24.12.2012 Views

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

Annual Meeting Proceedings Part 1 - American Society of Clinical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266s Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer<br />

4111 General Poster Session (Board #49F), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

A phase II trial <strong>of</strong> gemcitabine, irinotecan, and panitumumab in advanced<br />

cholangiocarcinoma, with correlative analysis <strong>of</strong> EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF:<br />

An interim report. Presenting Author: Davendra Sohal, Abramson Cancer<br />

Center at the University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA<br />

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive neoplasm. Current chemotherapy<br />

approaches achieve modest results. The epidermal growth<br />

factor receptor (EGFR) pathway appears to be associated with tumor stage,<br />

prognosis and response to therapy. This trial was designed to evaluate the<br />

tolerability and efficacy <strong>of</strong> the combination <strong>of</strong> panitumumab, a monoclonal<br />

anti-EGFR antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan, in patients with<br />

advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Molecular analysis <strong>of</strong> EGFR pathway genes<br />

was planned as well. Methods: Patients with advanced (unresectable or<br />

metastatic) cholangiocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate liver, kidney<br />

and bone marrow function were treated with panitumumab (9 mg/kg) on<br />

day 1, and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 ) and irinotecan (100 mg/m2 ) on days<br />

1 and 8 <strong>of</strong> a 21-day cycle. Tissue specimens were collected at diagnosis for<br />

correlative molecular analyses. Primary objective is to evaluate the 5-month<br />

progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Secondary objectives include overall<br />

response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity <strong>of</strong> the combination.<br />

Mutational analysis <strong>of</strong> EGFR (del 19; 858), KRAS (codons 12, 13) and<br />

BRAF (V600E) was done on samples with adequate material for testing.<br />

Results: There have been 26 (<strong>of</strong> planned 42) patients recruited to the study.<br />

A median <strong>of</strong> 6 (0-30) cycles were administered. There were no treatment<br />

related deaths. The most common gr 3 or higher toxicities were neutropenia<br />

(10 pts, 38%), thrombocytopenia (10 pts, 38%), skin rash (10 pts, 38%)<br />

and diarrhea (3 pts, 12%). During the study, there were 3 CR, 6 PR, 10 SD<br />

(disease control rate <strong>of</strong> 90%), and 2 PD (by RECIST) in 21 evaluable pts.<br />

Two pts went on to have surgical resection. Median OS is 12.7 months. Of<br />

13 testable samples, no EGFR or BRAF mutations were identified; however,<br />

there were 7 KRAS mutations. Retrospective analysis showed no difference<br />

in OS by KRAS mutation status. Conclusions: Interim evaluation <strong>of</strong> this<br />

ongoing study showed encouraging tolerability and efficacy <strong>of</strong> this regimen.<br />

Several patients have KRAS mutations; there appears to be no association<br />

with response, however. The pre-specified efficacy criteria to continue<br />

enrollment were met.<br />

4113 General Poster Session (Board #49H), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

SWOG 0941: A phase II study <strong>of</strong> sorafenib and erlotinib in patients (pts)<br />

with advanced gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Presenting<br />

Author: Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University <strong>of</strong> Southern California Norris<br />

Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA<br />

Background: The treatment <strong>of</strong> pts with advanced biliary cancers represents<br />

a therapeutic challenge. The vascular endothelial growth factor and<br />

epidermal growth factor receptor pathways play an important role in biliary<br />

carcinogenesis, as evidenced by their up-regulation and prognostic impact.<br />

Methods: The primary objective was progression free survival (PFS) (improvement<br />

in PFS from 4 to 8 months); secondary endpoints included overall<br />

survival (OS), objective response rate, and toxicity. A two-stage design was<br />

used; if 13 or more eligible pts <strong>of</strong> the 25 initially accrued were alive without<br />

progression at 4 months, an additional 25 were to be accrued. Eligibility<br />

criteria included no prior treatment for advanced or metastatic disease,<br />

histologic diagnosis <strong>of</strong> gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma, presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> measurable disease, Zubrod performance status 0-1, AST/ALT � 5<br />

IULN, total bilirubin �1.5 IULN, adequate hematologic function. Pts were<br />

treated with sorafenib 400 mg PO BID and erlotinib 100 mg PO q daily<br />

continuously. Restaging scans were performed every 8 weeks. Results: 32<br />

eligible pts were accrued. 30 pts were evaluable for response. 2 patients (7<br />

%) had an unconfirmed partial response (95% CI:1%-23%), and 8 pts<br />

(27%) had stable disease. Median PFS was 2 months (95% CI: 2-3<br />

months). 22/32 patients progressed or died within 4 months <strong>of</strong> registration.<br />

