24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5528 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

A phase II trial <strong>of</strong> cetuximab in high-risk premalignant lesions <strong>of</strong> the upper<br />

aerodigestive tract. Presenting Author: Joseph A Califano, Johns Hopkins<br />

University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Baltimore, MD<br />

Background: High risk head and neck premalignancy includes patients with<br />

prior HNSCC and loss <strong>of</strong> heterozygosity (LOH). These patients demonstrate<br />

30-60% rates <strong>of</strong> progression to malignancy despite conventional surgical<br />

excision. We performed a phase II trial using short term therapy with<br />

cetuximab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR, in<br />

the treatment <strong>of</strong> high risk premalignant lesions <strong>of</strong> the UADT. Methods:<br />

Inclusion criteria required; 1) presence <strong>of</strong> 3p, 9p21, or 17p LOH, and/or 2)<br />

surgically unresectable high grade premalignant lesions, and/or 3) high<br />

grade premalignancy after curative therapy for HNSCC. Patients received<br />

cetuximab 400 mg/m2 on week one followed by 250 mg/m2 on week 2-8 or<br />

observation, with the option for crossover to cetuximab for patients<br />

originally randomized to the observation arm. Histologic grade (1�benign,<br />

2�mild dysplasia, 3�moderate dysplasia, 4�severe dysplasia/carcinoma<br />

in situ, 5�invasive cancer) and change in grade <strong>of</strong> dysplasia was evaluated.<br />

Results: 19 patients were enrolled. Two patients discontinued therapy due<br />

to toxicity. We noted a decrease in grade <strong>of</strong> dysplasia in the cetuximab<br />

treated group (-1.0) vs. the observation group (-0.2), (Wilcoxon test p value<br />

� 0.18). In the observation group, 0/5 patients (0%) underwent complete<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> dysplasia; while 4/12 (33.3%) treated patients had no<br />

remaining dysplasia after therapy (p � 0.26), three <strong>of</strong> these patients had<br />

complete resolution <strong>of</strong> dysplastic changes after cetuximab therapy alone.<br />

Of these three patients, two have had no recurrence <strong>of</strong> leukoplakia or<br />

dysplasia at 1.5 and 2 years. One patient treated with oral cavity dysplasia<br />

has had no recurrence <strong>of</strong> dysplasia or lesions within the oral cavity, but<br />

developed a hypopharyngeal cancer at 1.5 years after trial completion. Of 5<br />

patients randomized to observation, three underwent crossover to cetuximab<br />

therapy, and two <strong>of</strong> these three patients had complete resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

dysplasia. Conclusions: EGFR blockade with cetuximab alone can result in<br />

significant, durable, and complete clinical and histological resolution <strong>of</strong><br />

moderate to severe dysplasia in at least a subset <strong>of</strong> high risk patients.<br />

5530 Poster Discussion Session (Board #21), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> institutional head and neck cancer (HNC) clinical trial<br />

accrual on overall survival (OS): An analysis <strong>of</strong> RTOG 0129. Presenting<br />

Author: Evan John Wuthrick, Ohio State University Medical Center-James<br />

Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH<br />

Background: NCCN recommends HNC patients (pts) be treated by providers<br />

with experience in HNC management. Whether treatment by experienced<br />

providers (measured by no. <strong>of</strong> pts treated) is associated with HNC survival<br />

outcome is unknown. Methods: Analysis included 471 pts in RTOG 0129<br />

with stage III-IVa HNC with known tumor HPV and smoking status<br />

randomized to cisplatin concurrent with standard or accelerated fractionation<br />

radiotherapy (RT). <strong>Part</strong>icipating centers were stratified into pt accrual<br />

tertiles (ATs) to 21 RTOG HNC trials from 1997-2002. As a surrogate for<br />

experience, we investigated the independent effect <strong>of</strong> AT on OS and<br />

progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariable cox proportional hazards<br />

models. Results: Median follow up was 4.8 yrs (range 1.1 - 6.5). In<br />

Kaplan-Meier analysis, OS and PFS for pts at centers in the two lower AT<br />

(low accruing centers [LAC]) were similar and compared to the upper AT<br />

(high accruing centers [HAC]). Median accrual in LAC vs HAC was 11 vs 82<br />

pts. Pts treated at LAC and HAC had similar age, HPV status, pack-years, N<br />

stage, comorbidities and study arm assignment (SAA), but pts at LAC had<br />

better performance status (PS)(Zubrod 0; 62% vs 52%; p�0.04), fewer T4<br />

tumors (27% vs. 35%; p�0.05) and were more likely uninsured (12% vs<br />

4%; p�0.009). Compared to HAC, LAC pts had significantly worse OS, (5<br />

yr 51.0% vs 69.1%; p � 0.002), and PFS (5 yr 42.7% vs 61.8%; p �<br />

0.001) and more locoregional failure (5 yr 36.4% vs 20.8%; p �0.001).<br />

Treatment at LAC was associated with ~90% increase in risk <strong>of</strong> death (OS<br />

HR 1.91, 95%CI 1.37-2.65) and progression (PFS HR 1.89, 95%CI<br />

1.39-2.56) when compared to pts treated at HAC, after adjustment for age,<br />

PS, pack-years, T and N stage, SAA and HPV status. Acute and chronic<br />

toxicities, RT dose, fractions, and treatment duration did not differ for pts<br />

at LAC vs HAC. RT at LAC was more likely than HAC to differ from protocol<br />

(18% [16.8% acceptable variation {AV}, 1.2% unacceptable deviation<br />

{UD}] vs 6% [4.7% AV, 1.3% UD]; p�0.001). Conclusions: Pts with HNC<br />

treated at LAC in RTOG trials were associated with significantly worse<br />

survival outcomes compared to pts treated at HAC.<br />

Head and Neck Cancer<br />

363s<br />

5529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #20), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Prognostic significance <strong>of</strong> the AJCC staging in patients with squamous cell<br />

carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the oropharynx. Presenting Author: Carlos Rodrigo Acevedo-<br />

