24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

512s Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders<br />

8009 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Phase I/II study <strong>of</strong> carfilzomib plus melphalan-prednisone (CMP) in elderly<br />

patients with de novo multiple myeloma. Presenting Author: Brigitte Kolb,<br />

University Hospital, Reims, France<br />

Background: Melphalan-prednisone � thalidomide (MPT) or bortezomib<br />

(MPV) are approved in frontline MM patients (pts) �65 years. Both<br />

regimens demonstrated significant benefit over MP alone in terms <strong>of</strong> PFS<br />

and OS but this benefit could be hampered by the risk <strong>of</strong> peripheral<br />

neuropathy (PN). Carfilzomib (Cfz) is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has<br />

demonstrated promising activity and favorable toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile, with low<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> PN. This phase I/II study was designed to determine the maximum<br />

tolerated dose (MTD) <strong>of</strong> CMP, to assess safety and evaluate efficacy <strong>of</strong> this<br />

combination in newly diagnosed MM �65. Methods: In Phase I, Cfz was the<br />

only escalating agent starting at 20 mg/m2 (level 1) with maximal planned<br />

dose 36 mg/m2 (level 3), given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 29, 30 for<br />

nine 42-day cycles. Oral melphalan 9 mg/m² and prednisone 60mg/m²<br />

were given on days 1 to 4, for all dose levels. Based on toxicity assessment,<br />

the study was amended to add dose level 4 (Cfz 45 mg/m2). MTD<br />

determination was based on occurrence <strong>of</strong> Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs)<br />

during the first cycle only. DLTs were defined as any grade 4 hematologic<br />

toxicity or preventing administration <strong>of</strong> 2 or more <strong>of</strong> the 8 Cfz doses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

first treatment cycle except grade 4 thrombocytopenia without bleeding or<br />

grade 4 neutropenia lasting � 7 days; or grade � 3 febrile neutropenia; or<br />

any other grade � 3 nonhematologic toxicity. Results: As <strong>of</strong> January 20th<br />

2012, 24 pts have been enrolled in the phase I: 6 pts at level 1 (Cfz 20), 6<br />

at level 2 (Cfz 27), 6 at level 3 (Cfz 36), and 6 at level 4 (Cfz 45). There<br />

were 2 DLTs at level 4 (fever and hypotension not related to sepsis) and the<br />

MTD was considered to be 36 mg/m². Then, 16 additional pts were<br />

included in the phase II at level 3. Overall, 40 pts have been enrolled into<br />

the phase I/II study and 26 pts are evaluable for response. The ORR was<br />

92% including 42% at least VGPR. These results compare favorably to<br />

those achieved with MPV, MPT, MPR or lenalidomide-dex (ORR 71, 76, 80<br />

and 85%, respectively) in the same population. Conclusions: Frontline<br />

carfilzomib (36 mg/m2) � MP is a tolerable and very effective combination<br />

in elderly MM pts. Treatment is ongoing, with updated toxicity and efficacy<br />

data to be presented at the meeting.<br />

8011 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

Stringent complete response (sCR) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed<br />

multiple myeloma (NDMM) treated with carfilzomib (CFZ), lenalidomide<br />

(LEN), and dexamethasone (DEX). Presenting Author: Andrzej J. Jakubowiak,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Chicago, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: Combination treatment (tx) with CFZ, LEN, and DEX (CRd) is<br />

well tolerated and highly active in NDMM. In a phase 1/2 study, CRd<br />

provided rapid reduction <strong>of</strong> disease by 68% after cycle (C) 1 and 94%<br />

�partial response (PR) at a median <strong>of</strong> 8C, including 65% �very good PR<br />

and 53% �near CR (nCR), which improved to 79% �nCR after C12 (ASH<br />

2011, Abstr 631). Here, we examine the clinical significance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

response rates with longer follow-up. Methods: Pts with NDMM were treated<br />

in 28-day (d) C with CFZ 20–36 mg/m2 IV (d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16), LEN 25 mg<br />

