24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2000 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

MGMT promoter methylation as a predictive biomarker for response to<br />

radiotherapy versus chemotherapy in malignant astrocytomas in the elderly:<br />

The NOA-08 trial. Presenting Author: Wolfgang Wick, University<br />

Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany<br />

Background: In a few years more than half <strong>of</strong> the patients with glioblastoma<br />

will be older than 65 years <strong>of</strong> age and thus be classified as elderly. The<br />

current standard <strong>of</strong> care in elderly patients with glioblastoma (GB) or<br />

anapestic astrocytoma (AA) is resection or biopsy followed by involved-field<br />

radiotherapy (RT). The role <strong>of</strong> primary chemotherapy is poorly defined. The<br />

NOA-08 trial compared efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> RT to temozolomide (TMZ) in<br />

patients with newly diagnosed AA or GB. Methods: Patients (N�412; 39<br />

AA, 373 GB) � 65 years with a Karn<strong>of</strong>sky performance score � 60 were<br />

randomized to receive RT or TMZ. The primary endpoint was overall survival<br />

(OS). The trial sought to demonstrate the non-inferiority <strong>of</strong> TMZ compared<br />

with RT. Results: Patient characteristics in the intention-to-treat population<br />

[N�373 (178 patients RT, 195 patients TMZ)] were balanced. All<br />

histologic diagnoses (11% AA and 89% GB) were centrally confirmed.<br />

Median OS [HR�1.09 (95% CI: 0.84-1.42)] and event-free survival (EFS)<br />

[hazard ratio (HR)�1.15 (0.92-1.43)] <strong>of</strong> TMZ versus RT did not differ<br />

between both arms. Non-inferiority <strong>of</strong> TMZ compared with RT was significant<br />

(p�0.05). Extent <strong>of</strong> resection, but not age or diagnosis <strong>of</strong> AA were<br />

associated with prolonged EFS and OS. DNA repair protein O6-methylgua nine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in tumor tissue<br />

was associated with prolonged OS [HR�0.67 (0.38-1.29)]. Patients with<br />

MGMT promoter methylation had longer EFS when treated with TMZ (8.4<br />

months [5.5-11.7] versus RT (4.6 [4.2-5] months) whereas patients<br />

without MGMT promoter methylation had longer EFS when treated with RT<br />

(4.6 [3.7-6.3] versus 3.3 [3-3.5] months). This effect persisted for OS.<br />

Conclusions: NOA-08 demonstrates the non-inferiority <strong>of</strong> TMZ compared<br />

with RT in the treatment <strong>of</strong> elderly patients with malignant astrocytoma.<br />

MGMT promoter methylation is a strong predictive biomarker for the choice<br />

between RT and TMZ.<br />

2002 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

The NF�B pathway as a key mediator <strong>of</strong> the glioblastoma mesenchymal<br />

subtype in glioblastoma stem cells and human tumors. Presenting Author:<br />

Brian D. Vaillant, The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX<br />

Background: The mesenchymal (MES) subtype <strong>of</strong> glioblastoma (GBM) is<br />

associated with worse prognosis and increased treatment resistance.<br />

Several transcription factors driving the MES phenotype have been identified,<br />

including STAT3, CEBP-�, and WWTR1/TAZ. However, the key<br />

signaling pathways driving this transcriptional program remain unknown.<br />

Methods: Expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling analyses was performed on multiple GBM<br />

stem cell (GSC) lines derived from individual human tumors. Three large<br />

GBM tumor gene expression datasets (TCGA, Rembrandt, Erasmus) were<br />

also used in the analyses to identify pathways activated in MES tumors and<br />

GSCs. Intracranial GSC xenograft models were used for in vivo validation.<br />

Results: We found that GSCs with a MES phenotype also demonstrated<br />

upregulation <strong>of</strong> a gene cassette associated with NF�B activation. Analysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> multiple large expression data sets also demonstrated a tight correlation<br />

between the MES phenotype and NF�B activation in human tumors. To<br />

determine the effect <strong>of</strong> NF�B activation in GSCs, we stimulated NF�B by<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> the inflammatory cytokine TNF�. This was accompanied by<br />

increased expression <strong>of</strong> the MES transcription factors (STAT3, CEBP-�,<br />

