24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

536s Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders<br />

8106 General Poster Session (Board #39G), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

<strong>Part</strong>icipation <strong>of</strong> BTK in MYD88 signaling in malignant cells expressing the<br />

L265P mutation in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia, and effect on<br />

tumor cells with BTK-inhibitor PCI-32765 in combination with MYD88<br />

pathway inhibitors. Presenting Author: Guang Yang, Dana-Farber Cancer<br />

Institute, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) promotes B-cell receptor<br />

signaling along with B-cell expansion and survival through NF-�B and<br />

MAPK. MYD88 L265P is a widely expressed somatic mutation in tumor<br />

cells from WM patients. MYD88 L265P promotes enhanced tumor cell<br />

survival through IRAK 1/4 mediated NF-�B and MAPK signaling. We<br />

therefore sought to clarify the role <strong>of</strong> BTK signaling in MYD88 L265P<br />

expressing WM cells, and the impact <strong>of</strong> BTK and MYD88/IRAK inhibition<br />

on WM cell signaling and survival. Methods: Western blot analysis was<br />

performed using total and phospho-specific BTK antibodies in MYD88<br />

L265P expressing primary WM patient cells, BCWM.1 and MCWL-1 WM<br />

cell lines following MYD88 knockdown by lentiviral transduction, and/or<br />

use <strong>of</strong> MYD88 or IRAK signal inhibitors. Cells were also treated with the<br />

BTK inhibitor PCI-32765, in the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> MYD88 homodimerization<br />

or IRAK1/4 inhibitors. Annexin V/PIstaining was used to<br />

assess cell survival, and synergism assessed with CalcuSyn s<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

Results: BTK was phosphorylated in MYD88 L265P expressing WM cells.<br />

Knockdown <strong>of</strong> MYD88 by lentiviral transduction, and/or use <strong>of</strong> MYD88 or<br />

IRAK 1/4 kinase inhibitors led to decreased BTK phosphorylation. Phosphorylation<br />

<strong>of</strong> BTK, TIRAP, a major TLR adapter protein for MYD88 signaling,<br />

IRAK1, IKB�, ERK1/2 and STAT3 were significantly reduced following<br />

treatment with PCI-32765. Treatment with PCI-32765 also induced<br />

apoptosis <strong>of</strong> MYD88 L265P expressing WM cells, and showed synergistic<br />

tumor cell killing in the presence <strong>of</strong> either MYD88 homodimerization or<br />

IRAK 1/4 kinase inhibitors. Conclusions: BTK activation is facilitated by<br />

MYD88 pathway signaling in L265P expressing WM cells, and participates<br />

in MYD88 downstream signaling. Inhibition <strong>of</strong> BTK by PCI-327625 led to<br />

robust tumor cell killing <strong>of</strong> MYD88 L265P expressing WM,cells, which was<br />

potentiated by MYD88 pathway inhibitors. These studies provide the<br />

framework for the investigation <strong>of</strong> BTK inhibitors in WM, as single agents<br />

and in combination with MYD88 pathway inhibitors.<br />

8108 General Poster Session (Board #40A), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

miRNA expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> CD20� plasma cell myeloma (PCM):<br />

Upregulation <strong>of</strong> miR-155 shedding new insight into disease biology and<br />

clinicopathologic behavior. Presenting Author: Ravindra Kolhe, Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pathology, Georgia Health Sciences University, Augusta, GA<br />

Background: Up to15-20% <strong>of</strong> patients with PCM have expression <strong>of</strong> CD20,<br />

although the significance <strong>of</strong> this remains unclear. The prognostic significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> CD20 expression in PCM is unclear. Recently, a class <strong>of</strong><br />

noncoding RNAs, miRNAs, were identified as critical gene regulators in cell<br />

growth, disease, and development. Our study investigates importance <strong>of</strong><br />

miRNAs in cases <strong>of</strong> CD20� PCM and correlates them with clinicopathological<br />

parameters. Methods: The miRNA expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> CD20� PCM<br />

(n�6), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (n�6), and CD20 negative<br />

PCM (n�8) were evaluated using the Affeymertrix miRNA microarray<br />

platform on GeneChip miRNA 2.0 array in paraffin-embedded samples.<br />

After hybridization and data acquisition, we used <strong>Part</strong>ek Genomics Suite<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware for RMA normalization and to determine statistically significant<br />

differences in miRNA expression between experimental groups by ANOVA<br />

and pairwise comparisons (two-sided ��0.05). Results: miRNA expression<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> CD20� PCM, show upto �4 times upregulation <strong>of</strong> 7 miRNAs<br />

and downregulation <strong>of</strong> 8 miRNAs. miR-155, the miRNA upregulated in<br />

various B cell lymphomas and plays a key role in the lymphomagenesis, was<br />

amongst the highest miRNAs that were upregulated. Conclusions: miR-155<br />

is known to repress SH2-domain containing inositol-5-phosphatase-1<br />

(SHIP-1), which is a critical phosphatase that negatively down modulates<br />

AKT pathway and has functions during normal B-cell development.<br />

Physiologically, miR-155 is upregulated during B-cell activation upon<br />

antigen stimulation and so plays a role in antibody class switching and<br />

plasma cell formation. We propose that this overexpression <strong>of</strong> miR-155 in<br />

