24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9536 Poster Discussion Session (Board #16), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Association <strong>of</strong> chromosome complexity with age and metastasis in synovial<br />

sarcomas: Validation <strong>of</strong> expression and genomic prognostic signatures.<br />

Presenting Author: Fred Chibon, Bergonie Cancer Institute, Bordeaux,<br />

France<br />

Background: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is one <strong>of</strong> the rare sarcomas that occurs<br />

in adolescents as well as in adults. Nevertheless, metastasis occurs with a<br />

lowest frequency in the former, 10 vs 50% respectively. In almost all cases,<br />

a characteristic translocation t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2) exists and the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this translocation in SS oncogenesis is well established, but the<br />

genetic basis <strong>of</strong> SS metastasis is still poorly understood. We recently<br />

published expression (CINSARC) and genomic (GI) signatures related to<br />

chromosome integrity control that predict outcome in undifferentiated<br />

sarcomas and GIST and ask whether these signatures could also predict<br />

outcome in SS. Methods: To asses this issue we selected in the European<br />

sarcoma database CONTICABASE 92 primary untreated SS for expression<br />

and genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iling. Results: As demonstrated by metastasis-free survival,<br />

CINSARC and GI have strong and independent prognostic values (p �<br />

1.6x10-5 and p � 4x10-6 , respectively). Comparing expression pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong><br />

tumors with or without metastasis in a training series <strong>of</strong> 58 SS, a 52-genes<br />

signature was identified and validated in an independent series <strong>of</strong> 34 SS.<br />

Fourteen <strong>of</strong> these genes are common with CINSARC and these 52 genes are<br />

involved the same pathways than CINSARC, mitosis checkpoints and<br />

chromosome integrity. Comparing genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> adult versus pediatric<br />

SS we show that in both situations metastasis is associated to genome<br />

complexity and that the adult genome is highly more frequently rearranged.<br />

In line with this, the pediatric good-prognosis patients, according to GI, do<br />

not develop metastasis. Conclusions: Results clearly indicate that SS<br />

metastasis development is strongly associated with chromosome complexity<br />

and that CINSARC and GI are powerful prognostic factors. Data also<br />

mean that the metastasis frequency difference between adult and children<br />

likely is associated to the genome instability which is highly more frequent<br />

in adults. Finally, among these tree signatures, GI is potentially the best<br />

overall and clearly the most clinically relevant considering that CGH from<br />

FFPE samples is already used in the daily practice <strong>of</strong> pathology.<br />

9538 Poster Discussion Session (Board #18), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Conservative treatment <strong>of</strong> intraocular retinoblastoma: A prospective phase<br />

II randomized trial <strong>of</strong> neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local treatments<br />

and chemothermotherapy. Presenting Author: Isabelle Aerts, Institut<br />

Curie, Pediatric Oncology Department, Paris, France<br />

Background: intraocular retinoblastoma treatments <strong>of</strong>ten associate chemotherapy<br />

and focal treatments. The protocols vary and may combine two or<br />

three drugs, and different number <strong>of</strong> cycles associated to the local adjuvant<br />

treatments. A first prospective protocol <strong>of</strong> conservative treatments in our<br />

institution showed the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> two courses <strong>of</strong> chemoreduction<br />

with etoposide and carboplatin, followed by chemothermotherapy using<br />

carboplatin, as a single agent. In order to decrease the possible long term<br />

toxicity <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy due to etoposide, a prospective randomized phase<br />

II chemo reduction protocol was conducted, using vincristine and carboplatin<br />

vs. etoposide carboplatin. Methods: the study was proposed when initial<br />

tumour size or location did not allow the use <strong>of</strong> front-line local treatments.<br />

The phase II randomized study <strong>of</strong> reduction chemotherapy used vincristin<br />

carboplatin or etoposide carboplatin, followed by local treatment including<br />

chemothermotherapy using the combination carboplatin and laser diode<br />

hyperthermia. Primary endpoint was the need for secondary enucleation or<br />

EBRT not exceeding 40% at 2 years. The new treatment was considered<br />

sufficiently effective if 10 events or less were observed among 33 eyes.<br />

Results: 55 children, 65 eyes were included in the study (May 2004-<br />

August 2009).32 eyes (27 children) were treated conservatively in the arm<br />

etoposide-carboplatin and 33 (28 children) eyes in the arm vincristin<br />

carboplatin.At two years after treatment 23/33 (69.7%) eyes were treated<br />

and salvaged without EBRT or enucleation in the arm vincristin-carboplatin<br />

and 26/32 (81.3%) in the arm etoposide and carboplatin. Conclusions:<br />

neoadjuvant chemotherapy by two cycles <strong>of</strong> vincristine and carboplatin<br />

followed by chemothermotherapy (using the combination carboplatin, as a<br />

single drug, and laser diode hyperthermia) does not seem to <strong>of</strong>fer an<br />

optimal local control.<br />

Pediatric Oncology<br />

615s<br />

9537 Poster Discussion Session (Board #17), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> local control strategies in patients with localized Ewing<br />

sarcoma <strong>of</strong> bone: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Presenting<br />

Author: Steven G. DuBois, University <strong>of</strong> California, San Francisco, San<br />

Francisco, CA<br />

Background: Patients (pts) with Ewing sarcoma (EWS) require local control,<br />

either with surgery alone (S), radiation alone (R), or a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

surgery � radiation (S�R). Optimal choice <strong>of</strong> local control for disease<br />

control remains unclear. Our primary aim was to determine the mode <strong>of</strong><br />

local control associated with the highest event-free survival (EFS). Methods:<br />

