24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

594s Patient and Survivor Care<br />

9110 General Poster Session (Board #46H), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> half-dose pegfilgrastim in cancer patients receiving<br />

cytotoxic chemotherapy. Presenting Author: Ryan C. Ramaekers, Saint<br />

Francis Cancer Treatment Center, Grand Island, NE<br />

Background: Pegfilgrastim reduces neutropenia risk in patients (pts) on<br />

cytotoxic chemotherapy. A single 6 mg dose per chemotherapy cycle<br />

commonly causes bone pain and leukocytosis. While half-dose pegfilgrastim<br />

has been shown to be safe and effective in breast cancer pts, there is no<br />

data on half-dose pegfilgrastim in general oncology pts. Methods: We<br />

evaluated the efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> half-dose pegfilgrastim in general<br />

oncology pts on cytotoxic chemotherapy at St Francis Cancer Center. Pts<br />

who received at least one dose <strong>of</strong> 6 mg pegfilgrastim and developed<br />

NCI-CTCAE grade 2 or more bone pain and/or leukocytosis (WBC�10,000/<br />

ml) were given 3 mg dose pegfilgrastim on their following chemotherapy<br />

cycles. Pt demographics, type/number <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy regimens, efficacy,<br />

side effects and complications were evaluated. McNemar’s test, logistic<br />

regression analysis and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. Results:<br />

Twenty-six pts (3 males, 23 females, all Caucasian) with median age 55<br />

(range 34-86) received a total <strong>of</strong> eighty-three 3 mg doses <strong>of</strong> pegfilgrastim.<br />

Cancers treated were breast (N�16), colorectal (N�7), head and neck<br />

(N�1), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (N�1) and non-small cell lung cancer<br />

(N�1). Chemotherapy received was anthracycline (N�9), taxane (N�7),<br />

5-FU/oxaliplatin (N�7), 5-FU/cisplatin (N�1), gemcitabine/oxaliplatin<br />

(N�1), pemetrexed/carboplatin (N�1). No neutropenia or chemotherapy<br />

dose modifications occurred on half-dose pegfilgrastim. In the 26 pts we<br />

report, bone pain occurred in 23 pts at 6 mg and 14 pts at 3 mg dose.<br />

Leukocytosis occurred in 23 pts at 6 mg and only 2 pts at 3 mg dose<br />

(McNemar’s test, P�0.01). While older age and full-dose pegfilgrastim<br />

were predictive <strong>of</strong> bone pain, more than one line <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy and<br />

half-dose pegfilgrastim were predictive <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> leukocytosis (logistic<br />

regression analysis/ANOVA, P�0.01). Conclusions: Half-dose pegfilgrastim<br />

in general oncology pts receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy seems to be safe<br />

and effective with less bone pain and leukocytosis without resultant<br />

neutropenia or need for chemo modification. Larger prospective studies <strong>of</strong><br />

half-dose pegfilgrastim in this setting are needed to further understand the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> this approach.<br />

9112 General Poster Session (Board #47B), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Determinants <strong>of</strong> fatigue improvement in outpatient oncology according to<br />

baseline categories <strong>of</strong> fatigue severity. Presenting Author: Michael Fisch,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Understanding the determinants <strong>of</strong> fatigue response may help<br />

distinguish between different fatigue phenotypes and inform trial designs.<br />

Methods: Patients with invasive cancer <strong>of</strong> the breast, prostate, colon/<br />

rectum, or lung were enrolled from multiple sites. At baseline and 4-5<br />

weeks later patients rated their symptoms on a 0-10 numerical rating scale.<br />

A 2-point change was considered clinically significant for fatigue change.<br />

Logistic regression models and ordinal logistic regression models were used<br />

to examine the effects <strong>of</strong> demographic and clinical factors on fatigue<br />

change. Separate models were constructed for fatigue deterioration in<br />

patients with mild fatigue at baseline and lack <strong>of</strong> improvement for those<br />

with severe fatigue at baseline or any significant change for those with<br />

moderate baseline fatigue. Results: 3,106 pts were enrolled at baseline and<br />

3,032 were analyzable for fatigue change. At baseline, 23% had no<br />

fatigue, 35% mild, 25% moderate, and 17% severe. Improvement varied<br />

by baseline fatigue score with response in 54% with severe fatigue, 31%<br />

with moderate, and 9% with mild. Overall, 13 different parameters were<br />

significant in these 3 models <strong>of</strong> fatigue change, but no single parameter<br />

was common to all 3 categories <strong>of</strong> fatigue. Exposure to anxiolytics and<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> current treatment were significant in models <strong>of</strong> mild and severe<br />

fatigue; antidepressant exposure was significant for mild and moderate<br />

fatigue, and baseline fatigue level was a significant parameter in moderate<br />

and severe fatigue. In colorectal and lung cancer patients, gender was not<br />

significant for fatigue change in patients with mild or moderate fatigue, but<br />

gender was the strongest predictor fatigue improvement in patients with<br />

severe fatigue with men most likely to significantly improve (OR�2.49,<br />

95% CI 1.15-5.41, p�0.021). Conclusions: <strong>Clinical</strong>ly significant improvement<br />

in fatigue varies between 9% and 54%. Predictors <strong>of</strong> fatigue change<br />

vary depending on categories <strong>of</strong> baseline fatigue severity. Gender is the<br />

