24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86s Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology<br />

1500 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

A phase III prevention trial <strong>of</strong> low-dose tamoxifen in HRT users: The HOT<br />

trial. Presenting Author: Bernardo Bonanni, European Institute <strong>of</strong> Oncology,<br />

Milan, Italy<br />

Background: Primary prevention trials have shown that tamoxifen (T) lowers<br />

ER� breast cancer (BC) incidence, but adverse events are a barrier to its<br />

broad use. The Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Trial showed a positive<br />

risk/benefit ratio in the subgroup <strong>of</strong> hormone replacement therapy (HRT)<br />

users in the T arm, with fewer BC and no cardiovascular disease (CVD)<br />

excess. In a dose-ranging study, T 5 mg/day showed a favorable biomarker<br />

modulation in HRT users. We conducted a multicentre, phase III, BC<br />

prevention trial in current or de novo HRT users, randomized to either T 5<br />

mg/day or placebo (P) for 5 yrs, with 5yrs follow-up. Methods: The study was<br />

powered to detect a 40% decrease <strong>of</strong> BC on T from an annual rate <strong>of</strong><br />

4/1000 on P with 20% dropout and 5y recruitment. All analyses were<br />

performed on ITT basis. The cumulative incidence <strong>of</strong> events was determined<br />

using Kaplan-Meier methods. The two treatment groups were<br />

compared by using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%<br />

confidence intervals were obtained using Cox proportional regression<br />

model. All P values were two-sided. Results: Due to the WHI-HRT trial<br />

results, recruitment was lower than anticipated, with a total <strong>of</strong> 1884<br />

subjects being randomized (946 P and 938 T arm, respectively). 79% were<br />

�50 years old at study entry. 66% were normal weight, 21% were<br />

hysterectomized; 80% were already on HRT at baseline, 53% were on<br />

trasdermal route and 28% had 5y-Gail risk�1.5%. At 7.7y mean follow-up,<br />

43 BC were diagnosed, 24 (annual rate 4.1/1000) on P and 19 (3.3/1000)<br />

on T (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.44-1.46). The efficacy <strong>of</strong> T was greater in<br />

luminal-A type (HR�0.32, 95% CI, 012-086). CVD events were rare<br />

(including 1 DVT on T), with no statistical difference between arms. A HR <strong>of</strong><br />

4.74 (95% CI, 1.96-11.5) was observed for benign endometrial polyps,<br />

but no increase <strong>of</strong> uterine cancers (3 on P vs 1 on T). Menopausal<br />

symptoms were more frequent on T, whereas headache was less frequent on<br />

T. Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> low-dose T and HRT is safe and provides<br />

a promising way to retain the benefits while reducing the risks <strong>of</strong> either<br />

agent. While the insufficient power <strong>of</strong> our study prevents firmer conclusions,<br />

it supports further studies <strong>of</strong> low-dose T in the prevention setting.<br />

1502 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

BMI, long-term changes in BMI, and risk <strong>of</strong> cancer mortality in a large<br />

cohort study. Presenting Author: Nilo<strong>of</strong>ar Taghizadeh, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands<br />

Background: There are indications <strong>of</strong> an association between Body Mass<br />

Index (BMI) and risk <strong>of</strong> different cancer types. There is dispute whether this<br />

association differs between males and females. Methods: We studied the<br />

association <strong>of</strong> BMI at the first survey with risk <strong>of</strong> mortality from the most<br />

common types <strong>of</strong> cancer (lung, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer) in a<br />

large general population-based cohort study (Vlagtwedde-Vlaardingen,<br />

1965-1990) with follow-up on mortality status until 2009. Additionally,<br />

we assessed this association based on tertiles <strong>of</strong> the annual change in BMI<br />

(defined as the difference between BMI at last survey and first survey<br />

divided by the time between last and first survey). We used 3 categories <strong>of</strong><br />

BMI (� 25 kg/m2 , 25-30 kg/m2 , and � 30 kg/m2 ) and changes in BMI<br />

(� 0.02 kg/m2 /yr, 0.02-0.2 kg/m2 /yr, and � 0.2 kg/m2 /yr) in the analyses.<br />

The multivariate Cox regression model was adjusted for age, smoking,<br />

gender. Analyses were additionally stratified by gender and smoking.<br />

Results: Among all 8645 subjects, 1194 died due to cancer (lung cancer:<br />

275; colorectal cancer: 134; breast cancer: 117; prostate cancer: 83).<br />

Mortality from all types <strong>of</strong> cancer was significantly increased in subjects<br />

with BMI � 30 kg/m2 (HR (95 % CI)) � 1.22 (1.00-1.48)), especially in<br />

females (1.38 (1.06-1.81)) and in never smokers (1.39 (1.02-1.90)).<br />

Prostate cancer mortality was significantly increased in males with BMI<br />

25-30 kg/m2 (2.04 (1.90-3.83)) and � 30 kg/m2 (2.61 (1.02-6.67)). This<br />

association between prostate cancer mortality and BMI was higher in<br />

smokers. Lung cancer mortality risk was decreased in subjects with BMI<br />

25-30 kg/m2 (0.71 (0.54-0.93)) and � 30 kg/m2 (0.82 (0.50-1.32)),<br />

especially in males, in smokers, and in smoking males. There were no<br />

significant associations between BMI and colorectal or breast cancer<br />

mortality nor between change in BMI and mortality from all analyzed types<br />

<strong>of</strong> cancer. Conclusions: We show that an increase in BMI is associated with<br />

an increased risk <strong>of</strong> mortality from all types <strong>of</strong> cancer in females and with<br />

an increased mortality risk from prostate cancer in males but with a<br />

decreased lung cancer mortality risk, especially in males. More research is<br />

needed into the biological mechanisms that link BMI to cancer.<br />

1501 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Estrogen plus progestin (E�P) and breast cancer incidence and mortality.<br />