Pts with localized EWS <strong>of</strong> bone treated on INT0091, INT0154, or<br />

AEWS0031 phase III trials were included if they had complete local control<br />

data, did not have cranial tumors, received local control starting 2-6<br />

months after enrollment, and were randomized to receive standard dose<br />

5-drug chemotherapy every 3 weeks. We used propensity scores to control<br />

for differences in age, tumor site, and year <strong>of</strong> diagnosis between local<br />

control groups. We constructed Cox models controlling for local control<br />

propensity scores to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> local control type on EFS and<br />

overall survival (OS) from the start <strong>of</strong> local control. Results: 465 pts were<br />

included. Pts selected for S were treated more recently (p � 0.001), more<br />

likely to have appendicular tumors (p � 0.001), and younger (p � 0.02).<br />

Pts treated with R, compared to S, had higher unadjusted risk <strong>of</strong> any event<br />

(HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.18 - 2.44; p � 0.004) or death (HR 1.84; 95% CI<br />

1.18 – 2.85; p � 0.006). Pts treated with S�R, compared to S, had higher<br />

unadjusted risk <strong>of</strong> death (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.10 – 2.76; p � 0.02). After<br />

adjusting for propensity scores, there was a trend <strong>of</strong> higher risk <strong>of</strong> any event<br />

for pts treated with R (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.94 – 2.14; p � 0.10) compared<br />

to S, though this was not statistically significant. No other differences in<br />

adjusted risk <strong>of</strong> event or death between local control groups were statistically<br />

significant. We confirmed these results with standard Cox models<br />

using age, tumor site, and year <strong>of</strong> diagnosis as covariates. Conclusions: In<br />

this large group <strong>of</strong> uniformly treated pts, investigator choice <strong>of</strong> local control<br />

approach was not significantly related to EFS. These data support current<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> surgical resection when feasible, while validating radiotherapy<br />

as a reasonable alternative in selected pts.<br />

9539 Poster Discussion Session (Board #19), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

11:30 AM-12:30 PM<br />

Carboplatin (CBP) versus cisplatin (CP) within prognostic groups in<br />

pediatric extracranial malignant germ cell tumors (MGCTs). Presenting<br />

Author: Juliet Hale, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Trust, Newcastle upon<br />

Tyne, United Kingdom<br />

Background: It is established that CBP is inferior to CP in adult MGCTs<br />

when used at AUC 5 or 400mg/m2 . There are no randomised data for<br />

paediatric MGCTs, so conclusions from adult MGCTs have been generalised<br />

despite differences in site, histology and biology. A database, pooling<br />

patients from US and UK paediatric MGCT studies, was established to<br />

determine prognostic factors in paediatric MGCTs. We examined the effect<br />

<strong>of</strong> CBP and CP in identified prognostic groups. Methods: A dataset <strong>of</strong> 1110<br />

paediatric MGCTs was created, treated 1983 to 2009. Treatment was CBP<br />

(JEB, AUC 7.9) in the UK and CP (PEB) in the US. After excluding patients<br />

with surgery only, pure germinoma or immature teratoma , 697 patients<br />

remained. The cure model was used to assess the prognostic significance <strong>of</strong><br />

chemotherapy regimen after adjustment for patient characteristics. Results:<br />

Analysis stratified prognosis according to age (0-10 v 11�yrs) and stage<br />

(1-3 v 4) at diagnosis by site (testis: ovary: extragonadal). Outcome for CBP<br />

and CP in these prognostic groups is shown in the table. Conclusions:<br />

Interpretation <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> this nonrandomised comparison requires<br />

caution. However, after adjustment for other prognostic factors, the risks <strong>of</strong><br />

failure for JEB and PEB were not statistically different . This is particularly<br />

true for 0-10yrs. At AUC7.9 CBP is tolerable in paediatric patients, with<br />

potentially fewer late toxicities than CP.<br />

Prognostic group 4-year EFS JEB (95% CI) 4-year EFS PEB (95% CI) P value<br />

Testis 0-10 stage 1-3 0.94 (0.63-0.99) 0.92 (0.83-0.96) 0.79<br />

Testis 0 –10 stage 4 0.82 (0.45-0.95) 0.94 (0.67-0.99) 0.31<br />

Ovary 0-10 stage 1-3 1.00 (0.80-1.00) 1.00 (0.92-1.00) n/a<br />

Ovary 0 -10 stage 4 0.67 (0.05-0.95) 0.80 (0.20-0.97) 0.78<br />

Extragonadal 0-10 stage 1-3 0.92 (0.81-0.97) 0.90 (0.82-0.94) 0.90<br />

Extragonadal 0-10 Stage 4 0.76 (0.60-0.86) 0.83 (0.74-0.90) 0.38<br />

Testis 11� stage 1-3 1.00 (0.54-1.00) 0.95 (0.68-0.99) 0.57<br />

Testis 11� stage 4 1.00 (0.16-1.00) 0.81 (0.59-0.91) 0.52<br />

Ovary 11� stage 1-3 0.82 (0.62-0.92) 0.90 (0.80-0.95) 0.25<br />

Ovary 11� stage 4 0.71 (0.26-0.92) 1.00 (0.29-1.00) 0.85<br />

Extragonadal 11� stage 1-3 0.50 (0.01-0.91) 0.68 (0.44-0.83) 0.55<br />

Extragonadal 11� stage 4 Not assessable 0.45 (0.17-0.71) 0.45<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!