Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
74s Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy<br />
1101 General Poster Session (Board #31B), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Patterns <strong>of</strong> regional node irradiation therapy following breast-conserving<br />
surgery: Report from the National Cancer Data Base 2003-2007. Presenting<br />
Author: Ningqi Hou, University <strong>of</strong> Chicago, Chicago, IL<br />
Background: A recent randomized trial (MA.20) showed that regional nodal<br />
irradiation (RNI) in addition to breast irradiation in high risk node negative<br />
and 1-3 node positive patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT)<br />
reduced the risk <strong>of</strong> recurrence and improved disease-free survival. We<br />
investigated the trends <strong>of</strong> RNI use in the United States and related factors<br />
for the use <strong>of</strong> RNI using the National Cancer Data Base. Methods: This study<br />
includes 292,598 stage I-III breast cancer patients without neoadjuvant<br />
therapy who underwent BCT from 2003-2007. We investigated pathological,<br />
patient, and facility factors related to RNI use, by multivariable logistic<br />
regression, with odds ratio (OR) estimations. Results: The proportion <strong>of</strong><br />
radiotherapy use after BCT slightly declined from 78.6% in 2003 to 75.6%<br />
in 2007. The use <strong>of</strong> breast irradiation plus RNI decreased from 10.8% in<br />
2003 to 8.3% in 2007 (p�0.0001). The number <strong>of</strong> tumor positive lymph<br />
nodes strongly determined the use <strong>of</strong> additional RNI: 4.4% patients with<br />
negative nodes, 22.8% patients with 1-3 nodes, and 39.7% patients with<br />
4 or more nodes received breast irradiation plus RNI after undergoing BCT<br />
(p�0.0001). The proportion <strong>of</strong> patients undergoing RNI significantly<br />
decreased over the study period from 43.3% to 37.2% in the 4� node<br />
positive group, and from 23.6% to 22.0% in the 1-3 node positive group.<br />
At comprehensive community cancer centers, 25.5% patients with 1-3<br />
positive nodes were treated with breast irradiation plus RNI (vs. 23.2% in<br />
community cancer centers and 21.1% in academic/research cancer<br />
centers). Among node negative patients, 11.5% <strong>of</strong> those with tumor size<br />
greater than 5 cm received additional RNI, compared to 4.3% in patients<br />
with tumors less than 5cm (p�0.0001). Other significant factors related to<br />
RNI use included higher tumor grade, younger age, facility location, and<br />
facility volume. Conclusions: The use <strong>of</strong> RNI varies by number <strong>of</strong> tumor<br />
positive nodes and facility factors. Only 22.8% <strong>of</strong> patients with 1-3 positive<br />
nodes underwent RNI. Future studies are needed to determine if the use <strong>of</strong><br />
RNI will increase after publication <strong>of</strong> the MA.20 trial especially for the 1-3<br />
node positive group.<br />
1103 General Poster Session (Board #31D), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
SPIO-enhanced MR imaging for axillary staging to avoid sentinel node<br />
biopsy in patients with breast cancer. Presenting Author: Kazuyoshi<br />
Motomura, Department <strong>of</strong> Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka Medical<br />
Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan<br />
Background: We previously demonstrated the usefulness <strong>of</strong> SPIO-enhanced<br />
MR imaging for the detection <strong>of</strong> metastases in sentinel nodes localized by<br />
computed tomography (CT) lymphography (CT-LG) in patients with breast<br />
cancer (Ann Surg Oncol, 2011). These techniques have evolved and we<br />
report our most recent results <strong>of</strong> axillary staging using them. Methods:<br />
Previously unreported 87 consecutive patients with breast cancer and<br />
clinically negative nodes were enrolled in this study. Sentinel nodes<br />
identified by CT-LG were evaluated prospectively using SPIO-enhanced MR<br />
imaging. A node was considered non-metastatic if it showed a homogenous<br />
low signal intensity and metastatic if the entire node or a focal area did not<br />
show a low signal intensity on MR imaging. Sentinel nodes located by<br />
CT-LG were removed, and imaging results and histopathological findings<br />
were compared. Results: The mean patient age was 54.9 years (range,<br />
34-77). Sentinel nodes were identified by CT-LG and removed successfully<br />
in all patients. The mean number <strong>of</strong> sentinel nodes identified by CT-LG was<br />
1.16 (range, 1-2). Twenty <strong>of</strong> 22 patients with positive sentinel nodes<br />
definitively diagnosed by pathology demonstrated metastases on SPIOenhanced<br />
MR imaging. Fifty-eight <strong>of</strong> 65 patients with negative sentinel<br />
nodes definitively diagnosed by pathology were non-metastatic on imaging<br />
studies. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy <strong>of</strong> MR imaging for the<br />
diagnosis <strong>of</strong> sentinel node metastases were 91%, 89%, and 90%,<br />
respectively. Two patients whose metastases were not detected had<br />
micrometastases. No adverse events were associated with either CT or MR<br />
imaging. Conclusions: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging provided accurate<br />
axillary staging, and therefore sentinel node biopsy may not be necessary<br />
for most patients with breast cancer.<br />
1102 General Poster Session (Board #31C), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Primary tumor resection to improve survival and local disease control in<br />
