24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5560 General Poster Session (Board #24D), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Acetylated tubulin and risk <strong>of</strong> nodal metastases in squamous cell carcinoma<br />

<strong>of</strong> the head and neck (SCCHN). Presenting Author: Nabil F. Saba,<br />

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA<br />

Background: We previously established that AT expression predicts for<br />

response to chemotherapy in SCCHN (Saba et al, AACR 2010 meeting<br />

abstr 3744). We wanted to further examine the relation <strong>of</strong> AT expression<br />

and nodal metastases in SCCHN. Methods: We assessed AT expression in<br />

archival tissue specimens from primary SCCHN cases with (50 cases) and<br />

without (53 cases) lymph node metastases (NM) using standard immunohistochemistry<br />

(IHC). <strong>Clinical</strong> characteristics <strong>of</strong> patients were retrieved<br />

from the department <strong>of</strong> pathology under the guidelines <strong>of</strong> the institutional<br />

review board (IRB). IHC staining for AT was scored based on intensity and<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> tumor cells stained: 0 � no staining, 1� �weak, 2� �<br />

moderate, 3� �moderate to high, 4� �high and a weighted index (WI)<br />

was calculated as percent stain x stain intensity. Wilcoxon two-sample test<br />

and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to estimate the relationships <strong>of</strong> the WI<br />

with nodal metastasis, node status, primary tumor location, grade, and<br />

stage. Log-rank test was used to examine the difference in OS and DFS<br />

among four groups based on quartiles <strong>of</strong> the WI. A Cox proportional hazard<br />

model was employed to estimate the adjusted effect <strong>of</strong> WI on OS and DFS.<br />

Results: A higher AT expression was associated with nodal metastasis<br />

(p�0.0155) and higher stage (p�0.0311). A lower AT expression was<br />

associated with oral cavity primary (p�0.0107). After adjusting for age,<br />

gender, race, and smoking status, a lower AT expression was significantly<br />

associated with better DFS in the subset <strong>of</strong> patients with NM by multivariate<br />

analysis (HR�1.008; 95% CI�1.002- 1.014; p�0.0123). Among<br />

patients with no NM there was a marginally significant difference in OS<br />

among four different groups based on quartiles <strong>of</strong> AT expression<br />

(p�0.0765). Conclusions: High AT expression is associated with nodal<br />

metastases in SCCHN and may be a marker <strong>of</strong> poor prognosis in patients<br />

with node positive disease. The value <strong>of</strong> AT as a prognostic marker in<br />

SCCHN needs to be better defined. This work is supported by a SPORE CDP<br />

Grant P50 CA128613-03 to NFS.<br />

5562 General Poster Session (Board #24F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Nomogram for prediction <strong>of</strong> prognosis in patients treated for oral cavity<br />

squamous cell carcinoma. Presenting Author: Pablo H. Montero, Head and<br />

Neck Service, Department <strong>of</strong> Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer<br />

Center, New York, NY<br />

Background: TNM staging is an effective tool for prognostic prediction in<br />

patients with oral cavity cancer, but it disregards variables such as the<br />

anatomic subsite, medical comorbidity, lifestyle, etc. A nomogram has the<br />

ability to take into account many factors predictive <strong>of</strong> outcome for an<br />

individual patient, beyond the traditional TNM. We have developed a<br />

nomogram to accurately predict overall mortality (OM) and disease specific<br />

mortality (DSM) in individual patients treated for oral cancer. Methods:<br />

Demographic, host, and tumor characteristics <strong>of</strong> 1,617 oral cancer<br />

patients treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment between 1985 and<br />

2009 were available from a preexisting database. Recurrent disease was<br />

recorded in 509 patients, 328 died <strong>of</strong> cancer-related causes and 542 died<br />

<strong>of</strong> other causes. The median follow-up was 42 months (range 1-300<br />

months). Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for OM and<br />

competing risk regression was used for DSM. Death from other causes was<br />

treated as competing risk for DSM. Missing values in the predictors were<br />

multiply imputed before analysis. Variables analyzed as prognosis predictors<br />

included age, gender, race, alcohol/tobacco use, anatomic subsite,<br />

comorbidity, tumor size/thickness, bone/deep muscle invasion, nodal<br />

status/level, grade, vascular/perineural invasion, margin status and adjuvant<br />

therapy. Step-down method was used to select the statistically most<br />

powerful predictors for inclusion in the final nomogram for each outcome.<br />

Results: Age, severe comorbidity, subsite, tumor size, bone/deep muscle<br />

invasion, margin status, vascular and perineural invasion, nodal status and<br />

level, and adjuvant therapy were the variables with highest predictive value<br />

for OM. The most influential predictors <strong>of</strong> DSM were gender, tumor size,<br />

nodal status and location, subsite, margin status, grade and vascular<br />

invasion. Nomograms were generated for prediction <strong>of</strong> OM and DSM. The<br />

nomograms were internally validated with correction for over-fitting; biascorrected<br />

concordance index for OM was 75% and DSM 76%. Conclusions:<br />

We have developed nomograms that can accurately estimate OM and DSM<br />

based on tumor and host characteristics <strong>of</strong> an individual patient treated for<br />

oral cancer.<br />

Head and Neck Cancer<br />

371s<br />

5561 General Poster Session (Board #24E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Patient-reported symptoms following IMRT alone for oropharynx cancer: A<br />

survivorship study. Presenting Author: Gary Brandon Gunn, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Patients (pts) with favorable oropharynx cancer (OPC) are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten treated with single modality RT with excellent disease control. We<br />

present the pattern <strong>of</strong> pt-reported symptoms in OPC survivors treated with<br />

