24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1016 Poster Discussion Session (Board #8), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Tesetaxel: Activity <strong>of</strong> an oral taxane as first-line treatment in metastatic<br />

breast cancer. Presenting Author: Andrew David Seidman, Memorial<br />

Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: Tesetaxel, unlike standard taxanes (docetaxel, paclitaxel), is<br />

not a substrate for Pgp, a major cause <strong>of</strong> taxane resistance in tumor models.<br />

In a DU4475 breast cancer xenograft that overexpresses Pgp, tesetaxel<br />

induced a 94% reduction in tumor size, markedly exceeding the activity <strong>of</strong><br />

docetaxel (46%) and paclitaxel (26%). Tesetaxel is associated with<br />

substantially less neuropathy preclinically than equi-myelotoxic doses <strong>of</strong><br />

docetaxel. In clinical studies to date, tesetaxel is not associated with<br />

hypersensitivity reactions (0% incidence in � 450 patients [pts]), thus<br />

eliminating the need for premedication and extended observation. In a prior<br />

study, tesetaxel (27-35 mg/m2 Q3 wks) achieved a 38% partial response<br />

(PR) rate as 2nd-line therapy in pts with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)<br />

who had progressed after multidrug anthracycline-containing regimens. To<br />

extend these data, we initiated a phase 2 study <strong>of</strong> tesetaxel as 1st-line therapy in women with MBC. Methods: Eligibility included MBC; HER2-;<br />

ECOG PS 0-1; and adequate organ function. Adjuvant chemotherapy<br />

(including taxanes) was allowed. Tesetaxel was administered orally without<br />

anti-allergic premedication at a starting dose <strong>of</strong> 27 mg/m2 once every 3<br />

wks. Overall response rate (ORR; RECIST) was the primary endpoint.<br />

Results: All 45 pts have been accrued. Median age is 58 y (range 36-80);<br />

median time from diagnosis, 4.0 y (range 0-21); triple negative status, 8<br />

pts at diagnosis, 14 at time <strong>of</strong> metastasis. Metastatic sites are lung (22<br />

pts), lymph nodes (22), liver (24), and bone (21). Prior treatment includes<br />

anti-estrogen therapy (32 pts), adjuvant chemotherapy (31), prior taxane<br />

(25), and radiotherapy (28). ORR in 24 pts evaluable for response is 50%<br />

(1 CR [4%], 11 PR [46%]); 5 responding pts had prior taxane therapy.<br />

Neutropenia is the most common � Grade 3 adverse event with 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

casesobservedafterdoseescalationto35mg/m2 ;febrileneutropeniaandGrade<br />

3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 2 pts each. There were no hypersensitivity<br />

reactions. Conclusions: Tesetaxel is highly active in 1st-line MBC and<br />

overcomes multiple limitations <strong>of</strong> standard taxanes. Updated ORR and PFS<br />

for all pts will be presented. Weekly dosing will be evaluated in a new cohort<br />

<strong>of</strong> pts.<br />

1018 Poster Discussion Session (Board #10), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Everolimus with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy for<br />

HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A randomized, doubleblind,<br />

placebo-controlled phase II trial <strong>of</strong> the Sarah Cannon Research<br />

Institute (SCRI). Presenting Author: Denise Aysel Yardley, SCRI/Tennessee<br />

Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN<br />

Background: Constitutive activation <strong>of</strong> mTOR and amplified PI3K/Akt/<br />

mTOR signaling are common in MBC, and increase as treatment-resistance<br />

is acquired. Everolimus (E), an mTOR inhibitor, has single agent activity,<br />

combines well with paclitaxel (P) and bevacizumab (B), and prolonged PFS<br />

when added to AI therapy in BOLERO-2. In this randomized phase II trial, E<br />

was added to P/B as first-line treatment <strong>of</strong> HER2-negative MBC. Methods:<br />

