24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

314s Genitourinary Cancer<br />

4650 General Poster Session (Board #11A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Correlation <strong>of</strong> increased eosinophil count following sipuleucel-T treatment<br />

with outcome in patients (pts) with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate<br />

cancer (mCRPC). Presenting Author: Douglas G. McNeel, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI<br />

Background: Sipuleucel-T is the first autologous cellular immunotherapy<br />

approved for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic mCRPC. In the<br />

IMPACT trial, pts treated with sipuleucel-T had transient increases in<br />

eosinophil counts compared with control. In this retrospective analysis, we<br />

assess potential correlations between eosinophilia, overall survival (OS),<br />

prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) and immune response following<br />

sipuleucel-T. Methods: Data from three phase III trials (D9901, D9902A,<br />

and IMPACT) were pooled. The analysis included CBCs performed at<br />

baseline and wks 2–34. Eosinophilia was defined as either �ULN (with<br />

normal baseline), or a max change from baseline within the top quartile, at<br />

any time between wks 2–16. Results: Increased eosinophil counts were<br />

seen in sipuleucel-T pts by wk 6, decreasing to near baseline by wk 14;<br />

eosinophil counts in control pts were stable. Of 377 sipuleucel-T pts<br />

eligible for analysis, 105 (27.9%) had eosinophilia. Baseline disease<br />

characteristics associated with eosinophilia were indicative <strong>of</strong> better<br />

prognosis (i.e., longer Halabi predicted survival [p�0.007], lower PSA<br />

[P�0.033], higher Hgb [p�0.001], and no prior docetaxel [p�0.012]). In<br />

univariate analyses, eosinophilia correlated with improved OS (HR�0.75;<br />

95%CI: 0.56–1.01; p�0.057) and PCSS (HR�0.71; 95%CI: 0.53–<br />

0.97; p�0.031); trends persisted after adjusting for Halabi. The magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> eosinophilia positively correlated with antigen-specific humoral<br />

responses (p �0.039 for wks 6, 14 and 26) and elevations in the cytokines<br />

at wk 6 (IL2 [p�0.011], IL5 [p�0.038] and TARC [p�0.001]). AEs<br />

occurring more frequently (p�0.05) in pts with eosinophilia were infusionrelated:<br />

pyrexia (33.3 v 21.3%) and nausea (19.0 v 10.7%). No cases <strong>of</strong><br />

hypereosinophilic syndrome were reported. Conclusions: Increases in eosinophils<br />

after sipuleucel-T correlated with improved OS and PCSS. Large<br />

increases in eosinophil counts were associated with humoral responses and<br />

Th2-type cytokine production. Further studies <strong>of</strong> eosinophilia as a biomarker<br />

for sipuleucel-T response, particularly in earlier disease settings,<br />

are <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

4652 General Poster Session (Board #11C), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Comparing the ability <strong>of</strong> clinicians and a nomogram model at predicting<br />

future 99mTc-bone scan (BS) positivity in patients (pts) with rising prostatespecific<br />

antigen (PSA) following radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate<br />

cancer (PCa). Presenting Author: Michael W. Kattan, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH<br />

Background: Nomograms that assist clinicians in predicting which PCa pts<br />

have a high risk <strong>of</strong> developing M1 disease have been developed, but<br />

clinicians still tend to use their own judgment <strong>of</strong> risk when managing<br />

individual pts. This is the first study to compare the ability <strong>of</strong> clinicians vs a<br />

nomogram at predicting future BS positivity in pts with PCa. Only androgen<br />

deprivation therapy- (ADT-) naive post-RP pts were considered, as there are<br />

currently no nomograms for predicting M1 disease in pts receiving ADT.<br />

The Slovin nomogram (Slovin et al. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 8669-<br />

8673) was chosen based on considerations <strong>of</strong> the numbers <strong>of</strong> pts analyzed<br />

and the follow-up intervals used in its development. Methods: During an<br />

advisory board in June 2011, 24 PCa experts were given details <strong>of</strong> 25<br />

ADT-naive post-RP PCa pts with biochemical recurrence who were randomly<br />

selected from the Cleveland Clinic Database <strong>of</strong> 759 pts. The<br />

predicted 1-yr from today probability <strong>of</strong> freedom from metastasis was<br />

generated using the Slovin nomogram and estimated by the clinicians. The<br />

predictive accuracy was quantified using the concordance index (C-index).<br />

Results: All pts were Caucasian and median age was 62 yrs. Median PSA<br />

level at biochemical recurrence was 1.2 ng/mL and PSADT varied between<br />

1.3 and 11.7 months. The data used for each <strong>of</strong> the pts was acquired<br />

between 4 and 133 months after the RP procedure. Eight pts had a positive<br />

BS within 1 yr. Considerable variation between the clinicians’ predictions<br />

for each pt was observed. The nomogram gave a higher C-index compared to<br />

the clinicians (0.812 and 0.628, respectively; p�0.003). The clinicians<br />

typically overestimated the risk <strong>of</strong> developing M1 disease. The nomogram<br />

outperformed all <strong>of</strong> the clinicians (C-index range: 0.47 to 0.75). Urologists<br />

predictions were superior to those <strong>of</strong> oncologists (p�0.048). Conclusions:<br />

