24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

524 Poster Discussion Session (Board #14), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Vasomotor (VM) and musculoskeletal (MSK) symptoms and association<br />

with outcomes on extended adjuvant letrozole therapy: Analyses from NCIC<br />

CTG MA.17. Presenting Author: Pedro Emanuel Rubini Liedke, Massachusetts<br />

General Hospital, Avon International Breast Cancer Center, Boston,<br />

MA<br />

Background: Surrogate markers <strong>of</strong> clinical outcomes can potentially guide<br />

cancer therapy. New onset MSK symptoms and VM symptoms on aromatase<br />

inhibitors (AI) for hormone receptor positive (HR�) early breast cancer<br />

(EBC) have been investigated as markers <strong>of</strong> clinical outcomes, but results<br />

have been conflicting. MA.17 showed improved disease free survival (DFS)<br />

with letrozole (L) as extended adjuvant therapy after 5 years <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen<br />

(T). We performed this exploratory analysis <strong>of</strong> new onset symptoms and<br />

their association with clinical outcomes in the MA.17 trial. Methods:<br />

Patients (pts) with HR� EBC were randomized to receive L or placebo (P)<br />

for 5 years after 5 years <strong>of</strong> T. Symptoms were collected according to CTC v.<br />

2.0 at baseline, 1 month (mo), 6 mos, and every 12 mos thereafter.<br />

Analyses included pts with new symptoms <strong>of</strong> any grade who received<br />

therapy and excluded pts with baseline symptoms, EBC not HR�, and<br />

deaths/ relapses prior to each time point. Symptoms were categorized as<br />

VM - hot flashes/flushes, flushing, or sweating; and MSK - arthritis,<br />

arthralgia, myalgia, bone pain, or MSK other. Multivariate Cox Models<br />

adjusting for age, nodal status, duration <strong>of</strong> T and prior chemotherapy were<br />

used for analysis <strong>of</strong> DFS, distant DFS (DDFS), and overall survival (OS)<br />

assessed before unblinding. Hazard Ratios [HR] and 95% confidence<br />

intervals (CI) for patients with either VM or MSK symptoms are presented<br />

below for L using pts with no symptoms as controls. Results: Emergent VM<br />

symptoms were associated with improved DFS and DDFS on L (Table). No<br />

association was found for MSK symptoms at any time point. No association<br />

between either MSK or VM and OS was found at any time point.<br />

Conclusions: New VM symptoms initiating with extended letrozole were<br />

associated with improved outcomes. Similar findings have been seen with<br />

up-front AI therapy. Our results should be confirmed as they are <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

significance in guiding therapy.<br />

Month <strong>of</strong> assessment<br />

VM<br />

1<br />

HR (95% CI)<br />

6 12<br />

DFS 0.22 (0.05-0.92) 0.25 (0.07-0.85) 0.42 (0.15-1.18)<br />

DDFS<br />

MSK<br />

0.17 (0.02-1.26) 0.13 (0.02-0.99) 0.54 (0.16-1.81)<br />

DFS 2.33 (0.54-10.04) 0.70 (0.24-2.07) 0.68 (0.24-1.91)<br />

DDFS 1.91 (0.25-14.74) 0.57 (0.13-2.58) 0.45 (0.10-2.15)<br />

526 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Common polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor-1 may determine risk <strong>of</strong><br />

hot flashes in early breast cancer patients using tamoxifen. Presenting<br />

Author: Vincent O. Dezentje, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology, Leiden<br />

University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands<br />

Background: In breast cancer patients the occurrence <strong>of</strong> hot flashes as<br />

common side effect <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen therapy may be associated with effective<br />

estrogen receptor antagonism dependent on genetic variations <strong>of</strong> metabolic<br />

enzymes and the estrogen receptor. Methods: 742 early breast cancer<br />

patients who were randomized to receive tamoxifen, followed by exemestane<br />

after 2.5 to 3 years within the Tamoxifen Exemestane Adjuvant<br />

Multinational (TEAM) Trial were genotyped for 30 germ line genetic<br />

variants <strong>of</strong> 11 enzymes that are involved in the tamoxifen metabolism and<br />

the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1). These genetic variants were related to the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> hot flashes during the first year <strong>of</strong> tamoxifen use (primary<br />

aim) and during the complete tamoxifen treatment period (secondary aim).<br />

A multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for age and adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy. Results: No genetic variant was associated with the occurrence<br />

<strong>of</strong> hot flashes during the first year. Higher age was related to a lower<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> hot flashes in the first year (adjusted odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI<br />

0.92-0.96; p�0.001). The ESR1 PvuII XbaI CG haplotype (CG/CG vs<br />

CG/other � other/other: adjusted odds ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.92;<br />

p�0.03), ESR1 PvuII XbaI TA haplotype (TA/TA � TA/other vs other/other:<br />

adjusted odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.09-3.14; p�0.02) and age (adjusted<br />

odds ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; p�0.001) were associated with the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> hot flashes during the total tamoxifen treatment period. No<br />

association was found between the CYP2D6 predicted phenotype and hot<br />

flashes. Conclusions: Common polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor-1<br />

might help to predict the occurrence <strong>of</strong> hot flashes in breast cancer patients<br />

treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. If replicated, this may provide clinicians<br />

with a tool to <strong>of</strong>fer more personalized hormonal therapy.<br />

Breast Cancer—HER2/ER<br />

13s<br />

525 Poster Discussion Session (Board #15), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Genetic variants associated with toxicity-related discontinuation <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />

aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Presenting Author: Norah Lynn<br />

