24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210s Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer<br />

3528 Poster Discussion Session (Board #20), Fri, 1:00 PM-5:00 PM and<br />

4:30 PM-5:30 PM<br />

BRAF V600 mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) expansion cohort from the<br />

phase I/II clinical trial <strong>of</strong> BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436) plus<br />

MEK inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212). Presenting Author: Ryan Bruce<br />

Corcoran, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA<br />

Background: BRAF V600 mutations occur in 10-15% <strong>of</strong> CRC and may<br />

predict lack <strong>of</strong> response to standard chemotherapy and anti-EGFR treatment.<br />

There have been no significant recent changes in the treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

CRC. Novel therapeutic strategies for BRAF mutant CRC are critically<br />

needed. To collect preliminary efficacy data, an expansion cohort <strong>of</strong> 25<br />

BRAF mutant CRC patients (pts) was included in part 2 <strong>of</strong> a phase I/II study<br />

evaluating the combination <strong>of</strong> dabrafenib (BRAFi) and trametinib (MEKi).<br />

Methods: Eligible pts had BRAF V600 mutant CRC, measurable disease per<br />

RECIST 1.1, and previous treatment with anti-cancer therapies. Pts were<br />

treated with established dose <strong>of</strong> dabrafenib (150mg BID) and trametinib<br />

(2mg QD). Results: Data for 23 pts are available at data cut-<strong>of</strong>f: median age<br />

54 years, 74% female, ECOG performance status 0 (48%) or 1 (52%).<br />

39% had received prior EGFR inhibitor treatment. 74% had received � 2<br />

prior chemotherapy regimens; 48% had � 1 biologic therapy. 48% had<br />

� 3 metastatic sites. Three <strong>of</strong> the 23 pts were non-evaluable at data cut-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

as they had not reached the first restaging assessment. Among the 20<br />

evaluable pts, 1 (5%) achieved partial response and 10 (50%) stable<br />

disease. Minor responses (�10% to �30% tumor shrinkage) were observed<br />

in 4/10 patients (40%) with stable disease. The most frequent<br />

adverse events observed in all <strong>Part</strong> 2 patients who received the same dosing<br />

combination (n�75) included pyrexia (65%), fatigue (47%), nausea<br />

(44%), chills (41%), vomiting (31%), constipation (28%), diarrhea (24%)<br />

and rash (21%). Conclusions: Dabrafenib at 150 mg BID combines safely<br />

with trametinib 2 mg QD in this BRAF mutant CRC cohort. Based on the<br />

preliminary anti-tumor activity seen, further investigation is warranted in<br />

BRAF mutant CRC pts. Updated safety and efficacy data and an analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the relationship between efficacy and potential predictive biomarkers,<br />

including microsatellite status, PTEN loss, PIK3CA mutation, and total and<br />

phosphorylated EFGR levels, will be presented.<br />

3530 Poster Discussion Session (Board #22), Fri, 1:00 PM-5:00 PM and<br />

4:30 PM-5:30 PM<br />

Overall survival (OS) <strong>of</strong> advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) patients (pts)<br />

treated with the multipeptide vaccine IMA910: Results <strong>of</strong> a matched-pair<br />

analysis with arm C pts from COIN. Presenting Author: Tim S. Maughan,<br />

Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University <strong>of</strong> Oxford,<br />

Oxford, United Kingdom<br />

Background: IMA910 is a novel cancer vaccine consisting <strong>of</strong> 10 class I and<br />

3 class II tumor-associated peptides (TUMAPs), naturally presented on<br />

HLA molecules <strong>of</strong> CRC. Vaccine-induced immune responses are associated<br />

with prolonged OS <strong>of</strong> renal cell carcinoma pts treated with IMA901, a<br />

multi-peptide vaccine identified by the same antigen discovery platform.<br />

Methods: 92 HLA-A*02� aCRC pts with stable or responding disease after<br />

12 weeks <strong>of</strong> first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy were enrolled in this phase<br />

I/II trial. After immunomodulation with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2 )to<br />

reduce regulatory T cells, pts were immunized intradermally (up to 16<br />

vaccinations) with IMA910 in combination with GM-CSF without (cohort 1;<br />

n�66) or with (cohort 2; n�26) topically applied imiquimod. Safety and<br />

PFS data was recently presented [Mayer et al., ASCO-GI 2012]. OS <strong>of</strong><br />

