24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1588 General Poster Session (Board #7F), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Second primary gynecologic neoplasms among breast cancer survivors.<br />

Presenting Author: Maria Pilar Barretina Ginesta, Institut Catala d’Oncologia<br />

Hospital Universitari Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain<br />

Background: Excess <strong>of</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> several second primary malignancies after<br />

treatment for breast cancer (BC) has been reported. This risk can be related<br />

with shared risk factors, cancer susceptibility genes or prior treatments<br />

received. Hormonal factors and hormone therapy are known to be risk<br />

factors for both BC and some gynecological malignancies. The aim <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study was to asses gynecological cancer risk as a second neoplasm among<br />

BC patients in our population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with invasive<br />

BC (CIE10: C50.0-C50.9) and registered in the Girona Cancer Registry<br />

from 1980 to 2006 were included in our study. We analyzed their<br />

incidence <strong>of</strong> second gynaecological malignancies except for contralateral<br />

BC. Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) and absolute excess <strong>of</strong> risk (AER)<br />

<strong>of</strong> these patients compared to general population were calculated. Results:<br />

6.209 patients were diagnosed <strong>of</strong> invasive BC in this period, with median<br />

age at diagnosis 62 years, median follow-up 4 years. 84 <strong>of</strong> them developed<br />

a second malignancy <strong>of</strong> gynaecological origin (SIR 1,98 CI 95% 1,59-<br />

2,44; AER 104,01/100.000 person-year). We observed 4 uterine cervix<br />

(SIR 0.64 IC95% 0,20-1,54), 3 vulvar-vaginal (SIR 0,96 IC95% 0,24-<br />

2,60), 13 ovarian (SIR 1,13 IC95% 0,63-1,89) and 63 uterine corpus<br />

neoplasms (UC), as well as 1 genital female tract neoplasm unspecified.<br />

High and statistically significant SIR was observed for gynecological<br />

malignancies in general and specifically for UC(SIR 3.14 IC 95% 2,44-<br />

4,00). With this finding, histology <strong>of</strong> UC cases was reviewed. 12 out <strong>of</strong> 63<br />

were malignant histologies, not otherwise specified. Among the remaining<br />

51, there were 8 type II (1 clear cell and 7 serous adenocarcinoma,<br />

15.7%), 34 type I (endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 66.7%) and 6 carcinosarcomas<br />

(11.8%). There were also 2 adenosarcomas (3.9%) and 1<br />

mucinous adenocarcinoma (1.9%). Conclusions: Women with previous BC<br />

have an elevated risk <strong>of</strong> developing a second primary gynecological<br />

malignancy compared with general population, particularly for UC. These<br />

patients should be followed up for its early detection. We detected a slight<br />

increase in unfavourable uterine carcinoma histologies respect to the<br />

general population. Further investigation <strong>of</strong> this finding is warranted.<br />

1590 General Poster Session (Board #7H), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Renal impairment after chemotherapy in lung (LC), colorectal (CRC), and<br />

breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) from the Henry Ford Health System<br />

(HFHS) tumor registry. Presenting Author: Laura Chu, Genentech, South<br />

San Francisco, CA<br />

Background: Renal impairment is a common comorbidity in cancer pts. It<br />

can delay excretion and alter metabolism <strong>of</strong> anticancer drugs leading to<br />

further renal toxicity. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to determine the<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> pts with renal impairment, defined as the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

proteinuria (PR), acute kidney injury (AKI), or chronic kidney disease<br />

(CKD), after chemotherapy (chemo) initiation. Methods: LC, CRC, and BC<br />

pts newly diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 (regardless <strong>of</strong> prior renal<br />

status) were identified using the HFHS tumor registry, with follow-up<br />

through Mar 2009. AKI was defined based on RIFLE (severity categories<br />

only) using lab data within 1 to 7 days after chemo initiation. CKD was<br />

defined based on NKF-KDOQI criteria and lab data up to 1 year after chemo<br />

initiation. Proteinuria was defined as protein/creatinine �30 mg/g within 3<br />

months after chemo initiation. Descriptive statistics include proportions<br />

stratified by renal impairment status (yes, no) at cancer diagnosis. Results:<br />

We identified 1,896 LC, 1,088 CRC, 1,611 BC chemo treated pts. Median<br />

age for all pts was 66 years. For LC and CRC, 56% and 51% were men,<br />

respectively. The proportion <strong>of</strong> pts with renal impairment after chemo by<br />

tumor type was the following: LC (AKI�23.4%; CKD�48.2%; PR�0.4%);<br />

CRC (AKI�20.3%; CKD�55.7%; PR�0.1%); BC (AKI�7.8%;<br />

CKD�63.9%; PR�0.6%). Pts with pre-existing renal impairment at<br />

cancer diagnosis were more likely to have impairment after chemo (Table).<br />

Conclusions: In LC, CRC, and BC pts, the proportion <strong>of</strong> pts with renal<br />

impairment after chemo initiation was high. Extent <strong>of</strong> renal impairment,<br />

especially AKI, appears to be associated with tumor type. Older age, as in<br />

this HFHS cohort, is associated with higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> CKD. Renal<br />

function should be closely monitored, particularly among pts with preexisting<br />

renal impairment, and preventive measures implemented to<br />

minimize further toxicity after treatment.<br />

Cancer Prevention/Epidemiology<br />

107s<br />

1589 General Poster Session (Board #7G), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> prognostic factors on metastatic breast cancer survival<br />

over time. Presenting Author: Margaret Quinn Rosenzweig, University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh School <strong>of</strong> Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA<br />