Henry, University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI<br />

Background: Discontinuation <strong>of</strong> adjuvant AI therapy due to intolerable<br />

symptoms occurs in up to 30% <strong>of</strong> patients. Predictors <strong>of</strong> which patients will<br />

be unable to tolerate these medications have not been defined. We<br />

hypothesized that inherited variants in candidate genes are associated with<br />

treatment discontinuation because <strong>of</strong> AI-associated toxicity. Methods: We<br />

prospectively evaluated reasons for treatment discontinuation in women<br />

with hormone receptor positive breast cancer initiating adjuvant AI through<br />

a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial <strong>of</strong> exemestane (exe)<br />

versus letrozole (let). Using multiple genetic models, we evaluated potential<br />

associations between 136 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in<br />

24 candidate genes, selected a priori, primarily with roles in estrogen<br />

metabolism and signaling, and discontinuation <strong>of</strong> AI therapy because <strong>of</strong><br />

toxicity. To account for multiple comparisons, statistical significance was<br />

defined as p�0.0003. Results: Of the 467 enrolled patients who had<br />

available germ line DNA, 152 (33%) discontinued AI therapy because <strong>of</strong><br />

toxicity. After adjusting for multiple covariates, multivariable analyses<br />

revealed that two inherited genetic variants in ESR1, which encodes<br />

estrogen receptor (ER) alpha, and one in CYP19A1 were associated with<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> discontinuation <strong>of</strong> AI therapy because <strong>of</strong> toxicity (Table). A<br />

variant in NCOR1 (ER co-repressor) was associated with decreased risk <strong>of</strong><br />

discontinuation <strong>of</strong> letrozole because <strong>of</strong> toxicity. Conclusions: Variants in<br />

genes involved in estrogen metabolism and signaling may be associated<br />

with toxicity <strong>of</strong> AI therapy.<br />

Statistical model Gene SNP AI HR (95% CI) p value<br />

Recessive CYP19A1 rs28566535 Either 8.2 (2.7-24.9) �0.0002<br />

Exe 8.1 (1.6-41) 0.012<br />

Let 7.5 (1.5-38.1) 0.016<br />

ESR1 rs9322335 Either 4.2 (2-8.6) �0.0001<br />

Exe 10.5 (2.9-38.7) �0.0004<br />

Let 3.3 (1.2-9.1) 0.018<br />

ESR1 rs9322336 Either 3.7 (1.8-7.4) �0.0004<br />

Exe 7.2 (2.7-19.5) 0.0001<br />

Let 3 (1-8.8) 0.050<br />

Additive NCOR1 rs1065822 Either 0.7 (0.5-0.9) 0.015<br />

Exe 1.1 (0.7-1.6) 0.77<br />

Let 0.3 (0.2-0.6) �0.0002<br />

527 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> adjuvant trastuzumab on outcomes <strong>of</strong> HER2-positive breast<br />

cancer patients treated with HER2-targeted therapy in the metastatic<br />

setting. Presenting Author: Rashmi Krishna Murthy, University <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />

M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Trastuzumab (T) was approved for the adjuvant treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

women with early-stage, HER-2 overexpressing (HER2�) breast cancer in<br />

2006. There are limited data outlining the outcomes <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

HER2� breast cancer who receive adjuvant T-based therapy and then<br />

receive T and/or lapatinib in the metastatic setting. Methods: We identified<br />

540 patients with HER2� breast cancer treated with T or lapatinib as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> their first-line treatment for metastatic disease from 01/1997 to<br />

11/2011. HER-2 positivity was assessed by immunohistochemistry (score,<br />

3�) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (HER2/CEP17 ratio � 2). We<br />

excluded 17 patients from this analysis because they were either lost to<br />

follow-up or received less than 2 cycles <strong>of</strong> therapy at the institution.<br />

Statistical analyses were performed using the chi-square test to compare<br />

proportions between groups and the Cox proportional hazards regression<br />

analysis to compare survival times and estimate the corresponding hazard<br />

ratio with 95% confidence interval. Results: Of the 523 patients eligible for<br />

analysis, 76 patients had received T in the adjuvant setting and 447 had<br />

not. In the group who did not receive adjuvant T, 48% (213/447) <strong>of</strong><br />

patients achieved a complete or partial response (CR/PR), whereas only<br />

13% (14/76) achieved a CR/PR in the adjuvant T group (P�.0001). After<br />

adjustment for age, disease-free interval, post-menopausal status, stage at<br />

presentation, ER/PR status, and nuclear grade, the odds ratio was 0.27 (CI<br />

0.13 - 0.56, p � 0.0004). Overall survival from first evidence <strong>of</strong> metastasis<br />

was significantly longer in the group who did not receive adjuvant T (39<br />

months vs. 24 months, HR � 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4). For OS, the adjusted<br />

hazard ratio was 1.5 (CI 1.04 - 2.1, p � 0.029). Age, DFI and stage were<br />

also significant predictors <strong>of</strong> OS. Conclusions: Patients with HER2�<br />

metastatic breast cancer who were T naive, had a higher response rate<br />

(CR/PR) to front line HER2 targeted therapy and a longer OS compared to<br />

patients with metastatic HER2� breast cancer who received T in the<br />

adjuvant setting. These findings highlight the importance <strong>of</strong> recognizing a<br />

pre-treated population and calls for further research in this area.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!