24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

252s Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer<br />

4055 General Poster Session (Board #42F), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A randomized phase III multi-institutional study <strong>of</strong> TNFerade biologic with<br />

5-FU and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Final results<br />

Presenting Author: Aaron Tyler Wild, Department <strong>of</strong> Radiation Oncology<br />

and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, Baltimore, MD<br />

Background: TNFerade biologic (TNF) is a novel means <strong>of</strong> selective delivery<br />

<strong>of</strong> TNF-� to tumor cells by gene transfer through intratumoral (IT) injection.<br />

TNF is a replication deficient adenovirus vector containing TNF-� cDNA<br />

ligated downstream from a radiation-inducible Egr-1 promoter, allowing<br />

spatiotemporal constraint <strong>of</strong> TNF-� production to the radiation field. Herein<br />

we report the final results <strong>of</strong> a multi-center, randomized, open-label,<br />

controlled phase III trial <strong>of</strong> TNF with chemoradiotherapy for locally<br />

advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). Methods: Pts with<br />

locally advanced PDA were randomized 1:2 to standard <strong>of</strong> care (SOC;<br />

5-FU/RT followed by GEM) versus TNF � SOC. RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28<br />

fractions. Concurrent 5-FU (200 mg/m2 /day IV) started on day 1 <strong>of</strong> RT each<br />

wk. TNF was injected IT ~4 hrs prior to RT weekly by percutaneous (PTA) or<br />

endoscopic (EUS) approach. 4 wks after RT, GEM (1000 mg/m2 IV) was<br />

given until progression or toxicity. Results: Of 277 pts, 187 were randomized<br />

to TNF and 90 to SOC. Demographic/baseline characteristics were<br />

similar between arms (all NS), as was GEM received (67 vs. 68%; 7.0 vs.<br />

7.6 total wks). Median f/up was 9.1 mos (range, 0.1-50.5). Median OS for<br />

TNF by ITT analysis was 10.1 mos (95% CI, 9.1-11.7) vs. 10.0 mos (95%<br />

CI, 7.6-11.2) for SOC (p�0.6). TNF delivery method did not affect OS (9.4<br />

mos for PTA vs. 11.5 for EUS; p�0.7). Baseline CA19-9 � 1000 was<br />

found to impart independent risk to TNF pts (HR�1.7; p�0.02). Subgroup<br />

analysis (SGA) <strong>of</strong> 86 pts with T1-T3 disease showed an OS benefit for TNF<br />

compared to SOC (10.9 vs. 9.0 mos, respectively; p�0.04). TNF resulted<br />

in more grade 1-2 fever/chills (p�0.001) as well as grade 3 (p�0.001) and<br />

4(p�0.05) toxicities (commonly lymphopenia, hypo/hyperkalemia, abd/<br />

chest pain) than SOC. Use <strong>of</strong> PTA vs. EUS did not affect grade 3/4 toxicity<br />

rates. Conclusions: TNF � SOC did not prolong OS for locally advanced<br />

PDA. SGA reveals a possible OS benefit for early stage (T1-T3) tumors and<br />

CA19-9 � 1000. PTA and EUS injection achieved similar rates <strong>of</strong> efficacy<br />

and toxicity. Grade 1-2 toxicity typical <strong>of</strong> systemic exposure to TNF-�<br />

(pyrexia/hypotension/chills) was common, but grade 3-4 was minimal.<br />

4057 General Poster Session (Board #42H), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Activity <strong>of</strong> front-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) in stage III/IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma<br />

(PC) at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC). Presenting<br />

Author: Maeve A. Lowery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,<br />

New York, NY<br />

Background: The PRODIGE/ACCORD trial recently established FFX as a<br />

treatment option for good performance status (PS) pts with stage IV PC<br />

(Conroy et al, NEJM 2011). We evaluated the activity and toxicity<br />

associated with FFX therapy in pts with advanced PC treated at MSKCC<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> a clinical trial. Methods: 80patients (pts) treated withFFX as<br />

