24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

376s Head and Neck Cancer<br />

5580 General Poster Session (Board #30A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

P16 and cyclin D1 (CYD1) as prognostic markers in hypopharyngeal (HSC)<br />

and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OSC). Presenting Author:<br />

Siok Hoon Ang, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore,<br />

Singapore<br />

Background: In head and neck cancer (HNC), dysregulation <strong>of</strong> cell cycle<br />

proteins p16 and CYD1 are common. Variable associations <strong>of</strong> p16 over- and<br />

under- expression and CYD1 overexpression with overall survival (OS) have<br />

been described in different HNC sites. We evaluated the relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

p16 and CYD1 expression with clinical characteristics and OS in OSC and<br />

HSC. Methods: p16 and CYD1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry<br />

in 77 HSC and 103 OSC patients (pts) and recorded as p16N<br />

(0% tumor cells stained), p16L (5-69%) and p16H (�70%), CYD1-<br />

(�10%) and CYD1� (�10%). OS between groups was evaluated by<br />

Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) for<br />

death was estimated using multivariable Cox models. Results: Pts were<br />

predominantly Chinese (83.6% v 85.4%) with locally advanced HNC<br />

(91.4% v 92.2%). Compared to OSC, HSC pts were older (median age 67 v<br />

61 yrs), more likely male (89.3% v 74.0%), current or ex-smokers (83.3%<br />

v 63.6%) with higher comorbidity-age combined risk score (ageCCI), less<br />

likely p16H (6.5% v 30.1%)(all p�0.001) and had similar CYD�. p16H<br />

pts were younger (median age 58 (p16H) v 65 (p16L) v 66 (p16N) yrs,<br />

p�0.002), more likely non-smoker (51.4% v 23.4% v 13% p�0.001) with<br />

lowest ageCCI (p�0.001). <strong>Clinical</strong> characteristics did not differ by CYD1<br />

status. At median f/u <strong>of</strong> 50mths, median OS was 33 mths. Median OS was<br />

poor in HSC compared to OSC (23.9 v 72.1, p�0.001). Multivariate<br />

analysis showed associations <strong>of</strong> N2/N3 disease (HR 1.57, p�0.036),<br />

ageCCI (HR 1.22 per 1 pt increase, p�0.001), p16 (p16H: ref; p16L: HR<br />

2.34, p�0.045; p16N: HR 2.74, p�0.013) and CYD1� (HR 1.94,<br />

p�0.015) with death, independent <strong>of</strong> gender, smoking and site. Association<br />

<strong>of</strong> p16 with OS was seen mainly in OSC (median OS p16H: not reached<br />

(NR), p16L: 62, p16N: 22 mths, p�0.001) compared with median OS<br />

(HSC) (27 v 28 v 21, p�0.609). Similarly the association <strong>of</strong> CYD1 with OS<br />

was mainly in OSC (median OS CYD1-: NR v 23 mths, p�0.001 v HSC: 25<br />

v 25 mths, p�0.19). Conclusions: In OSC, p16 expression correlates with<br />

OS, with p16N associated with worst OS. CYD1 has an independent<br />

association with OS. Poorer OS in HSC may be due to adverse clinical<br />

characteristics. Assessment <strong>of</strong> p16 and CYD1 status in HSC did not predict<br />

for OS.<br />

5582 General Poster Session (Board #30C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

HPV and survival in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer <strong>of</strong><br />

the head and neck (OPC) treated with induction chemotherapy followed by<br />

chemoradiotherapy (ST) versus chemoradiotherapy alone (CRT): The Dana-<br />

Farber experience. Presenting Author: Jochen H. Lorch, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School,<br />

