24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

620s Pediatric Oncology<br />

9557 General Poster Session (Board #41D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Diagnostic and treatment challenges <strong>of</strong> adolescent and young adult<br />

oncology patients. Presenting Author: Yanqing Xu, McGill Adolescent and<br />

Young Adult Oncology Program, Montreal, QC, Canada<br />

Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients are faced<br />

with obstacles and challenges related to their diagnosis and treatment<br />

compared to children and older adults. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore<br />

the patient and health care system-related delays in the interval from<br />

cancer symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment as well as to identify the<br />

possible contributing factors to these delays in the AYA group. Methods:<br />

This study was based on a questionnaire conducted in 2010-2011<br />

completed by patients diagnosed with a malignancy between the ages <strong>of</strong> 16<br />

and 39 in addition to older patients diagnosed with a pediatric type<br />

malignancy. Four categories <strong>of</strong> delays: patient delay (time from patient<br />

symptom onset until first health care contact date), health care system<br />

delay (time from first health care contact until diagnosis date), treatment<br />

delay (time from diagnosis date until first treatment) and oncologist delay<br />

(time from first health care contact until first medical oncologist meeting)<br />

were calculated. Median delay (in days) with interquartile interval (IQI) was<br />

the main outcome measure. Median time for each category <strong>of</strong> delay was<br />

further analysed to explore how they vary with different patient characteristics.<br />

Results: We identified a median patient delay <strong>of</strong> 30 days (IQI 1-131), a<br />

median health care system delay <strong>of</strong> 53 days (IQI 1-213), a median<br />

treatment delay <strong>of</strong> 36 days (IQI 5-92) and a median oncologist delay <strong>of</strong> 77<br />

days (IQI 30-281). Patient delay was affected by patient gender, age at<br />

diagnosis and type <strong>of</strong> first health care contact. Health care system delay<br />

was associated with patient marital status, financial situation and attitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> first health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional. Treatment delay was related to type <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer. Conclusions: The health care system delay (including oncologist<br />

delay) accounts for much <strong>of</strong> the delay from symptom onset to first<br />

treatment. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional characteristics <strong>of</strong> frontline medical personnel as<br />

well as socioeconomic and biological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients may<br />

contribute to delay. Healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and the general community as<br />

a whole need to be aware <strong>of</strong> the factors contributing to delay in diagnosis<br />

and treatment in the underserved patient population.<br />

9559 General Poster Session (Board #41F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> autologous transplants for children from a tertiary cancer center<br />

in India. Presenting Author: Amol Dongre, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai,<br />

India<br />

Background: Autologous transplantation is a curative option for children<br />

with various malignancies. We report the results <strong>of</strong> our center with the aim<br />

<strong>of</strong> evaluating toxicities and prognostic factors that may influence decision<br />

making to use our limited resources judiciously. Methods: Forty-six patients<br />

diagnosed below 18 years from 1st April 1994- 28th February 2011 were<br />

included in this retrospective study. Twenty-four patients had lymphoma,<br />

12- neuroblastoma and 10-others ( 5- acute leukemia, 4- Ewing sarcoma<br />

and 1 - rhabdomyosarcoma). Twenty-eight patients received peripheral<br />

blood stem cells, 12 – marrow and 6-both. Prognostic factors evaluated for<br />

overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were remission<br />

status at transplant, baseline and pre-transplant serum albumin, time<br />

interval between diagnosis and transplant, type <strong>of</strong> malignancy and number<br />

<strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy pre transplant. Results: Median age at diagnosis<br />

and transplant were 9 and 12 years respectively. Median baseline and pre<br />

transplant serum albumin were 3.6 and 3.9 g/dl. Median number <strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong><br />

chemotherapy was 2. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 1.1<br />

years. Incidence <strong>of</strong> grade 3 and 4 oral mucositis and diarrhea were 46%<br />

and 25% respectively. At the time <strong>of</strong> transplant, 45% were in complete<br />

remission (CR), 41% in partial remission (PR) and 13% in refractory state.<br />

Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) was used in 63% patients with median<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> 11 days. No patient developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-<br />

.Median days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 and 15 days<br />

respectively. Neutropenic sepsis leading to death was seen in 17%. Median<br />

follow up was 1.5 years. At 2 years, the probability <strong>of</strong> OS and PFS were<br />

39% and 35% for all patients while OS and PFS for lymphoma, neuroblastoma<br />

and others were 45% and 32%, 17% and 0% and 50% and 40%<br />

respectively. CR at transplant was the most important determinant <strong>of</strong> better<br />

OS (59 % vs 28%; p � 0.000004) and PFS (53% vs 8%; p �<br />

0.0000018). Conclusions: CR at transplant is the most important prognostic<br />

factor. Patients with neuroblastoma have dismal outcome which<br />

requires reevaluation <strong>of</strong> transplant strategies for this group.<br />

9558 General Poster Session (Board #41E), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Treatment outcomes <strong>of</strong> pediatric oncology patients in Zambia. Presenting<br />

