Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
10004 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 3:00 PM-6:00 PM<br />
A first-in-human, phase Ib combination study to assess safety, pharmacokinetics<br />
(PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) <strong>of</strong> a hedgehog inhibitor, GDC-0449, with a<br />
Notch inhibitor, RO4929097, in patients with advanced sarcoma. Presenting<br />
Author: Mrinal M. Gounder, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York,<br />
NY<br />
Background: Aberrant Hedgehog and Notch signaling is seen in sarcoma and<br />
anti-tumor activity is enhanced by inhibiting both pathways. This first in man<br />
Phase Ib study evaluated safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong> GDC-0449<br />
(G), a smoothened inhibitor with RO4929097 (R), a gamma-secretase/notch<br />
inhibitor. Methods: The study evaluated fixed dose G (150 mg qd) for 21 days<br />
followed by G � R at either 10 mg (level 1) or 15 mg (level 2) QD. At MTD pts<br />
were evaluated with G � R (without “lead in” G) or single agent R. Pre and post<br />
treatment tumor biopsies were obtained to assess notch and hedgehog inhibition.<br />
PK was assessed for each drug. Key eligibility: advanced sarcoma, ECOG<br />
� 2, age � 18 and prior therapies � 4. RECIST response was assessed Q6 wks.<br />
Results: 34 pts had a median age <strong>of</strong> 53 yrs (23-78), median priors 3 and various<br />
histologies [liposarcoma (7), chondrosarcoma (7), leiomyosarcoma (4), osteosarcoma<br />
(2), GIST (2) and other (12)]. No DLT was seen. Common (�10 %) grade<br />
�3 toxicity was hypophosphatemia (18%). Systemic exposure (AUC0-24 and<br />
Cmax) <strong>of</strong> G was similar to established studies (not shown). AUC0-24 and Cmax <strong>of</strong> R<br />
was significantly lower (~70%) when administered with G (Table). However,<br />
measurement <strong>of</strong> unbound, free drug (Cfree) <strong>of</strong> R showed comparable levels<br />
between single agent R and G � R, but not when G was a “lead in” (Table).<br />
Target inhibition <strong>of</strong> the notch pathway (cleaved notch) and pAkt was observed in<br />
matched tumor biopsies with both arms. Durable SD was seen in both arms:<br />
myxoid chondrosarcoma (56 wks), liposarcoma (24� wks), clear cell (21� wks),<br />
desmoid (17� wks), spindle cell (15� wks) and chondrosarcoma (13� wks).<br />
Conclusions: The combination <strong>of</strong> G�R is well tolerated and the RP2D is G 150<br />
mg qd and R 15 mg qd without a “lead in” G. Despite reduction in total levels <strong>of</strong><br />
R in the combination, free drug was similar and inhibits target. Disease stability<br />
was seen with R and R � G. Further clinical development <strong>of</strong> notch and hedgehog<br />
inhibitors in sarcomas is warranted.<br />
PK <strong>of</strong> R �Lead in G� then G � R G�R R<br />
AUC0-24 714 3150 4477<br />
Half life hr 21 17.5 28<br />
Tmax hr 2.75 2 2<br />
Cmax ng/mL 87.6 382 535<br />
Trough total ng/mL 28 38 103<br />
Trough free 0.5 0.9 1<br />
10006 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 3:00 PM-6:00 PM<br />
An open-label international multicentric phase II study <strong>of</strong> nilotinib in<br />
progressive pigmented villo-nodular synovitis (PVNS) not amenable to a<br />
conservative surgical treatment. Presenting Author: Isabelle Ray-Coquard,<br />
GINECO and Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France<br />
Background: PVNS, also known as tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT), is a<br />
rare pathological entity affecting the synovium in young adults. This<br />
neoplastic disease is driven by a t(1;2) translocation which results in the<br />
fusion <strong>of</strong> COL6A3 and M-CSF genes. Nilotinib has inhibitory properties on<br />
M-CSF receptor pathway which could be <strong>of</strong> therapeutic interest in pts with<br />
