24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

614s Pediatric Oncology<br />

9532 Poster Discussion Session (Board #12), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Parent-reported cognition and its clinical applications in pediatric oncology.<br />

Presenting Author: Jin-Shei Lai, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: Parent-reported cognitive function (PCF) <strong>of</strong> their child’s<br />

cognitive abilities is <strong>of</strong>ten used to trigger referral for comprehensive<br />

neuropsychological evaluation. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate<br />

the clinical utility <strong>of</strong> PCF to predict impairment as measured by neuropsychological<br />

assessment and to identify factors associated with PCF. Methods:<br />

565 patients (53% brain tumor, BT; 47% other types <strong>of</strong> cancer, non-BT)<br />

aged 7-21 (mean�14 yrs; 56% males) and their parents were recruited.<br />

34% received radiation therapy, 72% chemotherapy and 71% surgery.<br />

Mean years since diagnosis� 5.7 yrs. PCF was measured using a 43-item<br />

pediatric perceived cognitive function item bank (pedsPCF). Parents<br />

completed the pedsPCF and a single item to rate their child’s quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

(QOL). Patients completed NINDS-NeuroQOL Depression, PedsQL Fatigue<br />

scales and neuropsychological tests (NPT) <strong>of</strong> psychomotor function,<br />

attention, learning and working memory using the CogState. K-Means<br />

clustering was used to group patients based on scores <strong>of</strong> depression,<br />

fatigue and pedsPCF. Results: PedsPCF significantly differentiated BT from<br />

non-BT, t�5.65, p�.01. Correlations between pedsPCF and NPT ranged<br />

from 0-0.66 (BT, � 1 yr diagnosis, psychomotor), depending on BT (vs<br />

non-BT), yrs since diagnosis and treatment, and NPT. Three clusters were<br />

identified with its own unique characteristics. Specifically, pedsPCF was<br />

significantly correlated w/ depression & fatigue for cluster 1; correlated w/<br />

NPT scores for non-BT for cluster 2; and correlated w/ NPT for BT for<br />

cluster 3. Cluster membership <strong>of</strong> patients were significantly differentiated<br />

by Karn<strong>of</strong>sky rating, surgery (yes/no), QOL, parent education, child age,<br />

and child gender, but not types <strong>of</strong> treatment, and grade repetition (yes/no).<br />

Conclusions: This is one <strong>of</strong> the first studies to report an association between<br />

perceived cognitive function, using parent ratings, and neuropsychological<br />

performance. PedsPCF demonstrated clinical utility in differentiating<br />

between children with a brain tumor from children with other cancer types.<br />

PedsPCF has the potential to serve as a screening tool to facilitate efficient<br />

referral for comprehensive neurocognitive assessment.<br />

9534 Poster Discussion Session (Board #14), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Genome-based outcome prediction in MYCN nonamplified high-risk neuroblastoma.<br />

Presenting Author: Andres Eduardo Morales La Madrid, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chicago, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: Less than 40% <strong>of</strong> children with high-risk neuroblastoma<br />

achieve long-term survival, and at diagnosis, it is not possible to identify<br />

patients who will be cured. Microarray studies have proposed expression<br />

signatures associated with outcome within high-risk cohorts. However,<br />

integrating this technology as a clinical test has been difficult, in part due<br />

to the lack <strong>of</strong> available frozen tissue and high quality RNA. The nCounter<br />

overcomes this obstacle, using formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue<br />

(FFPE). Our objective is to test the correlation <strong>of</strong> a previously published<br />

“ultra high-risk” microarray gene signature developed in the MYCN<br />

nonamplified high-risk population (Asgharzadeh et al, J Natl Cancer Inst,<br />

2006) with the gene expression signature obtained with the nCounter<br />

(NanoString Technologies) using RNA isolated from FFPE MYCN nonamplified<br />

high-risk neuroblastoma samples. Methods: FFPE tumor samples<br />

linked to clinical outcome data were obtained from 6 collaborative<br />

institutions. Tumor content <strong>of</strong> each sample was assessed morphologically.<br />

RNA was isolated using the RNeasy FFPE-kit. Customized probes corresponding<br />

to the candidate genes were designed by NanoString. Hybridization<br />

reactions were performed in duplicate using 100 ng <strong>of</strong> RNA. Positive<br />

and negative control probes and housekeeping probes were included in<br />

every reaction and were used to normalize data for differences in purification,<br />

hybridization, and capture efficiencies Results: Forty-two MYCN<br />

nonamplified high-risk neuroblastoma samples were analyzed by the<br />

nCounter. The cohort 5-year event-free survival and overall survival were<br />

44.6 �/- 8.0% and 53.8 �/- 8.4% respectively. Highly degraded RNA<br />

(RIN ~ 1.5-2.8) was obtained. Unsupervised clustering and principle<br />

components analysis on normalized expression data showed differential<br />

expression <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the genes with clustering <strong>of</strong> cases depending upon<br />

outcome (FDR � 0.05). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the<br />

nCounter can yield gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles that are similar to microarray<br />

gene signatures. Further investigation <strong>of</strong> the clinical utility the nCounter<br />

technology to prognosticate outcome in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma<br />

is warranted.<br />

9533 Poster Discussion Session (Board #13), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Outcome analysis <strong>of</strong> non-high-risk neuroblastoma patients enrolled on<br />