Background: Recent evidence suggests that survival in metastatic breast<br />

cancer is slowly improving associated with the use <strong>of</strong> better adjuvant and<br />

metastatic chemotherapeutic and targeted agents. Patient and clinical<br />

factors such as age, estrogen status, non-white race, Her 2 status, disease<br />

free interval and sites <strong>of</strong> metastatic breast cancer involvement indicate<br />

worse clinical outcome after recurrence. This analysis focused on the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> these factors on metastatic breast cancer survival over time.<br />

Methods: Subjects were women with metastatic breast cancer from one<br />

large urban practice, <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Breast<br />

Cancer Program followed from 1999 through December, 2008. Patients<br />

were dichotomized into two time categories: A) 1999 through 2004 and B)<br />

2005 through 2008. Outliers <strong>of</strong> long term survivors (n �72) with survival<br />

extending beyond 6 years were excluded. Log rank tests were conducted for<br />

assessing the relationship between prognostic factors and survival. Results:<br />

Cohorts included patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 1999<br />

through 2004, (n�284) and 2005 through 2008, (n�332). They were<br />

followed up to December, 2011. Median survival improved over time<br />

(p�0.053). Estrogen negativity remained significant for worse survival<br />

across both time periods (p�0.0001). Age, presence <strong>of</strong> brain metastasis<br />

and Her 2 status were not significant for influence on survival at either time<br />

interval. Shorter disease free interval (p� 0.02), higher number <strong>of</strong><br />

metastatic sites (p�.001) and presence <strong>of</strong> visceral metastasis at diagnosis<br />

(p�0.003) became significant for worse survival in the 2005-2008<br />

intervals but had not been in the earlier time period. African <strong>American</strong> race<br />

was highly significant (�0.001) for worse survival in 1999-2004 but lost<br />

significance in 2005 through 2008 with dramatic survival increase<br />

(median survival - 12.5 months to 35 months). Conclusions: It is important<br />

for clinicians to clarify the prognostic features associated with worse<br />

outcomes in metastatic breast cancer. With newly emergent therapies and<br />

sensitivity toward specific patient factors these features evolve over time.<br />

1591 General Poster Session (Board #8A), Sat, 1:15 PM-5:15 PM<br />

Treatment patterns and comorbidities in a population-based cohort <strong>of</strong><br />

glioblastoma patients diagnosed 1997-2008. Presenting Author: Susan A.<br />

Oliveria, EpiSource, Newton, MA<br />

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one <strong>of</strong> the most common,<br />

most malignant and rapidly progressive forms <strong>of</strong> brain cancer. Published<br />

reports <strong>of</strong> GBM in non-trial populations are limited. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study was to assemble a population-based cohort <strong>of</strong> GBM patients with<br />

comprehensive clinical and demographic information and to define treatment<br />

patterns and outcomes in this population. Methods: GBM patients<br />

served by Henry Ford Health System (HFHS), a major GBM referral center,<br />

were identified using ICD-O and histology codes from the HFHS tumor<br />

registry. Eligible patients were newly diagnosed with GBM between 1997<br />

and 2008. Comprehensive, population-based data were compiled using<br />

tumor registry data (including histology and mortality) with linkages to<br />

pharmacy data (including infusion), outpatient and inpatient encounter<br />

data, and laboratory results. Results: Overall, 812 GBM patients were<br />

identified; mean age was 54 years (standard deviation 15.8). The cohort<br />

was 63% male and 84% white. Among the most common post-diagnosis<br />

comorbidities/complications, 14% <strong>of</strong> patients had venous thromboembolism<br />

(95% confidence interval [CI] 12-17), 16% had seizures (95% CI<br />

14-19), and 6% had central nervous system hemorrhage (95% CI 4-7).<br />

Arterial thromboembolism occurred in 3% <strong>of</strong> patients (95% CI 2-4), while<br />

7% experienced infections such as candidiasis, herpes simplex, and<br />

pneumocystis pneumonia (95% CI 5-9) and 2% experienced wound<br />

dehiscence (95% CI 1-3). 94% (95% CI 93-96) <strong>of</strong> the cohort received<br />

some form <strong>of</strong> treatment with 81% undergoing surgery (95% CI 78-84),<br />

75% receiving radiation therapy (95% CI 72-78), and 67% receiving<br />

chemotherapy (95% CI 64-70). Median overall survival after diagnosis was<br />

1.4 years (95% CI 1.3-1.5) among all patients, and 1.6 years (95% CI<br />

1.4-2.0) among those diagnosed 2005-2008. Conclusions: This study<br />

presents a well-characterized population-based cohort <strong>of</strong> GBM patients.<br />

Understanding treatment patterns and comorbidities outside the clinical<br />

trial setting is important in informing and evaluating real-world treatment<br />

decisions. Additional results exploring time trends in systemic cancer<br />

therapy and Kaplan-Meier survival curves will be presented.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!