non resectable PVNS. Methods: In this open-label International, multicenter,<br />
non-randomized, phase II study the primary objective is to evaluate<br />
the efficacy <strong>of</strong> nilotinib treatment in patients (pts) with progressive or<br />
relapsing PVNS not amenable to surgery or in whom surgery would be<br />
mutilating, as measured by the 12-week progression-free rate (12-w PFR)<br />
validated by an independent committee. Using a Bayesian design with a<br />
stopping rule for futility, interim analyses were planned after the inclusion<br />
<strong>of</strong> 10 pts and then every 5 pts. Results: From December 2010 to November<br />
2011, 33 pts with progressive disease from 17 institutions from Europe<br />
and Australia were enrolled. 14 pts (median age 37 y (range: 19-68), 7<br />
males) were analyzed in the 2nd interim analysis. Median time since<br />
diagnosis was 4.4 years (range: 0.2-26). Primary tumour was located on a<br />
knee for 10 pts (71%) and on hip (1 pt, 7%), finger (7%), foot (7%), hand<br />
(7%), respectively. 69% <strong>of</strong> pts had a inoperable PVNS and 31% had a<br />
resectable tumour but requiring mutilating surgery. All pts started nilotinib<br />
at the planned dose <strong>of</strong> 800 mg/day. At a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 8.9 months<br />
(range: 0.6-11), 2 pts had a dose reduction and 1 pt had discontinued<br />
nilotinib after 14 days due to toxicity. Nilotinib was well tolerated, with only<br />
2 pts experiencing grade 3 adverse events (anorexia: 1 pt; hepatic failure: 1<br />
pt).The 12-w PFR was 85.7% (95%CI, 57.2%-98.2%), in favour <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study continuation. No OR was observed at w-12; 1 pt (7%) was in PR at<br />
w-30. Updated results will be presented after the 3rd interim analysis.<br />
Conclusions: Nilotinib treatment induces disease stabilisation in a large<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> PVNS patients with non resectable disease or in whom<br />
resection would be mutilating.<br />
Sarcoma<br />
631s<br />
10005 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 3:00 PM-6:00 PM<br />
GDC-0449 in patients with advanced chondrosarcomas: A French Sarcoma<br />
Group (FSG)/French and U.S. National Cancer Institutes phase II collaborative<br />
study. Presenting Author: Antoine Italiano, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux,<br />
France<br />
Background: Chondrosarcomas (CS) exhibit a strong activation <strong>of</strong> hedgehog<br />
(Hh) signaling which plays a crucial role in cartilage tumorigenesis.<br />
Preclinical data show that hedgehog blockade reduces strongly chondrosarcoma<br />
cell proliferation and tumour size. GDC-0449 is a small-molecule<br />
antagonist <strong>of</strong> the Hh pathway. Methods: This is a multicentric single-arm<br />
phase 2 clinical trial based on two-stage Simon’s design which assesses<br />
safety and efficacy <strong>of</strong> GDC-0449 in patients (pts) with advanced CS. All pts<br />
had to have documented progressive disease (PD) as per RECIST 1.1 before<br />
study entry. Pts receive GDC-0449 150mg (oral route), daily until PD or<br />
unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is the 6-month non-PD rate<br />
according to RECIST. Based on the following hypotheses: 20% 6-month<br />
non-PD rate (H0), 40% acceptable 6-month non-PD rate (H1), 10% type I<br />
error rate, 90% power, a total <strong>of</strong> 37 assessable pts are necessary (17 for the<br />
first stage � 20 for the second stage). Following the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the first 17<br />
pts, if � four pts are progression-free at 6 months, the accrual will<br />
continue. In order to account for not assessable pts (�/- 10%), 41 pts will<br />
be recruited. Accrual started in February 2011 in six centers <strong>of</strong> the FSG.<br />
Results: As <strong>of</strong> January 24 2012, 40 pts (28 males, 12 females) have been<br />
