24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

488s Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Metastatic<br />

7532 Poster Discussion Session (Board #22), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> NSCLCs harboring NRAS mutations. Presenting Author:<br />

Kadoaki Ohashi, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN<br />

Background: We sought to determine the frequency and clinical characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) harboring NRAS<br />

mutations. We used preclinical models to identify targeted therapies likely<br />

to be <strong>of</strong> benefit against NRAS mutant lung cancer cells. Methods: We<br />

reviewed data in the Catalogue <strong>of</strong> Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC)<br />

and clinical history from patients with NSCLC whose tumors underwent<br />

systematic screening for driver mutations including NRAS. Patient characteristics<br />

examined included age, gender, race, smoking history, disease<br />

stage, treatment history, and overall survival (OS). 6 NSCLC cell lines with<br />

NRAS mutations were screened for sensitivity against multiple targeted<br />

agents. Gene expression was pr<strong>of</strong>iled using Affymetrix U133A arrays in 5<br />

NRAS mutant NSCLC cell lines, 8 with EGFR mutations and 17 with KRAS<br />

mutations. Results: Among 4524 patients with NSCLC tested, NRAS<br />

mutations were present in 29 (0.64%). The types <strong>of</strong> substitutions found<br />

were Q61H/K/L/R and G12A/C/D/R/S, with NRAS Q61L the most common<br />

(n�14; 48%). One tumor had a concurrent KRAS mutation. 83% had<br />

adenocarcinoma histology, with no significant differences in gender. While<br />

90% <strong>of</strong> patients were former or current smokers, smoking-related G:C�T:A<br />

transversions were significantly less frequent in NRAS than in KRASmutant<br />

NSCLC (KRAS: 66%, NRAS: 13%, p�0.05). Systemic chemotherapy<br />

showed limited efficacy in 7 patients with metastatic disease<br />

(median OS 7 mos). 5 <strong>of</strong> 6 NRAS mutant lung cancer cell lines were<br />

sensitive to the MEK inhibitors, AZD6244 and GSK1120212, while other<br />

targeted agents (against EGFR, ALK, MET, IGF-1R, PIK3CA, BRAF) were<br />

minimally effective. Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> NRAS mutant cell lines<br />

were distinct from those with KRAS or EGFR mutations. Conclusions: NRAS<br />

mutations define a distinct subset <strong>of</strong> NSCLCs (~1%) with potential<br />

sensitivity to MEK inhibitors. While NRAS gene mutations are more<br />

common in current/former smokers, the types <strong>of</strong> mutations are not those<br />

classically associated with smoking.<br />

7534 Poster Discussion Session (Board #24), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Native and rearranged ALK copy number and rearranged ALK cell count in<br />

NSCLC: Implications for ALK inhibitor therapy. Presenting Author: D. Ross<br />

Camidge, University <strong>of</strong> Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO<br />

Background: ALK rearranged NSCLC responds well to ALK inhibitors.<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong>ly, �15% cells showing rearrangements by break-apart FISH<br />

classifies tumors as ALK(�). Native ALK copy number gain has also been<br />

reported. We explored the significance <strong>of</strong> native and rearranged ALK copy<br />

number on crizotinib outcomes and whether �15% reflected a clear<br />

biological distinction in the frequency <strong>of</strong> ALK(�) cells. Methods: Copy<br />

number and genomic status <strong>of</strong> ALK assessed by FISH. A total <strong>of</strong> 1426<br />

NSCLC clinical specimens, 174 ALK(�) and 1252 ALK(-) by standard<br />

criteria, and 26 NSCLC cell lines (2 ALK(�) and 24 ALK(-)) were<br />

investigated. Results: Native ALK gene mean copy number was significantly<br />

higher in ALK(-) than in ALK(�) cases (2.8, SD 0.93, range 1.2-11.4 vs.<br />

1.8, SD 0.79; range 0.6 to 5.2; p�0.01). Frequency <strong>of</strong> native ALK copy<br />

number gain (�3 copies/cell in �40% cells) was 19% in ALK(�) and 62%<br />

in ALK(-) tumors (p�0.001). In ALK(-) tumors, abundant focal amplification<br />

<strong>of</strong> native ALK was rare (0.8%); scanty amplification (�10% tumor<br />

cells) occurred in 1.1%, and duplication <strong>of</strong> the entire native ALK or <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ALK 3’ end occurred in 3.5%. Among ALK(-) cell lines, mean native ALK<br />

copy number ranged 2.1-6.9 and was not correlated with in vitro crizotinib<br />

sensitivity (IC50s 0.34-2.8 uM). In (�) patients, neither native or rearranged<br />

ALK copy number, nor percentage cell count correlated with<br />

maximal tumor shrinkage or PFS with crizotinib. <strong>Clinical</strong> specimens with<br />

0-9%, 10-15%, 16-30%, 31-50% and �50% <strong>of</strong> ALK� cells were found in<br />

79.3%, 8.5%, 1.4%, 2.7% and 8.1% <strong>of</strong> cases, respectively. Conclusions:<br />

Lower native ALK copy number in ALK(�) NSCLC suggests ALK fusion<br />

occurs early, preceding chromosomal instability. Elevated native ALK copy<br />

number rarely reflects focal amplification and native ALK copy number<br />

increases alone are not associated with sensitivity to ALK inhibition in vitro.<br />

