Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
620s Pediatric Oncology<br />
9557 General Poster Session (Board #41D), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Diagnostic and treatment challenges <strong>of</strong> adolescent and young adult<br />
oncology patients. Presenting Author: Yanqing Xu, McGill Adolescent and<br />
Young Adult Oncology Program, Montreal, QC, Canada<br />
Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients are faced<br />
with obstacles and challenges related to their diagnosis and treatment<br />
compared to children and older adults. The aim <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore<br />
the patient and health care system-related delays in the interval from<br />
cancer symptom onset to diagnosis and treatment as well as to identify the<br />
possible contributing factors to these delays in the AYA group. Methods:<br />
This study was based on a questionnaire conducted in 2010-2011<br />
completed by patients diagnosed with a malignancy between the ages <strong>of</strong> 16<br />
and 39 in addition to older patients diagnosed with a pediatric type<br />
malignancy. Four categories <strong>of</strong> delays: patient delay (time from patient<br />
symptom onset until first health care contact date), health care system<br />
delay (time from first health care contact until diagnosis date), treatment<br />
delay (time from diagnosis date until first treatment) and oncologist delay<br />
(time from first health care contact until first medical oncologist meeting)<br />
were calculated. Median delay (in days) with interquartile interval (IQI) was<br />
the main outcome measure. Median time for each category <strong>of</strong> delay was<br />
further analysed to explore how they vary with different patient characteristics.<br />
Results: We identified a median patient delay <strong>of</strong> 30 days (IQI 1-131), a<br />
median health care system delay <strong>of</strong> 53 days (IQI 1-213), a median<br />
treatment delay <strong>of</strong> 36 days (IQI 5-92) and a median oncologist delay <strong>of</strong> 77<br />
days (IQI 30-281). Patient delay was affected by patient gender, age at<br />
diagnosis and type <strong>of</strong> first health care contact. Health care system delay<br />
was associated with patient marital status, financial situation and attitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> first health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional. Treatment delay was related to type <strong>of</strong><br />
cancer. Conclusions: The health care system delay (including oncologist<br />
delay) accounts for much <strong>of</strong> the delay from symptom onset to first<br />
treatment. Pr<strong>of</strong>essional characteristics <strong>of</strong> frontline medical personnel as<br />
well as socioeconomic and biological characteristics <strong>of</strong> the patients may<br />
contribute to delay. Healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essionals and the general community as<br />
a whole need to be aware <strong>of</strong> the factors contributing to delay in diagnosis<br />
and treatment in the underserved patient population.<br />
9559 General Poster Session (Board #41F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> autologous transplants for children from a tertiary cancer center<br />
in India. Presenting Author: Amol Dongre, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai,<br />
India<br />
Background: Autologous transplantation is a curative option for children<br />
with various malignancies. We report the results <strong>of</strong> our center with the aim<br />
<strong>of</strong> evaluating toxicities and prognostic factors that may influence decision<br />
making to use our limited resources judiciously. Methods: Forty-six patients<br />
diagnosed below 18 years from 1st April 1994- 28th February 2011 were<br />
included in this retrospective study. Twenty-four patients had lymphoma,<br />
12- neuroblastoma and 10-others ( 5- acute leukemia, 4- Ewing sarcoma<br />
and 1 - rhabdomyosarcoma). Twenty-eight patients received peripheral<br />
blood stem cells, 12 – marrow and 6-both. Prognostic factors evaluated for<br />
overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were remission<br />
status at transplant, baseline and pre-transplant serum albumin, time<br />
interval between diagnosis and transplant, type <strong>of</strong> malignancy and number<br />
<strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong> chemotherapy pre transplant. Results: Median age at diagnosis<br />
and transplant were 9 and 12 years respectively. Median baseline and pre<br />
transplant serum albumin were 3.6 and 3.9 g/dl. Median number <strong>of</strong> lines <strong>of</strong><br />
chemotherapy was 2. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 1.1<br />
years. Incidence <strong>of</strong> grade 3 and 4 oral mucositis and diarrhea were 46%<br />
and 25% respectively. At the time <strong>of</strong> transplant, 45% were in complete<br />
remission (CR), 41% in partial remission (PR) and 13% in refractory state.<br />
Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) was used in 63% patients with median<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> 11 days. No patient developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome-<br />
.Median days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were 11 and 15 days<br />
respectively. Neutropenic sepsis leading to death was seen in 17%. Median<br />
follow up was 1.5 years. At 2 years, the probability <strong>of</strong> OS and PFS were<br />
39% and 35% for all patients while OS and PFS for lymphoma, neuroblastoma<br />
and others were 45% and 32%, 17% and 0% and 50% and 40%<br />
respectively. CR at transplant was the most important determinant <strong>of</strong> better<br />
OS (59 % vs 28%; p � 0.000004) and PFS (53% vs 8%; p �<br />
0.0000018). Conclusions: CR at transplant is the most important prognostic<br />
factor. Patients with neuroblastoma have dismal outcome which<br />
