24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

360s Head and Neck Cancer<br />

5516^ Poster Discussion Session (Board #6), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Cilengitide with cetuximab, cisplatin, and 5-FU in recurrent and/or metastatic<br />

squamous cell cancer <strong>of</strong> the head and neck: The ADVANTAGE phase<br />

II trial. Presenting Author: Jan Baptist Vermorken, Department <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />

Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium<br />

Background: Prognosis for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous<br />

cell cancer <strong>of</strong> the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN) is very poor. �v�5<br />

integrin is overexpressed in SCCHN and selective integrin blockade is being<br />

investigated as a treatment strategy. Methods: ADVANTAGE was a phase I/II<br />

study evaluating cilengitide with cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy.<br />

Eligible patients were �18 years with �1 measurable lesion,<br />

Karn<strong>of</strong>ski performance status �70%, and confirmed R/M-SCCHN. The<br />

phase II part reported herein was an open-label, randomized, controlled<br />

trial investigating progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with 2<br />

cilengitide 2000 mg regimens: once weekly (CIL1W) and twice weekly<br />

(CIL2W) administration combined with cisplatin, 5-FU, and cetuximab<br />

(PFE) as compared with PFE alone (control). Secondary objectives included<br />

overall survival (OS) and objective response (OR). Treatment-emergent<br />

adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored. Results: 184 eligible patients were<br />

enrolled. Overall, patient characteristics were similar across arms. Median<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> treatments was shorter in the CIL2W arm compared with the<br />

CIL1W arm (cilengitide: 16.1 vs 23.4 wk, cetuximab: 16.0 vs 22.6 wk,<br />

platinum: 16.0 vs 18.0 wk, and 5-FU: 14.6 vs 18.0 wk). Median PFS was<br />

6.4 months in the CIL1W group, 5.6 months in the CIL2W group and 5.7<br />

months in the control group, with CIL1W and CIL2W having HRs <strong>of</strong> 1.03<br />

(95% CI: 0.67–1.59) and 1.55 (95% CI: 0.99–2.43) vs control. The latter<br />

HR was possibly due to less compliance in the CIL2W arm. Median OS was<br />

12.4, 10.6, and 11.6 months in the CIL1W, CIL2W, and control groups,<br />

respectively. ORs were observed in 46.8%, 26.7%, and 35.5% <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

in the CIL1W, CIL2W, and control arms, respectively. Most common<br />

(�15%) grade 3/4 TEAEs were neutropenia, hypokalemia, leukopenia,<br />

stomatitis, and fatigue. No safety differences were noted between treatment<br />

arms. Overall, there were 7 drug-related TEAEs (2 in CIL1W, 2 in<br />

CIL2W, and 3 in control) leading to death. Conclusions: In this population,<br />

neither <strong>of</strong> the cilengitide-containing regimens was able to demonstrate a<br />

PFS benefit over PFE alone.<br />

5518 Poster Discussion Session (Board #8), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Lenvatinib treatment <strong>of</strong> advanced RAI-refractory differentiated thyroid<br />

cancer (DTC): Cytokine and angiogenic factor (CAF) pr<strong>of</strong>iling in combination<br />

with tumor genetic analysis to identify markers associated with<br />

response. Presenting Author: Douglas Wilmot Ball, The Johns Hopkins<br />

University School <strong>of</strong> Medicine, Baltimore, MD<br />

Background: Lenvatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting<br />

VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, RET, KIT and PDGFR�. In a phase II study <strong>of</strong><br />

lenvatinib, 58 patients (pts) with DTC were enrolled and a response rate <strong>of</strong><br />

50% was observed (Sherman, ASCO 2011). Methods: Pts received lenvatinib<br />

at a starting dose <strong>of</strong> 24 mg oral once daily in 28-day cycles. Serum<br />

was collected at baseline (BL), on day 8 and on day 36 and concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> 47 CAFs were measured using multiplex bead arrays and enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assay (ELISA). 33 genes (443 mutations) were examined<br />

in archival tumor tissues (n�25). Association <strong>of</strong> baseline CAF, changes in<br />