The Slovin nomogram was more accurate than expert clinicians in predicting<br />

1-yr BS positivity. We suggest nomograms should become an integral<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the clinical decision process in the PCa setting.<br />

4651 General Poster Session (Board #11B), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Proton radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the Medicare population:<br />

Patterns <strong>of</strong> care and comparison <strong>of</strong> early toxicity with IMRT. Presenting<br />

Author: James B. Yu, Yale University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New Haven, CT<br />

Background: Proton radiotherapy (PRT) is a costly treatment used for<br />

prostate cancer despite little evidence supporting its use. We examined<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> PRT use in the Medicare program and assessed the short-term<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> PRT vs. intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods:<br />

Using national Medicare claims from 2008-2009, we identified a sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> prostate cancer patients ages 66-94 who had received PRT or IMRT. We<br />

used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and regional<br />

factors associated with receipt <strong>of</strong> PRT. We searched claims for procedure<br />

and diagnosis codes indicative <strong>of</strong> treatment-related complications and<br />

grouped the complications into genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI),<br />

and other complications. To compare the effect <strong>of</strong> PRT and IMRT on<br />

short-term toxicity, we used a Mahalanobis distance approach to match<br />

each PRT patient to two IMRT patients, achieving balanced distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. We compared six-month<br />

and one-year outcomes between the two treatment groups using conditional<br />

logistic regression. Results: We identified 27,647 men; 421 (2%)<br />

received PRT and 27,226 (98%) received IMRT. Patients who received<br />

PRT were widely geographically distributed, with some patients traveling<br />

�500 miles for treatment. PRT patients were younger, healthier, and <strong>of</strong><br />

higher socioeconomic status. Although PRT was associated with a significant<br />

reduction in GU complications at six-months compared with IMRT<br />

(6.1% vs. 12.0%, OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.38-0.96], p�0.03), at one-year<br />

post-treatment there was no longer any difference in cumulative complication<br />

rates (18.9% vs. 21.9%, OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.61-1.53], p�0.88).<br />

There was no significant difference in GI or other complications at<br />

six-months or one-year post-treatment. Conclusions: Although PRT remains<br />

a scarcely used treatment, some prostate cancer patients traveled great<br />

distances for treatment. While PRT was associated with a reduction in<br />

six-month GU toxicity, there were no differences in toxicity at one-year.<br />

Further study on longer-term effects and other clinical and patient-reported<br />

outcomes is needed to inform the widespread application <strong>of</strong> PRT.<br />

4653 General Poster Session (Board #11D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Detecting prostate cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A role<br />

for EN2? Presenting Author: Emma Killick, Institute <strong>of</strong> Cancer Research,<br />

Sutton, United Kingdom<br />

Background: EN2 is part <strong>of</strong> the HOX gene family and plays a role in foetal<br />

development. More recently a potential oncogenic role for the protein has<br />

been postulated and its utility as a cancer biomarker has been explored in<br />

prostate cancer (PrCa) and breast cancer. Carriers <strong>of</strong> mutations in the<br />

BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have an increased risk <strong>of</strong> PrCa (1.8-fold and<br />

5-fold respectively) and their tumours tend to be more aggressive and<br />

advanced than sporadic cases. Currently there is no national screening<br />

program for BRCA mutation carriers in the UK, and the IMPACT study was<br />

set up to evaluate PSA screening in this particular group. Here we analyse<br />

the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the urinary EN2 protein as a marker <strong>of</strong> early cancer detection<br />

within this higher risk group. Methods: First pass urine (without preceding<br />

digital rectal examination) was collected as part <strong>of</strong> the IMPACT screening<br />

study which enrolled individuals aged between 40 and 69 who were<br />

unaffected by PrCa at time <strong>of</strong> enrolment into the study (n� 418). All<br />

participants were from families harbouring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation<br />

and were either BRCA mutation carriers themselves or controls with a<br />

negative predictive BRCA genetic test. They underwent annual PSA test<br />

with a PSA <strong>of</strong> � 3.0 ng/ml triggering a diagnostic biopsy. EN2 protein was<br />

measured in the urine using an ELISA; (positive ��42.5ng/ml). Results:<br />

Our initial results demonstrated urinary EN2 had a sensitivity <strong>of</strong> 66.67%<br />

and a specificity <strong>of</strong> 89.29% when discriminating which men had been<br />

diagnosed with PrCa; the ROC AUC was 0.816. The difference in EN2 level<br />

between those diagnosed with cancer and those who were not was<br />

significant (p ��0.001). There was trend towards higher EN2 levels in<br />

those with more aggressive tumours (median EN2 84.5ng/mL in Gleason<br />

�3�4 vs 111ng/mL in Gleason �4�3), however this was not statistically<br />

significant. In one PrCa case EN2 rise preceded PSA rise by 2 years.<br />

Further samples are in the process <strong>of</strong> being analysed, results from these will<br />

be included. Conclusions: Urinary EN2 protein measurement warrants<br />

further investigation as a PrCa biomarker in this higher risk group with<br />

genetic predisposition to PrCa.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!