Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
594s Patient and Survivor Care<br />
9110 General Poster Session (Board #46H), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> half-dose pegfilgrastim in cancer patients receiving<br />
cytotoxic chemotherapy. Presenting Author: Ryan C. Ramaekers, Saint<br />
Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE<br />
Background: Pegfilgrastim reduces neutropenia risk in patients (pts) on<br />
cytotoxic chemotherapy. A single 6 mg dose per chemotherapy cycle<br />
commonly causes bone pain and leukocytosis. While half-dose pegfilgrastim<br />
has been shown to be safe and effective in breast cancer pts, there is no<br />
data on half-dose pegfilgrastim in general oncology pts. Methods: We<br />
evaluated the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> half-dose pegfilgrastim in general<br />
oncology pts on cytotoxic chemotherapy at St Francis Cancer Center. Pts<br />
who received at least one dose <strong>of</strong> 6 mg pegfilgrastim and developed<br />
NCI-CTCAE grade 2 or more bone pain and/or leukocytosis (WBC�10,000/<br />
ml) were given 3 mg dose pegfilgrastim on their following chemotherapy<br />
cycles. Pt demographics, type/number <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy regimens, efficacy,<br />
side effects and complications were evaluated. McNemar’s test, logistic<br />
regression analysis and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. Results:<br />
Twenty-six pts (3 males, 23 females, all Caucasian) with median age 55<br />
(range 34-86) received a total <strong>of</strong> eighty-three 3 mg doses <strong>of</strong> pegfilgrastim.<br />
Cancers treated were breast (N�16), colorectal (N�7), head and neck<br />
(N�1), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (N�1) and non-small cell lung cancer<br />
(N�1). Chemotherapy received was anthracycline (N�9), taxane (N�7),<br />
5-FU/oxaliplatin (N�7), 5-FU/cisplatin (N�1), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin<br />
(N�1), pemetrexed/carboplatin (N�1). No neutropenia or chemotherapy<br />
dose modifications occurred on half-dose pegfilgrastim. In the 26 pts we<br />
report, bone pain occurred in 23 pts at 6 mg and 14 pts at 3 mg dose.<br />
Leukocytosis occurred in 23 pts at 6 mg and only 2 pts at 3 mg dose<br />
(McNemar’s test, P�0.01). While older age and full-dose pegfilgrastim<br />
were predictive <strong>of</strong> bone pain, more than one line <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy and<br />
half-dose pegfilgrastim were predictive <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> leukocytosis (logistic<br />
regression analysis/ANOVA, P�0.01). Conclusions: Half-dose pegfilgrastim<br />
in general oncology pts receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy seems to be safe<br />
and effective with less bone pain and leukocytosis without resultant<br />
neutropenia or need for chemo modification. Larger prospective studies <strong>of</strong><br />
half-dose pegfilgrastim in this setting are needed to further understand the<br />
feasibility <strong>of</strong> this approach.<br />
9112 General Poster Session (Board #47B), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Determinants <strong>of</strong> fatigue improvement in outpatient oncology according to<br />
baseline categories <strong>of</strong> fatigue severity. Presenting Author: Michael Fisch,<br />
University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />
Background: Understanding the determinants <strong>of</strong> fatigue response may help<br />
distinguish between different fatigue phenotypes and inform trial designs.<br />
Methods: Patients with invasive cancer <strong>of</strong> the breast, prostate, colon/<br />
rectum, or lung were enrolled from multiple sites. At baseline and 4-5<br />
weeks later patients rated their symptoms on a 0-10 numerical rating scale.<br />
A 2-point change was considered clinically significant for fatigue change.<br />
Logistic regression models and ordinal logistic regression models were used<br />
to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> demographic and clinical factors on fatigue<br />
change. Separate models were constructed for fatigue deterioration in<br />
patients with mild fatigue at baseline and lack <strong>of</strong> improvement for those<br />
with severe fatigue at baseline or any significant change for those with<br />
moderate baseline fatigue. Results: 3,106 pts were enrolled at baseline and<br />
3,032 were analyzable for fatigue change. At baseline, 23% had no<br />
fatigue, 35% mild, 25% moderate, and 17% severe. Improvement varied<br />
by baseline fatigue score with response in 54% with severe fatigue, 31%<br />
with moderate, and 9% with mild. Overall, 13 different parameters were<br />
significant in these 3 models <strong>of</strong> fatigue change, but no single parameter<br />
was common to all 3 categories <strong>of</strong> fatigue. Exposure to anxiolytics and<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> current treatment were significant in models <strong>of</strong> mild and severe<br />
fatigue; antidepressant exposure was significant for mild and moderate<br />
fatigue, and baseline fatigue level was a significant parameter in moderate<br />
and severe fatigue. In colorectal and lung cancer patients, gender was not<br />
significant for fatigue change in patients with mild or moderate fatigue, but<br />
gender was the strongest predictor fatigue improvement in patients with<br />
severe fatigue with men most likely to significantly improve (OR�2.49,<br />
95% CI 1.15-5.41, p�0.021). Conclusions: <strong>Clinical</strong>ly significant improvement<br />
in fatigue varies between 9% and 54%. Predictors <strong>of</strong> fatigue change<br />
vary depending on categories <strong>of</strong> baseline fatigue severity. Gender is the<br />
strongest predictor for fatigue improvement among lung and colorectal<br />
outpatients with severe baseline fatigue. Future trial designs should<br />
account for gender and baseline fatigue severity.<br />
9111 General Poster Session (Board #47A), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Continued suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover following a single dose <strong>of</strong> zoledronic<br />
