24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3597 General Poster Session (Board #34B), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Genetic variants <strong>of</strong> kinases suppressors <strong>of</strong> ras in KRAS-BRAF wild-type<br />

metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan.<br />

Presenting Author: Leonor Benhaim, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California<br />

Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA<br />

Background: Scaffold proteins kinase suppressor <strong>of</strong> ras (KSRs) have<br />

emerged as critical modulators <strong>of</strong> the EGFR pathway that binds to RAS<br />

promoting ERK activation. KSR1 and KSR2 have been shown to be over<br />

expressed in various solid tumours including colon cancer. In-vitro, the<br />

down-regulation <strong>of</strong> KSR results in reduction <strong>of</strong> cells proliferation and<br />

tumour growth independently to KRAS status. Moving from this biological<br />

rational we investigated the correlation between functional polymorphisms<br />

in the KSR genes and clinical outcomes in patients with KRAS and BRAF<br />

wild-type mCRC treated with cetuximab and irinotecan. Methods: Germline<br />

DNA was obtained from peripheral blood <strong>of</strong> patients with mCRC KRAS and<br />

BRAF wild- type resistant to irinotecan treated with a combination <strong>of</strong><br />

cetuximab and irinotecan. Seven functionally relevant SNP were selected<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> public literature resources and databases, 4 in the KSR1<br />

and 3 in the KSR2 genes and analyzed by PCR followed by direct<br />

sequencing. All candidate SNPs were evaluated for association with<br />

response rate, PFS and OS. Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 66 patients were included.After<br />

a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 13.3 months, median PFS and OS were<br />

4.7 and 11.3 months respectively. Seventeen out <strong>of</strong> 66 patients (26%)<br />

achieved a RECIST response. In univariate analysis, KSR2 rs11068551<br />

any G(AG/GG) genotype was significantly associated with shorter PFS<br />

compared to that <strong>of</strong> A/A carriers (median 3.5 vs. 7.4 months, HR�1.74<br />

[95%CI: 1-3.04] p�0.049, log-rank test). This result remained significant<br />

in a multivariate model (HR�2.13 [95%CI: 1.15-3.95], p�0.017, logrank<br />

test). None <strong>of</strong> the other tested SNPs were significantly associated with<br />

outcomes. Conclusions: Beyond KRAS and BRAF, some proteins including<br />

KSR are involved in modulating the level <strong>of</strong> activation <strong>of</strong> the EGFR pathway.<br />

Our results show that the functionally relevant KSR2 rs11068551 could<br />

affect PFS in advanced mCRC patients treated with cetuximab and<br />

irinotecan. Preclinical studies to confirm and further explain these preliminary<br />

findings are ongoing.<br />

3599 General Poster Session (Board #34D), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> deprivation on uptake and outcomes in a population-based<br />

FOBt colorectal cancer screening program. Presenting Author: David<br />

Mansouri, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, University <strong>of</strong> Glasgow, Glasgow, United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Background: Population-based FOBt colorectal cancer screening has been<br />

shown to reduce cancer specific mortality and is used across the UK.<br />

Despite evidence that socioeconomic deprivation is associated with increased<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> colorectal cancer, uptake <strong>of</strong> screening may be lower in<br />

those who are more deprived. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to assess the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> deprivation on the screening process. Methods: A prospectively maintained<br />

database, encompassing the first screening round in a single<br />

geographical area, was analysed with deprivation categories calculated<br />

from the Scottish Index <strong>of</strong> Multiple Deprivation 2009. Results: Overall,<br />

395,698 individuals were invited to screening, 204,812(52%) participated<br />

and 6,094(3%) tested positive. 32% <strong>of</strong> screened individuals were in<br />

the most deprived quintile. Of the positive tests, 5,457(95%) agreed to be<br />

pre-assessed for colonoscopy. 839(16%) did not proceed to colonoscopy<br />

following pre-assessment. Of the 4,618 that attended for colonoscopy,<br />

cancer was detected in 7%. Colonoscopy results were not recorded in<br />

1,035(22%) cases. Lower uptake <strong>of</strong> screening was seen in males, those<br />

that were younger and those who were more deprived (p�0.001). Higher<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> deprivation were also associated with not proceeding to colonoscopy<br />

following pre-assessment (p�0.001). Higher positivity rates were<br />

seen in males, those that were older and more deprived (p�0.001). Despite<br />

higher positivity rates in the more deprived individuals (4% most deprived<br />

vs 2% least deprived, p�0.001), the positive predictive value <strong>of</strong> detecting<br />

cancer in those attending for colonoscopy was lower in those who were more<br />

deprived (6% most deprived vs 8% least deprived, p�0.040). Conclusions:<br />

Socioeconomic deprivation has a significant effect throughout the FOBt<br />

screening process. Individuals who are more deprived are less likely to<br />

participate in screening, less likely to complete the screening process and<br />

less likely to have cancer identified as a result <strong>of</strong> a positive test. This study<br />

adds further weight to existing evidence that individuals who are more<br />

deprived are less likely to engage in population-based FOBt colorectal<br />

cancer screening. Novel strategies to improve this are required.<br />

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer<br />

227s<br />

3598 General Poster Session (Board #34C), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Correlation <strong>of</strong> specific cytokine pr<strong>of</strong>iles with high blood neutrophil-tolymphocyte<br />

ratio and outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer. Presenting<br />

