Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
674s Tumor Biology<br />
10574 General Poster Session (Board #46G), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Correlation <strong>of</strong> ERCC1 expression on circulating tumor cells with progressionfree<br />
survival in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with<br />
platinum-based chemotherapy. Presenting Author: Jonathan Riess, Stanford<br />
University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Stanford, CA<br />
Background: Biomarkers predicting efficacy <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy are highly<br />
desirable. Fiber array scanning technology (FAST) is a novel method <strong>of</strong><br />
detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that does not employ an EpCam<br />
enrichment step. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to use FAST to evaluate<br />
ERCC1 expression on CTCs to determine whether ERCC1 expression<br />
correlates with progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who received<br />
platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer<br />
(NSCLC). Methods: Peripheral blood from one hundred enrolled patients<br />
with metastatic NSCLC was collected by two institutions (Stanford Cancer<br />
Institute and Billings Clinic Cancer Center). FAST was used to identify<br />
individual CTCs on immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence by pancytokeratin antibodies.<br />
Nuclear localization <strong>of</strong> ERCC1 expression by immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence was<br />
quantified on individual CTCs. Total patient ERCC1 levels were determined<br />
from the average expression <strong>of</strong> all the CTCs in each patient sample.<br />
Fifty-seven <strong>of</strong> the one hundred patients enrolled received platinum chemotherapy.<br />
Seventeen <strong>of</strong> those fifty-seven patients (30%) had � 2 evaluable<br />
intact CTCs and were analyzed retrospectively. Linear regression (F-test)<br />
was used to evaluate the correlation between ERCC1 expression and PFS.<br />
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log-rank test) was used to compare PFS in<br />
patients with CTCs with no detectable ERCC1 expression versus patients<br />
with CTCs that expressed any level <strong>of</strong> ERCC1. Results: PFS decreased with<br />
increasing ERCC1 expression (P�0.04 F-test, linear regression). Lack <strong>of</strong><br />
ERCC1 expression was associated with longer PFS (266 days vs. 172 days,<br />
log-rank test P�0.02). The difference in survival was statistically significant<br />
with a hazard ratio <strong>of</strong> 4.20 (95% CI 1.25-14.1, p�0.02, log-rank<br />
test). Conclusions: In this small study, using FAST to isolate CTCs, low<br />
expression <strong>of</strong> ERCC1 on evaluable CTCs correlated with increased PFS in<br />
patients with metastatic NSCLC who received platinum chemotherapy. A<br />
larger, prospective study to validate these retrospective results is warranted.<br />
10576 General Poster Session (Board #47A), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
A gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile test that distinguishes ovarian from endometrial<br />
cancers. Presenting Author: Anita Lal, Pathwork Diagnostics, Redwood<br />
City, CA<br />
Background: The differential diagnosis between primary epithelial ovarian<br />
and endometrial cancers is <strong>of</strong>ten unresolved because the histologic<br />
subtypes <strong>of</strong> these two tumor types can have very similar histology and<br />
immunohistochemical appearance. Here we report the development and<br />
validation <strong>of</strong> a gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile (GEP) diagnostic test (Pathwork<br />
Tissue <strong>of</strong> Origin Endometrial Test) that distinguishes ovarian and endometrial<br />
cancers in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens using<br />
a 316–gene classification model. Methods: The test was clinically validated<br />
in a blinded study using a pre-specified algorithm and microarray<br />
data files for 75 metastatic, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated<br />
primary FFPE tumor specimens that had either a known clinical diagnosis<br />
<strong>of</strong> ovarian or endometrial cancer and belonged to one <strong>of</strong> the 14 ovarian and<br />
endometrial WHO histologic subtypes on the test panel. Results: Classification<br />
biomarkers, empirically selected by machine learning, included<br />
several genes such as homeobox transcription factors and kallikrein<br />
peptidases with known function in the biology <strong>of</strong> ovarian and endometrial<br />
cancers. The Tissue <strong>of</strong> Origin Endometrial Test accurately identified the<br />
primary site for 94.7% (95% CI, 87% to 99%) <strong>of</strong> ovarian and endometrial<br />
cancers. Other measures <strong>of</strong> test performance include an area under the<br />
ROC curve <strong>of</strong> 0.997 and a diagnostic odds ratio <strong>of</strong> 406. Test performance<br />
did not change significantly when stratified by specimens from metastases<br />
(90.5%) or by poorly differentiated and undifferentiated primary tumors<br />
(96.3%). All stages <strong>of</strong> ovarian and endometrial cancers were included in<br />
the validation study and had agreements <strong>of</strong> 85% to 100% with the clinical<br />
diagnosis. In a precision study, concordance in test results was 100%.<br />
Reproducibility in test results between three laboratories had a concordance<br />
<strong>of</strong> 94.3%. Conclusions: The GEP test identified specific ovarian and<br />
endometrial cancer morphologies even when a clear distinction could not<br />
be made by histologic criteria. The GEP test can aid in resolving an<br />
important differential diagnostic question in gynecologic oncology and may<br />
impact clinical management <strong>of</strong> these patients as well as entry opportunities<br />
into clinical trials.<br />
