24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126s Central Nervous System Tumors<br />

2043 General Poster Session (Board #12F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Expression <strong>of</strong> CXCR7, CXCR4, CXCR3 and their chemokine ligands in<br />

glioblastoma. Presenting Author: Robert D. Berahovich, ChemoCentryx,<br />

Inc., Mountain View, CA<br />

Background: The chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7, and their shared<br />

ligand CXCL12/SDF-1, have been implicated in multiple aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

tumorigenesis, including tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, vasculogenesis,<br />

and metastasis. Recently, a role for CXCR4 and CXCR7 has been<br />

postulated in the control <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma growth and vasculogenesis. We set<br />

out to define the expression patterns <strong>of</strong> these proteins on primary<br />

glioblastoma tumors and associated vasculature. Methods: First, a tumor<br />

microarray containing grades 1, 3, and 4 glioma samples were analyzed by<br />

immunohistochemical techniques for the expression <strong>of</strong> CXCR7. Second,<br />

two glioblastoma microarrays were analyzed by the same technique for<br />

CXCR7, CXCR4, and their shared chemokine ligand CXCL12. The same<br />

microarrays were also probed for the expression <strong>of</strong> the additional CXCR7<br />

ligand, CXCL11/ITAC, as well as the chemokine receptor CXCR3, which is<br />

also a receptor for CXCL11. Tissues were scored in a blinded fashion by a<br />

certified neuropathologist for both the intensity <strong>of</strong> signal and location <strong>of</strong><br />

signal for all proteins tested. Results: CXCR7 expression was largely<br />

dependent on tumor grade, as the receptor was usually absent on most<br />

grade 1 gliomas but was moderately-to-highly expressed in the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas. CXCR7 expression on tumorassociated<br />

vasculature was seen in all samples and its expression level also<br />

increased with glioma grade. In contrast to CXCR7, CXCR4 expression in<br />

glioblastoma was usually limited to the glioma cells, with only infrequent<br />

expression on the vasculature. Conversely, CXCL12 expression in glioblastoma<br />

was usually limited to the vasculature. CXCR3 was detected in a<br />

subset <strong>of</strong> glioblastomas, and only on the glioma cells. The CXCR7 and<br />

CXCR3 ligand CXCL11 was, like CXCR7, expressed on both the glioma cells<br />

and vasculature. Conclusions: These results, in light <strong>of</strong> prior evidence for<br />

CXCR7 in tumor growth, suggest a positive role for CXCR7 in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma. Because CXCR7 colocalizes with its ligands,<br />

CXCL12 and CXCL11, as well as their other receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR3,<br />

the function <strong>of</strong> CXCR7 in glioblastoma may lie in the regulation <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

CXCR4/CXCL12 and CXCR3/CXCL11 axes.<br />

2045 General Poster Session (Board #12H), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

A phase II multicentric study <strong>of</strong> sunitinib administered as upfront therapy<br />

in glioblastoma: A study by the GEINO group. Presenting Author: Carmen<br />

Balana, Institut Catala d’Oncologia Badalona, Barcelona, Spain<br />

Background: Sunitinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has<br />

direct antitumor and antiangiogenesis activity through targeting VEGFR<br />

1-2, PDGFR �-�, c-kit, bFGF, (CSF-1), FLT3 and RET. Experimental<br />

studies in GB mice showed angiogenic activity, prolonged survival and<br />

synergy with irradiation Methods: Eligible pts were �75 years with GB not<br />

amenable to resection, PS�2, MMS �25. Treatment was sunitinib<br />

37.5mg daily for 8 w before radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (60Gy, 6 w)<br />

and after radiotherapy until disease progression. Primary endpoint was<br />

overall response (OR) (RANO criteria) after 8w<strong>of</strong>sunitinib treatment<br />

before radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints were % pts free <strong>of</strong> neurological<br />

deterioration before radiotherapy, % pts who completed radiotherapy, PFS,<br />

OS and 1-year survival. We used a Simon 2-stage design (12 ¡20) based<br />

on OR to calculate the number <strong>of</strong> patients needed to detect at least 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

responses with � error <strong>of</strong> 0.05 and � error <strong>of</strong> 0.10. Twelve patients were<br />

included in the first phase and one response was needed to continue study<br />

accrual. Results: 12 pts were enrolled: 7 males, median age 65 years,<br />

PS�1: 8pts, median MMS 26.5. Neurological deficit: 5pts, DXM treatment<br />

10/12, non-EIDS 3/12. Treatment: 5 pts completed 8w<strong>of</strong>therapy, 2pts<br />

completed 7 w, 4 pts � 6w. Toxicity G3 and 4: diarrhea (1pt), asthenia<br />

(2pts), skin and EDDPP (2), mucositis (2), fatal CNS hemorrhage (1),<br />

hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglycemia (1). OR was 1/12 SD, 11/12 P;<br />

