24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

556s Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />

8564 General Poster Session (Board #34F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

High-risk uveal melanoma: A prospective study evaluating the role <strong>of</strong><br />

magnetic resonance imaging <strong>of</strong> the liver. Presenting Author: Ernie Marshall,<br />

Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Wirral, United Kingdom<br />

Background: Almost 50% <strong>of</strong> uveal melanomas are fatal. Metastatic death<br />

occurs almost exclusively with tumours showing chromosome 3 loss and 8q<br />

gain. Metastases, which almost always involve the liver, are resectable in<br />

some patients. They are rarely detectable when the patient presents with<br />

the primary ocular tumour. Screening is therefore necessary, but there is no<br />

consensus as to who should be screened, how <strong>of</strong>ten, and for how long.<br />

Methods: Uveal melanoma patients with ECOG performance status 0-2<br />

were eligible if their risk <strong>of</strong> metastatic death at 5 years exceeded 50%.<br />

Survival probability was estimated by multivariate analysis <strong>of</strong> tumour stage,<br />

histological grade and genetic tumour type. Patients underwent screening<br />

6monthly, clinical examination, non-contrast liver MRI and liver function<br />

tests for at least five years. Results: Between Jan 2000 and November<br />

2010, 279 high-risk patients were referred for screening. Of these, 188<br />

(84 male, 104 female) accepted screening and underwent as least 1 MRI.<br />

The median age was 63 years (IQR 16.5). Median basal tumour diameter<br />

was 16.5mm (IQR 5.25). Chromosome 3 loss was detected in 175<br />

tumours. Median follow up time was 28.8 months (IQR 29.1). Median<br />

relapse-free survival was 33 months (95% CI 28-38) with a 35%<br />

relapse-free survival at 5 years. After a median <strong>of</strong> 18 months (IQR 20),<br />

screening detected metastases in 90/188 (48%), 83 <strong>of</strong> whom were<br />

asymptomatic. 12 patients underwent R0 liver resection, which increased<br />

the median survival from 10 (95% CI 8.1 - 11.9) to 24 (95% CI 20.2-<br />

27.8) months. The screening programme stimulated a UK NCRI portfolio <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical trials in which 23 <strong>of</strong> these patients were subsequently treated.<br />

Conclusions: Six-monthly liver MRI detects metastases from uveal melanoma<br />

at an early stage, thereby enhancing opportunities for surgical<br />

metastatectomy, clinical trial participation and prolonging life.<br />

8566 General Poster Session (Board #34H), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Biomarker for benefit from ipilimumab: Correlation <strong>of</strong> breadth <strong>of</strong> humoral<br />

tumor-antigen-specific immunity with outcome. Presenting Author: Sarah<br />

Ellis, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Background: Checkpoint blockade through CTLA4 with ipilimumab has for<br />

the first time improved survival in patients with advanced melanoma.<br />

Immune-mediated toxicity and increase in humoral and T-cell anti-NY-<br />

ESO-1 immune responses after treatment are both linked with benefit.<br />

However there is currently no broadly relevant, immunological biomarker<br />

for predicting outcome prior to initiation <strong>of</strong> therapy. Methods: Using a novel<br />

immunological assay developed by Serametrix Corporation we analysed the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> antibodies to a proprietary panel <strong>of</strong> tumour associated antigens<br />

(TAAs) in 34 patients with advanced melanoma, given ipilimumab at<br />

3mg/kg as second or subsequent line <strong>of</strong> treatment. Results: 34 patients<br />

were consented and analysed, 22 females, 13 males. With a median age <strong>of</strong><br />

63 years median overall survival was 24 weeks; 6/34 patients had an<br />

objective response to ipilimumab (17.6%, median survival not reached).<br />

Antibody (AB) responses were tested against the panel <strong>of</strong> 26 TAAs. This<br />

panel includes BRAF, Cancer/Testis and other described or novel TAAs. We<br />

observed a wide range in the incidence and levels <strong>of</strong> antibody response. 12<br />

patients had no detectable immunity, 6 an AB response to a single antigen,<br />

5 AB response to 2, and 11 patients to 3 or more TAA. Five patients had<br />

either pre-existing anti-BRAF antibodies or developed these after CTLA4blockade.<br />

Survival was significantly longer in those patients with preexisting<br />

antibodies to 2 or more TAA, compared to those with 0 or 1<br />

specificities (median survival 39.4 vs 16.4 weeks p�0.02). Conclusions:<br />

Patients with advanced melanoma had variable levels <strong>of</strong> humoral immunity<br />

to a large number <strong>of</strong> TAA, including to BRAF. The presence <strong>of</strong> antibody<br />

response to 2 or more TAA correlated with longer survival following<br />

treatment with ipilimumab and appears to provide a biomarker for identifying<br />

those patients that are most likely to respond to checkpoint blockade<br />

with ipilimumab.<br />

8565 General Poster Session (Board #34G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

MicroRNA alterations associated with BRAF status in melanoma. Presenting<br />

Author: Michelle W. Ma, New York University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, New<br />

York, NY<br />

Background: We hypothesize that BRAF mutations result in microRNA<br />

(miRNA) alterations which contribute to orchestrating the mutant BRAF’s<br />

oncogenic effects in melanoma. Our study is the first to examine the<br />

association between the BRAF mutation status in primary melanomas and<br />

the expression <strong>of</strong> miRNAs that target known tumor suppressors. Methods:<br />

