Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9057 General Poster Session (Board #40D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Widespread use <strong>of</strong> complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among<br />
non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors. Presenting Author: Alexis D. Leal,<br />
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN<br />
Background: The incidence <strong>of</strong> CAM use among patients with cancer is<br />
higher when compared to the general population. However, there are few<br />
studies examining CAM use in NHL survivors, and limited data are available<br />
regarding beliefs in CAM. This study was conducted to examine the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> CAM use in NHL, define CAM beliefs among NHL survivors,<br />
and explore differences between patients with indolent and aggressive<br />
lymphoma. Methods: Newly diagnosed lymphoma patients were prospectively<br />
enrolled within 9 months <strong>of</strong> diagnosis in the University <strong>of</strong> Iowa/Mayo<br />
Clinic SPORE Molecular Epidemiology Resource from 2002-2008. NHL<br />
patients who completed the 3-year post diagnosis questionnaire, which<br />
includes questions regarding CAM use and beliefs, were included in this<br />
study. Chi-squared tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess<br />
the association <strong>of</strong> CAM use with prognostic and demographic factors.<br />
Results: 719 patients were included with a median age <strong>of</strong> 63 years (range<br />
22-92). 53% were male. Overall, 636 (89%) reported ever using CAM.<br />
78% <strong>of</strong> patients used vitamins and 54% alternative therapies (chiropractic<br />
(36%) and massage therapy (24%)). Among CAM users, 141 (22%)<br />
believe CAM can assist the body to heal, 123 (19%) believe CAM can<br />
relieve cancer symptoms, 115 (18%) believe CAM use gives a feeling <strong>of</strong><br />
control, 106 (17%) believe CAM can boost immunity, 24 (4%) believe<br />
CAM can cure cancer, and 35 (6%) believe CAM can prevent the spread <strong>of</strong><br />
cancer. Female gender was associated with increased overall CAM use<br />
(p�0.0001) as well as use <strong>of</strong> vitamins (p�0.0001), herbal supplements<br />
(p�0.006) and alternative therapy (p�0.0002) specifically for cancer.<br />
Older age was also associated with increased vitamin use (p�0.005) and<br />
decreased herbal supplements use (p�0.008). There was no significant<br />
difference in overall CAM use between those with follicular lymphoma<br />
grades I-II (n�195, 91%) and non-relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma<br />
(n�151, 87%), although massage therapy was utilized more <strong>of</strong>ten by FL<br />
survivors (29% versus 18%, p�0.005). Conclusions: CAM modalities are<br />
used by the majority <strong>of</strong> NHL survivors (89%). The assessment <strong>of</strong> CAM use<br />
and education regarding potential harms is imperative for the NHL survivor.<br />
9059 General Poster Session (Board #40F), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Prevention <strong>of</strong> palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) with an antiperspirant<br />
in breast cancer patients treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin<br />
(PLD), a placebo-controlled, double blinded, phase lll trial (SAKK 92/08).<br />
Presenting Author: Thomas Ruhstaller, Swiss Group for <strong>Clinical</strong> Research,<br />
Berne, Switzerland<br />
Background: PPE, also known as hand-foot syndrome, is a distinctive<br />
adverse drug reaction <strong>of</strong> PLD treatment. PLD has been detected in elevated<br />
concentrations in eccrine sweat glands in palms and soles. We postulated<br />
that prophylactic administration <strong>of</strong> an antiperspirant (F511 cream) prior<br />
and during treatment with PLD could decrease the incidence <strong>of</strong> PPE.<br />
Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer treated with PLD<br />
monotherapy �10mg/m2 per week applied an antiperspirant to the left or<br />
right hand and foot and a corresponding placebo to the opposite site with<br />
double-blinding for the content <strong>of</strong> the cream applied to either side<br />
(intra-patient randomization). The creams were applied once daily during<br />
the first week, then three times per week. The primary endpoint was the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> PPE grade (G) � 2 in the antiperspirant or placebo treated side. Pts were<br />
evaluable if they developed PPE G � 2 or had received cumulatively at least<br />
160mg/m2 PLD. Patient-reported extent <strong>of</strong> symptom burden was a secondary<br />
endpoint. Using McNemar’s matched pairs design 53 pts were needed<br />
to detect a difference <strong>of</strong> 20% between the sides with a significance level <strong>of</strong><br />
5% and power <strong>of</strong> 90%. Results: 52 <strong>of</strong> 90 pts from 11 Swiss centers<br />
included were evaluable. Median age was 64.5 years; median duration <strong>of</strong><br />
PLD treatment was 12 weeks. 30 pts developed PPE G � 2. In 3 pts PPE G<br />
� 2 occurred on the placebo side but not on the antiperspirant side<br />
(p�0.097; table). PPE G � 2 was borderline significantly more frequent in<br />
placebo foot than antiperspirant foot (p�0.048). Patient-reported extent <strong>of</strong><br />
symptom burden showed a trend in favor <strong>of</strong> the antiperspirant side for skin<br />
problems (peeling, blistering, bleeding) in the group <strong>of</strong> pts with PPE G � 2<br />
(p�0.051). Conclusions: In this double-blind trial with intra-patient randomization<br />
we observed a trend towards less PPE G � 2 with application <strong>of</strong> the<br />
antiperspirant cream F511 in pts treated with PLD as determined by the<br />
treating physician and reported by the pts.<br />