CAF levels upon treatment and gene mutation status with treatment<br />

outcomes was investigated. Results: Combination <strong>of</strong> low baseline VEGF and<br />

ANG-2 (p�0.02 and HR�0.386) correlated with longer PFS. Both<br />

baseline and changes in CAF levels demonstrated an association with gene<br />

mutation status. High baseline levels <strong>of</strong> VEGF were observed in pts with<br />

wild type RAS and BRAF (p�0.035) whereas high baseline sTIE-2 levels<br />

associated with RAS mutation (p�0.023). Supporting pre-clinical mouse<br />

xenograft tumor model developed using ANG2-overexpressing human<br />

thyroid cancer cell line FTC-286 demonstrated reduced sensitivity to<br />

lenvatinib treatment. Increased levels <strong>of</strong> IL-10 and FGF-2 8-day posttreatment<br />

(8d post-tx) significantly associated with RAS (N- or K-) and<br />

BRAF mutation. Combination <strong>of</strong> gene mutation status with baseline CAF<br />

levels provided better prediction <strong>of</strong> longer PFS compared to gene mutation<br />

alone. Hierarchical clustering modeling using changes in CAF levels 8d<br />

post-tx with tumor shrinkage identified a set <strong>of</strong> CAFs that could predict two<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> lenvatinib response: longer PFS and greater tumor shrinkage<br />

or longer PFS in the absence <strong>of</strong> significant tumor shrinkage. Conclusions:<br />

CAF pr<strong>of</strong>iling identified potential predictive biomarkers <strong>of</strong> lenvatinib<br />

treatment outcomes in DTC. Combination <strong>of</strong> RAS and BRAF mutation with<br />

baseline VEGF and ANG-2 or treatment-associated changes in FGF-2 and<br />

IL-10 level correlated with lenvatinib treatment response.<br />

5517 Poster Discussion Session (Board #7), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iling <strong>of</strong> a clinically annotated cohort <strong>of</strong> locoregionally advanced<br />

head and neck cancers (HNC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.<br />

Presenting Author: Tanguy Y. Seiwert, The University <strong>of</strong> Chicago<br />

Medical Center, Chicago, IL<br />

Background: Recent advances in genomic technology and sequencing have<br />

allowed the near comprehensive characterization <strong>of</strong> genetic abnormalities<br />

in HNC, but their correlation with clinical outcome remains to be determined.<br />

We analysed a clinically annotated cohort <strong>of</strong> locoregionally advanced<br />

HNC for copy number changes and mutations and correlated with<br />

outcome in an exploratory fashion. Methods: 120 head and neck cancers<br />

(frozen tissue) and matching normal tissues/blood from patients with<br />

locoregionally advanced HNC treated with definitive chemoradiation �/induction<br />

at the University <strong>of</strong> Chicago were obtained from our tissue bank.<br />

DNA, RNA, protein were extracted. Barcoded, multiplexed sequencing<br />

libraries for 500 head and neck cancer associated genes (Agilent capture)<br />

were built and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq next generation sequencers.<br />

150 commonly copy number altered and HNC relevant genes were analysed<br />

for copy number alterations (CNA) using the Nanostring nCounter platform.<br />

Respective genetic aberrations in curated pathways were allocated to tumor<br />

subgroups. Exploratory analysis correlated data with induction response<br />

and progression free survival. Confirmatory HPV testing was performed<br />

using an E6, nested, multiplex PCR. Results: �80% <strong>of</strong> targeted sequences<br />

were successfully captured and sequenced. Commonly mutated genes<br />

included: TP53, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, NOTCH1. Of note PIK3CA mutations<br />

were enriched in HPV(�) tumors. Commonly copy number altered genes<br />

included amplifications <strong>of</strong> VEGF1, CCND1, MYC, EGFR, MDM4, CTTN, as<br />

well as PIK3CA, and deletions <strong>of</strong> CDKN2A, SUCLG2, FHIT, TGFBR2,<br />

