24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

642s Sarcoma<br />

10048 General Poster Session (Board #48A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Differential gene expression in liposarcoma: Insight into pathways for<br />

dedifferentiation? Presenting Author: Dale Han, H. Lee M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer<br />

Canter & Research Institute, Tampa, FL<br />

Background: Liposarcoma (LPS) dedifferentiation signifies conversion to a<br />

clinically aggressive phenotype, but the biologic processes required for this<br />

change have not been determined. We describe differential gene expression<br />

patterns between well-differentiated (WD) and dedifferentiated (DD)<br />

tumors to determine pathways involved in LPS dedifferentiation. Methods:<br />

From 1999 to 2006, 121 fatty tumors were resected at a single institution.<br />

Twenty tumors, consisting <strong>of</strong> atypical lipomatous tumors (ALT), WD LPS or<br />

DD LPS, were randomly selected and clinicopathologic characteristics were<br />

retrospectively reviewed. Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling was performed on<br />

extracted RNA using the Affymetrix GeneChip platform. Differentially<br />

expressed genes were obtained and gene network analysis was done using<br />

GeneGO by MetaCore. Results: Median age was 59 years and 70% <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

were male. WD tumors, consisting <strong>of</strong> 3 ALT and 6 WD LPS, were compared<br />

with 11 DD LPS. After a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 64 months, 7 patients had<br />

died <strong>of</strong> whom 6 had DD LPS. DD histology was associated with lower overall<br />

survival (p�0.05). Significance Analysis <strong>of</strong> Microarrays for WD tumors vs.<br />

DD LPS using a 0% false discovery rate showed differential expression <strong>of</strong><br />

188 genes. Network analysis <strong>of</strong> genes from WD tumors vs. DD LPS showed<br />

significant (p�0.001) differential regulation <strong>of</strong> glucose-activated transcription<br />

factor ChREBP (carbohydrate response element binding protein), a key<br />

element involved in lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis and glycolysis. There was<br />

also significant differential regulation <strong>of</strong> insulin signaling, PI3K-dependent<br />

and PKA signal transduction pathways and <strong>of</strong> amino acid, fatty acid and<br />

glucose metabolism pathways (p�0.05). These pathways, based on Gene<br />

Ontology cellular processes, mapped to gene networks primarily involved in<br />

lipid metabolism (p�0.05). Conclusions: Differential expression <strong>of</strong> genes<br />

involved in lipid metabolism networks is seen in DD LPS and changes in<br />

lipid metabolism may be associated with dedifferentiation. These differential<br />

gene expression patterns may help identify fatty tumors potentially at<br />

risk for progressing to a malignant or DD state and provide prognostic<br />

factors and therapeutic targets for patients with LPS.<br />

10050 General Poster Session (Board #48C), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Does combined dose intensification radiotherapy improve disease control<br />

in resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma? Long-term results <strong>of</strong> a phase I/II<br />

trial. Presenting Author: Myles J. F. Smith, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgical<br />

Oncology , Toronto, ON, Canada<br />

Background: Late failure is a challenging problem in retroperitoneal<br />

sarcoma (RPS) and reported 10 yr overall survival (OS) rates range from<br />

20-30%. Use <strong>of</strong> preoperative external beam radiotherapy (XRT) in the<br />

management <strong>of</strong> RPS remains controversial. No RCT and very few prospective<br />

trials <strong>of</strong> any type have been completed. We investigated the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

preop XRT plus dose escalation with early postop brachytherapy (BT) on<br />

long term survival and recurrence in RPS. Methods: From 06/96 to 10/00,<br />

40 patients (25 female) with resectable RPS were entered onto a phase I/II<br />

trial <strong>of</strong> preop XRT (50 Gy) plus postop BT (20-25 Gy). As previously<br />

reported, BT to the upper abdomen was associated with significant grade<br />

III-V postop toxicity, and from 12/98 on, BT was applied only to cases<br />

where the “field at risk” excluded the upper abdomen. Kaplan Meier<br />

survival curves were constructed; OS and recurrence free survival (RFS)<br />

were compared by log rank (SPSS 19.0). Results: Median age at study entry<br />

was 58 (38-70) yrs. Twenty nine patients presented to our center with<br />

primary disease (73%), and 22 (55%) had high grade tumors. All patients<br />

had preop XRT and total gross resection, while half (n�19) received BT. As<br />

<strong>of</strong> 12/2011, median follow-up time is 108 mos. For the entire study cohort,<br />

OS at 5 and 10 yrs were 70% and 65%, respectively; RFS at 5 and 10 yrs<br />

were 65% and 58%, respectively. RFS at 5 yrs was reduced in high vs. low<br />

grade RPS (50% vs. 83%, p�0.028), but by 10 yrs. was similar in high and<br />

low grade tumors (50% vs. 67%, p�ns). RFS was reduced in patients who<br />

presented with recurrent vs. primary disease (27% vs. 69% at 10 yrs.,<br />

p�0.018), as was OS (36% vs. 76% at 10 yrs., p�0.034). Neither OS nor<br />

RFS was improved in the cohort <strong>of</strong> patients who received BT compared to<br />

the cohort who did not: at 10 yrs. RFS was 53% �BT and 62% -BT, while<br />

OS was 53% and 76%, respectively, p�ns. Conclusions: In this prospective<br />

study with mature follow-up, long term OS and RFS in patients who<br />

underwent combined preop XRT plus resection <strong>of</strong> RPS compare favorably<br />

with those reported in retrospective institutional and population-based<br />

series. Postoperative BT did not contribute to disease control.<br />

10049 General Poster Session (Board #48B), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Interest <strong>of</strong> tumor to liver ratio 18F-FDG uptake in positron emission<br />

