24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

608s Pediatric Oncology<br />

CRA9508 Oral Abstract Session, Sat, 1:15 PM-4:15 PM<br />

Outcome in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients compared with<br />

younger patients treated for high-risk B-precursor acute lymphoblastic<br />

leukemia (HR-ALL): A report from the Children’s Oncology Group study<br />

AALL0232. Presenting Author: Eric Larsen, Maine Children’s Cancer<br />

Program, Scarborough, ME<br />

The full, final text <strong>of</strong> this abstract will be available at<br />

abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Saturday, June 2,<br />

2012, and in the <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong> online<br />

supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue <strong>of</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Clinical</strong> Oncology. Onsite at the <strong>Meeting</strong>, this abstract will<br />

be printed in the Saturday edition <strong>of</strong> ASCO Daily News.<br />

9510 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> prognostic molecular markers in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma<br />

based on gene expression and copy number variations. Presenting<br />

Author: Edoardo Missiaglia, Swiss Institute <strong>of</strong> Bioinformatics, Lausanne,<br />

Switzerland<br />

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

tissue sarcoma and comprises two major histological subtypes: alveolar and<br />

embryonal. The majority <strong>of</strong> alveolar tumors harbor PAX/FOXO1 fusion<br />

genes. Current patient risk stratification, unlike other pediatric embryonal<br />

tumors, does not utilize any molecular data. Therefore, we aimed to<br />

improve the risk stratification <strong>of</strong> RMS patients through the use <strong>of</strong> molecular<br />

biological data. Methods: Two independent data sets <strong>of</strong> gene expression<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iling for 124 and 101 RMS were used to derive prognostic gene<br />

signatures by meta-analysis. Genomic array CGH data for 109 RMS was<br />

also evaluated to develop a prognostic marker based on copy number<br />

variations (CNVs). The performance and usefulness <strong>of</strong> these derived<br />

metagenes and CNVs as well as a previously published metagene signature<br />

were evaluated using rigorous leave-one-out cross-validation analyses.<br />

Results: The new prognostic gene expression signature, MG15, and one<br />

previously published (MG34) (Davicioni. JCO. 2010) performed well with<br />

reproducible and significant effects (HR 3.2 [1.7-5.9] p � 0.001 and HR<br />

2.5 [1.5-4.3] p � 0.001, respectively). However, they did not significantly<br />

add new prognostic information over the fusion gene status (PAX3/FOXO1,<br />

PAX7/FOXO1 and Negative). Similarly, a prognostic CNV marker, although<br />

showing HR 2.9 [1.5-5.6] p � 0.01, was also not improving models with<br />

fusion gene status. Within fusion negative RMS, the analysis identified<br />

prognostic markers based on either gene expression or CNVs and showed<br />

significant association with patients outcome (HR 6.3 [1.5-26.3] p �<br />

0.016 and HR 11.2 [2.5-50.7] p � 0.010, respectively). Moreover, these<br />

were able to identify distinct risk groups within the COG (Children’s<br />

Oncology Group) risk categories, which is currently used to guide treatment.<br />

Conclusions: Molecular signatures derived using all RMS effectively<br />

stratify patients by their risk, but most <strong>of</strong> their prognostic information is<br />

contained in the PAX/FOXO1 fusion gene status which is simpler to assay.<br />

New markers developed within the fusion negative population seem<br />

improving current RMS risk classifier and should be tested in follow-up<br />

studies.<br />

9509 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Vincristine (V), dactinomycin (A), and lower doses <strong>of</strong> cyclophosphamide (C)<br />

with or without radiation therapy for patients with newly diagnosed low-risk<br />

embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS): A report from the Children’s<br />

Oncology Group (COG). Presenting Author: David Walterhouse, Children’s<br />

Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS) trials showed<br />

improved survival with VAC compared with VA for patients with Stage 1<br />

Group III (non-orbit) or Stage 3 Group I/II ERMS (see table). In COG<br />

ARST0331, we hypothesized that VA in combination with lower doses <strong>of</strong> C<br />

(total cumulative dose�4.8 g/m2 ) would produce the benefit <strong>of</strong> IRS-IV VAC<br />

with less toxicity for patients with Stage 1 Group III (non-orbit) or Stage 3<br />