Gadea, Yale University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New Haven, CT<br />

Background: There have been significant changes in the epidemiology <strong>of</strong><br />

head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), with an increase in the<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> oropharyngeal (OP) cancer and opposite effect in other sites.<br />

Since the rise in OP cancer incidence is attributed to human papillomavirus<br />

(HPV), which is associated with a different biology and clinical behavior, we<br />

evaluated whether the current AJCC system retained its prognostic impact<br />

in this patient population. Methods: The Surveillance Epidemiology and<br />

End Results (SEER) registry was queried for patients with HNSCC diagnosed<br />

between 2004 and 2007. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the<br />

Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox model was used to compare the survival<br />

curves for each AJCC stage. Patients were grouped into three anatomical<br />

locations: oral cavity (OC), larynx (L) and OP. Results: There were 26,520<br />

patients meeting eligibility criteria, including 8622 OP, 7332 OC, and<br />

10566 L. The AJCC staging retained its prognostic significance across all<br />

stages for patients with HNSCC <strong>of</strong> the OC and L. Patients with OP cancer,<br />

however, had similar 4-year survival for stages I through IVA, whereas stage<br />

IVB and IVC had a significantly decrease survival compared to IVA and IVB<br />

respectively (Table). Conclusions: The OS for stages III and IVA OP cancer is<br />

similar to those with stages I and II, in an effect that may be attributed to<br />

the increased frequency <strong>of</strong> HPV in this population, rendering the tumors<br />

more sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation. Therefore, the AJCC stage in<br />

OP cancer may be more useful in guiding the therapy than as a prognostic<br />

factor.<br />

4-year OS according to tumor site and stage.<br />

Oral cavity Larynx Oropharynx<br />

I 72.9% 71.6% 62.4%<br />

II 59.3% Vs I (HR 1.91, 64.0% Vs I (HR 1.51, 57.7% Vs I (HR 1.14,<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.22)<br />

III 44.5% Vs II (HR 1.51, 48.9% Vs II (HR 1.68, 67.2% Vs II (HR 0.81,<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.017)<br />

IVA 33.9% Vs III (HR 1.49, 39.3% Vs III (HR 1.29, 63.9% Vs III (HR 1.16,<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.014)<br />

IVB 27.2% Vs IVA (HR 1.46, 23.1% Vs IVA (HR 1.85, 42.6% Vs IVA (HR 1.99,<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

IVC 12.0% Vs IVB (HR 1.74, 16.6% Vs IVB (HR 1.28, 22.2% Vs IVB (HR 2.14,<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

p � 0.027)<br />

p � 0.001)<br />

5531 Poster Discussion Session (Board #22), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Outcomes <strong>of</strong> HIV patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for<br />

squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (SCCHN). Presenting<br />

Author: Waleed F Mourad, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: SCCHN with HIV is a challenging clinical situation in the<br />

medical arena due to limited data. We report our outcomes and the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemotherapy (CT) and HPV on this patient (pt) population Methods: This<br />

is a single institution retrospective study <strong>of</strong> 71 HIV pts with SCCHN treated<br />

from 1998-2011. The median age at RT and HIV diagnosis was 51 (32-72)<br />

and 34 (25-50) respectively. HIV duration was 11 yrs (6-20). Stage I-II, III<br />

and IV were 22, 27 and 51% respectively. Pts treated with RT alone were<br />

37% and CRT 63% {CDDP 91%}. Fifty pts were on HAART during<br />

treatment and 50% <strong>of</strong> pts with SCC <strong>of</strong> the oropharynx were HPV�. Median<br />

dose <strong>of</strong> 70, 63 and 54 Gy were delivered at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction to gross<br />

disease, high and low risk neck respectively. Twelve pts (17%) underwent<br />

neck dissection for N3 Results: With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 50 months<br />

(12-140) the median weight loss was 20 lbs (6-40). Acute skin desquamation<br />

and mucositis grades � 2 and 3 were 76 and 24% respectively.<br />

Treatment breaks � 10 and 5 days were 7 and 21% respectively. One pt<br />

died from induction CT, 1 was hospitalized for grade 4 mucositis and 1<br />

developed osteoradionecrosis during CRT. Late dysphagia grades � 2, 3<br />

and 4 were 74, 15 and 11%. Late xerostomia grades � 2 and 3 were 77<br />

and 23% respectively. The median CD4 count and viral load before, during<br />

and after treatment were 370, 135, 100 and 0, 160, 260 respectively.<br />

Seven pts (10%) developed second primary malignancy. The 4 yr locoregional<br />

control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were 69% and 55%<br />

respectively. Chi-square test shows significant relationship between LRC<br />

and RT duration, as well as between CT and lower CD4 counts and higher<br />

viral load (P�0.001). Positive trends were observed between (weight loss<br />

�10% and LRC) and (absence <strong>of</strong> second malignancy and OS) (P�0.271).<br />

There was no significant relationship between HPV �ve or CT on either LRC<br />

or OS. Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong> CT to RT yielded higher morbidity and<br />

mortality without clear benefit on LRC or OS. HIV per se seems to have a -ve<br />

impact on HPV �ve pts outcomes. Comparing observed rates <strong>of</strong> LRC and<br />

OS, our data show that RT�CT administered for HIV �ve pts with SCCHN<br />

appears to be less effective than HIV-ve pts. Larger size studies are<br />

warranted to optimize the management <strong>of</strong> this growing patient population.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!