TAZ), and MES markers including CD44. Conversely, blockade <strong>of</strong> NF�B<br />

signaling in GSCs by I�B-� was sufficient to prevent TNF-induced MES<br />

transition. Investigation <strong>of</strong> potential source <strong>of</strong> NF�B activation suggested a<br />

role <strong>of</strong> microglia. Indeed, addition <strong>of</strong> supernatant from activated microglia<br />

was sufficient to activate NF�B and MES transition in GSCs that could be<br />

blocked by I�B-�. To test the role <strong>of</strong> microglia and NF�B activation on<br />

treatment resistance in vivo, treatment with minocycline, an inhibitor <strong>of</strong><br />

microglia activation, led to a reduction <strong>of</strong> tumor grade and down-regulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> MES markers in intracranial GSC xenografts. Conclusions: NF�B appears<br />

to play an important role in induction <strong>of</strong> the MES phenotype in GBM and<br />

GSCs. Furthermore, activation <strong>of</strong> microglia is a potential source <strong>of</strong> NF�B<br />

activation in these tumors. These data suggest that blockade <strong>of</strong> NF�B<br />

and/or inhibition <strong>of</strong> microglia activation may be attractive therapeutic<br />

approaches for downregulating MES transition and overcoming treatment<br />

resistance in GBM.<br />

Central Nervous System Tumors<br />

2001 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

A revised RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) model for glioblastoma<br />

based upon multiplatform biomarker pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Presenting Author:<br />

Arnab Chakravarti, Arthur G. James Cancer Center, The Ohio State<br />

University, Columbus, OH<br />

Background: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) recursive<br />

partitioning analysis (RPA) model, which relies on clinical variables, has<br />

been used worldwide to establish distinct prognostic classes <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

(pts) with malignant glioma as well as eligibility criteria for clinical trials. In<br />

the present study, we have updated the RPA to include additional<br />

molecular variables, specifically for glioblastoma (GBM) patients treated in<br />

the temozolomide (TMZ)-era, to make the model more relevant, contemporary,<br />

and discriminatory. Methods: The dataset utilized was from RTOG<br />

0525, a phase III study examining radiation (RT) with concurrent TMZ,<br />

followed by adjuvant standard dose vs. dose-dense TMZ in pts with<br />

newly-diagnosed GBM. 162 pts from RTOG 0525 had available tissues for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> key signaling molecules using the AQUA platform. Results:<br />

pAKT, c-met, and MGMT protein were each found to be significantly<br />

associated with adverse outcome on multivariate analysis. These variables<br />

were combined with clinical and genetic biomarkers (e.g., MGMT promoter<br />

methylation, IDH1 mutation, mRNA pr<strong>of</strong>iling) previously found to be <strong>of</strong><br />

significance (MCP model, ASCO, 2011) to generate an even more robust,<br />

discriminatory RTOG RPA model. The explained variation for these three<br />

classification models was found to be 41.7 (Current RPA), 19 (MCP), and<br />

14.9% (<strong>Clinical</strong> RPA), respectively, with higher values indicating better<br />

separation <strong>of</strong> prognostic groups (see table). Conclusions: The current RTOG<br />

RPA classification model, based upon incorporation <strong>of</strong> multi-platform<br />

biomarker analysis, holds promise for RT�TMZ-treated GBM patients;<br />

further validation <strong>of</strong> this model is planned. Financial Support: NCI grants<br />

U10 CA21661, U10 CA37422, U24 CA114734, 1RC2CA148190,<br />

1RC2CA148190, RO1CA108633, and BTFC grant.<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> RPA Current RPA<br />