acid: Time to re-think dosing intervals in the management <strong>of</strong> bone<br />
metastases? Presenting Author: Christine E. Simmons, St. Michael’s<br />
Hospital, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada<br />
Background: The management <strong>of</strong> patients (pts) with bone metastases has<br />
changed significantly over the past decade, with the advent <strong>of</strong> newer, more<br />
potent anti-osteoclastic agents. However, the dosing interval in which these<br />
agents are given has not changed; pts are still dosed at a frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
monthly or q3weekly injections. It is not known if this is the optimal dosing<br />
frequency or due to convention. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine<br />
the duration <strong>of</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover by Zoledronic Acid (ZA) in a<br />
population <strong>of</strong> bisphosphonate naive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts.<br />
Methods: This prospective single arm phase II study enrolled 26 pts with<br />
MBC to bone who had not received bisphosphonates in the metastatic<br />
setting. A single dose <strong>of</strong> ZA was given at week 0, and biomarkers <strong>of</strong> bone<br />
turnover (serum CTX) were collected every 2 weeks subsequently. Pain<br />
scores and quality <strong>of</strong> life data were collected every 4 weeks. Pts remained<br />
on study if their biomarkers remained suppressed, but came <strong>of</strong>f study as<br />
soon as escape from suppression was noted, (defined as a rise � 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
baseline value). Results: At 12 weeks, 73% (95% CI 56%-90%) <strong>of</strong> pts had<br />
continued suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover demonstrated by serum CTX. The<br />
pts that escaped suppression did so at a median <strong>of</strong> 8 weeks after first<br />
infusion <strong>of</strong> ZA (range 8-10 weeks). The magnitude <strong>of</strong> suppression (proportion<br />
decrease from baseline) <strong>of</strong> serum CTX at week 4 was significantly<br />
greater in those who had continued suppression compared to those who<br />
escaped suppression before 12 weeks (75% vs 58%, p � 0.02). The<br />
absolute baseline value <strong>of</strong> CTX was significantly lower in pts who maintained<br />
suppression (507 vs. 745 ng/L, p � 0.04). Quality <strong>of</strong> life scores and<br />
pain medication use did not change appreciably during this period.<br />
Conclusions: This study suggests that ZA may not need to be given at<br />
conventional intervals in the majority <strong>of</strong> pts, and may safely be withheld<br />
without increased risk to morbidity or decline in quality <strong>of</strong> life over a 12<br />
week period. Baseline CTX and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong> bone<br />
turnover at 4 weeks may predict for the optimal dosing frequency.<br />
Confirmation in a randomized trial is needed.<br />
9113 General Poster Session (Board #47C), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Pain, sleep disturbance, and fatigue symptom cluster in patients suffering<br />
from chronic chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP). Presenting<br />
Author: Jennifer S. Gewandter, University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Medical Center,<br />
Rochester, NY<br />
Background: Various symptom cluster combinations <strong>of</strong> pain, fatigue, sleep<br />
disturbance (SD), and depression have been identified in cancer patients.<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> symptom clusters has not been assessed in patients with<br />
persistent CINP. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine which<br />
symptoms statistically clustered with pain in cancer survivors with CINP.<br />
Methods: The University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Cancer Center Community <strong>Clinical</strong><br />
Oncology Program recruited 461 patients with CINP � 4 (on a 0-10 scale)<br />
who had completed chemotherapy (median 7 months ago) for a pain<br />
intervention trial. At baseline, groups <strong>of</strong> highly associated symptoms that<br />
included pain were identified empirically using factor and cluster analyses<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 11 symptoms in the University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Symptom Inventory plus<br />
the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. To investigate if<br />
associated symptoms track together over time, multiple linear regression<br />
(MLR) analysis was performed using changes in symptom severity between<br />
baseline and week 6, controlling for gender, age, education, race, and<br />
marital status. Results: Subjects were 88% white and 71% female, and on<br />
average 61 years old. Mean (standard deviation) baseline pain, fatigue, and<br />
SD were 5.7 (2.8), 5.0 (2.7), and 4.2 (3.1), respectively; 26% <strong>of</strong> subjects<br />
had borderline or abnormal HADS scores. Factor analysis identified 3<br />
factors that accounted for 88% <strong>of</strong> the variance. One factor included pain,<br />
fatigue, SD, but not HADS, and accounted for 37% <strong>of</strong> the variance.<br />
Variable clustering also identified pain, SD, and fatigue as 1 symptom<br />
cluster. Changes in severity <strong>of</strong> SD and fatigue (p � 0.0001), but not HADS,<br />
were associated with changes in pain (adjusted R2 � 0.168) in MLR<br />
analysis. Conclusions: Pain, fatigue, and SD were identified as a symptom<br />
cluster by factor and cluster analyses, and were found to track together over<br />
time by MLR. Since these data suggest that pain is associated with sleep<br />
quality and fatigue in patients with persistent CINP, targeting one <strong>of</strong> these<br />
symptoms may lead to reductions in the others. Future research should<br />
investigate interventions that target pain, fatigue, and SD concurrently in<br />
cancer survivors suffering from CINP.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.