strongest predictor for fatigue improvement among lung and colorectal<br />

outpatients with severe baseline fatigue. Future trial designs should<br />

account for gender and baseline fatigue severity.<br />

9111 General Poster Session (Board #47A), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Continued suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover following a single dose <strong>of</strong> zoledronic<br />

acid: Time to re-think dosing intervals in the management <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

metastases? Presenting Author: Christine E. Simmons, St. Michael’s<br />

Hospital, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada<br />

Background: The management <strong>of</strong> patients (pts) with bone metastases has<br />

changed significantly over the past decade, with the advent <strong>of</strong> newer, more<br />

potent anti-osteoclastic agents. However, the dosing interval in which these<br />

agents are given has not changed; pts are still dosed at a frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

monthly or q3weekly injections. It is not known if this is the optimal dosing<br />

frequency or due to convention. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine<br />

the duration <strong>of</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover by Zoledronic Acid (ZA) in a<br />

population <strong>of</strong> bisphosphonate naive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts.<br />

Methods: This prospective single arm phase II study enrolled 26 pts with<br />

MBC to bone who had not received bisphosphonates in the metastatic<br />

setting. A single dose <strong>of</strong> ZA was given at week 0, and biomarkers <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

turnover (serum CTX) were collected every 2 weeks subsequently. Pain<br />

scores and quality <strong>of</strong> life data were collected every 4 weeks. Pts remained<br />

on study if their biomarkers remained suppressed, but came <strong>of</strong>f study as<br />

soon as escape from suppression was noted, (defined as a rise � 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

baseline value). Results: At 12 weeks, 73% (95% CI 56%-90%) <strong>of</strong> pts had<br />

continued suppression <strong>of</strong> bone turnover demonstrated by serum CTX. The<br />

pts that escaped suppression did so at a median <strong>of</strong> 8 weeks after first<br />

infusion <strong>of</strong> ZA (range 8-10 weeks). The magnitude <strong>of</strong> suppression (proportion<br />

decrease from baseline) <strong>of</strong> serum CTX at week 4 was significantly<br />

greater in those who had continued suppression compared to those who<br />

escaped suppression before 12 weeks (75% vs 58%, p � 0.02). The<br />

absolute baseline value <strong>of</strong> CTX was significantly lower in pts who maintained<br />

suppression (507 vs. 745 ng/L, p � 0.04). Quality <strong>of</strong> life scores and<br />

pain medication use did not change appreciably during this period.<br />

Conclusions: This study suggests that ZA may not need to be given at<br />

conventional intervals in the majority <strong>of</strong> pts, and may safely be withheld<br />

without increased risk to morbidity or decline in quality <strong>of</strong> life over a 12<br />

week period. Baseline CTX and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> suppression <strong>of</strong> bone<br />

turnover at 4 weeks may predict for the optimal dosing frequency.<br />

Confirmation in a randomized trial is needed.<br />

9113 General Poster Session (Board #47C), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Pain, sleep disturbance, and fatigue symptom cluster in patients suffering<br />

from chronic chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP). Presenting<br />

Author: Jennifer S. Gewandter, University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Medical Center,<br />

Rochester, NY<br />

Background: Various symptom cluster combinations <strong>of</strong> pain, fatigue, sleep<br />

disturbance (SD), and depression have been identified in cancer patients.<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> symptom clusters has not been assessed in patients with<br />

persistent CINP. This exploratory analysis aimed to determine which<br />

symptoms statistically clustered with pain in cancer survivors with CINP.<br />

Methods: The University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Cancer Center Community <strong>Clinical</strong><br />

Oncology Program recruited 461 patients with CINP � 4 (on a 0-10 scale)<br />

who had completed chemotherapy (median 7 months ago) for a pain<br />

intervention trial. At baseline, groups <strong>of</strong> highly associated symptoms that<br />

included pain were identified empirically using factor and cluster analyses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 11 symptoms in the University <strong>of</strong> Rochester Symptom Inventory plus<br />

the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores. To investigate if<br />

associated symptoms track together over time, multiple linear regression<br />

(MLR) analysis was performed using changes in symptom severity between<br />

baseline and week 6, controlling for gender, age, education, race, and<br />

marital status. Results: Subjects were 88% white and 71% female, and on<br />

average 61 years old. Mean (standard deviation) baseline pain, fatigue, and<br />

SD were 5.7 (2.8), 5.0 (2.7), and 4.2 (3.1), respectively; 26% <strong>of</strong> subjects<br />

had borderline or abnormal HADS scores. Factor analysis identified 3<br />

factors that accounted for 88% <strong>of</strong> the variance. One factor included pain,<br />

fatigue, SD, but not HADS, and accounted for 37% <strong>of</strong> the variance.<br />

Variable clustering also identified pain, SD, and fatigue as 1 symptom<br />

cluster. Changes in severity <strong>of</strong> SD and fatigue (p � 0.0001), but not HADS,<br />

were associated with changes in pain (adjusted R2 � 0.168) in MLR<br />

analysis. Conclusions: Pain, fatigue, and SD were identified as a symptom<br />

cluster by factor and cluster analyses, and were found to track together over<br />

time by MLR. Since these data suggest that pain is associated with sleep<br />

quality and fatigue in patients with persistent CINP, targeting one <strong>of</strong> these<br />

symptoms may lead to reductions in the others. Future research should<br />

investigate interventions that target pain, fatigue, and SD concurrently in<br />

cancer survivors suffering from CINP.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!