tomography for detection <strong>of</strong> neur<strong>of</strong>ibrosarcoma in neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis 1<br />

patients. Presenting Author: Patrick Combemale, Centre Leon Berard,<br />

Lyon, France<br />

Background: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are<br />

difficult to detect in neur<strong>of</strong>ibromatosis 1 (NF1) individuals. The 18F FDG<br />

positron emission tomoscintigraphy (FDG PET) is a useful tool. The<br />

Standard Uptake Value (SUV) is the gold standard but it is subject to<br />

individual variation among patients and medical centers. So we assessed<br />

the interest <strong>of</strong> FDG PET based on a specific tumor to liver uptake ratio (T/L)<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> SUV to find a reproducible and constant cut-<strong>of</strong>f for detecting<br />

malignant tumors. Methods: From 2000 to 2010, we conduct a multi<br />

centric study: all patients with NF1 and presenting clinical signs <strong>of</strong> MPNST<br />

suspicion (increased tumor size, induration or pain) underwent a FDG PET.<br />

Preliminary study estimated a T/L ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.5 as cut-<strong>of</strong>f for malignity.<br />

Based on semi-quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> FDG PET images, patients were<br />

compared with this cut-<strong>of</strong>f value. Results: 98 patients with 125 tumors<br />

were included. FDG PET evaluation identified 42/125 suspected lesions<br />

with T/L � 1.5; among these 30 MPNST and 12 benign lesions were found.<br />

83/125 tumors were classified as non-suspicious and 82 were actually<br />

benign according to histology or long term follow up. The 1.5 T/L cut <strong>of</strong>f<br />

corresponds to 99 % Negative Predictive Value (NPV) and 71% Positive<br />

(PPV). The positive likelihood ratio (LR) was thus equal to 7, 69 and the<br />

Negative LR to 0, with 97% sensitivity and 87% specificity. When T/L ratio<br />

is � 1.5, MPNST is eliminated with 99% NPV, thus avoiding useless<br />

surgery. When T/L ratio is above 1.5, there is a strong suspicion <strong>of</strong><br />

malignancy. But there is a risk <strong>of</strong> false positivity, which requires discussion<br />

before any therapeutic decision. On the over hand we found no significant<br />

correlation between SUVmax and malignancy. Conclusions: This study<br />

confirms the FDG PET in the detection <strong>of</strong> NF1-associated MPNST. The<br />

tumor/liver ratio with a cut <strong>of</strong>f 1.5 has a very sensitive and specific value to<br />

sort out malignant from benign tumors and thus provides adequate surgery.<br />

More this semi-quantitative analysis method is just as easy as SUV, more<br />

sensitive and more reproducible.<br />

10051 General Poster Session (Board #48D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Geriatric high-grade s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcoma (G-HG STS): An analysis <strong>of</strong> 116<br />

patients (pts) evaluating prognostic factors and clinical outcomes stratified<br />

by histology. Presenting Author: Richard Hong Hui Quek, National Cancer<br />

Centre, Singapore<br />

Background: STS in geriatric pts is not well studied. We evaluated<br />

prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in elderly pts with HG STS.<br />

Methods: Single centre retrospective study. G-HG STS pts defined as age<br />

� 65 yrs seen in our centre from 2002 - 2011 with complete medical<br />

records were identified. Charlson age-comorbidity score was assessed for<br />

each pt. Results: 116 pts from 4 most common HG STS histo-types<br />

representing 69% <strong>of</strong> pts in the geriatric STS cohort were analysed;<br />

leiomyosarcoma (LMS, 14%), non well-differentiated liposarcoma (nWD-<br />

LPS, 9%), angiosarcoma (AS, 30%), and undifferentiated pleomorphic<br />

sarcoma (UPS, 47%). Median age was 72 yrs, 81% presented with<br />

localised disease; <strong>of</strong> 78% <strong>of</strong> these localised pts who had curative surgery,<br />

49% received adjuvant therapy, <strong>of</strong> whom 92% had radiotherapy (RT) only.<br />

AS arises more commonly from the head/neck region (p�0.001) and fewer<br />

receive curative surgery (p�0.006). In 43 pts who had metastases either at<br />

diagnosis or relapse, 33% received first-line palliative chemotherapy with a<br />

response rate <strong>of</strong> 27% in evaluable pts. At a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 15.8 mths,<br />

overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 25.1 mths, 30.5 vs 3.9 mths<br />

in pts presenting with localised vs metastatic disease respectively<br />

(p�0.0001). In pts who had curative surgery for localised disease, overall<br />

relapse-free survival (RFS) was 17.7mths; 26.8 mths vs 16.0 mths vs 7.3<br />

mths vs 12.5 mths in LMS, nWD-LPS, AS and UPS respectively. In<br />

univariate analysis, adjuvant RT, non-head/neck primary and sarcoma<br />

subtype were associated with improved RFS. In multivariate analysis,<br />

adjuvant RT (p�0.001), sarcoma subtypes AS (p�0.011) and UPS<br />

(0.012) vs LMS remained significant. In pts with metastatic HG STS either<br />

at diagnosis or relapse, overall median OS was 5.9 mths; 5.9 mths (LMS),<br />

30.5 mths (nWD-LPS), 6.4 mths (AS) and 4.3 mths (UPS). In univariate<br />

analysis, presence <strong>of</strong> bone metastases was significantly associated with<br />

inferior OS (p�0.0029). Charlson score did not correlate with RFS or OS.<br />

Conclusions: Prognosis <strong>of</strong> G-HG STS appears poor particularly in AS and<br />

UPS. Adjuvant RT improves outcomes in this group <strong>of</strong> pts and should not be<br />

omitted based on age alone.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!