24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3605 General Poster Session (Board #35B), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Phase II study <strong>of</strong> preoperative radiation with concurrent capecitabine,<br />

oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by surgery and postoperative 5-FU,<br />

leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), and bevacizumab in patients with locally<br />

advanced rectal cancer: A trial <strong>of</strong> the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group<br />

(E3204). Presenting Author: Steven J. Cohen, Fox Chase Cancer Center,<br />

Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Oxaliplatin and bevacizumab potentiate the antitumor activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> fluoroyprimidines and radiotherapy in preclinical and clinical studies <strong>of</strong><br />

colorectal cancer. This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the preoperative<br />

combination <strong>of</strong> capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab with<br />

radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Methods: Eligibility: resectable T3/T4 adenocarcinoma<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rectum � 12 cm. from anal verge. Preoperative treatment<br />

was capecitabine (825 mg/m² bid M-F), oxaliplatin (50 mg/m² weekly),<br />

bevacizumab (5 mg/kg D1,15,29), and pelvic external beam radiotherapy<br />

(50.4 Gy/28 fractions). Surgery was performed within 6-8 weeks. Within<br />

12 weeks <strong>of</strong> surgery, patients received 12 cycles <strong>of</strong> FOLFOX � bevacizumab<br />

(5 mg/kg) Q2 weeks. Pathologic complete response (path CR) was<br />

the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included resection rate and<br />

toxicity. Results: Fifty-seven patients (pts) enrolled from 7/06 to 5/10 and<br />

54 were eligible. <strong>Clinical</strong> staging: T3/4 (50/4), NX0/1/2 (2/16/31/5). Most<br />

common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities during treatment were rectal<br />

pain (9), fatigue (8), and diarrhea (7). Two patients died <strong>of</strong> aspiration. Nine<br />

pts had early postsurgical complications (9 wound infections, 6 dehiscence,<br />

1 abscess) and 23 had late surgical complications (23 non-healing<br />

wounds, 12 dehiscence, 5 bowel obstruction/ileus, 2 abscess). Pathologic<br />

staging: T0/1/2/3 (11/3/15/19), N0/1/2 (32/10/7). Nine pts had path CRs<br />

(17%, 90% CI:[9%-27%]. Surgery was LAR (38) and APR (11). Twentytwo<br />

pts did not receive postoperative chemotherapy (39%), 16 due to<br />

adverse events. Five local recurrences have been reported. RFS and OS<br />

data are immature. Conclusions: The addition <strong>of</strong> oxaliplatin and bevacizumab<br />

to capecitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer<br />

resulted in downstaging for the majority <strong>of</strong> pts but did not improve the<br />

pathologic complete response rate compared to historical controls. The<br />

combination resulted in significant early and late postsurgical complications.<br />

3607 General Poster Session (Board #35D), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Six months versus twelve months <strong>of</strong> capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

for stage III (Dukes’ C) colon cancer: Initial safety report for the<br />

open-label randomized phase III study (JFMC37-0801). Presenting Author:<br />

Katsuyuki Kunieda, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu,<br />

Japan<br />

Background: The standard treatment duration <strong>of</strong> adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

(CT) in patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer is 6 months. On the other<br />

hand, no clinical trial showed the optimal treatment duration <strong>of</strong> oral<br />

chemotherapeutic agents in adjuvant setting for colon cancer. Sargent et al<br />

have reported that 83% <strong>of</strong> recurrences in stage II and III pts have occurred<br />

within the first 3 years after surgery and peak was observed around one year<br />

after surgery. Therefore, to clarify the benefit <strong>of</strong> 12 months administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> Capecitabine, we designed randomized phase III trial for a comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

6 months treatment and 12 months treatment <strong>of</strong> capecitabine as adjuvant<br />

CT for stage III colon cancer. Methods: JFMC37 is a multicenter, randomized<br />

Phase III trial. Patients with fully resected Stage III colon or recto<br />

sigmoid cancer were eligible. Capecitabine was administered orally as<br />

tablets, 2,500 mg/m²/day for 14 days followed by a 7-days rest. Treatment<br />

is continued to 8 cycles (6 months) in arm A (A) or 16 cycles (12 months) in<br />

arm B (B). Patients were randomized 1:1 to A or B. Data size was estimated<br />

by disease free survival as primary endpoint. The statistical design is based<br />

on superiority hypothesis; 5-yrs DFS is 60% in arm A, 67% in arm B<br />

;unilateral ��0.05, 1-��0.8;and planed accrual is 1200 pts. Results:<br />

Between September 2008 to December 2009, 1304 patients were<br />

enrolled and then randomized. Both arms were well balanced for mean age:<br />

(A) 64.1, (B) 63.8; ECOG PS (%0/1): (A) 95.0/5.0, (B) 97.1/2.9;<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> lymph nodes (%N0/N1/N2): (A) 77.1/19.9/3.1, (B) 76.6/<br />

19.7/3.7. Treatment completion rate for A and B were 68.2% and 43.4%.<br />

Incidences <strong>of</strong> serious adverse events (SAEs) over 1% were neutropenia: (A)<br />

2.6%, (B) 3.8%, diarrhea: (A) 2.9%, (B) 2.1%, loss <strong>of</strong> appetite: (A) 1.3%,<br />

(B) 1.0%, fatigue: (A) 1.8%, (B) 1.2%, hand-hoot syndrome: (A) 16.4%,<br />

(B) 22.1%. Conclusions: There were no obvious differences in SAEs<br />

between arm A and arm B. Although twelve months <strong>of</strong> capecitabine showed<br />

a tendency to increase G3/4 hand-foot syndrome, we concluded that<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> SAEs were acceptable and comparable to previously report.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer<br />