stage IV inflammatory breast cancer. Presenting Author: Catherine Akay,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />
Background: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive form<br />
<strong>of</strong> breast cancer typically presenting with early metastasis. Optimal<br />
outcomes are achieved with multimodality treatment strategies in the<br />
non-metastatic setting. Data is limited, however, on the benefit <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />
in patients with metastatic IBC. We evaluated the effect <strong>of</strong> primary tumor<br />
resection on outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed stage IV IBC.<br />
Methods: We reviewed records <strong>of</strong> 172 patients with metastatic IBC treated<br />
at our institution from 1994 - 2009. All patients received systemic therapy<br />
with or without locoregional therapy (LRT). Patient demographics, receptor<br />
(ER) and HER2-neu status, grade, histology, presence <strong>of</strong> lymphovascular<br />
invasion, margin status, number <strong>of</strong> distant disease sites, pathologic<br />
response <strong>of</strong> primary tumor and clinical response to systemic therapy (CRS)<br />
at distant disease sites were recorded. Overall survival (OS), distant<br />
progression-free survival (DPFS), and chest/skin involvement at last follow-up<br />
were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, univariate (UV) and<br />
multivariate (MV) logistic regression models were used. Chest/skin involvement<br />
was compared between groups using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results:<br />
Seventy-nine (45%) patients underwent primary tumor resection. Average<br />
age was 51 (22-78). Median live-patient follow-up was 33 months. OS and<br />
DPFS were significantly better for patients who underwent LRT versus none<br />
(p�0.0001). Factors associated significantly for improved DPFS on MV<br />
analysis were ER and HER2-neu status (HR 0.61,0.60 p�0.02,0.05<br />
,respectively), LRT (HR .38, p�0.002) and CRS (HR 0.62, p�0.03). ER<br />
status (HR .45, p�0.001), LRT (HR .30, p�0.001) and CRS (HR 0.54,<br />
p�0.02) were significant predictors for higher OS on MV analysis. At last<br />
follow up, chest/skin involvement was moderate/severe in 11% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />
in LRT group versus 35% <strong>of</strong> patients in no LRT group (p�0.0001).<br />
Conclusions: This latest retrospective study demonstrates metastatic IBC<br />
patients who undergo LRT in addition to systemic therapy may have<br />
improved survival and local control outcomes. CRS may be used to guide<br />
LRT. A prospective randomized trial is needed to validate these findings.<br />
1104 General Poster Session (Board #31E), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Breast cancer multifocality-multicentricity and survival outcomes. Presenting<br />
Author: Siobhan P. Lynch, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer<br />
Center, Houston, TX<br />
Background: Studies have consistently shown a correlation between multifocal<br />
(MF) and multicentric (MC) breast cancers and the rate and extent <strong>of</strong><br />
lymph node metastases, but the literature is divided on whether there is a<br />
corresponding impact on survival outcomes. In the absence <strong>of</strong> compelling<br />
evidence to dictate otherwise, the convention according to current TNM<br />
staging guidelines has been to stage and treat MF and MC cancers<br />
according to the diameter <strong>of</strong> the largest lesions, without taking other foci <strong>of</strong><br />
disease into consideration. We evaluated a large single institution cohort <strong>of</strong><br />
MF and MC breast cancers to determine their frequency, clinicopathological<br />
characteristics and effect on survival outcomes. Methods: MF<br />
and MC were defined pathologically as more than one lesion in the same<br />
quadrant and more than one lesion in separate quadrants, respectively.<br />
Patients were categorized by presence or absence <strong>of</strong> MF or MC disease.<br />
Kaplan-Meier product limit method was used to calculate relapse-free<br />
survival (RFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival<br />
(OS). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine independent<br />
associations <strong>of</strong> MF/MC disease with survival outcomes. Results: Out <strong>of</strong><br />
3924 patients, 942 (24%) had MF (n�695) or MC (n�247) disease. MF<br />
and MC disease was associated with higher T-stages (T2 26% vs. 21.6%;<br />
T3 7.4% vs. 2.3%, P�0.001), higher nuclear grade (grade 3 44% vs.<br />
38.2%, P�0.001), lymphovascular invasion (26.2% vs. 19.3%, P�0.001)<br />
and lymph node metastases (43.1% vs. 27.3%, P�0.001). After a median<br />
follow up <strong>of</strong> 51 months, MC but not MF breast cancers were associated with<br />
significantly worse 5-year RFS (90% vs. 95%, P�0.02) and BCSS (95%<br />
vs. 97%, P�0.01), and a trend towards worse 5-year OS (92% vs. 93%,<br />
P�0.08). After controlling for other risk factors, multifocality and multicentricity<br />
did not have an independent impact on RFS, BCSS or OS. This was<br />
true for the subset <strong>of</strong> T1N0 breast cancers as well. Conclusions: MF and MC<br />
breast cancers occurred in 24% <strong>of</strong> the cases and were associated with poor<br />
prognostic factors, but they were not independent predictors <strong>of</strong> worse<br />
survival outcomes. Our findings support the current TNM staging system <strong>of</strong><br />
using the diameter <strong>of</strong> the largest lesion to assign T-stage.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.