24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

550s Melanoma/Skin Cancers<br />

8540 General Poster Session (Board #31F), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Prognostic value <strong>of</strong> BRAFV600 mutations in melanoma patients after<br />

resection <strong>of</strong> metastatic lymph nodes. Presenting Author: Philippe Saiag,<br />

Hospital Ambroise Pare, APHP, University Versailles-SQY, Boulogne-<br />

Billancourt, France<br />

Background: Prognosis <strong>of</strong> AJCC stage III melanoma is heterogeneous.<br />

BRAF V600 mutations are frequent in melanomas. BRAFV600-targeted therapy<br />

has dramatic, but <strong>of</strong>ten transitory, efficacy in stage IV patients (pts). We<br />

aimed to determine for the first time the prognostic value <strong>of</strong> BRAFV600 mutations and other known prognostic criteria in stage III pts with<br />

sufficient nodal invasion. Methods: We searched all pts with cutaneous<br />

melanoma who had radical lymphadenectomy in our institution between<br />

1/1/00 and 15/6/10 and included those with a nodal deposit �2 mm.<br />

BRAFV600 mutations were detected by DNA sequencing and pyrosequencing<br />

in formalin-fixed nodal samples containing �60% melanoma cells.<br />

Samples were considered mutated when �15% <strong>of</strong> DNA was positive.<br />

Endpoints were overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis free survival<br />

(DMFS). 92 patients had to be included to demonstrate a doubling <strong>of</strong> OS in<br />

patients without (40 months (m)) and with BRAFV600 mutation (20 m).<br />

Log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model<br />

were used. Results: 105 consecutive pts were included, with 72% prospectively<br />

followed-up pts. BRAFV600 mutations (E: 83%; K: 14% <strong>of</strong> pts) were<br />

detected in 40% <strong>of</strong> pts. Median follow-up was 19 m (range: 3-139). Death<br />

occurred in 83% and 60% <strong>of</strong> pts with and without BRAF mutations,<br />

respectively, with median OS <strong>of</strong> 1.4 and 2.8 years. Pts’ age, primary<br />

melanoma ulceration, number <strong>of</strong> invaded nodes, AJCC staging, and BRAF<br />

status influenced OS and DMFS in the univariate analysis. The multivariate<br />

analysis showed the major prognostic role <strong>of</strong> BRAF status and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> invaded nodes (table). Conclusions: Provided our findings are<br />

independently replicated, BRAFV600 status should be used to stage<br />

melanoma pts with nodal metastasis. Our results also help to plan adjuvant<br />

trials with BRAFV600-targeted therapy in such patients, for whom the low<br />

tumor load may induce longer efficacy <strong>of</strong> BRAF-targeted therapies.<br />

OS DMFS<br />

P HR[IC95%] P HR[IC95%]<br />

N invaded nodes (1,2-3,4) 0.005 2.2 [1.3-3.9] 0.005 2.4 [1.3-4.3)<br />

BRAF mutated (Y/N) 0.005 1.9 [1.2-3.1] 0.002 2·1 [1·3-3·4]<br />

Ulceration <strong>of</strong> primary (Y/N) NS - 0.04 1.7 [1.0-2.8]<br />

AJCC staging, extracapsular spread, macro/micrometastasis, Breslow index: NS.<br />

8542 General Poster Session (Board #31H), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Role <strong>of</strong> cytokine-induced plasticity in melanoma on invasive, therapyresistant<br />

cells that express EMT-related genes and pathways. Presenting<br />

Author: Jonathan S. Cebon, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne,<br />

Australia<br />

Background: The acquisition <strong>of</strong> new mutations can explain resistance to<br />

targeted therapies; however resistance also develops without demonstrable<br />

new mutations. To better understand potential mechanisms for treatment<br />

failure we studied subpopulations <strong>of</strong> chemo-resistant cells that can be<br />

identified in early passage cell lines and the cellular plasticity that yields<br />

these. Methods: Melanoma subpopulations were identified and sorted on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> functional assays. Gene expression was evaluated with Illumina<br />

HT12 arrays and qPCR to identify potential mechanisms and targets.<br />

Sorted cells were evaluated in vitro for the induction <strong>of</strong> phenotype<br />

switching and effects <strong>of</strong> target inhibition. Results: A subset <strong>of</strong> slow<br />

proliferating label-retaining cells (LRC) was identified using a membrane<br />

dye. Direct isolation <strong>of</strong> LRC from a pt showed these were not an in vitro<br />

artefact. LRC isolated from multiple cell lines comprised the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

cells that resisted cytotoxic drugs and could invade through an artificial<br />

extracellular membrane. Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>iling identified a network <strong>of</strong><br />

over-expressed genes related to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)<br />

notable for the expression <strong>of</strong> Thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1), Transforming-<br />

Growth Factor, Beta Induced, (TGFBI) and other extracellular matrix<br />

molecules. Initial studies show that LRC shared gene expression characteristics<br />

with PLX4032-resistant cells. Although interrogating LRC by qPCR<br />

showed up-regulation <strong>of</strong> the putative melanoma stem cell marker ABCB5<br />

and the lysine specific demethylase Jarid1B, cell sorting and serial<br />

re-labelling experiments revealed a dynamic and interchangeable phenotype<br />

for these cells, challenging the hierarchical stem cell model for<br />

melanoma. The observed slow-cycling and chemo-resistant phenotype<br />

could be induced in vitro through TGF beta-mediated phenotype switching<br />

and cellular invasion was blocked using an antibody against TSP-1.<br />

Conclusions: Cytokine-induced plasticity in melanoma yields invasive,<br />

therapy-resistant cells which express EMT-related genes and pathways. We<br />

hypothesize that these cells are a source <strong>of</strong> treatment resistance in vivo and<br />

blocking their emergence may prevent treatment failure.<br />

8541 General Poster Session (Board #31G), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Characterization <strong>of</strong> ipilimumab exposure-efficacy/safety response relationships<br />

in subjects with previously treated or untreated advanced melanoma.<br />

Presenting Author: Yan Feng, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ<br />

