24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6568 General Poster Session (Board #18C), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Incidence <strong>of</strong> second and secondary malignancies in patients with CLL: A<br />

single institution experience. Presenting Author: Samir Dalia, H. Lee<br />

M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL<br />

Background: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have a<br />

higher incidence <strong>of</strong> second malignancies than the general population with<br />

one study showing the risk at 2.2 times the general popualtion. The<br />

increased incidence is thought to be due to immunosupression which<br />

results in decreased cell surveillance and proliferation <strong>of</strong> malignant cells.<br />

Our study aims to present the rate <strong>of</strong> second malignancies by cancer type in<br />

patients with CLL at our institution. Methods: The M<strong>of</strong>fitt Cancer Center<br />

Total Cancer Care (TCC) database was used to identify patients who had a<br />

diagnosis <strong>of</strong> CLL between January 1993-December 2009. Individual<br />

charts were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> CLL, collect demographic<br />

data, and to assess for the presence <strong>of</strong> a second malignancy under an IRB<br />

approved protocol. A second malignancy was defined as another malignancy<br />

or transformation <strong>of</strong> CLL reported in the medical record. Second<br />

malignancy data was placed in three categories; skin cancers, solid tumor<br />

malignancy, and hematologic malignancy. Results: 546 CLL patients were<br />

included in the study. Median age was 62.5 years. 84 (43%) were Stage 0<br />

and 62 (32%) were Stage 1 RAI at diagnosis indicating earlier disease. 266<br />

(49%) patients had a second or secondary malignancy. A total <strong>of</strong> 304<br />

cancers were identified. 14% <strong>of</strong> patients had more than one malignancy.<br />

Melanoma was identified in 44 (16.5%) patients and non-melanoma skin<br />

cancer was identified in 54 (20%). Lung cancer was identified as the most<br />

frequent solid tumor malignancy with 36 (13.5%) cases, followed by<br />

prostate (35), breast (21), colorectal (15), and bladder (14). 10 patients<br />

had a Richter’s transformation <strong>of</strong> their CLL. 26 patients developed either<br />

myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myelogenous leukemia. Conclusions:<br />

Second malignancies are frequent in CLL patients. Immunosupression,<br />

increased UV light exposure, longer life expectancy in low risk CLL, and<br />

tertiary cancer center referral bias are likely reasons for these increased<br />

rates. Further research is needed to identify the precise mechanism which<br />

cause patients with CLL to have higher rates <strong>of</strong> second malignancies and to<br />

identify if there is an increased risk <strong>of</strong> a specific type <strong>of</strong> malignancy in<br />

patients with CLL.<br />

6570 General Poster Session (Board #18E), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase II study <strong>of</strong> AZD2171 for the treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with myelodysplastic<br />

syndromes. Presenting Author: Shannon Eileen O’Mahar, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin, Madison, WI<br />

Background: Inhibition <strong>of</strong> vascular endothelial growth factor receptors<br />

(VEGFR) can block growth and trigger apoptosis in neoplastic cells.<br />

AZD2171 (cediranib) is a highly potent, orally bioavailable, VEGFR-1/2<br />

inhibitor. We conducted a phase II study <strong>of</strong> the efficacy <strong>of</strong> AZD2171 for the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> MDS. Methods: Adults with MDS (IPSS Int-2 or High) were<br />

eligible if they exhibited adequate organ function and ECOG 0-2. The<br />

primary endpoint was proportion <strong>of</strong> responses according to the IWG criteria<br />

assessed at one and every 3 months. Prior investigation <strong>of</strong> cediranib at 45<br />

mg daily in patients with acute leukemia demonstrated toxicity concerns<br />

and therefore, the starting dose <strong>of</strong> this study was lowered to 30 mg daily.<br />

Results: A total <strong>of</strong> 16 pts with MDS (median age 73 years) were enrolled at a<br />

30 mg starting dose, and all were evaluable. Median baseline marrow blasts<br />

were 12.0 % (range 2-18); 3 pts (18.8 %) had low, 6 (37.5 %)<br />

intermediate, and 7 (43.8 %) had high risk cytogenetics. Prior therapy<br />

included azacitidine (n�7), decitabine (n�2), cytarabine (n�2), erythropoietin-stimulating<br />

agents (ESAs) (n�2), lenalidomide (n�1), or none<br />

(n�6). Patients were treated for a median <strong>of</strong> two 28-day cycles (range 1 to<br />

11). There were no confirmed responses. Patients with baseline blasts �<br />

5% showed no significant reduction in the blast count at 4 and 12 weeks.<br />

Median OS was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.6 – 11.6). Median TTP was 3.8 mo<br />

(95% CI: 1.7 – 10.8). Grade 4 hematological adverse events at least<br />

possibly related to cediranib were neutropenia (n�2) and thrombocytopenia<br />

(n�4). Grade 3 hematological adverse events at least possibly related to<br />

study treatment included: neutropenia (n�3), thrombocytopenia (n�2),<br />

and anemia (n�2). Grade 3 non-hematological adverse events included<br />

fatigue (n�4), dyspnea (n�3), dehydration (n�2), diarrhea (n�2), nausea<br />

(n�2), asthenia (n�1), and hypertension (n�1). Hypertension and proteinuria<br />

was uncommon with the 30 mg/day dose. Conclusions: With no<br />

confirmed response from 16 patients, cediranib was determined to be<br />

ineffective at a dose <strong>of</strong> 30 mg daily in our patient population. Supported by<br />