included in the study. Median age is 59 years (30-86). The most frequent<br />
histological subtype is conventional CS (n�32). Twenty eight pts (70%)<br />
had grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AE) possibly related to the drug whereas 3<br />
pts (7.5%) had grade 3 or 4 AE. The planned interim statistical analysis<br />
performed after central histological and radiological review showed that<br />
four patients out <strong>of</strong> the first 17 evaluable patients had stable disease<br />
indicating that GDC-0449 had reached the primary endpoint to justify<br />
continuing accrual after the 1st step <strong>of</strong> the study. 15 pts are still on<br />
treatment. Molecular analyses are available for 21 pts. No mutation <strong>of</strong> SMO<br />
was detected. qRT-PCR experiments and PTCH sequencing are ongoing.<br />
Conclusions: GDC-0449 is well tolerated and shows some activity in a<br />
subset <strong>of</strong> pts with advanced CS. Final clinical and molecular data will be<br />
presented at the meeting.<br />
10007 Oral Abstract Session, Mon, 3:00 PM-6:00 PM<br />
Masitinib mesylate in imatinib-resistant advanced GIST: A randomized<br />
phase II trial. Presenting Author: Antoine Adenis, Centre Oscar Lambret,<br />
Lille, France<br />
Background: Masitinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with greater in<br />
vitro activity and selectivity than imatinib against wild-type and juxtamembrane<br />
mutations <strong>of</strong> KIT (Dubreuil, 2009, PLoSONE). This trial studied<br />
efficacy and safety <strong>of</strong> masitinib at 12 mg/kg/day and sunitinib at 50 mg/day<br />
for the treatment <strong>of</strong> imatinib-resistant GIST. Methods: Patients with<br />
inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic GIST and showing disease<br />
progression while treated with imatinib 400 mg/day received either<br />
masitinib or sunitinib until progression. Primary endpoint was PFS evaluated<br />
with RECIST with OS as a secondary endpoint. Based upon an 80%<br />
power to detect with a Fleming design a median PFS �3 months (alpha<br />
10%, unilateral), a population <strong>of</strong> 44 patients (22 per arm) was required.<br />
Stratification was applied based on mutation status. Results: 44 patients<br />
(exon 11 [66%], exon 9 [11%], wild-type or other [5%], not done at<br />
baseline [18%]) were randomized into masitinib (n�23) or sunitinib<br />
(n�21) treatment-arms from 9 centers between 02/2009 and 09/2011.<br />
After a median follow-up <strong>of</strong> 14 months, median PFS was 3.9 months<br />
(95%CI [2.6;8.1]) for masitinib vs 3.8 months [1.9;11] for sunitinib. Of<br />
those patients progressing under masitinib, 88% received sunitinib in third<br />
line. Median OS was not reached (NR) (95%CI [21;NR]) for masitinib vs 15<br />
months [9.4;22] for sunitinib. The 18-month and 24-month OS rates for<br />
masitinib vs sunitinib were 79% (95%CI [53;92]) vs 20% [1.5;55], and<br />
53% (95%CI [9.5;84]) vs 0%, respectively. Similar results were seen in<br />
the exon 11 subpopulation with median OS for masitinib NR (95%CI<br />
[NR;NR]) vs 15 months [9.6;22] for sunitinib. The safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong><br />
masitinib was better than sunitinib with a lower occurrence <strong>of</strong> severe<br />
related adverse events (AEs) (17% vs 52%) and related AEs leading to<br />
discontinuation (0% vs 9.5%). In masitinib treated patients, nausea,<br />
diarrhea and asthenia were the most common related AEs. Conclusions:<br />
Although PFS curves looked similar, this study apparently showed a longer<br />
survival in the masitinib treatment-arm with a better safety pr<strong>of</strong>ile than<br />
sunitinib. Masitinib may potentially <strong>of</strong>fer patients a new active compound<br />
for advanced GIST in the second-line setting.<br />
Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.