IMA910 pts was compared to matched pts from arm C (intermittent<br />

chemotherapy) <strong>of</strong> the COIN trial [Adams et al., Lancet Oncology 2011].<br />

Matching was performed in a prospectively defined, fully blinded fashion<br />

based on a propensity score involving all available prognostic factors. T-cell<br />

responses to individual IMA910 peptides were analyzed by HLA multimer<br />

and intracellular cytokine assays. Results: At a median follow up <strong>of</strong> 1.7 yrs,<br />

OS <strong>of</strong> IMA910 vaccinated pts was significantly longer in comparison to 1:1<br />

matched HLA-A*02� COIN pts (HR 0.675, 95% CI 0.458-0.995,<br />

p�0.047; 1 yr OS: 69% vs 55%; 2 yr OS: 40% vs 24%). Multi-TUMAP<br />

responders (�2 CD8� and �2 CD4� vaccine-induced T cells) had a<br />

significantly longer OS (HR 0.45, p�0.04) compared to matched COIN pts<br />

while non-multi-TUMAP responders showed similar OS compared to<br />

matched COIN pts (HR 0.76, p�0.22). Conclusions: OS <strong>of</strong> IMA910 pts was<br />

significantly longer in comparison to matched COIN pts with separation <strong>of</strong><br />

survival curves at ~9 months and increasing OS difference over time.<br />

Multi-TUMAP immune responders had a significantly longer OS compared<br />

to non-multi-TUMAP responders and compared to matched COIN pts.<br />

These clinical and immune response data strongly suggest clinical activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> IMA910 in 1st line CRC pts and warrant further development.<br />

3529 Poster Discussion Session (Board #21), Fri, 1:00 PM-5:00 PM and<br />

4:30 PM-5:30 PM<br />

Pharmacodynamic biomarker-driven trial <strong>of</strong> MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, with<br />

AZD6244 (selumetinib), a MEK inhibitor, in patients with advanced colorectal<br />

carcinoma (CRC). Presenting Author: Giovanna Speranza, National Cancer<br />

Institute, Bethesda, MD<br />

Background: The RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways are commonly<br />

deregulated in CRC. Each can serve as a compensatory mechanism<br />

mediating resistance to single pathway blockade. Combined inhibition with<br />

MK-2206 and selumetinib (AZD6244) could enhance antitumor activity.<br />

Tolerable doses for the combination in solid tumors (ASCO 2011, abstr 3004)<br />

are less than single agent MTDs. We conducted a biomarker driven trial <strong>of</strong><br />

MK-2206 and selumetinib at the established combination doses to determine<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> pERK and pAKT inhibition in tumor biopsies (bx), using new, clinically<br />

validated immunoassays for pERK and pAKT. Methods: Patients (pts) with<br />

advanced CRC, refractory to standard therapy, ECOG � 2, adequate organ<br />

function, and disease amenable to bx were treated with oral MK-2206, 90 mg<br />

QW and selumetinib, 75 mg daily, stratified for KRAS mutation status (� or WT).<br />

For each strata, pAKT and pERK levels from paired tumor bx, baseline and 3-6<br />

hrs post-dose in 3 pts each on C1D1 or C1D22, were measured using a<br />

quantitative, chemiluminescence immunoassay (dilution linearity R2 � 0.985<br />

pERK, 0.995 pAKT; % CV at 0 � 6). 70% inhibition was considered biologically<br />

significant based on levels observed in preclinical models that demonstrated<br />

antitumor activity. Results: 11 pts enrolled to date (KRAS �, 6 pts; WT, 5 pts).<br />

2/9 pts had SD after 2 cycles. Gr 1/ 2 toxicities: rash, reversible retinal<br />

detachment, liver abnormalities, hypoalbuminemia, lymphopenia. Target protein<br />

inhibition data are available for 8 paired bx samples (Table). Conclusions:<br />