Women with untreated HER2-negative MBC were randomized (1:1) to P<br />

90mg/m2 IV (days 1, 8, and 15) and B10mg/kg IV (days 1 and 15) q28<br />

days with E 10mg PO (Arm 1) or placebo PO (Arm 2) daily. Response<br />

assessment was performed q8 weeks until progression or intolerable<br />

toxicity. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints: safety, overall<br />

response rate, response duration, overall survival. 110 pts allowed detection<br />

<strong>of</strong> improvement in median PFS from 11 to 16 months with 70% power.<br />

Results: Between 8/2009 and 6/2011, 112 pts were randomized (Arm<br />

1�55; Arm 2�57). Median age: 58 years (range: 25-79). 88% were ER�<br />

or PR�. Pts received a median 5 treatment cycles (range: �1- 26�); 18<br />

(16%) pts remain on treatment (Arm1, 9; Arm 2, 9). Median PFS were 8.8<br />

months (Arm 1) and 7.1 months (Arm 2) (95% CIs 7.4-9.6; 5.5-9.1<br />

months, p�0.79, HR 0.94). Complete responses were observed in 5%<br />

[Arm1, 4 (7%); Arm 2, 2 (4%)] with partial responses in 49% [Arm1, 29<br />

(53%); Arm 2, 26 (46%)]. Responses rates in taxane pretreated pts Arm 1<br />

22%, Arm 2 12%. Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms; grade 3<br />

mucositis occurred in 13% <strong>of</strong> E pts. Dose reductions (47% vs 25%) and<br />

interruptions (42% vs 26%) were more frequent with E due to mucositis<br />

and rash. Treatment discontinuation rates were similar. Conclusions: The<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> E did not result in a significant improvement in the efficacy <strong>of</strong><br />

weekly paclitaxel/bevacizumab in the first-line treatment <strong>of</strong> HER2-negative<br />

MBC although response rates and median PFS were better with E. Possible<br />

explanation for these results may include lower dose intensity in the E arm,<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> less resistant pts, or intrinsic differences in E activity when<br />

added to antiestrogen vs chemotherapy.<br />

Breast Cancer—Triple-Negative/Cytotoxics/Local Therapy<br />

1017 Poster Discussion Session (Board #9), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Final analysis <strong>of</strong> phase II study <strong>of</strong> EZN-2208 (PEG-SN38) in metastatic<br />

breast cancer (MBC). Presenting Author: Cynthia R. C. Osborne, Baylor<br />

Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology PA, US Oncology, Dallas, TX<br />

Background: EZN-2208 is a water-soluble PEGylated conjugate <strong>of</strong> SN38.<br />

EZN-2208 results in prolonged exposure <strong>of</strong> tumors to SN38 via preferential<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> EZN-2208 in the tumor and prolonged release <strong>of</strong> SN38.<br />

These data represent the final analysis <strong>of</strong> our study evaluating EZN-2208 in<br />

MBC. Methods: EZN-2208 9 mg/m2 (SN38 equivalents) was delivered as a<br />

60-minute IV infusion, weekly for 3 wks in 4-wk cycles. The primary<br />

objective was to determine the overall response rate (RR) in female patients<br />

with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who had received prior adjuvant or<br />

metastatic therapy with either 1) anthracycline and taxane (AT) or 2)<br />

anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine (ATX). Secondary objectives included<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> RR based on tumor receptor status, duration <strong>of</strong><br />

response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.<br />

Results: Patients with MBC (n�164) were treated with a median (range) <strong>of</strong><br />

3.3 (0.3-22) cycles <strong>of</strong> EZN-2208. The objective response rate (RR) was<br />

20% for AT and 9% for ATX. The clinical benefit rate (CBR�%CR � %PR<br />

� %SD �6 months) was 41% and 27% in patients in the AT and ATX<br />

cohorts, respectively. The RR and CBR among ER� patients were 11%<br />

(10/91 pts) and 41.8% (38/91 pts). In patients who progressed during or<br />

within 30 days <strong>of</strong> prior platinum-containing regimens (Platinum Progressors),<br />