Boston, MA<br />

Background: HPV status is a major prognostic marker for survival in patients<br />

with OPC. We examined overall survival (OS) and progression free survival<br />

(PFS) in patients with OPC and known HPV status treated at Dana-Farber<br />

Cancer Institute with ST and CRT between 2002 and 2011. Methods: 280<br />

patients with OPC and known HPV status were identified retrospectively<br />

and clinical information was recorded. Results: 174 patients were treated<br />

with CRT (124 HPV positive, 50 HPV negative) and 106 patients were<br />

treated with ST (77 HPV positive, 29 HPV negative). For all 280 patients,<br />

OS and PFS were significantly better for patients who were HPV positive<br />

compared to those who were HPV negative. 3 year OS was 89.1% for HPV<br />

positive (95% CI, 83.8-94.7) and 70.5% for HPV negative patients<br />

(95%CI, 59.9-83%, HR 0.37, p�0.0007). Among HPV positive patients<br />

treated with CRT, 13/124 had died at 3 years (OS 88.5%, 95%CI<br />

81.7-95.9) while 13 deaths were recorded among 50 HPV negative<br />

patients (OS 72.2%, 95% CI 59.1-88.2, HR 0.38, p�0.011). PFS at 3<br />

years was also significantly better for HPV positive versus HPV negative<br />

patients(81.7% vs 58.8%, HR 0.42, p�0.006). In the group treated with<br />

ST, outcomes were similar despite a higher rate <strong>of</strong> stage IV versus stage III<br />

disease compared to the group treated with CRT (100% stage IV in ST<br />

versus 77% stage IV and 23% stage III disease in CRT group). Three year<br />

OS was 89.7% for HPV positive and 68.2% in the HPV negative group<br />

(8/77 HPV pos vs 10/29 HPV neg, HR 0.33, p�0.015). PFS was borderline<br />

better for HPV positive patients (81% vs 61.7%, HR 0.48, p� 0.058).<br />

Conclusions: We present the DFCI experience treating OPC with ST and CRT<br />

for patients with known HPV status over one decade.OS and PFS were<br />

superior for HPV positive versus HPV negative patients. Outcomes were<br />

virtually identical for patients treated with CRT versus ST despite a higher<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> stage IV disease in the ST group. Outcomes for the HPV negative<br />

patients in particular were superior compared to the published literature.<br />

5581 General Poster Session (Board #30B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the management <strong>of</strong><br />

parotid gland malignancy (PGM). Presenting Author: Louis Harrison, Beth<br />

Israel Medical Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: To report the role <strong>of</strong> PORT in the management <strong>of</strong> PGM and to<br />

analyze the prognostic factors for optimal locoregional (LRC) and distant<br />

control (DC) Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study. From<br />

March 2001-2011, a total <strong>of</strong> 118 patients with PGM were treated with<br />

surgery and PORT (100%) <strong>of</strong> which 75% were treated with IMRT, 20 and<br />

10% received concurrent carboplatin and CDDP respectively. Indications<br />

for PORT were: recurrent or gross residual disease, �ve or close margins,<br />

nerve invasion and �ve lymph nodes (LN). PORT fields comprehended<br />

parotid bed and ipsilateral neck. Median PORT doses delivered were 70,<br />

63, 54 Gy (at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction) for gross, microscopic disease, and<br />

ipsilateral neck respectively. All PORT was delivered via 4-6 MV photons<br />

with daily 3-5 mm bolus. The median age was 52 (18-89). Females and<br />

Caucasian made up 56% and 64% <strong>of</strong> the population, respectively.<br />

Histologic findings were adenoid cystic carcinoma 20%, mucoepidermoid<br />

carcinoma 19%, adenocarcinoma 18%, pleomorphic carcinoma 16%,<br />

salivary duct carcinoma 9%, acinic cell carcinoma 8%, ex-pleomorphic<br />

carcinoma 7%, and sarcoma 3%. Pathological stages I, II, III, IV were 10,<br />

30, 20 and 40% respectively Results: With a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 56<br />

months (12-124), the LRC and DC for the whole cohort were 96% (5/118)<br />

and 93% (8/118) respectively. The median duration <strong>of</strong> PORT was 45 days<br />