Presenting Author: Rowan T. Chlebowski, Los Angeles Biomedical Research<br />

Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA<br />

Background: In the WHI clinical trial, E�P increased both breast cancer<br />

incidence and breast cancer mortality (JAMA 2010;304:1684). In contrast,<br />

breast cancers associated with E�P use in most observational studies<br />

have a more favorable prognosis. To address differences, a cohort <strong>of</strong> WHI<br />

Observational Study participants with characteristics similar to the WHI<br />

clinical trial was identified to examine E�P association with invasive breast<br />

cancer incidence and outcome. Methods: 41,449 postmenopausal women<br />

with no prior hysterectomy and mammogram negative for breast cancer � 2<br />

years before who either were not hormone users (25,328) or were using<br />

E�P (16,121) were identified. Breast cancers were verified by centralized<br />

medical record review. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression was<br />

used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).<br />

Additional analyses adjusted for breast cancer screening, censoring participants<br />

for incidence analyses who had a � 2 year interval without a<br />

mammogram. Results: After a mean (SD) follow-up 11.3 (3.1) years, 2,236<br />

breast cancers were diagnosed. Breast cancer incidence was higher in E�P<br />

users (0.60% vs 0.42%, annualized rate, respectively: HR 1.55, 95% CI<br />

1.41-1.70, P�0.001). Screening adjusted analyses had stronger breast<br />

cancer association (0.63% vs 0.39%, HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.54-1.93;<br />

P�0.001). Survival following breast cancer, measured from diagnosis<br />

date, was similar in E�P users and non-users (HR 0.95, 95% CI<br />

0.74-1.23). Breast cancer mortality, analyzed from cohort entry date, are<br />

shown in the table. Conclusions: E�P use is associated with increased<br />

breast cancer incidence. As breast cancer prognosis following diagnosis on<br />

E�P is similar to that <strong>of</strong> nonusers, the higher incidence with E�P leads to<br />

increased breast cancer mortality.<br />

Deaths from breast cancer HR (95% CI) P values<br />

Screening adjusted*<br />

No 1.32 (0.90-1.93) 0.15<br />

Yes 1.54 (1.00-2.39) 0.052<br />

Deaths after breast cancer diagnosis<br />

Screening adjusted *<br />

No 1.65 (1.29-2.12) �0.001<br />

Yes 2.21 (1.66-2.94) �0.001<br />

* Censored for breast cancer diagnosis when time w/o mammogram � 2 yrs.<br />

1503 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Long-term therapy with thiazolidinediones and the risk <strong>of</strong> bladder cancer: A<br />

cohort study. Presenting Author: Ronac Mamtani, Perelman School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine at the University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: The US Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory<br />

agencies recently warned prescribers that use <strong>of</strong> pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione<br />

(TZD), may increase the risk <strong>of</strong> bladder cancer. France and Germany<br />

removed the drug from their markets, although the rest <strong>of</strong> Europe did not.<br />

However, no information was available about the risk from alternative TZDs.<br />

We aimed to compare bladder cancer risk over time with use <strong>of</strong> TZDs<br />

relative to sulfonylureas (SUs), and between pioglitazone and rosiglitazone.<br />

Methods: We conducted a cohort study <strong>of</strong> patients with type 2 diabetes who<br />

initiated treatment with a TZD or SU using The Health Improvement<br />

Network (2000-2010), a UK general practitioner medical record database.<br />

Incident cancers within the database were identified. We computed hazard<br />

ratios (HRs) <strong>of</strong> bladder cancer for TZDs in comparison to the reference<br />

group <strong>of</strong> SU users. Results: There were 60 incident diagnoses <strong>of</strong> bladder<br />

cancer in the TZD cohort (n�18,459) and 137 in the SU cohort<br />

(n�41,396). There was no significant difference in bladder cancer risk<br />

between the cohorts (HR 0·93, [95% CI 0·68-1·29]), but most use was<br />

short-term use. In contrast, the risk <strong>of</strong> bladder cancer increased with<br />

increasing time since initiation <strong>of</strong> TZD versus SU therapy (HRs 1·15, 1·40,<br />

and 1·72 for 3-4, 4-5, and � 5 years, respectively; P-trend�0·033).<br />

Bladder cancer risk also increased with increasing time since initiation <strong>of</strong><br />

pioglitazone (P-trend�0·001) and rosiglitazone (P-trend�0·006). Direct<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> pioglitazone to rosiglitazone did not demonstrate significant<br />

differences in cancer risk with increasing time since initiation (Ptrend�0·12)<br />

or duration <strong>of</strong> therapy (P-trend�0·75). Conclusions: Longterm<br />

TZD therapy is associated with an increased risk <strong>of</strong> bladder cancer,<br />

which appears to be a class effect.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!