IMRT alone. This will represent a benchmark for later comparison to pts<br />

treated with other modalities (e.g., proton therapy, transoral surgery).<br />

Methods: Pts eligible for this cross-sectional questionnaire-based study had<br />

OPC treated with IMRT (no systemic therapy), in remission �18 mos,<br />

completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory – Head and Neck Module<br />

(MDASI-HN). <strong>Clinical</strong> data were tabulated and analyzed using nonparametric<br />

statistics. Results: 89 pts participated. OPC sub-site was tonsil<br />

in 58, base <strong>of</strong> tongue (BOT) in 30, and s<strong>of</strong>t palate in 1 pt. 65% were TX/1,<br />

28% T2, and 7% T3/4, while 53% were NX/1 with 47% N2. Mean RT dose<br />

was 66 Gy (SD�2.5). Median age was 54 years (SD�11). Mean follow-up<br />

at MDASI-HN was 74 months (SD�15). Mean MDASI-HN symptom rating<br />

(0 to 10 scale) was 1.3 (95% CI 0.97-1.6), with no significant difference<br />

by OPC sub-site. No single MDASI-HN items showed significant difference<br />

in the percentage <strong>of</strong> pts with moderate to severe (M/S) reports by OPC site,<br />

thou dry mouth approached significance (p�0.054), 53% in BOT vs. 32%<br />

for tonsil. Overall, 14% <strong>of</strong> pts were entirely symptom free (i.e. “0” across all<br />

22 symptom items), 33% reported only mild symptoms, 23% only<br />

moderate symptoms, and 31% reported any symptom as severe . The top 7<br />

symptoms were dry mouth, swallowing, sleep, taste, fatigue, distress, and<br />

teeth and these were reported at M/S levels by 39%, 24%, 19%, 17%,<br />

16%, 14%, and 10% <strong>of</strong> pts, respectively. For those with any M/S symptom,<br />

the median number <strong>of</strong> symptoms reported at M/S levels was 3. 1/89 pts had<br />

a feeding tube at the time <strong>of</strong> MDASI-HN completion. Conclusions: The late<br />

symptom burden for long-term OPC survivors following IMRT alone was low,<br />

with nearly half <strong>of</strong> pts with only minimal symptoms across all items.<br />

Considering other endpoints (e.g. disease control, acute toxicity, second<br />

malignancies, and functional measures), future treatment strategies should<br />

seek to match or exceed these results. Future RT symptom prevention/<br />

reduction strategies should focus on the top symptoms identified here.<br />

5563 General Poster Session (Board #24G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Head and neck cancer in Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita.<br />

Presenting Author: Blanche P. Alter, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda,<br />

MD<br />

Background: Fanconi Anemia (FA) and dyskeratosis congenita (DC) are<br />

inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) with extraordinarily high<br />

risks <strong>of</strong> cancer, particularly head and neck squamous cell carcinoma<br />

(HNSCC). The standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for solid tumors are 40<br />

in FA and 10 in DC, and for HNSCC 700 and 900 respectively. In the<br />

general population, cancers <strong>of</strong> the oropharynx may be associated with<br />

human papilloma virus (HPV) more than the oral cavity. The specific<br />

locations <strong>of</strong> HNSCC in FA and DC have not been reviewed, and thus the<br />

hypothetical role <strong>of</strong> HPV in these cancers is unknown. Methods: Literature<br />

cases were reviewed through PubMed searches using the terms “Fanconi<br />

anemia” and “dyskeratosis congenita”. All papers were reviewed, and<br />

details <strong>of</strong> the specific cancers recorded. FA literature included reports from<br />

1927 through 2011, and DC literature from 1910 through 2011. <strong>Part</strong>icipants<br />

in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) IBMFS retrospective/<br />

prospective protocol (NCI 02-C-0052, opened in 2002) were also analyzed<br />

for cancer. The HPV vaccine was not available during most <strong>of</strong> the time<br />

frame <strong>of</strong> this study. Results: There were 411 cases <strong>of</strong> cancer among 2190<br />

(19%) cases <strong>of</strong> FA described individually in the literature, and 21 cancer<br />

cases out <strong>of</strong> 116 (18%) FA patients in the NCI cohort. HNSCC were<br />

reported in 112 FA literature cases (5%), and 9 (8%) in the cohort. The<br />

oropharynx was the initial site for HNSCC in 31/112 literature cases (28%)<br />

and 3/9 NCI cases (33%). With regard to DC, 51/647 (8%) cases in the<br />

literature had cancer, as did 9 <strong>of</strong> 94 (10%) NCI participants. HNSCC were<br />

reported in 21/647 (3%) DC literature cases, and in 5/94 (5%) from the<br />

NCI cohort. Four <strong>of</strong> the 21 HNSCC (19%) in the literature were oropharyngeal,<br />

and 2/5 (40%) in the NCI cohort. The cumulative incidences <strong>of</strong> any<br />

HNSCC in the NCI FA and DC cohorts were 50% and 21% by 40 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age (censored at death from other causes). Conclusions: Patients with FA<br />

and DC have extremely high risks <strong>of</strong> HNSCC at substantially younger ages<br />

than the general population. Approximately 30% <strong>of</strong> these cancers occur in<br />

the oropharynx. The HPV vaccine could be important in prevention <strong>of</strong> these<br />

cancers. Future studies <strong>of</strong> the HPV status <strong>of</strong> oral cavity and oropharynx<br />

HNSCC tumors from patients with FA and DC will be informative.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!