PTPRD, IKBKG, TRAF6, and RASSF1. CCND1, and MYC were commonly<br />

co-amplified and correlated with poor progression free survival, representing<br />

a distinct HNC phenotype. Analysis for additional genes and influence<br />

on induction response will be presented. Conclusions: Targeted, medium<br />

throughput genomic pr<strong>of</strong>iling is feasible, and provides the majority <strong>of</strong> HNC<br />

specific genetic aberrations at a comparably low cost. Impact on outcome<br />

(CCND1/MYC amplification) and potential treatment targets (PIK3CA<br />

mutations in HPV(�) tumors) were identified.<br />

5519 Poster Discussion Session (Board #9), Sat, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM and<br />

12:00 PM-1:00 PM<br />

Safety, molecular, and imaging responses to cetuximab administered in a<br />

window pre-operative study in squamous cell carcinoma <strong>of</strong> the head and<br />

neck (SCCHN). Presenting Author: Sandra Schmitz, Department <strong>of</strong> Head<br />

and Neck Surgery, St-Luc Hospital, Catholic University <strong>of</strong> Louvain, Brussels,<br />

Belgium<br />

Background: Only a minority <strong>of</strong> SCCHN pts benefits from anti-EGFR mAbs.<br />

Trials with pre- and post-therapy tumor biopsies are crucial to better<br />

characterize the molecular pathways involved in treatment response or<br />

resistance. Targeted agents (TA) are <strong>of</strong>ten investigated in unselected<br />

end-stage cancer pts, making difficult optimal translational research. One<br />

way to resolve this issue is to perform “window” studies where a TA is given<br />

during the incompressible period between the diagnosis and surgery.<br />

Methods: We conducted a phase I/II study: cetuximab (C) was given<br />

pre-operatively to treatment-naïve SCCHN pts selected for primary curative<br />

surgery. C (400mg/m2 first wk followed by 250mg/m2/wk) was given<br />

during 2 wks (day -15 until day -1, 3 infusions) before surgery (day 0).<br />

Tumour biopsies, FDG/PET, and CT were performed at diagnosis and<br />

surgery. In the phase I, we investigated the safety <strong>of</strong> preoperative C by<br />

progressively reducing the delay between the last dose <strong>of</strong> C and surgery<br />

(minimum delay : 24 hrs ; 3�3 phase 1 design). The aims <strong>of</strong> the phase II<br />

were (i) safety, (ii) C activity by FDG-PET (Po�0.10, P1�0.35, a�0.05 and<br />

b� 0.10). As controls, 5 additional pts were included without C treatment<br />

but with the same requirements regarding biopsies and imaging. Results:<br />

The phase 1 study (n�18) demonstrated that C infusion given 24 hrs<br />

before surgery was safe. Safety was confirmed in the phase II (n�20). 90 %<br />

had a FDG-PET partial response (PR) (EORTC guideline) in the C group and<br />

0% in the controls. 52% had a �SUVmax decrease <strong>of</strong> �50%. 2 pts<br />

evaluable by CT/MRI had a PR (RECIST). Then, we compared the pre-and<br />

post treatment biopsies by immunochemistry. For the whole group, C did<br />

not reduce Ki67 (p�0.1) and did not seem to induce apoptosis (caspase).<br />

However, for pts with �SUVmax decrease � 25% or � 50%, Ki67 was<br />

decreased (p�0.04 and 0.006). C induced downregulation <strong>of</strong> pEGFR<br />

(p�0.0004) and pERK (p�0.007) but not pAKT/AKT (Histoscore).<br />

Conclusions: Pre-operative study with C is safe. Our findings suggest that<br />

the main downstream molecular pathway blocked by C in SCCHN is the<br />

RAS/RAF/ERK. Further analyses are ongoing to better characterize molecular<br />

response and escape mechanisms.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!