Antiperspirant side<br />
PPE grade > 2 toxicity<br />
No Yes Total<br />
Placebo side<br />
No 22 (42%) 0 (0%) 22 (42%)<br />
Yes 3 (6%) 27 (52%) 30 (58%)<br />
Total 25 (48%) 27 (52%) 52 (100%)<br />
Patient and Survivor Care<br />
581s<br />
9058 General Poster Session (Board #40E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Prospective survey study regarding the implementation <strong>of</strong> new communication<br />
skills curriculum for medical oncology trainees. Presenting Author:<br />
Nathan M. Shumway, San Antonio Military Medical Center, Ft. Sam<br />
Houston, TX<br />
Background: After a diagnosis <strong>of</strong> cancer, many patients suffer from anxiety<br />
and distress from uncertainty <strong>of</strong> symptoms, treatments, and prognosis.<br />
Clinicians must recognize opportunities to explore concerns. This study<br />
assesses oncology trainees’ views about communication with cancer<br />
patients before (PRE) and after (POST) a 12 month curriculum. Methods:<br />
Medical oncology fellows were surveyed PRE and POST a communication<br />
curriculum consisting <strong>of</strong> case studies and 6 core lectures which included<br />
fundamentals, breaking bad news, transitions to palliative care, advanced<br />
care planning, conducting family conferences, and discussing treatment<br />
options and informed consent. A 5 point Likert-scale was used to measure<br />
fellows’ attitudes and comfort regarding communication PRE and POST<br />
with questions grouped according to core topics. (�2 � trainee disagreement,<br />
3�neutral opinion, and � 4 indicated agreement). Results: PRE and<br />
POST surveys were completed by 11 and 8 trainees respectively. In PRE<br />
100% felt communication skills were important and 63% believed these<br />
skills could be taught. 82% felt there was not enough time during most<br />
visits to address emotion. This decreased to 27% in POST. 18% PRE<br />
agreed they were comfortable recognizing coping mechanisms versus<br />
100% POST. 45% felt comfortable eliciting values in PRE versus 87.5%<br />
POST. Only 1 fellow (9%) felt comfortable addressing futility in PRE versus<br />
25% in POST. The median grouped score for fundamentals increased from<br />
15 to 17 (p�0.016) and median grouped score for advance care plans and<br />
DNR increased from 11 to 13(p�0.026). Conclusions: There is a need to<br />
improve oncology communication skills. Our curriculum is just one approach.<br />
After intervention, the majority <strong>of</strong> fellows agreed there was enough<br />
time to address emotion and felt more comfortable recognizing coping<br />
mechanisms and eliciting values. Discussing futility remains difficult for<br />
our fellows. All fellows were more comfortable with fundamental communication<br />
skills and advance care plans after the curriculum. The extent the<br />
curriculum contributed to the change in survey results is unclear. Further<br />
research is needed to guide communication education <strong>of</strong> oncologists.<br />
9060 General Poster Session (Board #40G), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability <strong>of</strong> BCD-017, a<br />
novel pegylated filgrastim: Results <strong>of</strong> open-label controlled phase I study<br />
with dose escalation in healthy volunteers. Presenting Author: Kirill D.<br />
Nikitin, BIOCAD, Moscow, Russia<br />
Background: Pegfilgrastim (conjugate <strong>of</strong> filgrastim and 20 kDa PEG) is<br />
approved for treatment <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy-associated neutropenia. BCD-017<br />
is a covalent conjugate <strong>of</strong> filgrastim with 30 kDa PEG. Increased molecular<br />
weight <strong>of</strong> PEG molecule may provide additional benefits compared to<br />
pegfilgrastim. We have conducted this open-label phase I study to assess<br />
the PK, PD and tolerability <strong>of</strong> BCD-017. Methods: 24 healthy male<br />
volunteers signed the informed consent and were sequentially assigned to<br />
receive 1, 3 or 9 mg <strong>of</strong> BCD-017 or 5 mcg/kg/day <strong>of</strong> filgrastim for 7 days, 6<br />
volunteers per group. Outcome measures included absolute neutrophil<br />
count (ANC) and �D34� cell count, PK parameters and adverse events<br />
(AEs). Results: BCD-017 induced a fast and significant increase <strong>of</strong> ANC.<br />
Median maximum ANC (ANCmax) for BCD-017 1, 3, 9 mg and filgrastim<br />
was 18.68 (10.62-21.02), 25.92 (15.43-28.07), 32.22 (18.22-45.79),<br />
and 28.21 (21-31.95) �103 cells/mm3 , respectively; median time to<br />
ANCmax was 24 (12-24); 48 (24-72); 72 (48-72); and 132,5 (12-169) h,<br />
respectively; median increase in �D34� cells number 96 h post dose was<br />
4.7 (1.2-6.5), 6.5 (1.7-12.3), 40.9 (24.5-102), and 17.8 (3.3-35.2)<br />
times, respectively. Filgrastim serum concentration was analyzed using<br />
ELISA. Median Cmax for BCD-017 3 and 9 mg and filgrastim was 45<br />
(31-65), 446 (191-649), and 40 (20-54) ng/mL, respectively; median<br />
Tmax was 48 (24-72), 36 (24-48), and 8 (6-8) h respectively; median T1/2 was 65 (51-70), 46 (41-57), and 6.7 (6.2-7.6) h, respectively. BCD-017<br />
was well tolerated. No dose-limiting AEs were observed. AEs included<br />
headache, back pain, myalgia, arthralgia, thrombocytopenia, hyperuricemia,<br />
alkaline phosphatase/LDH increased. All AEs were <strong>of</strong> grade 1-2.<br />
Compared to filgrastim, the best tolerability was observed in 3 mg group.<br />
Conclusions: BCD-017 is shown to be a potent stimulator <strong>of</strong> granulopoiesis.<br />
BCD-017 3 mg did not differ from filgrastim in terms <strong>of</strong> ANC increase and<br />
its safety was shown in healthy volunteers. Further phase II study <strong>of</strong><br />
BCD-017 for treatment and prophylaxis <strong>of</strong> neutropenia in patients receiving<br />
cytotoxic chemotherapy is necessary.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.