Neither native or rearranged copy number, nor positive cell count within<br />

ALK(�) tumors influences clinical benefit from ALK inhibition. As 8.5% <strong>of</strong><br />

ALK(-) cases fall within 5% <strong>of</strong> the established �15% cell positive<br />

threshold, further investigation <strong>of</strong> ALK status by other diagnostic techniques<br />

in this subset may be warranted.<br />

7533 Poster Discussion Session (Board #23), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> a global phase II study with crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive<br />

non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Presenting Author: Dong-Wan Kim,<br />

Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea<br />

Background: Approximately 3–5% <strong>of</strong> NSCLC harbors ALK gene rearrangements.<br />

Crizotinib is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule competitive ALK<br />

inhibitor with anti-MET activity. Methods: PROFILE 1005 is an ongoing<br />

global, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study evaluating the<br />

safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> crizotinib (250 mg BID in 3-week cycles) in patients<br />

with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed after �1 chemotherapy<br />

for recurrent/advanced/metastatic disease. Tumor response was<br />

evaluated by RECIST 1.1 every 6 weeks. Patient-reported symptoms and<br />

global quality <strong>of</strong> life (QOL) were assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and<br />

LC-13 at baseline, day 1 each cycle and at end <strong>of</strong> treatment. Results: As <strong>of</strong><br />

June 2011, 439 patients were evaluable for safety and 255 patients for<br />

tumor response. Median age was 53 years. The majority <strong>of</strong> patients were<br />

female (53%), never smokers (65%), and had adenocarcinoma (92%),<br />

ECOG PS 0–1 (83%) and �2 prior chemotherapy regimens (85%). Among<br />

patients evaluable for efficacy, median treatment duration was 25 weeks<br />

(77% <strong>of</strong> patients still ongoing). ORR was 53% (95% CI: 47–60), disease<br />

control rate at 12 weeks was 85% (95% CI: 80–89), median duration <strong>of</strong><br />

response was 43 weeks (96% CI 36–50) and median PFS was 8.5 months<br />

(95% CI: 6.2–9.9). The most frequent treatment-related AEs were visual<br />

effects (50%), nausea (46%), vomiting (39%), and diarrhea (35%), mostly<br />

grade 1–2. 29 patients (6.6%) had treatment-related SAEs, including<br />

dyspnea and pneumonitis (4 patients each; 0.9%), and febrile neutropenia<br />

and renal cyst (2 patients each; 0.5%). A statistically significant (p�0.05)<br />

and clinically meaningful (� 10 points) improvement from baseline was<br />

observed for patient-reported overall pain, pain in chest, cough, dyspnea,<br />

insomnia, fatigue and global QOL. Conclusions: Crizotinib demonstrated a<br />

high response rate and PFS, favorable tolerability pr<strong>of</strong>ile and improvement<br />

in patient-reported symptoms. These results provide strong evidence for<br />

crizotinib as a standard <strong>of</strong> care for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.<br />

7535 General Poster Session (Board #44A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> epithelial to mesenchymal transition with efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR wild type.<br />

Presenting Author: Shengxiang Ren, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji<br />

University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Shanghai, China<br />

Background: The epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a fundamental<br />

biological process during which epithelial cells change to a mesenchymal<br />

phenotype, it has a pr<strong>of</strong>ound impact on cancer progression and<br />

treatment. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to investigate the role <strong>of</strong> EMT to<br />

predict the efficacy <strong>of</strong> epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase<br />

inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)<br />

patients. Methods: We evaluated the correlation between EMT and sensitivity<br />

to EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunohistochemistry was<br />

used to examine the expression <strong>of</strong> EMT markers, E-cadherin, fibronectin,<br />

N-cadherin and vimentin and ARMs was used to detect the EGFR mutation<br />

in tumor specimens obtained before the treatment. The EMT phenotype<br />

status was determined according to the expression <strong>of</strong> E-cadherin, fibronectin,<br />

N-cadherin and vimentin. Results: 101 patients enrolled into this study<br />

and 97 had enough tissue to perform the EMT examination. The median<br />

age was 59 years old, male/female:56/45, never smoker/smoker: 71/30,<br />

adenocarcinoma/non-adeno: 73/28, PS 0-1/2-3: 83/18, Stage IIIB/IV:<br />

2/99, 1st /2nd-4th line: 13/88. The response rate and progression free<br />

survival(PFS) in the whole population were 45.5% and 7.6 months<br />

respectively. EMT test revealed that 46(47.4%) samples were epithelial<br />

phenotype, while 51(52.6%) were mesenchymal phenotype. 38 <strong>of</strong> 79<br />

patients harbour activating EGFR mutation. Among the patients with EGFR<br />

wild type or unknown status, patients with an epithelial phenotype had a<br />

higher response rate(40% Vs 17.6%, P�0.056) and significantly longer<br />

PFS(7.6 m Vs 3.8 m, P�0.045) than these with a mesenchymal phenotype.<br />

However, the response rate(85.7% Vs 64.7%, P�0.249) and<br />

PFS(15.2 m Vs 12.2 m, P�0.420) were similar in the patients with<br />

activated EGFR mutation. Conclusions: Patients with an epithelial phenotype<br />

got more benefit from the treatment <strong>of</strong> EGFR-TKIs in the advanced<br />

EGFR wild type NSCLC patients, which indicated that the EMT might be a<br />

potential marker to guide the individual therapy <strong>of</strong> EGFR-TKIs in this<br />

subpopulation.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!