24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

682s Tumor Biology<br />

10606 General Poster Session (Board #50G), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the clinical utility <strong>of</strong> kallikrein-related peptidase 6 gene<br />

(KLK6) downregulation in breast cancer. Presenting Author: Kleita Michaelidou,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Athens, Greece<br />

Background: Breast cancer (BC), the most common malignancy among the<br />

female population, remains a crucial public health problem. The identification<br />

and exploitation <strong>of</strong> novel molecular biomarkers can contribute in the<br />

multidimensional approach which is required for optimal management <strong>of</strong><br />

BC patients. The abnormal expression <strong>of</strong> several KLK members has been<br />

documented for breast cancer. Interestingly, many <strong>of</strong> these genes are found<br />

to be potential prognostic markers for this malignancy. KLK6 expression is<br />

positively associated with tumor progression in various human malignancies;<br />

however in breast cancer, it can restrain tumor progression. We<br />

therefore sought to investigate the possible clinical value <strong>of</strong> KLK6 as a<br />

breast cancer biomarker. Methods: Total RNA was isolated from 107 breast<br />

tumors and their matched normal compartments. After testing the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> the extracted RNA, cDNA was prepared by reverse transcription.<br />

Quantitative Real-time PCR was performed, for KLK6 mRNA quantification,<br />

using the SYBR Green chemistry. Relative quantification analysis was<br />

made using the comparative Ct (2-��C T) method. HPRT1 was used as an<br />

endogenous control gene and BT-474 breast cancer cell line served as a<br />

calibrator. Results: KLK6 mRNA levels were significantly downregulated in<br />

the cancerous breast tissue specimens compared to their normal counterparts<br />

(p�0.001). Additionally, a negative association was observed between<br />

KLK6 expression status and tumor stage, given the fact that 54.2%<br />

<strong>of</strong> less advanced breast tumors (TNM stage� T2a) were KLK6-positive<br />

compared to the 34.6% <strong>of</strong> more advanced-stage tumors (TNM �T2a)<br />

(p�0.034). Moreover, a statistically significant negative correlation was<br />

documented between KLK6 mRNA levels and estrogen (p�0.001) and<br />

progesterone receptor (p�0.003) statuses. Conclusions: The downregulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> KLK6 in cancerous compared to normal sections <strong>of</strong> breast tissue<br />

samples reflects the reported tumor suppressor properties <strong>of</strong> KLK6 gene in<br />

breast malignancies. Furthermore, the negative association <strong>of</strong> KLK6 mRNA<br />

expression with tumor stage, ER and PR statuses reveals the putative role <strong>of</strong><br />

KLK6 as a promising prognostic breast cancer biomarker.<br />

10608 General Poster Session (Board #51A), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> the usefulness <strong>of</strong> angiotensin type 1 receptor (AGTR1) as a<br />

possible response predictor in patients with metastatic breast cancer<br />

(mBC) subjected to chemotherapy and treatment with bevacizumab<br />

(AVALUZ Study). Presenting Author: Juan De la Haba- Rodriguez, Hospital<br />

Universitario Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía, Cordoba, Spain<br />

Background: Angiotensin type 1 receptor (AGTR1) is a membrane receptor<br />

implicated in the regulation <strong>of</strong> arterial pressure. It has also been related to<br />

carcinogenesis and tumor spread, and participates in neoangiogenesis.<br />

AGTR1 is expressed in a number <strong>of</strong> neoplasms as BC. In a previous<br />

neoadjuvant study, a significant relationship was observed between AGTR1<br />

expression and CR to a regimen <strong>of</strong> chemo and bevacizumab (B). To study<br />

and confirm the relationship between tumor expression <strong>of</strong> AGTR1 and<br />

response to a regimen <strong>of</strong> chemo and B in pts with mBC. Methods: AGTR1<br />

expression was subjected to immun<strong>of</strong>luorescence (monoclonal AGTR1<br />

sc1173 antibody, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA Dilution 1:50) in 50<br />

samples <strong>of</strong> mBC pts from the AVALUZ study treated with first line<br />

bevacizumab 10 mg/kg, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 2000<br />

mg/m2 d 1 and 15 c/28 d until PD, unacceptable toxicity or medical<br />

decision. Immunoreactivity was reported as negative (0), low positive (1�)<br />

and high positive (2�). RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks, using the<br />

QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit and Deparaffinization Solution (QIAGEN)<br />

and expression <strong>of</strong> AGTR1 candidate gene was quantified using reverse<br />

transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Results: 60% <strong>of</strong> the samples expressed<br />

AGTR1 (26% weak and 34% intense) – expression being more frequent in<br />

HR � tumors (65% vs 45%). Among the 50 samples analyzed, measurable<br />

disease was present in 39 pts. Treatment activity was significantly greater<br />

in the tumors AGTR1 expression 2� (p�0.009) (Table). With a median<br />

follow-up <strong>of</strong> 19.30 months, the progression-free interval was longer in the<br />

tumors with intense AGTR1 expression (17.7 vs 10.8 months, p�0.132).<br />

More consolidated PFS and OS will be presented. Conclusions: AGTR1<br />

expression may be useful as a predictor <strong>of</strong> response to chemo and<br />

bevacizumab. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.<br />

AGTR1 expression/objective response CR PR SD PD<br />

Intense AGTR1 expression (N:14 ) 35.7% (5) 64.3% (9) 0% 0%<br />

Negative or weak AGTR1 expression (N:25) 4% (1) 56.0% (14) 28% (7) 12 (3%)<br />

CR: complete response, PR: partial response, SD: stable disease, PD: progression disease<br />