(40-60). The median time to LR failure (LRF) and distant metastases were<br />

16 (12 - 30) and 28 months (24-48) respectively. Late RT toxicity was;<br />

grade I xerostomia 30%, altered taste 15%, trismus 6%, dysphagia and<br />

neck stiffness 2%. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the 5-year cause-specific<br />

survival to be 100%. Chi square and regression analysis tests show<br />

significant relationship (P�0.001) between salivary duct ca (70%) and<br />

distant metastases (DM), also males are at higher risk (17%) to develop<br />

LRF and DM, compared to females (6%). Poor prognostic features for DM<br />

and LRF were salivary duct ca, stage IV, PNI, and multiple LN involvement.<br />

Conclusions: Our data show that surgery followed by PORT to the tumor bed<br />

and ipsilateral neck provide excellent long standing oncologic and functional<br />

outcomes. Further studies are warranted to optimize the management<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients at higher risk <strong>of</strong> DM despite LRC and RT � chemotherapy<br />

administered.<br />

5583 General Poster Session (Board #31A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase II study <strong>of</strong> low-dose paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with<br />

split-course concomitant twice-daily reirradiation (XRT) in recurrent squamous<br />

cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (SCCHN): Long-term follow-up<br />

<strong>of</strong> Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 9911. Presenting<br />

Author: Corey J. Langer, Abramson Cancer Center at the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Loco-regionally recurrent SCCHN or new second primary tumor<br />

(SPT) in a previous radiation field, if not curable by surgery, is virtually<br />

always fatal. Chemotherapy alone yields a median survival time (MST) <strong>of</strong> no<br />

more than 10 to 11 months, 1- and 2- year overall survival (OS) rates <strong>of</strong><br />

35% and 10-15% at best. Concurrent re-irradiation and chemotherapy is<br />

an alternative strategy. Methods: Eligibility for RTOG protocol 9911 stipulated<br />

measurable, recurrent SCCHN or SPT in a previous radiation field, PS<br />

0-1, and adequate end-organ indices. Patients (pts) received twice-daily<br />

XRT (1.5 Gy per fraction BID x5devery 2 weeks x4), plus cisplatin 15<br />

mg/m2 IV QD x 5 and paclitaxel 20 mg/m2 IV QD x 5 every 2 weeks x 4.<br />

G-CSF was administered days 6 - 13 <strong>of</strong> each 2-week cycle. Primary<br />

endpoints were OS and progression-free survival PFS at 1 and 2 yrs.<br />

Secondary endpoints included acute/late toxicities and patterns <strong>of</strong> failure.<br />

Results: 105 patients were enrolled from March 2000 through June 2003.<br />

100 patients were analyzable (76% male, med age 60 yrs). Oropharynx<br />

(41%) and oral cavity (27%) were the predominant primary sites. 23% had<br />

SPT. Median prior XRT dose was 65.7 Gy. 73% <strong>of</strong> pts completed all<br />

chemotherapy. Grade � 4 acute toxicity occurred in 28%, grade � 4 acute<br />

hematologic toxicity in 21%. 9 treatment-related deaths (9%) occurred:<br />

five in the acute setting, four late (including three carotid hemorrhages at<br />

116, 427 and 2772 days). 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 50%, 27%,<br />

and 15% respectively. PFS at 1, 2, and 5 yrs were 35%, 18%, and 7%.<br />

64.9% died from the incident cancer, 3.2% from SPT, and 21.2% from<br />

other, non-cancer causes. Estimated 10 yr survival is 5% with 6 pts still<br />

alive, including 2 free from relapse. Conclusions: Despite a high incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> grade 5 toxicity, 1-, 2-, and 5- yr OS rates for split-course bid XRT and<br />

concurrent cisplatin/paclitaxel exceed results usually seen with chemotherapy<br />

alone. At 5-10 yrs, we have observed longterm survivors free <strong>of</strong><br />

recurrence.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!