Although 4/8 pts demonstrated biologically significant inhibition in one marker,<br />

at the MTD for this combination no pt had � 70% inhibition <strong>of</strong> both targets. If<br />

repeated dosing does not produce the desired inhibition <strong>of</strong> pERK and pAKT, we<br />

will conclude that the dose reductions for each agent necessitated by the toxicity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the agents used in combination preclude the possibility <strong>of</strong> providing adequate<br />

dual pathway inhibition. Loss <strong>of</strong> PTEN and DNA mutation analyses (KRAS,<br />

BRAF, PIK3Ca, AKT) are planned.<br />

% Inhibition <strong>of</strong> phosphorylation<br />

pt pERK pAKT<br />

C1D1<br />

KRAS � 1 46 15<br />

2 �77 4<br />

3 61 23<br />

C1D1<br />

KRAS WT 4 53 19<br />

5 �70 34<br />

6 48 78<br />

C1D22<br />

KRAS � 7 77 20<br />

8 0 60<br />

3531 Poster Discussion Session (Board #23), Fri, 1:00 PM-5:00 PM and<br />

4:30 PM-5:30 PM<br />

Molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> the randomized phase II/III study <strong>of</strong> the anti-IGF-1R<br />

antibody dalotuzumab (MK-0646) in combination with cetuximab (Cx) and<br />

irinotecan (Ir) in the treatment <strong>of</strong> chemorefractory KRAS wild-type metastatic<br />

colorectal cancer (mCRC). Presenting Author: David J. Watkins, The<br />

Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, United Kingdom<br />

Background: Previously reported results <strong>of</strong> this randomized study demonstrated<br />

that the addition <strong>of</strong> dalotuzumab (Dz) worsened the PFS and OS <strong>of</strong><br />

chem<strong>of</strong>ractory mCRC patients receiving Cx and Ir (Watkins et al; ASCO<br />

2011). Comprehensive molecular analysis has been undertaken retrospectively<br />

to identify possible predictors <strong>of</strong> Cx resistance and Dz response.<br />

Methods: Quantitative RT-PCR for IGF-1, IGF-2, immunohistochemistry for<br />

IGF-1R and microarray expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling was conducted on archival<br />

tumor tissue. All patients had received Cx and Ir with either placebo<br />

(n�107), weekly Dz (n�112), or 2 weekly Dz (n�110). Results: Data from<br />

292 and 206 patients was successfully obtained by RT-PCR or microarray<br />

respectively. Within the placebo arm, high IGF-1 expression was found to<br />

be associated with resistance to Cx (IGF-1-/IGF-1�; PFS 6.7/3.7 months,<br />

OS 15.5/9.6 months). High IGF-1 expression was associated with benefit<br />

from the addition <strong>of</strong> weekly Dz (placebo/weekly Dz; PFS 3.7/5.7 months,<br />

OS 9.6/18.2 months). By contrast the addition <strong>of</strong> Dz was not effective in<br />

tumors with high IGF-2 expression (placebo/weekly Dz; PFS 8.4/2.7<br />

months). Microarray analysis revealed distinct populations that differentially<br />

correlated with Cx and Dz response. An epithelial phenotype appeared<br />

more associated with Cx response, whereas a mesenchymal phenotype<br />

more associated with Dz response. Rectal cancers showed greater association<br />

with increased IGF-1 expression, EMT gene signature and Dz response.<br />

Conclusions: These data support IGF-1 and IGF-2 as potential biomarkers<br />

for response to Dz therapy and high IGF-1 as a marker <strong>of</strong> resistance to Cx<br />

therapy. Based on these data Dz is being further evaluated in a molecularly<br />

selected population <strong>of</strong> mCRC.<br />

Weekly Dz vs placebo arm<br />

Hazard ratio (95% CI)<br />

Difference<br />

in response rate%<br />

All patients<br />

n�191<br />

Colorectal<br />

high IGF-2<br />

n�25<br />

Colorectal<br />

high IGF-1<br />

n�48<br />

Rectal<br />

high IGF-1<br />

n�23<br />

- 7.4% - 13.3% � 14.6% � 24.6%<br />

PFS 1.30 (0.95, 1.78) 2.94 (1.09, 7.9) 0.59 (0.28, 1.24) 0.35 (0.10, 1.19)<br />

OS 1.37 (0.96, 1.95) 3.48 (0.97, 12.54) 0.67 (0.31, 1.45) 0.49 (0.15, 1.56)<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!