10607 General Poster Session (Board #50H), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

p53 mutations in advanced cancers: <strong>Clinical</strong> characteristics and outcomes<br />

in a phase I setting. Presenting Author: Rabih Said, Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program), University <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />

M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX<br />

Background: p53 mutation is one <strong>of</strong> the most common mutations in human<br />

tumors and plays an important role in apoptosis, genomic stability and<br />

inhibition <strong>of</strong> angiogenesis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 121<br />

consecutive patients (pts) with solid tumors referred to the <strong>Clinical</strong> Center<br />

for Targeted Therapy (Phase I program) who were tested for p53 mutation,<br />

and compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in p53 positive vs.<br />

wild-type (wt) pts. Results: Of the 121 tested pts, 65 (53.7%) were p53<br />

mutation-positive. The presence <strong>of</strong> p53 mutation was not associated with<br />

sex and race. Tumors with p53 mutation metastasized more <strong>of</strong>ten to the<br />

liver (44 pts (67.7%) with mutated p53 vs. 26 pts (46.4%) with wt p53,<br />

p�0.0264); there was no difference in metastasis to the bones, lungs,<br />

brain, s<strong>of</strong>t tissues and adrenals. p53 mutation also showed a trend toward<br />

an association with PTEN-loss (13 out <strong>of</strong> 43 (30%) with p53 mutated vs. 4<br />

out <strong>of</strong> 37 (11%) with wt p53, p�0.053). Among pts with the p53<br />

mutation, the best median progression-free survival (PFS) prior to phase I<br />

trial entry was 10.97 months (range 0.85–29.04 months) when the<br />

treatment regimen included bevacizumab and 4.37 months (range 0.92–<br />

14.98 months) when the treatment did not include bevacizumab<br />

(P�0.0046). Among patients with wt p53, there was no significant<br />

difference in PFS between bavacizumab-containing regimens and regimens<br />

without bevacizumab. The median OS from diagnosis was 7.7 years<br />

(95% CI 6.32–9.84 years) vs. 11.8 years (95% CI 10.37 years, not<br />

attained) for p53 mutant vs. wild-type disease (p � 0.03). Univariate<br />

analysis for OS from diagnosis showed that mutated p53, Hispanic race (vs.<br />

Caucasians) and the shorter time from diagnosis to metastasis were<br />

associated with a worse prognosis. Conclusions: Tumors with p53 mutation<br />

have a more aggressive clinical behavior, metastasize more to the liver and<br />

may have a higher rate <strong>of</strong> PTEN loss compared to tumors with wt p53; In<br />

addition, anti-angiogenic agents may be <strong>of</strong> therapeutic value in p53mutated<br />

pts.<br />

10609 General Poster Session (Board #51B), Mon, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

The lipid metabolome <strong>of</strong> clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). Presenting<br />

Author: Saby George, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY<br />

Background: The commonest type <strong>of</strong> kidney cancer is CCRCC. Treatment<br />

approaches mostly target aberrant vasculature. However, kidney cancer is<br />

also known to accumulate lipids and a detailed knowledge <strong>of</strong> the lipid<br />

species present in these tumors could lead to a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

underlying aberrant metabolic pathways and suggest possible treatment<br />

strategies. Lipidomics is an emerging field driven by rapid advances in<br />

mass spectrometry (MS), and is widely used to discover biomarkers. We<br />

attempt to identify the lipidomic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> CCRCC using a liquid chromatography<br />

MS-based approach (LC-MS). Methods: We utilized 6 fresh frozen<br />

representative samples <strong>of</strong> CCRCC and matching non-tumor areas <strong>of</strong> kidney<br />

from nephrectomy samples. Lipids and other non-polar cellular constituents<br />

were extracted from both CCRCC and control tissues by methyl-t-butyl<br />

ether /methanol. LC-MS based lipid pr<strong>of</strong>iling was performed on a Waters<br />

Q-ToF Premier MS coupled with Ultra Performance LC. The peak detection<br />

and alignment across all chromatograms were performed using the XCMS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware (v 1.14.1, Scripps Center for Metabolomics). Statistical comparisons<br />

<strong>of</strong> the intensities <strong>of</strong> aligned peaks were performed using the XCMSbuilt-in<br />

Welch’s t-test. Results: The outcome <strong>of</strong> XCMS was converted to a<br />

table that contains fold change, p-value and mass to charge ratio (m/z) for<br />

each peak, its corresponding retention time, and the integrated peak<br />

intensities from all samples. 224 peaks out <strong>of</strong> 1419 differed between<br />

CCRCC and the control group, with p �0.05, calculated by XCMS. About an<br />

equal number <strong>of</strong> analytes increased or decreased in CCRCC compared with<br />

control samples. Preliminary attempts to identify the analytes included use<br />

<strong>of</strong> METLIN (Scripps Center for Metabolomics) and HMDB (Human metabolome<br />

database, Genome Alberta & Genome Canada) databases. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hits identified phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, triacylglycerols<br />

and diacylglycerols, as well as other lipid species. Conclusions:<br />

The lipid metabolomic pr<strong>of</strong>ile varied significantly between CCRCC and<br />

control. Further studies are required to confirm the identities <strong>of</strong> the lipid<br />

species contributing to this variation by obtaining structural information<br />

using tandem MS (LC-MS/MS).<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!