requires reevaluation <strong>of</strong> transplant strategies for this group.<br />
9558 General Poster Session (Board #41E), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Treatment outcomes <strong>of</strong> pediatric oncology patients in Zambia. Presenting<br />
Author: Jeremy Slone, Vanderbilt University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Nashville,<br />
TN<br />
Background: Due to challenges in the delivery <strong>of</strong> pediatric oncology care in<br />
low-middle income countries (LMIC), diagnosis and treatment remains<br />
inadequate for the majority <strong>of</strong> patients. The University <strong>of</strong> Zambia School <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicine/University Teaching Hospital (UTH) and Vanderbilt University<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Medicine/Vanderbilt Institute for Global Health established a<br />
partnership to investigate treatment outcomes at UTH, the only institution<br />
providing pediatric oncology care in Zambia, and assess risk factors<br />
associated with treatment abandonment. Methods: A retrospective study<br />
was conducted in a cohort <strong>of</strong> patients, presenting from July 2008 – June<br />
2010, using an established database and medical record review. Results:<br />
Of the 230 children enrolled in the database, 162 met the inclusion<br />
criteria. The average age at diagnosis was 6.0 years; males comprised<br />
55.6% <strong>of</strong> the cohort; 51.6% had a histopathological diagnosis and 10.5%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cohort was HIV positive. The most common diagnoses were<br />
lymphoma (25.9%), Wilms tumor (22.8%), and retinoblastoma (17.9%).<br />
Leukemia and Kaposi sarcoma accounted for 7.4% each. Death (46.3%)<br />
and abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment (45.7%) were the most common outcomes<br />
with only 8.0% having completed treatment or currently undergoing<br />
treatment, including palliative regimens, at the time <strong>of</strong> data acquisition.<br />
Residence in Lusaka or Central provinces, closest in proximity to UTH, was<br />
associated with a decreased risk for abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment (Odds Ratio<br />
(OR) 0.41 (95% CI 0.21-0.81, p � 0.009) while maternal education less<br />
than secondary school (OR 2.73 95% CI 1.2-6.6, p � 0.03) was<br />
associated with an increased risk for abandonment <strong>of</strong> treatment. Conclusions:<br />
At the only pediatric cancer center in Zambia, treatment outcomes are dire<br />
with the majority <strong>of</strong> the cohort abandoning treatment or dying during<br />
therapy. Challenges include access to cancer chemotherapy, logistical<br />
facilitation, fiscal support <strong>of</strong> radiotherapy, and community engagement.<br />
Further investigation is required to inform effective intervention strategies<br />
to improve outcomes.<br />
9560 General Poster Session (Board #41G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> renal function in children with solid tumors: Comparison<br />
between estimation with Schwartz formula and EDTA clearance. Presenting<br />
Author: Carole Serrano, Institut Gustave Roussy-<strong>Clinical</strong> Pharmacy<br />
department, Villejuif, France<br />
Background: Using the [51Cr]-ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid ([51Cr]-<br />
EDTA) method provides an accurate measure <strong>of</strong> glomerular filtration rate<br />
(GFR) for each patient. However, this method is not always feasible in<br />
routine. Thus, several mathematical equations have been developed to<br />
predict creatinine clearance. The most widely used in pediatric patients is<br />
the Schwartz formula, based on patient height and serum creatinine.<br />
However, this method has not been validated in pediatric cancer patients.<br />
The aim <strong>of</strong> the present study was to compare GFR measured with the<br />
51Cr-EDTA method to GFR estimated with the Schwartz formula in<br />
patients younger than 18 years <strong>of</strong> age and treated for solid tumors. Methods:<br />
Data have been retrospectively collected on consecutive children treated<br />
between 2001 and 2011 at Institut Gustave Roussy. All <strong>of</strong> the patients had<br />
undergone assessment <strong>of</strong> GFR via 51Cr-EDTA clearance and estimation <strong>of</strong><br />
renal function by the Schwartz formula. Exclusion criteria were serum<br />
creatinine under 25�mol/L or no recent dosage available. GFR analysis was<br />
realized using the slope intercept method after a single injection <strong>of</strong><br />
51Cr-EDTA solution.. Values <strong>of</strong> the GFR were calculated by multiplying the<br />
volume <strong>of</strong> dilution by the slope <strong>of</strong> the single exponential fit to the three data<br />
points and then expressed in ml/min/1.73m². Student paired t-test (alpha<br />
� 0.05) was used to compare results obtained for each patient with the two<br />
methods. Results: 196 patients (120 males, 76 females), treated with<br />
various types <strong>of</strong> cancer (neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma,<br />
lymphoma. . .) Mean age was 6.7 years. Mean GFR was 127.5 ml/min/<br />
1.73m² with the 51Cr-EDTA method versus 148.1 ml/min/1.73m² with the<br />
Schwartz formula. Mean <strong>of</strong> difference was 20.7 ml/min/1.73m² with a<br />
confidence interval [-25.7 ; -15.6] (p � 0.0001). Conclusions: GFR<br />
estimated with the Schwartz formula is statistically different from the<br />
isotopic method. In most cases, GFR estimated with the Schwartz formula<br />
is overestimated. This study highlights the lack <strong>of</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> this equation<br />
in pediatric population with cancer. The 51Cr-EDTA method must be<br />
preferred when a reliable and accurate evaluation <strong>of</strong> renal function is<br />
needed.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.