24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5592 General Poster Session (Board #32B), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Final results <strong>of</strong> a phase II study <strong>of</strong> sorafenib in combination with<br />

carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous<br />

cell cancer <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (SCCHN). Presenting Author:<br />

George R. Blumenschein, University <strong>of</strong> Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer<br />

Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: Cytotoxic chemotherapy (CT) is the current standard treatment<br />

for metastatic/recurrent SCCHN. The prognosis for these patients (PTS) is<br />

poor with a median progression free survival (PFS) <strong>of</strong> 4 months with CT.<br />

Survival in PTS with SCCHN may correlate inversely with the number <strong>of</strong><br />

angiogenic growth factors secreted. Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor <strong>of</strong> c-Raf,<br />

b-Raf, VEGFR-1/2/3 and PDGFR-�. To investigate the hypothesis that a<br />

multi-targeted TKI added to chemotherapy would improve outcomes in<br />

patients with metastatic/recurrent SCCHN, we performed a phase II trial <strong>of</strong><br />

paclitaxel and carboplatin and sorafenib (PCS). Methods: PTS were<br />

required to have ECOG PS 0-1, measurable disease, controlled blood<br />

pressure, and may have received one regimen <strong>of</strong> induction, concomitant or<br />

adjuvant CT, but not CT for recurrent/metastatic disease. Sites <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

disease excluded nasopharynx and paranasal sinus. Treatment consisted P<br />

200mg/m2 and C AUC 6 intravenously on day 1 followed by S 400 mg orally<br />

bid (days 2-19) in every 3-week cycles. Primary endpoint was PFS,<br />

targeting median PFS <strong>of</strong> 6 months (M). Secondary endpoints include<br />

overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), exploratory biomarkers, and<br />

toxicity. Results: Forty-eight PTS with SCCHN were enrolled with 44 PTS<br />

evaluable for PFS and response using RECIST. Median age: 56 years<br />

(22-79 years), 89% male, median ECOG PS 1. Median follow-up was 24.1<br />

M. RR was 55% (n�24), disease control rate was 84% (n�37), median<br />

PFS was 8.51 M (95% CI: 5.98 ~ 13 months), and median OS was 22.6 M<br />

(95% CI: 13.1 - NA months). Grade ³3 treatment related toxicities included<br />

hand-foot syndrome (n�10), neutropenia (n�5), pain (n�6), elevated<br />

lipase (n�4), elevated amylase (n�3), anemia (n�3), fatigue (n�2),<br />

hypertension (n�2), neuropathy (n�2), febrile neutropenia (n�2), and<br />

thrombocytopenia (n�2). Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> PCS was well<br />

tolerated and had encouraging activity in recurrent/metastatic SCCHN.<br />

Blood-based and tissue biomarkers are being analyzed. Final outcomes,<br />

toxicity, and correlative biomarker data will be reported.<br />

5594 General Poster Session (Board #32D), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Long-term survival after distant metastasis in oropharyngeal carcinoma.<br />

Presenting Author: Sean M. McBride, Harvard Radiation Oncology Program,<br />

Boston, MA<br />

Background: The possibility <strong>of</strong> cure after distant metastases (DM) in<br />

oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) is uncertain. We conducted a retrospective<br />

cohort study to determine outcome and factors predictive <strong>of</strong> survival after<br />

metastasis in patients with OPC. Methods: From 2003-2010, 24 patients<br />

definitively treated (96% with concurrent chemo-radiation) at the Massachusetts<br />

General Hospital for OPC subsequently developed DM. At initial<br />

diagnosis, HPV status was available in 13 patients, 12 <strong>of</strong> whom were<br />

positive; six patients had T4 and 12 N2c-3 disease. Imaging studies<br />

pertinent to the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> DM were re-reviewed; 83% <strong>of</strong> patients had DM<br />

pathologically confirmed. Overall survival (OS) was defined from 1st<br />

radiographic evidence <strong>of</strong> DM to either death or last follow-up. Cox<br />

regression was used to evaluate factors predictive <strong>of</strong> OS after DM. Results:<br />

Median time to DM after initial treatment was 8.25 months (range,<br />

1.6-24). Twenty (83%) patients had isolated distant failure; <strong>of</strong> these, 6<br />

had limited (1 lesion or 2 adjacent lesions) single-organ disease. Eighteen<br />

(75%) had treatment after DM (83% had chemotherapy, 61% radiation,<br />

and 33% surgery). Median survival after distant metastasis was 19.2<br />

months. Median follow-up for survivors was 23.5 months (range, 7.9-<br />

60.3). In multivariate analysis, limited single-organ disease (HR�0.14,<br />

p�0.01, 95% CI 0.031, 0.67) was predictive <strong>of</strong> improved survival after<br />

DM; T4 disease at initial diagnosis predicted for decreased OS after DM<br />

(HR�3.9, p�0.01, 95% CI 1.31, 11.89). For patients with limited<br />

single-organ disease, the 2-year OS was 82% compared to 32% with<br />

extensive metastases (p � 0.006). Of the 6 patients with limited,<br />

single-organ metastatic disease, two remained alive at 59.4 and 60.5<br />

months without evidence <strong>of</strong> disease; both had HPV-positive tumors. One<br />

patient had a solitary hepatic failure and received neoadjuvant chemotherapy<br />

followed by partial hepatectomy; the other had a solitary lung<br />

metastasis and received wedge resection followed by radiation. Conclusions:<br />

