.0001<br />

III, IV 218 (59.3%) 1,284 (47.8%)<br />

PS 0, 1 308 (80.4%) 2,496 (91.7%) �0.0001<br />

HPV test in OP<br />

patients only<br />

Completed 21 (25.3%) 194 (24.1%)<br />

HPV result in OP<br />

patients only<br />

Pos 8 (38.1%) 159 (82.4%) �0.0001<br />

5535 General Poster Session (Board #21C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

An open-labeled, multicentric clinical study <strong>of</strong> cetuximab combined with<br />

intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plus concurrent chemotherapy in<br />

locoregionally advanced (LA) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): A 2-year<br />

follow-up report. Presenting Author: Chun-yan Chen, Cancer Center, Sun<br />

Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China<br />

Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy outcomes <strong>of</strong> concurrent<br />

cetuximab plus IMRT and cisplatin in Chinese patients with LA NPC.<br />

Methods: Patients with primary stage III-IVb (UICC/AJCC 2002 staging<br />

system) and non-keratinizing NPC were enrolled in this prospective,<br />

multicentric, phase II study. Cisplatin (80mg/m2 ,q3week) and cetuximab<br />

(400mg/m2 one w before radiation, and then 250mg/m2 /w) were given<br />

concurrently. The prescription dose <strong>of</strong> IMRT to GTVnx (primary tumor in<br />

nasopharynx) was 66 Gy - 75.9 Gy, GTVnd (positive cervical lymph nodes)<br />

was 60 Gy - 70Gy, The response rate was evaluated according to RECIST<br />

1.0 criteria, and adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE<br />

V3.0 criteria. Results: From July 2008 to April 2009, 100 patients were<br />

enrolled (74 male), with median age <strong>of</strong> 43 years. The proportion <strong>of</strong> stage<br />

III, IVa and IVb patients were 71%, 22% and 7% respectively. 99% <strong>of</strong><br />

enrolled patients completed the planned treatment. AEs were within the<br />

expected range and manageable. No toxic death occurred during the<br />

treatment. Acneiform skin eruptions, mucositis, in-field dermatitis, xerostomia<br />

and neucopenia were the most common seen AEs, with 64% grade 2/3<br />

acneiform eruptions, 26% grade 2/3 in-field dermatitis, 90% � grade 2<br />

mucositis (2 cases <strong>of</strong> grade 4 mucositis with spontaneous bleeding), 40%<br />

� grade 2 xerostomia and 8% grade 2/3 neucopenia. With a median<br />

follow-up time <strong>of</strong> 23.5 months, the 2 year overall survival (OS), disease-free<br />

survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival, regional (cervical lymph<br />

node) recurrence free survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates for<br />

the ITT population were 91%, 89%, 90%, 90% and 89%, respectively<br />

Multivariate analysis showed that N stage was the only prognostic factor for<br />

OS (p�0.0392, HR�2.946) and DFS (p�0.0062, HR�4.246) in these<br />

patients. Conclusions: Cetuximab combined with IMRT plus concurrent<br />

cisplatin in patients with LA NPC shows satisfactory 2-year locoregional<br />

control rate and 2-year overall survival. The combination seems to be well<br />

tolerated with a manageable side-effect pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!