84 prospectively accrued melanoma patients at New York University<br />

Langone Medical Center were studied. DNA and total RNA were extracted<br />

from consecutive sections <strong>of</strong> formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary<br />

tissues. BRAF mutation status was determined by DNA sequencing. RNA<br />

was hybridized to miRCURY miRNA microarrays containing 1314 probes.<br />

Normalized miRNA data were analyzed using the t-test (p�0.05) to<br />

identify differentially expressed miRNAs between BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt<br />

cases. Those with an average fold change (FC) � 2 were selected for<br />

predicted (TargetScan, PicTar) and validated (miRWalk) gene target<br />

analysis, and overlapping genes targeted by � 2 miRNAs were analyzed<br />

using pathway-mapping algorithms (KEGG, BioCarta, PANTHER). Results:<br />

48 (57%) primaries were BRAFwt and 36 (43%) were BRAFmut (26<br />

V600E, 4 V600K, 1 V600R, 1 V600D, 4 other). 30 miRNAs met the<br />

criteria for statistically significant differential expression and FC thresholding:<br />

let-7i, miR-23c, -26a/b, -27b, -34a, -98, -126*, -141, -148a, -181b,<br />

-195, -199a-3p, -199a/b-5p, -200a/b/c, -203, -205, -455-3p, -491-3p,<br />

-606, -641, -646, -1297, -4301; miRPlus-C1070, -C1110, -G1246-3p<br />

(average FC: 2.3-3.5, all increased in BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt). Predicted<br />

and validated target gene analysis revealed 317 genes, <strong>of</strong> which 110 (35%)<br />

were convergent targets <strong>of</strong> � 2 miRNAs. Pathway analyses <strong>of</strong> the predicted,<br />

validated, and convergent target genes pointed to the potential impact <strong>of</strong><br />

BRAFmut-associated miRNAs on known tumor suppressors FAS, PTEN,<br />

and TNF and the p53 pathway. Conclusions: Differentially expressed<br />

miRNAs in BRAFmut vs. BRAFwt primaries target genes with known roles<br />

in melanoma biology and/or treatment response. These miRNAs warrant<br />

further study as potential effectors <strong>of</strong> the BRAFmut oncogenic program.<br />

8567 General Poster Session (Board #35A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A single-arm, open-label, U.S. expanded access study <strong>of</strong> vemurafenib in<br />

patients with metastatic melanoma. Presenting Author: Lynn Mara Schuchter,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Vemurafenib (vem) has been FDA approved for the treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> unresectable or metastatic BRAFV600E mutated melanoma since August<br />

2011 based on results <strong>of</strong> a randomized phase III study (treatment-naive)<br />

and a single arm phase II study (previously treated). We report results <strong>of</strong> an<br />

expanded access study that allowed appropriate patients (pts) to receive<br />

vem until the drug was approved. Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic<br />

melanoma with a BRAFV600E mutation as detected by the cobas 4800<br />

BRAF V600<br />

Mutation Test. Enrolled pts received oral vem 960 mg b.i.d.<br />

Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated for vem-related toxicities; tumor<br />

responses were assessed using RECIST 1.1. Results: 29 US sites screened<br />

745 pts and enrolled 374 from December 2010 until October 2011. The<br />

following results are based on a median follow up time and treatment<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> 2 months. At baseline, mean age <strong>of</strong> pts was 54 y with 22% <strong>of</strong><br />

pts �65 y; 75% had stage M1c disease; 29% had received radiotherapy for<br />

brain metastases. 19% <strong>of</strong> pts were ECOG PS 2 or 3; 71% <strong>of</strong> pts had prior<br />

systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma (21% 1 regimen; 50% �2<br />

regimens). 50 pts had prior adjuvant treatment. At data cut-<strong>of</strong>f, 243 pts<br />

had sufficient follow-up time for tumor assessment. In this group, the<br />

unconfirmed overall response rate was 52% (95% CI, 46 to 59). The<br />

median time to response was 1.8 months. Based on 240 pts with available<br />

ECOG PS status at time <strong>of</strong> analysis, response rate was 53% for pts with<br />

ECOG PS 0 or 1 (n�209), and 45% for pts with ECOG PS 2 or 3 (n�31).<br />

370 pts were evaluable for safety analysis. The most common vem-related<br />

AEs were rash (36%), arthralgia (33%) and fatigue (21%) with the majority<br />

(~90%) <strong>of</strong> grade 1 or 2. 25 vem-related serious AEs were reported in 5.4%<br />

<strong>of</strong> pts with a slightly higher rate <strong>of</strong> pts with ECOG PS 2 or 3 (8.7%)<br />

compared to ECOG PS 0 or 1 (4.7%). 18% <strong>of</strong> pts missed at least one dose<br />

and 11% <strong>of</strong> pts required dose reduction <strong>of</strong> at least one level due to AEs.<br />

Conclusions: This expanded access study, with its limited follow-up time,<br />

confirms the established rapid and high tumor response rate with vem. No<br />

new safety signals were detected. Compared to the overall population, pts<br />

with an ECOG PS 2 or 3 demonstrated a similar benefit.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!