Children’s Oncology Group trials P9641 and A3961. Presenting Author:<br />

Holly Jane Meany, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC<br />

Background: Patients with non-high-risk neuroblastoma (low- and intermediate-risk)<br />

generally have an excellent event free (EFS) and overall (OS)<br />

survival with current therapy. However, within this heterogeneous patient<br />

population, there are patients that may benefit from further therapy<br />

reduction and patients that may benefit from augmented therapy. Methods:<br />

Survival tree regression analysis was performed in patients enrolled on<br />

P9641 and A3961 with OS the primary endpoint. Univariate Cox proportional<br />

hazards models determined statistically significant prognostic factors.<br />

Secondary analysis <strong>of</strong> cases with MYCN non-amplified, non-high-risk<br />

neuroblastoma classified patients by age, INSS stage, Shimada histology<br />

and genomic features to determine 5-year EFS and OS. Favorable genomics<br />

were defined as hyperdiploid tumors without 1p or 11q loss <strong>of</strong> heterozygosity<br />

(LOH). Those with LOH at 1p or 11q or with a diploid DNA index were<br />

considered unfavorable. Patients without genomic data were excluded.<br />

Results: In the survival tree analysis, ploidy and genomic features were<br />

found to be statistically significant. In the secondary analysis, patients<br />

�18 months <strong>of</strong> age with stage 2 or 3, favorable histology tumors with<br />

favorable genomic pr<strong>of</strong>ile had 5-year EFS and OS rates <strong>of</strong> 92.9�3.9% and<br />

100% respectively. Patients with stage 2 and 3 tumors, unfavorable<br />

histology and unfavorable genomic features had EFS <strong>of</strong> 68.4�8.0% and<br />

OS <strong>of</strong> 78.4�7.0%. Patients �12 months <strong>of</strong> age with stage 4 disease and<br />

either unfavorable histologic or genomic features had EFS <strong>of</strong> 69.1�5.4%<br />

and OS <strong>of</strong> 88.5�3.8%. Conclusions: Excellent outcomes in non-high-risk<br />

neuroblastoma patients with favorable histologic and genomic features<br />

suggest further reduction in therapy is possible in this cohort while<br />

maintaining survival and decreasing side effects. Select patients with<br />

unfavorable features have suboptimal OS and would benefit from modifications<br />

in therapy. Histologic and genomic criteria can be used to identify<br />

patients with non-high-risk neuroblastoma that may benefit from modifications<br />

in therapy. These data support the conduct <strong>of</strong> a cooperative group<br />

clinical trial to refine therapy for patients with non-high-risk disease.<br />

9535 Poster Discussion Session (Board #15), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Relationship <strong>of</strong> fusion protein status and outcome for children with<br />

intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: A Children’s Oncology Group report.<br />

Presenting Author: Stephen Skapek, University <strong>of</strong> Texas Southwestern<br />

Medical Center, Dallas, TX<br />

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) includes both alveolar (ARMS)<br />

and embryonal (ERMS) subtypes, with ARMS generally having a worse<br />

prognosis. Most ARMS express one <strong>of</strong> two fusion genes generated by<br />

balanced translocations fusing DNA binding domains <strong>of</strong> PAX3 or PAX7 with<br />

FOXO1 (P3F and P7F, respectively). The prognostic value <strong>of</strong> fusion gene<br />

versus histological subtype is not clear. We carried out a multi-institutional<br />

clinical trial through the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) to evaluate this<br />

molecular feature. Methods: All participants were enrolled on COG D9803<br />

from 1999-2005 for children and young adults with intermediate risk<br />

ARMS or ERMS, and were treated with vincristine, dactinomycin, and<br />

cyclophosphamide (�/- topotecan), radiotherapy, and surgery. Diagnostic<br />

specimens were reviewed centrally and fusion gene was assessed by<br />

fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, or both. Event-free<br />

(EFS) and overall survival (OAS) at 5 years (yr) was correlated with histology<br />

and fusion gene status. Results: Of 327 cases included in a re-review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pathology, 295 could be classified biologically. Cases with ARMS but<br />

unknown trans status (N�23) and those with mixed or RMS-NOS histology<br />

without trans (N�17) and 12 with inadequate clinical data were excluded.<br />

ARMS cases with detectable fusion gene were defined as ARMS P3F�,<br />

ARMS P7F�, while ARMSn was reserved for those without detectable<br />

fusion. P3F and P7F were not observed in ERMS. An additional 189 pts<br />

with ERMS tumors not re-reviewed were also included in the survival<br />

analysis. There was a trend toward better EFS for those with ARMSn than<br />

for ERMS (p�0.15); EFS for ARMS P3F� and P7F� were worse than that<br />

for ERMS (p�0.001). Only ALV P3F� cases had poorer OAS (p�0.004).<br />

Conclusions: ARMSn has an outcome similar to ERMS and a superior EFS<br />

compared to ARMS with P3F or P7F, when given therapy designed for<br />

intermediate risk RMS. This analysis, from a single, prospective trial<br />

restricted to those with non-metastatic disease and with near universal<br />

molecular evaluation, supports incorporating fusion status into treatment<br />

allocation.<br />

ERMS ARMSn ARMS P3F� ARMS P7F�<br />

N <strong>of</strong> patients 305 21 85 23<br />

5-yr EFS 77% 90% 54% 65%<br />

5-yr OAS 82% 89% 64% 87%<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!