Author: Zhi-Yu Chen, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai,<br />

China<br />

Background: High blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been<br />

previously identified as a poor prognostic marker in patients with metastatic<br />

colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the underlying pathophysiology associated<br />

with this marker is not well defined. We validated this biomarker and<br />

investigated the relationship between circulating cytokines and high NLR.<br />

Methods: NLRs were calculated retrospectively from the ratio <strong>of</strong> peripheral<br />

blood absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and segregated based on<br />

previously determined cut<strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> �5 and �5. Four cohorts with a total <strong>of</strong><br />

805 CRC pts were evaluated to confirm the prognostic clinical significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> NLR. Plasma cytokine levels were evaluated in exploratory (n�39) and<br />

validation cohorts (n�166) <strong>of</strong> previously untreated mCRC patients using<br />

multiplex-bead assays, and correlated with NLR. Results: High NLR is<br />

present in 20% <strong>of</strong> CRC patients and is associated with poor prognosis,<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> known prognostic factors (Table). Expression <strong>of</strong> 6 cytokines<br />

(IL-6, IL-8, IL-2Ra, HGF, M-CSF and VEGF) correlated with NLR�5 in both<br />

the exploratory and validation cohort. In the validation cohort, an additional<br />

14 cytokines correlated with NLR�5, including high EREG,AREG, and<br />

TGF-�, and low TRAIL. By hierarchial clustering, these 20 cytokines fall<br />

into 3 overlapping major clusters: angiogenic cytokines, inflammatory<br />

cytokines, and epidermal growth factor ligands. In the validation cohort, pts<br />

with a composite cytokine score below the median have longer survival than<br />

patients with high scores (40.0 mo vs 20.0 mo, HR � 2.24; 95%<br />

CI�1.47–3.41; P�0.001). Conclusions: High peripheral blood neutrophil/<br />

lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with poor outcomes independent <strong>of</strong><br />

other known prognostic features. NLR correlates with discrete sets <strong>of</strong><br />

cytokines which may reflect important biological features in poor prognosis<br />

mCRC.<br />

Median OS (months) 3-yr survival rate<br />

Cohort (number <strong>of</strong> pts) HR 95% CI P value NLR5 NLR5<br />

Untreated mCRC (166) 2.7 1.8-4.3 �0.001 34.2 15.3<br />

Phase � mCRC (167) 2.2 1.5-3.1 �0.001 9.0 3.7<br />

Hepatectomy mCRC (208) 1.8 1.1-2.9 0.01 13.3 (DFS) 9.5 (DFS) 38% 8%<br />

Stage II/ III CRC (274) 2.4 1.1-5.1 0.02 90% 75%<br />

3600 General Poster Session (Board #34E), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

HER2 status in locally advanced rectal cancer and metachronous metastases:<br />

Opportunity for a new therapeutic approach? Presenting Author:<br />

Lena-Christin Conradi, Department <strong>of</strong> General and Visceral Surgery, University<br />

Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany<br />

Background: Even though the implementation <strong>of</strong> multimodal treatment<br />

strategies including neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCT) has led to<br />

improved survival distant metastases are still limiting the prognosis <strong>of</strong><br />

rectal cancer patients. In this context, we investigated the HER-2 status in<br />

rectal cancer patients, UICC stages II and III. Our aim was to assess the<br />

HER-2 positivity rate in primary tumors and metachronous metastases.<br />

Methods: In this study 264 rectal cancer patients (192 male, 72 female;<br />

median age 64 years) from phase-II/-III-trials <strong>of</strong> the German Rectal Cancer<br />

Study Group (CAO/ARO/AIO-94 and 04) were included. HER-2 status was<br />

determined pretherapeutically in tumor biopsies as well as resection<br />

specimens and metachronous metastases (n�27) using immunohistochemistry<br />

(IHC0 to IHC3�) scoring and S-ISH-amplification detection. Tumors<br />

with IHC3� or S-ISH ratio ?2.0 were classified as HER-2 positive; results<br />

were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and long-term survival.<br />

Results: A positive HER-2 status was found in 12.4% <strong>of</strong> pre-treatment<br />

biopsies, in 29.3% <strong>of</strong> the resection specimens and 22.2% (n�6) <strong>of</strong><br />

metastases. With a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 46.5 months patients with<br />

HER-2-positivity showed better disease free survival (p�0.06) and cancerspecific<br />

survival (CSS, p�0.05). The 5-years survival rate was 96.4%<br />

(HER-2-positive) versus 79.5% (HER-2-negative). In multivariate analyses<br />

HER-2 status was as an independent (p�0.0053) predictor for CSS along<br />

with (y)pN-status (p�0.0001) and R-status (p�0.023). Conclusions:<br />

HER-2 amplification is detectable in a significant proportion (about 30%)<br />

<strong>of</strong> primary tumors <strong>of</strong> patients with advanced rectal cancer. Furthermore<br />

HER-2 amplification was detectable in 22% <strong>of</strong> resected metachronous<br />

metastases during follow-up. Therefore HER-2 represents a promising<br />

target and should be further assessed within prospective clinical trials.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!