NCI N01-CM62205, NCI P30-CA014520 and the UW Carbone Comprehensive<br />

Cancer Center.<br />

Leukemia, Myelodysplasia, and Transplantation<br />

433s<br />

6569 General Poster Session (Board #18D), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Induction chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone in<br />

elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Presenting Author: Muthalagu<br />

Ramanathan, UMass Memorial Medical Center and UMass Medical<br />

School, Worcester, MA<br />

Background: Induction chemotherapy is <strong>of</strong>ten not used in elderly patients<br />

with AML due to poor prognosis and inferior outcomes. We present here our<br />

experience in treating 20 patients age�70yrs with an induction regimen<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> high dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HiDAC/MITO).<br />

Methods: We analyzed all patients age � 70 years who underwent induction<br />

with HiDAC/MITO at our institution from January 2009 to December 2011.<br />

20 patients received HiDAC at 3 g/m2 daily on days 1-5 and mitoxantrone<br />

80mg/m2* once on day 2(*one patient received 60mg/m2). The end points<br />

analyzed were complete remission (CR) and induction mortality at day 30,<br />

overall survival and progression free survival. Results: Median age was 75<br />

years (70-83). 11 (55%) patients were male and 9 (45%) patients were<br />

female. Median duration <strong>of</strong> follow up <strong>of</strong> 10 (50%) patients who are still<br />

alive at the time <strong>of</strong> this analysis is 439 days (38-1095). High risk<br />

cytogenetics was noted in 11 (55%) patients including two patients with<br />

FLT3 mutated cytogenetics. Intermediate risk cytogenetics was noted in 9<br />

(45%) patients including 2 patients with NPM1 mutated FLT 3 WT AML.<br />

12 (60%) patients had secondary AML. The age unadjusted charlson<br />

comorbidity index (CCI) was 3 (2-9). 15 (75%) patients attained CR and 3<br />

(15%) patients attained a CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp). CR<br />

�CRp rate was 90%. Two (10%) patients were refractory to induction and<br />

5 (25%) patients relapsed at a later time point after induction. Median<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> hospital stay was 28 days (22-60). Median time to ANC �1K<br />

was 23.5 days (18-29), excluding 2 patients who had refractory disease.<br />

Median time to platelet recovery �100K was 25 days (20-44), excluding 2<br />

patients with refractory disease and 3 patients with CRp. Regimen related<br />

toxicity included cardiac toxicity in 4 patients and bacteremia in 11<br />

patients. Five (25%) patients were consolidated with stem cell transplant.<br />

Median overall survival (OS) was 151 days (38-1095) and progression free<br />

survival (PFS) was 131 days (38-1049). Conclusions: HiDAC/MITO induction<br />

is well tolerated by elderly patients with AML and demonstrates an<br />

overall response (CR�CRp) rate <strong>of</strong> 90% coupled with no induction deaths.<br />

6571 General Poster Session (Board #18F), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Overall and cancer-specific survival <strong>of</strong> breast, colon, and lung cancer in<br />

patients with and without chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A SEER populationbased<br />

study <strong>of</strong> over 1 million patients. Presenting Author: Benjamin M.<br />

Solomon, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN<br />

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is associated with an<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> developing second cancers. However, it is unknown<br />

whether CLL alters the natural history <strong>of</strong> these cancers once they occur.<br />

Methods: All patients with breast (n�583,838), colon (n�412,932),<br />

prostate (n�632,922), lung (n�489,290), kidney (n�95,902), pancreas<br />

(n�82,121) and ovarian (n�61,958) cancer reported to the Surveillance,<br />

Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from 1990 to 2007 were<br />

identified. Overall survival (OS; death due to any cause) and cancer-specific<br />

survival (death due to cancer site <strong>of</strong> interest) were examined, comparing<br />

patients with or without pre-existing CLL. Age- and sex-adjusted hazard<br />

ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results: OS for patients with pre-existing CLL<br />

was inferior for patients with breast (HR�1.61; p�0.001), colon<br />

(HR�1.65; p�0.001), kidney (HR�1.41; p�0.001), prostate (HR�1.75;<br />

p�0.001), and lung (HR�1.22; p�0.001) cancer after adjusting for age<br />

and sex. After excluding CLL-related deaths, OS remained shorter among<br />

patients with breast (p�0.001), colon (p�0.001), kidney (p�0.03),<br />

prostate (p�0.001), and lung (p�0.001) cancer. Cancer-specific survival<br />

was inferior for patients with breast (HR�1.29; p�0.03), colon (HR�1.75;<br />

p�0.001), and lung cancer (HR�1.17; p�0.001) who had pre-existing<br />

CLL after adjusting for age and sex. Conclusions: Several common cancers,<br />

including breast, colon, and lung, have inferior overall and cancer-specific<br />

survival when there is coexistent CLL.<br />

HRs for OS by cancer type.<br />

OS, including CLL deaths OS, excluding CLL deaths<br />

Cancer HR 95% C.I. p value HR 95% C.I. p value<br />

Breast 1.61 1.44-1.80 �0.001 1.38 1.21-1.57 �0.001<br />

Colon 1.65 1.52-1.78 �0.001 1.59 1.46-1.74 �0.001<br />

Kidney 1.41 1.19-1.68 �0.001 1.25 1.02-1.52 0.03<br />

Lung 1.22 1.15-1.29 �0.001 1.20 1.12-1.28 �0.001<br />

Ovary 1.13 0.86-1.49 0.38 0.98 0.73-1.33 0.91<br />

Pancreas 1.00 0.84-1.19 1.00 0.98 0.82-1.17 0.83<br />

Prostate 1.75 1.62-1.90 �0.001 1.35 1.22-1.50 �0.001<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!