24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7528 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Rebiopsy <strong>of</strong> non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to<br />

EGFR-TKI: Comparison between T790M mutation-positive and -negative<br />

populations. Presenting Author: Akito Hata, Division <strong>of</strong> Integrated Oncology,<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Biomedical Research and Innovation, Kobe, Japan<br />

Background: The secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)<br />

mutation T790M accounts for approximately half <strong>of</strong> acquired resistances to<br />

EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). A recent report has demonstrated<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> T790M predicts a favorable prognosis and indolent<br />

progression, compared to the absence <strong>of</strong> T790M after TKI failure. However,<br />

rebiopsy to confirm T790M status can be challenging due to limited tissue<br />

availability and procedural feasibility, and little is known regarding the<br />

differences among patients with or without T790M. Methods: We investigated<br />

73 patients harboring EGFR sensitive mutations who had undergone<br />

rebiopsy to confirm the emergence <strong>of</strong> T790M after TKI failure. The peptide<br />

nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp method was used in EGFR<br />

mutational analyses. Patient characteristics (age, gender, smoking history,<br />

performance status, EGFR mutation site, initial TKI, response to initial TKI,<br />

line <strong>of</strong> initial TKI, progression-free survival with initial TKI, and biopsy site)<br />

and postprogression survivals (PPS) after initial TKI failure, were retrospectively<br />

compared in patients with and without T790M. Results: We identified<br />

T790M in 2 (10%) <strong>of</strong> 21 central nervous system (CNS) (19 cerebrospinal<br />

fluid and 2 brain tissue) specimens, and in 20 (38%) <strong>of</strong> 52 other lesions<br />

(25 lung tissue, 24 pleural effusion, and 3 lymph node) (p � 0.0225).<br />

Other characteristics had no statistical association with the detection <strong>of</strong><br />

T790M. Median PPS in patients with T790M was 34.0 months, and in<br />

those without T790M, 14.5 months (p � 0.0038). Although none <strong>of</strong> our<br />

patients received TKIs continuously after initial failure, 56 (77%) patients<br />

were re-administered TKIs. Regardless <strong>of</strong> T790M status, PPS in patients<br />

with TKI re-administration (23.4 months) was significantly longer than<br />

without re-administration (10.4 months) (p � 0.0085). Conclusions: The<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> T790M in CNS is rare compared with other lesions. Patients<br />

with T790M after TKI failure have significantly better prognosis than those<br />

without T790M. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> TKI re-administration or continuous<br />

administration beyond progression is suggested after initial TKI failure.<br />

7530 Poster Discussion Session (Board #20), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

First-line dacomitinib (PF-00299804), an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine<br />

kinase inhibitor, for patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancers. Presenting<br />

Author: Mark G. Kris, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York,<br />

NY<br />

Background: Dacomitinib irreversibly inhibits EGFR, HER2 and HER4, and<br />

showed superior activity vs. reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in<br />

EGFR-mutant lung cancer models, including resistant forms. This openlabel<br />

Phase II study evaluates dacomitinib as 1st-line treatment (tx) for<br />

patients (pts) with lung cancers. Pts with sensitizing EGFR deletions/<br />

mutations in exons 19 or 21 are reported here. Methods: Pts had stage<br />

IIIB/IV adenocarcinoma, no prior systemic tx, had smoked �10 pack years<br />

(none within 15 years <strong>of</strong> enrollment) or had known EGFR mutation. Pts<br />

received dacomitinib orally once daily continuously at 45 mg, or 30 mg<br />

with the option to escalate to 45 mg; evaluation was every 28 days.<br />

Endpoints included progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS at 4M,<br />

primary); PFS, and partial response (PR) rate. Results: 92 pts enrolled; 47<br />

had EGFR mutation in exons 19 (n�25) or 21 (n�22), 33 were female and<br />

27 Asian. 34/46 evaluable pts with EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutations had a<br />

PR (PR rate � 74%; 95% CI: 59–86; exon 19 � 72%; exon 21 � 76%).<br />

PR rates and preliminary PFS were not significantly different for exons 19<br />

and 21. Preliminary PFS at 4M was 96% (95% CI: 84–99), preliminary<br />

PFS rate at 1 year was 77% (95% CI: 61–87) and preliminary median PFS<br />

was 17 months (95% CI: 13–24). Median tx duration was 13.1 months. For<br />

pts with EGFR wild-type lung cancers, PR and PFS at 4M rates were 7%<br />

(n�14; 95% CI: 0–34) and 33% (n�14; 95% CI: 11–58), respectively,<br />

and for pts with EGFR unknown lung cancers, 46% (n�22; 95% CI:<br />

24–68) and 68% (n�24; 95% CI: 45– 83), respectively. 7 pts had lung<br />

cancers with non-sensitizing EGFR mutations; 2 had a PR and 3 SD. For all<br />

92 pts, common side effects included dermatitis acneiform (grade 3/4 �<br />

17%/0) and diarrhea (14%/0). 3/46 pts with EGFR exon 19 or 21<br />

mutations discontinued tx due to drug-related toxicity. Conclusions: 74% <strong>of</strong><br />

pts in this cohort with EGFR exon 19 or 21 mutant lung cancers<br />

experienced PRs with 1st-line dacomitinib; preliminary PFS rate was 77%<br />

at 1 year; preliminary median PFS was 17 months; further research is<br />

planned in this pt population. As dacomitinib is well tolerated, with<br />

preclinical activity against HER2, a cohort <strong>of</strong> pts with HER2 mutant lung<br />