Background: Ipilimumab (IPI) is a fully human monoclonal antibody<br />

directed against CTLA-4 that is being developed as a novel immunotherapeutic<br />

agent against melanoma and other solid tumors. The objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this analysis was to retrospectively characterize the exposure-response<br />

(E-R) relationships for efficacy (overall survival, OS) in subjects with<br />

previously untreated advanced melanoma (pu-MEL), and safety (immune<br />

related adverse-events, irAEs) in subjects with previously treated advanced<br />

melanoma (pt-MEL) or pu-MEL. Methods: The E-R analysis <strong>of</strong> OS included<br />

498 pu-MEL from a phase III study (CA184024) <strong>of</strong> IPI administered at 10<br />

mg/kg � dacarbazine (DTIC) or DTIC � placebo; and the E-R analyses <strong>of</strong><br />

irAE included 1036 subjects from a phase I study (CA184078), 4 phase<br />

IIstudies (CA184004/007/008/022) and CA184024 <strong>of</strong> IPI administered<br />

at doses <strong>of</strong> 0.3, 3 or 10 mg/kg. The relationship between steady-state IPI<br />

trough concentration (Cminss) and OS was described using a Cox proportional<br />

hazards model, and the relationships between Cminss and incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> irAEs were described by ordinal logistic regression models (separate<br />

models for any irAE, as well as skin, liver and GI irAE). Results: The risk <strong>of</strong><br />

death decreased with increasing Cminss, and is higher for subjects with<br />

elevated baseline LDH level. The risk <strong>of</strong> death was higher for subjects with<br />

baseline ECOG status � 0 and was higher with increasing stage <strong>of</strong> disease<br />

(M1C�M1B�M1A�M0). The hazard ratio for OS corresponding to the<br />

median Cminss <strong>of</strong> 49.99 �g/mL was 0.745 relative to subjects in DTIC �<br />

placebo group. The probability <strong>of</strong> Grade 2� or Grade 3� GI, skin, liver and<br />

any irAEs also increases with Cminss. Prior anti-cancer therapy (including<br />

prior DTIC) or concomitant DTIC were the only significant covariates in the<br />

E-R irAE models. Conclusions: These model-based analyses suggest that<br />

higher Cminss <strong>of</strong> IPI appears to be associated with improved survival in<br />

pu-MEL (based on data from CA184024) and higher Cminss also appears<br />

to be associated with increased probability <strong>of</strong> irAEs in pu-MEL or pt-MEL.<br />

8543 General Poster Session (Board #32A), Sun, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Gene expression pr<strong>of</strong>ile signature (DecisionDx-Melanoma) to predict visceral<br />

metastatic risk in patients with stage I and stage II cutaneous<br />

melanoma. Presenting Author: Navneet Dhillon, Emory University , Atlanta,<br />

GA<br />

Background: The current AJCC TNM staging system has poor specificity for<br />

predicting visceral metastatic risk in patients diagnosed with stage I or<br />

stage II cutaneous melanoma. We, therefore, developed a gene expression<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile signature (GEP) following in silico investigation <strong>of</strong> previously<br />

published microarray analyses. Methods: 60 formalin fixed paraffin embedded<br />

primary cutaneous melanoma samples from patients with stage I or II<br />

cutaneous melanoma with at least a follow up period <strong>of</strong> at least 6 years were<br />

macrodissected and analyzed blindly. RNA was isolated, converted to<br />

cDNA and RT-PCR was performed to assess the expression <strong>of</strong> the gene set.<br />

Expression data and biostatistical analysis was performed using GeNorm<br />

and JMP Genomics (SAS) Predictive modeling included Radial Basis<br />

Machine (RBM) and <strong>Part</strong>ition Tree Analysis (PTA) Metastasis-free survival<br />

(MFS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The following clinical<br />

data was retrieved from medical records: survival, metastases, types <strong>of</strong><br />

metastases. 20 out <strong>of</strong> 60 patients had developed visceral metastases in the<br />

follow up period. Results: GEP was developed following multiple analytical<br />

approaches.Two types <strong>of</strong> signatures emerged: Low risk (Class 1) and High<br />

risk (Class 2). Without optimizing for sensitivity, the analyses <strong>of</strong> the 60<br />

sample cohort by radial basis machine (RBM) resulted in 92% ROC (met.<br />

accuracy � 90%, non-met. accuracy � 85%), while partition tree analysis<br />

(PTA) yielded 99% ROC (met. accuracy � 100%, non-met. accuracy �<br />

95%). RBM classification showed 6-year MFS rates <strong>of</strong> 97% for Class 1 and<br />

19% for predicted Class 2 <strong>of</strong> metastasis (median MFS � NR and 5.6 yrs,<br />

resp., P�0.0001 Log-Rank respectively). PTA showed 6-year MFS rates <strong>of</strong><br />

100% for predicted Class 1 and 14% for Class 2 <strong>of</strong> metastasis (median<br />

MFS � NR and 5.4 yrs, resp., P�0.0001 Log-Rank respectively).<br />

Conclusions: This study shows that DecisionDx-Melanoma GEP signature<br />

can provide excellent accuracy in predicting metastatic risk in stage I and II<br />

cutaneous melanoma.To our knowledge, the GEP provides the most<br />

accurate predictor to date for development <strong>of</strong> visceral metastases in<br />

patients with Stage I and II cutaneous melanoma.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!