PO (d1–21) and DEX 40/20 mg PO weekly (C1–4/5–8). After C4,<br />

autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) candidates achieving �PR could<br />

collect stem cells but then continued CRd with the option to proceed to<br />

ASCT. After C8, pts received CRd maintenance, using the last tolerated<br />

doses, with LEN/DEX at the same schedule but a modified CFZ schedule<br />

(d1, 2, 15, 16). Response was assessed by IMWG criteria plus nCR.<br />

Results: As <strong>of</strong> Nov 30, 2011, median follow-up was 14 mo (range 4–25)<br />

with 33/53 (62%) pts achieving �nCR and 42% sCR. After a median <strong>of</strong><br />

13C (range 1–25), 36 pts completed C8 and continued CRd maintenance,<br />

64% achieving sCR. 20/22 pts in CR evaluated for minimal residual<br />

disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry had no MRD. Progressionfree<br />

survival (PFS) rate was 97% at 12 and 92% at 24 mo. All pts who<br />

achieved sCR have maintained response for a median <strong>of</strong> 9 mo (range<br />

1–20). Extended CRd tx was well tolerated. During CRd maintenance, the<br />

most common toxicities (all grades) were lymphopenia (30%), leukopenia<br />

(26%), and fatigue (25%), and peripheral neuropathy remained limited<br />

(11%, all G1/2). There were no tx discontinuations due to toxicity during<br />

maintenance and limited dose modifications (CFZ 19%, LEN 28%, DEX<br />

31%). Conclusions: CRd is highly active in NDMM, providing rapid and<br />

deep responses. Extended tx was well tolerated and resulted in improved<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> response with a high sCR rate and a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> pts<br />

without evidence <strong>of</strong> MRD. Responses were durable with very promising<br />

PFS. All pts who achieved sCR remained on CRd with sustained sCR. These<br />

results compare favorably to other frontline regimens.<br />

8010 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

A phase I/II trial <strong>of</strong> cyclophosphamide, carfilzomib, thalidomide, and<br />

dexamethasone (CYCLONE) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple<br />

myeloma. Presenting Author: Joseph Mikhael, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ<br />

Background: Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor that irreversibly binds its<br />

target with favorable toxicity pr<strong>of</strong>ile that has shown significant activity in<br />

relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Here we used carfilzomib as the center <strong>of</strong><br />

a 4 drug induction regimen designed for MM patients pre stem cell<br />

transplant (SCT). Methods: We conducted a phase I safety run in 6 patients<br />

with no DLT observed before expanding to phase II. The phase II regimen is<br />

shown below. Treatment was for 4 cycles with expected SCT post induction.<br />

For the phase II portion <strong>of</strong> this trial, the primary endpoint is the proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> patients who have � very good partial response to treatment. All patients<br />

received herpes zoster prophylaxis and ASA daily. Results: Twenty seven<br />

patients were enrolled. Median age was 65 (range 27-74). ORR for<br />

evaluable patients (n�17) at phase II dosing is 100%: CR 35%, VGPR<br />

48%, PR 18% after 4 cycles <strong>of</strong> CYCLONE. Grade 3 toxicity was reported in<br />

52% <strong>of</strong> patients and 14% experienced a grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3/4<br />

toxicities occurring in �5% <strong>of</strong> patients included fatigue, neutropenia,<br />

lymphopenia, thromboembolism, myopathy. Toxicities <strong>of</strong> any grade seen in<br />

�20% <strong>of</strong> patients included fatigue, constipation, lethargy, thrombocytopenia,<br />

somnolence, creatinine increased, malaise. Four patients (20%)<br />

developed grade 1 sensory neuropathy; no higher grade or painful neuropathy<br />

was evident. All patients are alive. All patients advancing to SCT<br />

successfully collected stem cells. One patient with t(4;14) disease who was<br />

not transplanted has progressed. 94% remain progression free. Conclusions:<br />

The 4 drug CYCLONE regimen has remarkable efficacy (83% �VGPR) and<br />

manageable toxicity in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma.<br />