cancers is recruiting.<br />

Lung Cancer—Non-small Cell Metastatic<br />

487s<br />

7529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Concordance <strong>of</strong> driver mutations in primary and matched metastasis from<br />

patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using next-generation<br />

sequencing (NGS). Presenting Author: Stéphane Vignot, Institut Gustave<br />

Roussy, INSERM U981, Villejuif, France<br />

Background: Progress in treating NSCLC continues to be limited by high<br />

recurrence rates after definitive treatment <strong>of</strong> localized disease and frequent<br />

presentation with metastatic disease. In these pts, diagnostic samples are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten limited in size and may be inadequate for genotyping necessary in<br />

this disease. In applying genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iling to aid treatment planning for<br />

patients with metastatic NSCLC, it is critical to determine whether archived<br />

primary tumor adequately reflects the genomic spectrum <strong>of</strong> the patient’s<br />

metastatic disease or whether biopsy <strong>of</strong> a metastatic site is required. We<br />

undertook this study using NGS technology to characterize paired primarymetastatic<br />

biopsy genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iles. Methods: Primary and matched metastatic<br />

tumor pairs plus adjacent normal tissue from 15 pts with NSCLC<br />

(adenocarcinoma 9/squamous 4/large cell 2) and heavy smoking history<br />

were analyzed using a targeted NGS assay in a CLIA laboratory (Foundation<br />

Medicine). Genomic libraries were captured for 3230 exons in 182<br />

cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 14 genes <strong>of</strong>ten rearranged in<br />

cancer and sequenced to average median depth <strong>of</strong> 778X with 99% <strong>of</strong> bases<br />

covered �100X. Results: Among the 30 tumors, 373 somatic alterations<br />

were identified; 96 were known NSCLC drivers including: TP53 (14 pts),<br />

KRAS (4 pts), SOX2 (4 pts), STK11 (2 pts), CDKN2A (2 pts) and<br />

SMARCA4 (2 pts) in full agreement with their respective histological type.<br />

In all cases (15/15), primary and metastatic tumors from the same patient<br />

demonstrated 90% driver mutation concordance (74/82, 95 % CI, 82-<br />

95%). For other mutations, the majority <strong>of</strong> which are likely passengers, the<br />

69% (201/291) concordance rate was significantly lower (p� .001).The<br />

total number <strong>of</strong> alterations between primaries (190) and metastases (183)<br />

was remarkably similar. Conclusions: These results suggest that genomic<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> primary tumor can identify the key somatic alterations present in<br />

matched NSCLC metastases and therefore is a suitable specimen for<br />

clinical decision making in the majority <strong>of</strong> cases. Our data does not support<br />

the routine need for a new biopsy upon recurrence since variability in<br />

mutational status is low.<br />

7531 Poster Discussion Session (Board #21), Tue, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

A randomized discontinuation phase II trial <strong>of</strong> ridaforolimus in non-small<br />

cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with KRAS mutations. Presenting<br />

Author: Gregory J. Riely, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New<br />

York, NY<br />

Background: Mutations in KRAS are present in ~25% <strong>of</strong> patients with<br />

advanced NSCLC. Preclinical data support the role <strong>of</strong> mammalian target <strong>of</strong><br />

rapamycin (mTOR) in KRAS mediated oncogenesis. Ridaforolimus is an<br />

inhibitor <strong>of</strong> mTOR which has been shown to have efficacy in advanced<br />

endometrial cancer and s<strong>of</strong>t tissue sarcoma. Everolimus, another mTOR<br />

inhibitor was previously evaluated in unselected patients with advanced<br />

NSCLC and found to have a response rate �5%. We hypothesized that by<br />

enrichment for patients with NSCLC and KRAS mutations, treatment with<br />

ridaforolimus would be associated with prolonged stable disease relative to<br />

available standard treatments for NSCLC. Methods: Patients with stage<br />

IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with KRAS mutation who had received<br />

prior chemotherapy for NSCLC began treatment with oral ridaforolimus 40<br />

mg once daily on a 5 day/week schedule. After 8 weeks, patients with<br />

�30% tumor shrinkage remained on ridaforolimus and patients with<br />

�20% tumor growth discontinued treatment. Patients with stable disease<br />

were randomized 1:1 to placebo or ridaforolimus. The primary endpoint <strong>of</strong><br />

the study was progression-free survival (PFS) after randomization. Results:<br />

79 patients were enrolled (40 women, median age 58 [range 28-85]). The<br />

overall response rate (CR�PR) at 8 weeks was 1/79 (1%, 95% CI 0-7%).<br />

28 patients with stable disease at 8 weeks were randomized to ridaforolimus<br />

or placebo. Median PFS based on investigator assessment from<br />

randomization was significantly longer with ridaforolimus (4 months) than<br />

placebo (2 months, p�0.013, HR 0.36). Median OS from randomization<br />

was 18 months in the ridaforolimus treated arm and 5 months in the<br />

placebo treated group, (HR 0.46, p�0.09). The most common grade �3<br />

adverse events were fatigue (10%), mucositis/stomatitis (10%), pneumonia<br />

(10%), dyspnea (9%), diarrhea (6%), and hyperglycemia (6%).<br />

Conclusions: In patients with KRAS mutant NSCLC who had stable disease<br />

after 8 weeks <strong>of</strong> ridaforolimus, ridaforolimus was associated with prolonged<br />

progression-free survival. Further evaluation <strong>of</strong> ridaforolimus in this patient<br />

population is warranted.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!