229s<br />

3606 General Poster Session (Board #35C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Prognostic significance <strong>of</strong> intermediate mucinous carcinoma in patients<br />

with microsatellite stable stage II or III colon cancer. Presenting Author:<br />

Gun Min Kim, Department <strong>of</strong> Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College<br />

<strong>of</strong> Medicine, Seoul, South Korea<br />

Background: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) is a histological subtype <strong>of</strong><br />

colorectal cancer with �50% <strong>of</strong> mucinous component <strong>of</strong> tumor volume.<br />

According to WHO classification, tumor less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the lesion<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> mucin was considered as non-mucinous carcinoma (NMC).Mucinous<br />

histology has been shown to be an independent adverse prognostic<br />

factor in some studies, but not in others. However, prognostic implication<br />

<strong>of</strong> intermediate mucinous carcinoma (IMC) which had focal mucinous<br />

component �50% <strong>of</strong> tumor volume has not been studied yet. The aim <strong>of</strong><br />

this study is to explore prognostic impact <strong>of</strong> IMC in patients with resected<br />

stage II or III colon cancer. Methods: This study involved 917 patients who<br />

underwent curative resection for stage II or III colon cancer in Severance<br />

Hospital, from 2003 to 2009. The proportion <strong>of</strong> mucinous component was<br />

reviewed and re-classified correctly by pathologists. MC was defined tumor<br />

having �50% mucinous component. Tumor with mucinous component but<br />

less than 50% regarded as IMC and less than 10% mucin as NMC. Results:<br />

Among 917 patients, 63 (6.9%) and 60 (6.5%) were MC and IMC,<br />

respectively. Median follow-up duration was 50.2 months (0.9~109.7) and<br />

Stage 3 was 48.1% (441/917). The similarities between MC and IMC were<br />

found as right colon dominant (MC: IMC: NMC � 60%: 67%: 34%,<br />

p�.001) and higher incidence <strong>of</strong> MSI-high compared to NMC (MC: IMC:<br />

NMC � 27%: 30%: 11%, p�.001). In stage III, the disease-free survival<br />

(DFS) rate at 5 years was 44% for MC, 56% for IMC, and 74% for NMC<br />

(p�.001). Subgroup analysis according to MSI status showed that DFS had<br />

significant inverse correlation with proportions <strong>of</strong> mucinous components in<br />

MSI-low or MSS group, but patients with MSI-high tumor showed higher<br />

five-year DFS rate (�85%) regardless <strong>of</strong> mucinous component. For stage II<br />

colon cancer patients, both mucinous histology and MSI had little clinical<br />

significance. Conclusions: In patients with curative resection for stage II or<br />

III colon cancer, IMC had similar characteristics to MC, which were right<br />

colon dominant and high incidence <strong>of</strong> MSI-high tumor. The prognostic<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> IMC was intermediate risk between MC and NMC in stage III<br />

patients with MSI-low or MSS tumor, but not in MSI-high group.<br />

3608 General Poster Session (Board #35E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> postoperative complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use in<br />

stage III colon cancer. Presenting Author: Ryan P. Merkow, Northwestern<br />

University, Feinberg School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: The National Quality Forum has endorsed the use <strong>of</strong> adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, yet a substantial treatment gap<br />

exists in the United States. Our objective was to evaluate the contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> postoperative complications on the use <strong>of</strong> adjuvant therapy after<br />

colectomy for cancer. Methods: Patients from the National Surgical Quality<br />

Improvement Program and the National Cancer Data Base who underwent<br />

colon resection for cancer were linked (2006-2008). The association <strong>of</strong><br />

complications on adjuvant chemotherapy use was assessed using multivariable<br />

regression models. Results: From 140 hospitals, 2368 patients<br />

underwent resection for stage III colon adenocarcinoma. Overall, 36.8%<br />

(871/2,368) patients were not treated with adjuvant therapy, <strong>of</strong> which<br />

47.8% (416/871) had documented severe comorbidities or advanced age<br />

(�80) as the reason for no adjuvant therapy receipt. Of the remaining 455<br />

patients, 21.3% (97/455) had �1 serious complication that could account<br />

for adjuvant therapy omission. The remaining 41.1% (358/871) patients<br />

did not have a documented reason for not recieving adjuvant therapy.<br />

Complications associated with adjuvant therapy omission were abscess/<br />

anastomotic leak (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.02-3.59), renal failure (OR 7.16,<br />

95% CI 1.92-26.79), prolonged ventilation (OR 7.92, 95% CI 2.97-<br />

21.13), re-intubation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 2.13-15.18), and pneumonia (OR<br />

4.05, 95% CI 2.07-7.90). Abscess/anastomotic leak was associated with a<br />

28-day delay in time to adjuvant chemotherapy (73 vs. 45 days, p�0.05).<br />

Superficial surgical site infection did not decrease adjuvant therapy receipt<br />

but delayed the time to its use (57 vs. 44 days, p�0.05). The occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

postoperative sepsis was associated with a 15-day delay to adjuvant<br />

chemotherapy (60 vs. 45 days, p�0.05). Conclusions: Serious postoperative<br />

complications explained nearly one quarter <strong>of</strong> the adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

treatment gap among stage III colon cancer patients. Postoperative<br />

complications affect treatment utilization and should be considered when<br />

calculating adherence with the Stage III adjuvant therapy for colon cancer<br />

measure. Judging provider performance using quality metrics is challenging<br />

without clinical data.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!