CD20� PCM unblocks AKT activity, inducing cell proliferation and may<br />

explain some <strong>of</strong> the immunophenotypic behavior <strong>of</strong> CD20� PCM. This work<br />

is intriguing for the new information it provides about the role <strong>of</strong> miR-155<br />

in CD20� PCM. Furthermore, the phenotype <strong>of</strong> miR-155�ve CD20� PCM<br />

might ultimately provide new insights into regulation <strong>of</strong> poorly understood<br />

steps in B cell differentiation and maturation into plasma cell and more<br />

importantly the clinicopathological behavior <strong>of</strong> this entity.<br />

8107 General Poster Session (Board #39H), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> whole genome sequencing to identify highly recurrent somatic<br />

mutations in Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia. Presenting Author: Zachary<br />

R Hunter, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia (WM) is an IgM secreting<br />

lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The genetic basis for this disease remains<br />

to be clarified. Methods: We performed whole genome sequencing (WGS)<br />

using CD19 � selected bone marrow lymphoplasmacytic cells (LPC) from<br />

30 WM patients. For 10 <strong>of</strong> these patients, paired CD19 � depleted<br />

peripheral blood samples were used for WGS as normal controls. Results:<br />

The most common somatic variants identified and validated by Sanger<br />

sequencing included MYD88 L265P, an activating mutation for IRAK/<br />

TRAF6/NFKB and MAPK signaling, which was observed in 27/30 (90%)<br />

patients; the N-terminal domain <strong>of</strong> CXCR4, which included mutations<br />

associated with WHIM syndrome and confer constitutive CXCR4 signaling<br />

resulting from dysfunctional receptor endocytosis, a finding observed in<br />

8/30 (27%) patients, and ARID1A (5/30; 17%), a tumor suppressor gene.<br />

Less common somatic variants were also identified in MUC16 (4/30; 13%),<br />

TRAF2 (3/30; 10%), TRRAP (3/30; 10%) and MYBBP1A (2/30; 7%).<br />

Conclusions: Using WGS and confirmatory Sanger sequencing, we have<br />

identified several somatic variants with oncogenic function, the most<br />

common <strong>of</strong> which include MYD88 L265P, the N-terminal domain <strong>of</strong><br />

CXCR4, and ARID1A.<br />

TPS8109 General Poster Session (Board #40B), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Phase I/II study <strong>of</strong> investigational agent MLN8237 (alisertib) plus rituximab<br />

with or without vincristine in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory<br />

(rel/ref) aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)/transformed<br />

follicular lymphoma (TFL). Presenting Author: Daniel Oscar Persky, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ<br />

Background: DLBCL and TFL are aggressive subtypes <strong>of</strong> non-Hodgkin<br />

lymphoma (NHL), with poor prognosis in the rel/ref setting. Alternatives to<br />

standard rituximab-based treatments are needed. MLN8237 is an oral,<br />

selective inhibitor <strong>of</strong> Aurora A kinase – a key mitotic regulator overexpressed/<br />

amplified in various human cancers, including lymphomas (Hamada et al,<br />

2003; Yakushijin et al, 2004; Qi et al, 2011). Emerging data from a phase<br />

2 study suggest that MLN8237 has single agent activity in aggressive NHL<br />

(Friedberg et al, ASH 2011). MLN8237 � rituximab (MR) � vincristine<br />

(MRV) has also shown activity in preclinical B-cell NHL models (Mahadevan<br />

et al, ASH 2011). Further clinical evaluation <strong>of</strong> these regimens in<br />

rel/ref B-cell NHL is warranted. Methods: This single-arm phase 1/2 study<br />

(<strong>Clinical</strong>Trials.gov #NCT01397825) aims to assess the safety, efficacy,<br />

and pharmacokinetics <strong>of</strong>, and determine a recommended phase 2 dose<br />

(RP2D) and schedule for, MR and MRV in adults with CD20� rel/ref<br />

DLBCL/TFL after 1–4 prior regimens (including ASCT) and ECOG PS 0–2.<br />

Pts with other aggressive B-cell lymphomas may also enroll in phase 1.<br />

~100 pts will be recruited at 22 sites in the US, UK, Italy, and Spain, and<br />

study duration will be ~2 years. In part 1, a safety lead-in cohort will receive<br />

MR (table), with the RP2D determined as when �2 dose limiting toxicities<br />

(DLT) occur in 6 pts in cycle 1. MRV dose escalation (part 2) will then<br />

follow a 3�3 design. Phase 2 enrollment (part 3) will follow a Simon<br />

optimal 2-stage design, with pts receiving MRV at the RP2D determined in<br />

part 2. The primary phase 2 objective is overall response rate by IWG<br />

criteria. Responders may continue MLN8237 if clinical benefit is seen and<br />

if the regimen is tolerable. Enrollment as <strong>of</strong> 20 Jan 2012 is 6 evaluable pts.<br />

Starting doses: repeating 21-day cycles<br />

MLN8237 Rituximab Vincristine<br />

Phase 1 (part 1) 50 mg ECT BID, days 1–7* 375 mg/m 2 IV, day 1 –<br />

(part 2) ~50% <strong>of</strong> MR RP2D, days 1–7 †<br />

as above 1.4 mg/m 2 IV, days 1, 8 †<br />

Phase 2 (part 3) RP2D from part 2<br />

ECT, enteric coated tablet; BID, twice daily; *dose reduction permitted; † dose/schedule<br />

adjustments based on cycle 1 DLT.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!