Group I/II low-risk ERMS. Methods: This single arm, non-inferiority, phase<br />

III study enrolled newly diagnosed patients with Stage 1 Group III<br />

(non-orbit) ERMS or Stage 3 Group I/II ERMS onto Subset 2. Therapy was 4<br />

cycles <strong>of</strong> VAC followed by 12 cycles <strong>of</strong> VA over 46 weeks (total cumulative<br />

doses: V�54 mg/m2 ,A�21.6 mg/m2 ,C�4.8 g/m2 ). The radiation therapy<br />

dose was 36 Gy for Group IIA patients, 41.4 Gy for Group IIB/C patients,<br />

and 50.4 Gy for Group III patients. From 2004–2008 girls with Group III<br />

vaginal RMS did not receive radiotherapy if a complete response was<br />

achieved with chemotherapy with or without delayed resection. The primary<br />

endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS), and results were compared with a<br />

fixed expected outcome. Results: With a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 3.0 yrs, we<br />

observed 16 failures vs. 7.8 expected failures. Estimated 3-yr FFS was<br />

63% (95% CI: 46%, 75%) (n�60), and overall survival (OS) was 84%<br />

(95% CI: 68%, 93%). Estimated 3-yr FFS was 46% (95% CI: 23%, 67%)<br />

for girls with non-bladder genitourinary tract ERMS (n�21) and 75% (95%<br />

CI: 53%, 88%) for all other Subset 2 patients (n�39). Conclusions: We<br />

observed suboptimal FFS <strong>of</strong> patients with Subset 2 low-risk RMS using<br />

reduced total cyclophosphamide (4.8 g/m2 ). Results were complicated by<br />

the choice <strong>of</strong> no radiation therapy for girls with vaginal tumors. Future<br />

studies for low-risk RMS Subset 2 patients could investigate a dose <strong>of</strong> C<br />

between 4.8 and 26.4 g/m2 with VA and local radiotherapy.<br />

Chemotherapy cumulative dose<br />

Study<br />

Duration<br />

(weeks) V (mg/m<br />

FFS<br />

(5-yr)<br />

OS<br />

(5-yr)<br />

2 ) A (mg/m2 ) C (g/m2 )<br />

IRS-III 45 72 13.5 - 70% 79%<br />

IRS-IV 45 48 22.5 26.4 84%<br />

98%<br />

p�0.008 p�0.004<br />

9511 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> TNK2 as a critical kinase in rhabdomyosarcoma through a<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> function shRNA screen. Presenting Author: Fernanda Irene Arnaldez,<br />

Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD<br />

Background: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common pediatric s<strong>of</strong>t tissue<br />

sarcoma. Embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas (ERMS) are characterized by<br />

11p15 LOH while alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas harbor a translocation<br />

between PAX3 or PAX7 and FOXO1. Relapsed or metastatic disease has a<br />

5-year survival rate <strong>of</strong> 25%. Methods: We sought to identify critical genes<br />

for rhabdomyosarcoma cell growth and survival. We performed a loss-<strong>of</strong>function<br />

shRNA screen where a library <strong>of</strong> 15,000 shRNAs was introduced<br />

in RH30 (ARMS) and RD (ERMS) cells engineered to express the bacterial<br />

tetracycline repressor in a tet-on system. Relative abundance <strong>of</strong> cells<br />

containing a certain shRNA was determined using specific barcodes. We<br />

subtracted “hits” that are common to 4 lymphoma cell-lines to eliminate<br />

common survival pathways. Forty genes were associated with rhabdomyosaroma<br />

cell growth, <strong>of</strong> which 15 cause greater suppression in ARMS. We<br />

performed a subsequent validation <strong>of</strong> these 15 genes in multiple ARMS<br />

and ERMS cell lines using three different shRNA sequences using lentiviral<br />

constructs. In addition, we validated our results in an independent siRNA<br />

screen <strong>of</strong> the protein kinome in RMS cells. Results: TNK2 (tyrosine kinase,<br />

non-receptor 2) was identified as tyrosine kinase involved in rhabdomyosarcoma<br />

cell growth independently in the inducible shRNA screen and in the<br />

non-inducible siRNA platform. This molecule has been involved in downstream<br />

signaling from EGFR and integrins. Amplification <strong>of</strong> the TNK2 gene,<br />

located at 3q29, has been described in breast, prostate and lung cancer.<br />

More recently, a siRNA screen identified it as a potential therapeutic target<br />

in Ewing’s sarcoma. We confirmed TNK2 expression across patient tumor<br />

samples in a publically available database; where patients with high TNK2<br />

expression showed lower overall survival. TNK2 knock down resulted in<br />

decreased rhabdomyosarcoma cell growth in vitro and in orthotopic<br />

xenografts. We confirmed specificity <strong>of</strong> our findings with a rescue experiment.<br />

Conclusions: We identified TNK2 as a potential therapeutic target in<br />

rhabdomyosarcoma using a loss-<strong>of</strong>-function shRNA screen and subsequent<br />

validation. Further work is ongoing to fully characterize the molecular<br />

mechanisms involved in these findings.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!