Model class<br />

Median<br />

survival<br />

(months)<br />

Lower 95%><br />

confidence<br />

limit (CL)<br />

Upper<br />

95% CL<br />

No.<br />

cases<br />

(%)<br />

Model<br />

class<br />

Median<br />

survival Lower<br />

(months) 95% CL Upper<br />

95% CL<br />

115s<br />

No.<br />

cases<br />

(%)<br />

III 33.3 16.8 -na- 32 (19.6) III -na- 23.5 -na- 17 (10.5)<br />

IV 16.3 13.4 19.9 89 (55.9) IV 22.4 15.5 33.3 33 (20.4)<br />

V 13.1 7.9 16.6 41 (25.3) V 15.7 12.9 17.0 101 (62.4)<br />

VI 5.2 2.2 13.6 11 (6.8)<br />

Abbreviation: na, not reached.<br />

2003 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Randomized phase II 8-arm factorial study <strong>of</strong> adjuvant dose-dense (dd)<br />

temozolomide (TMZ) with permutations <strong>of</strong> thalidomide (Thal), isotretinoin<br />

(CRA), and/or celecoxib (Cel) for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).<br />

Presenting Author: Mark R. Gilbert, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson<br />

Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Concurrent radiation and TMZ followed by 6-12 months <strong>of</strong><br />

adjuvant TMZ (d 1-5 <strong>of</strong> a 28d cycle) is the current standard <strong>of</strong> care for<br />

patients with newly diagnosed GBM. The addition <strong>of</strong> cytostatic or signal<br />

transduction agents may enhance efficacy without a significant increase in<br />

toxicity. A phase I trial (Neuro-oncology 2009) established the safety <strong>of</strong><br />

ddTMZ with 2 or 3 <strong>of</strong> the cytostatic agents. Methods: This randomized<br />

phase II study was conducted by the Brain Tumor Trials Collaborative<br />

(BTTC) and the MDACC CCOP. The primary objectives: determine if<br />

specific cytostatic agents added to ddTMZ alters outcomes (PFS, OS) and<br />

compare triplet with doublet therapy. Eligibility criteria: centrally confirmed<br />

newly diagnosed GBM, age �18, KPS�60, stable or improved after<br />

chemoradiation (pseudoprogression allowed), adequate hematologic, renal<br />

and hepatic function. Pts were randomly assigned to 12 treatment cycles<br />

(28 d/cycle) in 8 arms: ddTMZ alone (150 mg/m2/day, 7-d on, 7-d <strong>of</strong>f) or<br />

TMZ-containing doublet, triplet and quadruplet combinations with Thal,<br />

CRA, or Cel. Results: The study enrolled 155 eligible patients from<br />

11/2005 to 9/2010 to the 8 arms <strong>of</strong> the factorial design. Median age was<br />

53 (18-84) and median KPS, 90 (60-100). Compared with TMZ alone, the<br />

TMZ�CRA doublet had worse PFS (10.5, 6.5 mo; p�0.043) and OS<br />

(21.2, 11.7 mo; p�0.037). Trends were also seen for worse outcome (PFS,<br />

OS) for CRA-containing regimens, improved OS for Cel containing arms and<br />

no impact <strong>of</strong> Thal. A strong trend for OS improvement was seen for triplet<br />

compared with doublet regimens (20.1, 17.0 mo; p�0.15), but no<br />

difference for PFS. Treatment was well tolerated with expected high rates <strong>of</strong><br />

grade 3/4 lymphopenia, and overall a modest toxicity rate. Conclusions: The<br />

results indicate that the addition <strong>of</strong> CRA to ddTMZ may be detrimental in<br />

patients with newly diagnosed GBM. This study demonstrated the utility <strong>of</strong><br />

the factorial design in efficiently testing drug combinations, the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

individual agents in these combinations as well as doublet vs. triplet<br />

regimens and supports its utility in testing combinations <strong>of</strong> targeted agents.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!