radiological response was SD in 5 pts but 4 pts progressed neurologically.<br />

Only 2 pts completed radiotherapy plus sunitinib. The only SD received<br />

treatment for 18 w. Median PFS was 7.5w (CI 95% 5.8-9.2), OS 16w (CI<br />

95% 0.5-23.7), 1year OS: 0%. Conclusions: the trial was closed after the<br />

first stage due to lack <strong>of</strong> response. Sunitinib is an inactive agent in<br />

glioblastoma.<br />

2044 General Poster Session (Board #12G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> tumor-targeting salmonella typhimurium to eradicate human glioma<br />

in an orthotopic model in nude mice. Presenting Author: Masashi Momiyama,<br />

AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA<br />

Background: Prognosis remains poor for glioma and therefore requires new<br />

approaches. We have previously developed a genetically-engineered strain<br />

<strong>of</strong> Salmonella typhimurium, A1-R, that targets tumors without overt toxicity<br />

in mouse models (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 755-760, 2005; Cancer<br />

Research 66, 7647-7652, 2006; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104,<br />

10170-10174, 2007; Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery 7, 73-83, 2012).<br />

In the present study, we demonstrated that Salmonella typhimurium A1-R<br />

can inhibit and eradicate human glioma in an orthotopic nude mouse<br />

model. Methods: S. typhimuirum A1-R was administered by injection<br />

through a craniotomy open-window or intravenously in nude mice. To<br />

establish the model, 2�105 U87 human glioma cells, expressing red<br />

fluorescent protein (RFP), were injected stereotactically into the mouse<br />

brain through the craniotomy open window. Two weeks after glioma-cell<br />

implantation, mice were treated with S. typhimurium A1-R (2�107 CFU /<br />

200 �l intravenous injection [i.v.] or 1�106 CFU / 1 �l intracranial<br />

injection [i.c.]) once a week for 3 weeks. Results: Brain tumors were<br />

observed by fluorescence imaging through the craniotomy open window<br />

over time. S. typhimurium A1-R, administered i.c., inhibited brain tumor<br />

growth 7.6-fold compared with untreated mice (p � 0.009) and improved<br />

survival 73% (p � 0.001). Two <strong>of</strong> ten mice had their tumors eradicated.<br />

Intravenous administration <strong>of</strong> S. typhimurium A1-R was not effective.<br />

Conclusions: The results <strong>of</strong> the present study demonstrate that bacterial<br />

therapy <strong>of</strong> glioma is a novel, effective and safe treatment strategy in a<br />

highly treatment-resistance cancer in an orthothopic model, a first step<br />

toward clinical development.<br />

2046 General Poster Session (Board #13A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Neuraxis imaging in leptomeningeal metastasis: A retrospective case<br />

series. Presenting Author: Marc C. Chamberlain, Fred Hutchinson Cancer<br />

Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA<br />

Background: (and Objective) Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a central<br />

nervous system metastatic complication <strong>of</strong> cancer that affects the entire<br />

neuraxis. Quantify imaging (brain and spine MRI and radio-isotope cerebrospinal<br />

fluid [CSF] flow study) abnormalities in a retrospective case series <strong>of</strong><br />

patients with LM. Methods: 240 adult patients with LM (125 non-brain<br />

solid tumor patients with positive CSF cytology; 40 non-brain solid tumor<br />

patients with negative CSF cytology; 50 lymphoma and 40 leukemia<br />

patients with positive CSF flow cytometry) underwent prior to treatment<br />

brain and entire spine MRI and radio-isotope CSF flow studies (FS). Results:<br />

Neuraxis MRI in pathologically defined patients was more <strong>of</strong>ten normal in<br />

hematologic tumors (80-84%) compared to solid tumors (60%). Similarly,<br />

FS was more <strong>of</strong>ten normal in hematologic tumors (90-92%) compared to<br />

solid tumors (72-75%). However, neuraxis MRI and FS abnormalities (i.e.<br />

CSF flow obstruction; nodular subarachnoid or parenchymal disease;<br />

hydrocephalus) altered therapy by requiring CSF diversion, site specific<br />

radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy or recommending no further therapy<br />

in one third <strong>of</strong> CSF cytology positive solid tumors and 15% <strong>of</strong> CSF flow<br />

cytometry positive hematologic tumors. Conclusions: Notwithstanding less<br />

frequent imaging abnormalities in hematologic tumors, similar to solid<br />

tumors imaging abnormalities frequently result in treatment alteration for<br />

patients with LM. Consequently, neuraxis imaging is recommended in both<br />

tumor categories in patients being considered for LM-directed and in<br />

particular intra-CSF chemotherapy treatment.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!