10575 General Poster Session (Board #46H), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Accuracy <strong>of</strong> microRNA-based classification <strong>of</strong> metastases <strong>of</strong> unknown<br />
primary. Presenting Author: Nicholas Pavlidis, Ioannina University Hospital,<br />
Ioannina, Greece<br />
Background: Identification <strong>of</strong> the tissue <strong>of</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> metastatic tumors is<br />
important for estimation <strong>of</strong> prognosis and patient management. Carcinoma<br />
<strong>of</strong> unknown primary (CUP) is not uncommon in oncology, representing<br />
3-5% <strong>of</strong> all newly found malignancies. We used a microarray-based test<br />
that uses the expression <strong>of</strong> 64 microRNAs to retrospectively evaluate<br />
tumors from CUP patients. Methods: A cohort <strong>of</strong> resected metastatic lesions<br />
from patients diagnosed with CUP was studied blindly on the microRNAbased<br />
test. The cohort included 93 samples (from 92 patients) with tissue<br />
adequate for the test. Eight samples failed due to inadequate RNA quality;<br />
85 samples (84 patients) were processed successfully. Test results were<br />
compared with clinical presentation including imaging, pathological data<br />
(histology and IHC) at initial CUP diagnosis and with clinical management<br />
and outcome data at the completion <strong>of</strong> each patient�s follow up. Results:<br />
The test results were fully concordant with the diagnosis based on all the<br />
clinical and pathological information available including follow-up and<br />
outcome in 92% <strong>of</strong> patients compared to ~70% agreement with the<br />
patients’ diagnosis at initial presentation, before additional data gathered<br />
throughout patient management. Two different metastases from the same<br />
patient yielded the same result. The microRNA test assigned a single tissue<br />
<strong>of</strong> origin for 51 patients and two tissues <strong>of</strong> origin in 33 patients, with the<br />
first being the more likely diagnosis. When comparing only the first (or<br />
single) diagnosis, a concordant level <strong>of</strong> 88% was achieved. Conclusions: In<br />
a retrospective, well studied cohort <strong>of</strong> metastases from CUP patients, a<br />
previously developed test based on the expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> 64 microRNAs<br />
allowed accurate identification <strong>of</strong> tissue <strong>of</strong> origin in 92% <strong>of</strong> the cases. This<br />
study validates the high accuracy <strong>of</strong> the test on real CUP patients. The high<br />
concordance <strong>of</strong> the test results to the final tissue <strong>of</strong> origin diagnosis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patient, even in cases where the initial diagnosis at CUP presentation was<br />
discordant, demonstrates the importance <strong>of</strong> the test in yielding additional<br />
data valuable for patient management at an early stage <strong>of</strong> the patient’s<br />
treatment plan.<br />
10577 General Poster Session (Board #47B), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> early 18f-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography to<br />
predict clinical outcome <strong>of</strong> patients with advanced non-small cell lung<br />
cancer on gefitinib treatment versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel. Presenting<br />
Author: Masaki Kanazu, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest<br />
Medical Center, Sakai, Japan<br />
Background: Early prediction <strong>of</strong> clinical efficacy is <strong>of</strong> great value in cancer<br />
patients in avoiding unnecessary toxicities and giving them another chance<br />
for different treatments. This study aimed to assess the 18F-fluorodeoxyglu cose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) at 3 days on treatment as an<br />
early predictor <strong>of</strong> clinical outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell<br />
lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with gefitinib and in those treated with<br />
cytotoxic chemotherapy. Methods: This study comprised two groups:<br />
patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were treated with gefitinib (250mg)<br />
once daily (gefitinib group) or with carboplatin (AUC 6, day 1) plus<br />
paclitaxel (200mg/m2 , day 1) q21 days (CP group) according to the<br />
physicians’ choice. FDG-PET was performed before, 3 days on and 28 days<br />
on each treatment. Reduction <strong>of</strong> tumor FDG uptake was assessed by using<br />
standardized uptake value (SUV). Metabolic response was defined as<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> FDG uptake in the tumor � 25% according to the criteria <strong>of</strong><br />
the European Organization for Research and Treatment <strong>of</strong> Cancer. Metabolic<br />
response was correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: This study<br />
included 38 patients: 19 in gefitinib group and 19 in CP group. Reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> SUV at 3days on treatment preceded tumor shrinkage more closely in<br />
gefitinib group. Metabolic response was significantly correlated with longer<br />
progression-free survival (PFS) in gefitinib cohort (median PFS 15.8<br />
months [95% CI 13.2-18.4] vs. 3.7 months [95% CI 0.1-8.0], p �<br />
0.001), but not in CP group (median PFS 5.7 months vs. 2.9 months, p �<br />
0.054). Furthermore, metabolic response was significantly correlated with<br />
longer overall survival (OS) in gefitinib group (median OS 28.7 months<br />
[95%CI 23.5-33.9] vs. 9.8 months [95% CI 2.1-17.5], p � 0.009), but<br />
not in CP group (median OS 13.9 months vs. 10.5 months, p � 0.56). In<br />
multivariate analysis using Cox hazards models, metabolic response was a<br />
significant predictive factor <strong>of</strong> PFS and OS. Conclusions: Reduction <strong>of</strong> SUV<br />
levels on FDG-PET at 3 days on treatment may predict response and<br />
survival in gefitinib-treated patients with advanced NSCLC.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.