1st-line therapyat MSKCC between 07/1/10 and 12/30/11, were identified<br />

from an institutional database (prior IRB approval). Records were reviewed<br />

for demographic, treatment, toxcity, and response data. Results: 61 and 19<br />

pts received FFX for stage IV and III PAC respectively. Demographics and<br />

outcomes are summarized in the table. Median starting dose <strong>of</strong> FFX was<br />

80% <strong>of</strong> that used in the PRODIGE/ACCORD trial. Median overall survival<br />

(OS) was 12.5 months (mo) (95% CI 9.5–15.5) in pts treated with 1st line<br />

FFX for stage IV PAC and 13.7 mo (95% CI 11.3–15.8) in pts with stage III<br />

PAC. 68% <strong>of</strong> pts with stage IV PAC who discontinued FFX for disease<br />

progression (PD) or toxicity received 2nd-line gemcitabine-based therapy.<br />

Conclusions: We observed activity and acceptable toxicity in carefully<br />

selected patients treated with FFX at 80% dose intensity and routine use <strong>of</strong><br />

growth factor support. Treatment with FFX resulted in median OS <strong>of</strong> � 1<br />

year in pts with stage IV PAC and is an active front-line regimen.<br />

1st line: Stage IV<br />

N�61<br />

1st line: Stage III<br />

N�19<br />

Age (yrs)<br />

Sex<br />

Male<br />

64 (range 46-80)<br />

-<br />

33(54%)<br />

58 (range 37-69)<br />

-<br />

11(58%)<br />

Female<br />

Primary tumor<br />

28(46%)<br />

-<br />

8(42%)<br />

-<br />

Head<br />

23(38%)<br />

14(74%)<br />

Body<br />

21(34%)<br />

2(10%)<br />

Tail<br />

Prophylactic growth factor<br />

Median number <strong>of</strong> cycles<br />

Dose reduction/discontinutation for toxicity<br />

17(28%)<br />

51(84%)<br />

7<br />

32(52%)<br />

3(16%)<br />

15(79%)<br />

6<br />

9(47%)<br />

GI<br />

11(18%)<br />

4(21%)<br />

Myelosupression<br />

4(7%)<br />

1(5%)<br />

Neuropathy<br />

9(15%)<br />

1(5%)<br />

Drug reaction<br />

4(7%)<br />

1(5%)<br />

Other<br />

Subsequent surgery/RT<br />

Best response*<br />

4(7%)<br />

N/A<br />

-<br />

2(10%)<br />

1(5%)/10(53%)<br />

-<br />

PR<br />

21(40%)<br />

4(21%)<br />

SD<br />

23(45%)<br />

13(68%)<br />

PD<br />

8(15%)<br />

2(11%)<br />

* Evaluable pts N�52 (1 pt not yet staged, 3 pts� 2 cycles FFX due to toxicity/5 pts due to<br />

non-treatment-related death).<br />

4056 General Poster Session (Board #42G), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

M402, a heparan sulfate mimetic and novel candidate for the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

pancreatic cancer. Presenting Author: Birgit C. Schultes, Momenta Pharmaceuticals,<br />

Cambridge, MA<br />

Background: Recent advances in pancreatic cancer research implicate the<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> several heparin-binding growth factors (such as HGF,<br />

HB-EGF, PDGF, hedgehogs, and TGFs) that control tumor-stroma interactions.<br />

We have rationally designed a heparan sulfate mimetic, M402, which<br />

has been previously shown to affect tumor progression and metastasis<br />

through disruption <strong>of</strong> multiple pathways. We hypothesized that M402<br />

could modulate tumor-stroma interactions and enhance the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

gemcitabine, and evaluated its efficacy in two preclinical models. Methods:<br />

A genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM; KrasLSLG12D p53LSLR172H )<br />

featuring spontaneous pancreatic tumor formation and metastasis assessed<br />

M402’s effect on tumorigenesis and metastasis. The orthotopic<br />

Capan-2 model in nude mice evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> M402 on desmoplasia,<br />

a fibrotic response that hinders effective delivery <strong>of</strong> chemotherapeutics, via<br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling in fibroblasts and stellate<br />

cells. In both models, M402 was studied as monotherapy and with<br />

gemcitabine. Results: In the GEMM, M402 significantly prolonged survival<br />

in combination with gemcitabine while each monotherapy showed modest<br />

efficacy. M402, alone and in combination, also reduced metastases and<br />

local invasion and inhibited epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. In the<br />

Capan-2 model, gemcitabine was increasingly less effective as desmoplasia<br />

progressed over time. The addition <strong>of</strong> M402 to gemcitabine increased<br />

its efficacy with respect to primary tumor burden. Metastasis, invasion, and<br />

surrounding fibrotic lesions appeared particularly impacted by the combination<br />

treatment. M402 was also effective as monotherapy with dosedependency,<br />

which correlated with reduced SHH signaling. Conclusions:<br />

M402 can modulate tumor-stroma interactions involved in the metastatic<br />

and desmoplastic pathways in two pancreatic cancer models supporting<br />

the translation <strong>of</strong> these findings into a clinical study. A first-in-human study<br />

is planned that will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and<br />

biomarker pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> escalating M402 doses in combination with gemcitabine<br />

in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.<br />

4058 General Poster Session (Board #43A), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Benefits <strong>of</strong> platinum-based chemotherapy (Pt-chemo) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma<br />

(PC) associated with BRCA mutations: A translational case<br />

series. Presenting Author: Olusola O. Faluyi, Princess Margaret Hospital,<br />

Toronto, ON, Canada<br />

Background: The prognosis <strong>of</strong> PC is poor with limited response to standard<br />

chemotherapy. Prior randomized studies <strong>of</strong> cisplatin and gemcitabine in PC<br />

demonstrated no additional benefit over gemcitabine alone. Preclinical<br />

data and case reports suggest that BRCA mutant PC may have increased<br />

sensitivity to Pt-chemo. Our case series characterizes the benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

Pt-chemo in germline BRCA mutant PC. Methods: Patients with PC and<br />

germline BRCA mutations were identified using the Ontario Pancreatic<br />

Cancer Study and Pharmacy databases. Review <strong>of</strong> clinical records provided<br />

demographic, treatment and survival data. Radiology review assessed<br />

responses to chemotherapy. RNA was extracted from tumor samples for<br />

gene expression studies using a panel <strong>of</strong> DNA repair genes and Nanostring<br />

technology. BRCA loss <strong>of</strong> heterozygosity (LOH) was also investigated.<br />

Results: We identified 14 PC patients with BRCA mutations (8 BRCA2, 6<br />

BRCA1). 11 <strong>of</strong> these had metastatic disease <strong>of</strong> which 5 received Pt-chemo.<br />

Of the 5 treated with Pt-chemo, there were 3 partial responses (PR) and 2<br />

complete responses (CR) using Recist criteria. For the remaining 6 not<br />

treated with Pt-chemo, there was 1 PR with gemcitabine. Additionally, two<br />

patients with locally advanced disease at diagnosis became resectable<br />

following Pt-chemo. Overall survival was superior for patients receiving<br />

Pt-chemo (33.0�25.6 vs 7.3�4.5 months; p�0.04). Gene expression<br />

and LOH results will be presented. Conclusions: Responses and survival<br />

associated with Pt-chemo observed in our case series <strong>of</strong> BRCA mutant PC<br />

adds to existing data supporting the use <strong>of</strong> Pt-chemo in this subgroup.<br />

Despite the low (2 to 5%) prevalence <strong>of</strong> BRCA mutations in PC, the benefits<br />

gained from personalizing treatment using Pt-chemo supports BRCA<br />

testing in selected patients.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!