Author: Jeremy Slone, Vanderbilt University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Nashville,<br />

TN<br />

Background: Due to challenges in the delivery <strong>of</strong> pediatric oncology care in<br />

low-middle income countries (LMIC), diagnosis and treatment remains<br />

inadequate for the majority <strong>of</strong> patients. The University <strong>of</strong> Zambia School <strong>of</strong><br />

Medicine/University Teaching Hospital (UTH) and Vanderbilt University<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Medicine/Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health established a<br />

partnership to investigate treatment outcomes at UTH, the only institution<br />

providing pediatric oncology care in Zambia, and assess risk factors<br />

associated with treatment abandonment. Methods: A retrospective study<br />

was conducted in a cohort <strong>of</strong> patients, presenting from July 2008 – June<br />

2010, using an established database and medical record review. Results:<br />

Of the 230 children enrolled in the database, 162 met the inclusion<br />

criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 6.0 years; males comprised<br />

55.6% <strong>of</strong> the cohort; 51.6% had a histopathological diagnosis and 10.5%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cohort was HIV positive. The most common diagnoses were<br />

lymphoma (25.9%), Wilms tumor (22.8%), and retinoblastoma (17.9%).<br />

Leukemia and Kaposi sarcoma accounted for 7.4% each. Death (46.3%)<br />

and abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment (45.7%) were the most common outcomes<br />

with only 8.0% having completed treatment or currently undergoing<br />

treatment, including palliative regimens, at the time <strong>of</strong> data acquisition.<br />

Residence in Lusaka or Central provinces, closest in proximity to UTH, was<br />

associated with a decreased risk for abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment (Odds Ratio<br />

(OR) 0.41 (95% CI 0.21-0.81, p � 0.009) while maternal education less<br />

than secondary school (OR 2.73 95% CI 1.2-6.6, p � 0.03) was<br />

associated with an increased risk for abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment. Conclusions:<br />

At the only pediatric cancer center in Zambia, treatment outcomes are dire<br />

with the majority <strong>of</strong> the cohort abandoning treatment or dying during<br />

therapy. Challenges include access to cancer chemotherapy, logistical<br />

facilitation, fiscal support <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, and community engagement.<br />

Further investigation is required to inform effective intervention strategies<br />

to improve outcomes.<br />

9560 General Poster Session (Board #41G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> renal function in children with solid tumors: Comparison<br />

between estimation with Schwartz formula and EDTA clearance. Presenting<br />

Author: Carole Serrano, Institut Gustave Roussy-<strong>Clinical</strong> Pharmacy<br />

department, Villejuif, France<br />

Background: Using the [51Cr]-ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid ([51Cr]-<br />

EDTA) method provides an accurate measure <strong>of</strong> glomerular filtration rate<br />

(GFR) for each patient. However, this method is not always feasible in<br />

routine. Thus, several mathematical equations have been developed to<br />

predict creatinine clearance. The most widely used in pediatric patients is<br />

the Schwartz formula, based on patient height and serum creatinine.<br />

However, this method has not been validated in pediatric cancer patients.<br />

The aim <strong>of</strong> the present study was to compare GFR measured with the<br />

51Cr-EDTA method to GFR estimated with the Schwartz formula in<br />

patients younger than 18 years <strong>of</strong> age and treated for solid tumors. Methods:<br />

Data have been retrospectively collected on consecutive children treated<br />

between 2001 and 2011 at Institut Gustave Roussy. All <strong>of</strong> the patients had<br />

undergone assessment <strong>of</strong> GFR via 51Cr-EDTA clearance and estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

renal function by the Schwartz formula. Exclusion criteria were serum<br />

creatinine under 25�mol/L or no recent dosage available. GFR analysis was<br />

realized using the slope intercept method after a single injection <strong>of</strong><br />

51Cr-EDTA solution.. Values <strong>of</strong> the GFR were calculated by multiplying the<br />

volume <strong>of</strong> dilution by the slope <strong>of</strong> the single exponential fit to the three data<br />

points and then expressed in ml/min/1.73m². Student paired t-test (alpha<br />

� 0.05) was used to compare results obtained for each patient with the two<br />

methods. Results: 196 patients (120 males, 76 females), treated with<br />

various types <strong>of</strong> cancer (neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma,<br />

lymphoma. . .) Mean age was 6.7 years. Mean GFR was 127.5 ml/min/<br />

1.73m² with the 51Cr-EDTA method versus 148.1 ml/min/1.73m² with the<br />

Schwartz formula. Mean <strong>of</strong> difference was 20.7 ml/min/1.73m² with a<br />

confidence interval [-25.7 ; -15.6] (p � 0.0001). Conclusions: GFR<br />

estimated with the Schwartz formula is statistically different from the<br />

isotopic method. In most cases, GFR estimated with the Schwartz formula<br />

is overestimated. This study highlights the lack <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> this equation<br />

in pediatric population with cancer. The 51Cr-EDTA method must be<br />

preferred when a reliable and accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> renal function is<br />

needed.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!