the CBR was 20% (8/40 pts). Among triple negative breast cancer<br />

(TNBC) patients, the RR and CBR were 22.5% (11/49 pts) and 36.7%<br />

(18/49 pts). For TNBC, Platinum Progressors, the CBR was 26.1% (6/23<br />

pts). Overall, most common reported drug-related adverse events were<br />

diarrhea, nausea and neutropenia. Conclusions: EZN-2208 has notable<br />

activity in patients with previously treated MBC and appears to be an active<br />

agent for treatment <strong>of</strong> TNBC. Patients with TNBC, who had been previously<br />

treated with a platinum-based regimen, also derive clinical benefit from<br />

EZN-2208. The safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> EZN-2208 is acceptable with good<br />

tolerability in most patients. Further evaluation <strong>of</strong> EZN-2208 in MBC in<br />

general and TNBC in particular is warranted.<br />

1019 Poster Discussion Session (Board #11), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM and<br />

4:45 PM-5:45 PM<br />

Metformin in early breast cancer (BC): A prospective, open-label, neoadjuvant<br />

“window <strong>of</strong> opportunity” study. Presenting Author: Saroj Niraula,<br />

Division <strong>of</strong> Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital<br />

and University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada<br />

Background: There is growing evidence that metformin may exert anticancer<br />

effects through indirect (insulin-mediated) or direct (insulinindependent)<br />

mechanisms. Here, we report final results <strong>of</strong> a neo-adjuvant<br />

“window-<strong>of</strong>-opportunity” study <strong>of</strong> metformin in women with operable BC.<br />

Methods: Newly diagnosed, untreated, non-diabetic BC patients received<br />

metformin 500 mg tid after diagnostic core-biopsy until definitive surgery(no<br />

other treatment). <strong>Clinical</strong> [weight, symptoms, European Organization<br />

for Research and Treatment <strong>of</strong> Cancer Quality <strong>of</strong> Life Questionnaire<br />

(EORTC-QLQ-C-30)] and biologic characteristics [insulin, glucose, homeostatic<br />

model assessment (HOMA), C-reactive protein (CRP), leptin] were<br />

compared pre- and post-metformin as were Terminal deoxynucleotidyl<br />

transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL, an apoptotic<br />

marker) and Ki67 (primary end-point) scored blinded by manual count <strong>of</strong><br />

positive nuclear-staining. The planned sample-size <strong>of</strong> 40 patients gave<br />

90% power to detect a 5.5 percentage point change in Ki67. Results:<br />

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and mean age was 51 years; metformin<br />

was given for 18 days (median), range 13-40 days. Twenty patients had T1<br />

and 19 T2/T3 tumors; 16 tumors were grade III; 24 were N0; 32 ER/PR<br />

positive, 5 HER-2 positive. Grade 1-2 self-limiting diarrhea, anorexia and<br />

abdominal distention occurred in 50%, 41% and 32%. EORTC QLQ scores<br />

were stable in all function domains and overall scores. Main study<br />

outcomes are tabulated here. Conclusions: Short-term preoperative metformin<br />

was well-tolerated and resulted in clinical and cellular effects in<br />

keeping with beneficial anti-cancer effects as demonstrated by improved<br />

insulin resistance (HOMA), decreased proliferation (ki67) and increased<br />

apoptosis (TUNEL).<br />

Variable (units)<br />

Pre-metformin<br />

mean (SD)<br />

53s<br />

Mean change<br />

(SD) p change<br />

Weight (kg) 70.3 (12.3) -1.2 (1.4) �0.0001<br />

BMI (kg/m 2 ) 26.9 (4.6) -0.5 (0.5) �0.0001<br />

CRP (mg/L) 2.0 (2.7) -0.2 (2.6) 0.35<br />

Glucose (mmol/L) 5.30 (0.56 -0.14 (0.43) 0.045<br />

Insulin (pmol/L) 43.4 (23.9) -4.7 (18.1) 0.069<br />

HOMA 1.47 (0.95) -0.21 (0.75) 0.047<br />

Leptin (ng/ml) 16.5 (13.0) -1.3 (7.2) 0.15<br />

TUNEL 0.56 (0.58) 0.49 (1.00) 0.0037<br />

Ki67 36.5 (24.8) -3.0 (9.8) 0.016<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!