Limited, single-organ metastatic disease predicts improved survival after<br />

DM in OPC. Cure is possible in this group. Patients with limited,<br />

single-organ distant disease should be considered for aggressive, local<br />

salvage treatment.<br />

Head and Neck Cancer<br />

379s<br />

5593 General Poster Session (Board #32C), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

TPF induction chemotherapy and pathologic response for patients with<br />

locally advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Presenting<br />

Author: Lai-ping Zhong, Department <strong>of</strong> Oral and Maxill<strong>of</strong>acial Surgery,<br />

Ninth People’s Hospital, School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University,<br />

Shanghai, China<br />

Background: The role <strong>of</strong> induction chemotherapy in locally advanced and<br />

resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma has not been well issued.<br />

Methods: A prospective, open label, parallel, and interventional randomized<br />

control trail has been performed to evaluate the induction chemotherapy <strong>of</strong><br />

TPF protocol in resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients<br />

at clinical stage III and IVA. The patients received two cycles <strong>of</strong> TPF<br />

induction chemotherapy (75 mg/m2 docetaxel d1, 75mg/m2 cisplatin d1,<br />

and 750mg/m2 5-fluorouracil d1-5) followed by radical surgery and<br />

post-operative radiotherapy with a dose from 54 to 66 Gy (the experimental<br />

group) or surgery and post-operative radiotherapy (the control group).<br />

Post-surgical pathologic examination was performed to determine a positive<br />

response or negative response. A positive response was defined as<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> any tumor cells (pathologic complete response) or presence <strong>of</strong><br />

scattered foci <strong>of</strong> a few tumor cells (minimal residual disease with �10%<br />

viable tumor cells). The primary endpoint is the survival rate; the secondary<br />

endpoint is the local control and safety. This study has been approved by<br />

institutional ethics committee at Ninth People’s Hospital, School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Survival analysis was conducted<br />

with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 256 patients were enrolled in this<br />

trail and 224 patients (111 in experiment group and 113 in control group)<br />

finished the whole treatment protocol. After a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 21<br />

months (ranging 6-43 m). The pathologic positive response rate was 29.7%<br />

(33/111), and negative response rate was 70.3% (78/111). The patients<br />

with positive response had a better disease free survival (38.5�2.1m,<br />

95%CI 34.4-42.6m, P�0.003) compared with those with negative response<br />

(24.6�2.1m, 95%CI 20.6-28.7m) and control group (31.0�1.6m,<br />

95%CI 27.9-34.1m). The toxicity <strong>of</strong> induction chemotherapy could be<br />

tolerated. Conclusions: Pathologic positive response to TPF induction<br />

chemotherapy could benefit the patients with locally advanced and<br />

resectable OSCC. However, further long-term follow-up is needed to<br />

confirm the benefit on survival and local control.<br />

5595 General Poster Session (Board #32E), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Progressive increasing in the risk <strong>of</strong> second and subsequent malignant<br />

tumors in patients with a head and neck cancer: A validation study with<br />

SEER data. Presenting Author: Xavier Leon, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona,<br />

Spain<br />

Background: Patients with a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma<br />

(HNSCC) index tumor have a increased risk (2-4% per year) for appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a second malignant neoplasms (SMN) and higher risk for successive<br />

malignant tumors during the follow-up. The objective <strong>of</strong> our study was to<br />

validate this concept with data <strong>of</strong> patients included in the Surveillance<br />

Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program (1973-2008). Methods:<br />

We performed a population-based cohort study <strong>of</strong> 149.328 patients with a<br />

primary oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx squamous cell<br />

carcinoma index tumor, included in the SEER program, to analize the<br />

actuarial survival-free <strong>of</strong> second and successive tumors. A total <strong>of</strong> 11.948<br />

(8%) patients had one or more malignant tumors before the diagnosis <strong>of</strong><br />

HNSCC. Results: During the follow-up period, a total <strong>of</strong> 31.507 new SMN<br />

appeared. There was a progressive and significant increase in the risk <strong>of</strong><br />

SMN. The annual hazard ratio for 2nd to 7th successive SMN was 2.3%,<br />

2.7%, 3.9%, 5.4%, 8.9% and 19.1% annual risk respectively. Additionally<br />

11 patients had 8th SMN. We observed a progressive increase in the<br />

risk <strong>of</strong> appearence <strong>of</strong> new malignant tumors located in and outside the<br />

aerodigestive tract. The increase in the risk <strong>of</strong> SMN was higher for tumors<br />

located in the aerodigestive tract than tumors located outside aerodigestive<br />

tract. It was a tendency towards the increase in the proportion <strong>of</strong> HNSCC<br />

with the appearance <strong>of</strong> new tumors, with a decrease in the proportion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

malignant tumors located in the lung and in locations outside the<br />

aerodigestive tract. There were significant differences inthe risk <strong>of</strong> SMN<br />

between second and third, third and fourth, fourth and fifth, and sist and<br />

seventh tumors (p�0.0001). Conclusions: In patients with HNSCC there is<br />

a progressive increase in the risk <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> successive tumors.<br />

Previous tobacco and alcohol consumption, persistence in the exposure to<br />

carcinogens and individual susceptibility (genetic) could play a role in the<br />

increased risk <strong>of</strong> SMN. We have validated this concept with data from the<br />

SEER program.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!