Especially notable was the low incidence <strong>of</strong> neuropathy and depth <strong>of</strong><br />

response (CR 35%) after only 4 cycles. Given the relative lack <strong>of</strong> toxicity an<br />

extension <strong>of</strong> this regimen at higher doses <strong>of</strong> carfilzomib (20/45mg/m2 ) has<br />

been initiated.<br />

Agent Dose level Route Day Cycle length<br />

Carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 cycle 1<br />

27mg/m2 IV 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16 28 days<br />

� cycle 2<br />

Thalidomide 100 mg Orally 1-28 28 days<br />

Cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 Orally 1,8,15 28 days<br />

Dexamethasone 40 mg Orally 1,8,15,22 28 days<br />

8012 Oral Abstract Session, Sun, 8:00 AM-11:00 AM<br />

PANORAMA 2: A phase II study <strong>of</strong> panobinostat in combination with<br />

bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomibrefractory<br />

multiple myeloma. Presenting Author: Melissa Alsina, H. Lee<br />

M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL<br />

Background: Patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to<br />

bortezomib (BTZ) and an immunomodulatory drug have limited treatment<br />

options and a poor prognosis. In a phase I study <strong>of</strong> pts with relapsed or<br />

relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat (PAN) � BTZ, clinical<br />

responses were observed overall and in pts with BTZ-refractory disease. We<br />

report results in PANORAMA 2, a trial in relapsed and BTZ-refractory pts.<br />

Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single-arm, phase II study <strong>of</strong> PAN � BTZ �<br />

dexamethasone (Dex) in pts with relapsed and BTZ-refractory MM. Treatment<br />

phase 1 (TP1) consists <strong>of</strong> eight 3-week cycles <strong>of</strong> oral PAN �<br />

intravenous BTZ � oral Dex. Pts demonstrating clinical benefit enter<br />

treatment phase 2 (TP2) which consists <strong>of</strong> four 6-week cycles <strong>of</strong> PAN �<br />

BTZ � Dex. The primary endpoint is overall response (� partial response<br />

[PR]) in TP1. Results: Fifty-five pts with BTZ-refractory MM were enrolled<br />

with 10 pts ongoing and 28 in follow-up. The median age was 61 years<br />

(range 41-88 years). Pts were heavily pretreated: the median number <strong>of</strong><br />

prior regimens was 4 (range 2-11), and most pts (64%) received prior<br />

autologous stem cell transplant. Twenty-seven (49%) and 36 (65%) pts<br />

had BTZ and Dex in their most recent prior line <strong>of</strong> therapy, respectively.<br />

Eighteen pts achieved � PR for an overall response rate <strong>of</strong> 33% (1 near<br />

complete response and 17 PR), and 13 pts achieved MR for a clinical<br />

benefit rate <strong>of</strong> 56%. Three pts achieved a VGPR. Eighteen pts completed<br />

TP1 and entered TP2, and 2 have completed � 12 cycles. Common<br />

adverse events (AEs) <strong>of</strong> any grade included thrombocytopenia (66%),<br />

fatigue (64%), diarrhea (62%), nausea (58%), dyspnea (40%), anemia<br />

(38%), decreased appetite (36%), and dizziness (36%). Common grade<br />

3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (58%), fatigue (17%), anemia (15%),<br />

pneumonia (15%), neutropenia (13%), and diarrhea (13%). Only 1 pt<br />

(2%) experienced grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy. Conclusions: PAN<br />

synergizes with BTZ in recapturing responses in heavily pretreated,<br />

BTZ-refractory MM pts. The combination <strong>of</strong> PAN and BTZ is a promising<br />

treatment for pts with BTZ-refractory MM that is generally well tolerated,<br />

with several pts receiving therapy long term.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!