Median OS was 6 months (95% CI: 3 -7 months). The study failed to meet<br />

its primary endpoint to proceed to the second stage <strong>of</strong> accrual. There were 3<br />

deaths on study, 1 <strong>of</strong> which was possibly related to treatment. 19 patients<br />

(59%) had grade 3 or 4 toxicities: AST/ALT (22%), bilirubin (16%),<br />

alkaline phosphatase (16%), hypertension (16%), diarrhea (9%), hepatic<br />

infection (6%). Conclusions: This multicenter study was the first to evaluate<br />

the combination <strong>of</strong> sorafenib and erlotinib in pts with advanced biliary<br />

cancers. Despite manageable toxicity, the study failed to meet its primary<br />

endpoint. Correlative studies on collected tissue and blood are ongoing;<br />

improved pt selection based on tumor biology and molecular markers is<br />

necessary for future evaluation <strong>of</strong> targeted therapies in this disease.<br />

4112 General Poster Session (Board #49G), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

<strong>Clinical</strong>, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

cediranib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A phase II study<br />

(CTEP 7147). Presenting Author: Andrew X. Zhu, Division <strong>of</strong> Hematology<br />

and Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA<br />

Background: Sorafenib remains the only approved systemic therapy in HCC.<br />

We performed a phase II study <strong>of</strong> cediranib (AZD2171)—a more potent and<br />

selective pan-VEGF receptor inhibitor—in advanced HCC patients (pts).<br />

Methods: Eligibility criteria included unresectable or metastatic measurable<br />

HCC, ECOG PS �2, CLIP score �3, and adequate organ function.<br />

Patients received cediranib at 30 mg po qd continuously (4-wk cycle). The<br />

primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). We also assessed<br />

overall survival (OS) and response rates, steady-state PK <strong>of</strong> cediranib, and<br />

blood circulating biomarkers. Results: Since 6/16/09, we have enrolled the<br />

targeted 17 pts required for the first stage <strong>of</strong> the planned study: ECOG<br />

0/1/2�5/11/1, CLIP 1/2/3�6/4/7, Child A/B�14/3, BCLC C�17. Nine<br />

pts had prior sorafenib. The best response was stable disease in five pts<br />

(29%). The median PFS was 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.5-9.7). The median<br />

OS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.5-13.6). Grade 3 toxicities included<br />

hypertension (29%), hyponatremia (12%), elevated SGOT (12%) and one<br />

pt each (6%) in SGPT, fatigue, hyperbilirubinemia, cardiac ischemia, and<br />

proteinuria. Grade 4 pulmonary embolism and brainstem hemorrhage<br />

occurred in 1 pt each. Steady-state PK parameters (mean�SD) were, Cmin, 22�21 ng/mL; Cmax, 55�33 ng/mL; AUC�, 887�503 ng*h/mL. Plasma<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> VEGF and PlGF increased and sVEGFR1, sVEGFR2 and Ang-2<br />

decreased significantly after cediranib treatment (p�0.05). PFS was<br />

inversely correlated with baseline levels <strong>of</strong> bFGF, sVEGFR2 and VEGF, and<br />

OS was inversely correlated with baseline levels <strong>of</strong> sVEGFR1, Ang-2,<br />

TNF-alpha and CD34�CD133� hematopoietic progenitor cells (p�0.05).<br />

Conclusions: Cediranib at 30 mg daily is associated with high frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

grade 3 hypertension and shows preliminary evidence <strong>of</strong> antitumor activity<br />

in advanced HCC pts. Exploratory studies confirmed potential PD and<br />

response biomarkers <strong>of</strong> anti-VEGF therapy. Cediranib exhibits similar PK in<br />

HCC pts as in those with other tumor types and normal/near normal hepatic<br />

function. This study was stopped by AstraZeneca after discontinuation <strong>of</strong><br />

cediranib development for unrelated factors.<br />

4114 General Poster Session (Board #50A), Mon, 8:00 AM-12:00 PM<br />

Multiparametric quantitative functional MRI for assessing early changes in<br />

volumetric functional tumor burden in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by<br />

intra-arterial therapies. Presenting Author: Vivek Gowdra Halappa, The<br />

Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD<br />

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary<br />

malignant disease <strong>of</strong> the liver. Intra-arterial therapy (IAT) has been shown<br />

to improve survival and is commonly used in unresectable HCC. Assessing<br />

response to IAT as early as possible using objective criteria is paramount for<br />

clinical care. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate volumetric diffusion<br />

weighted (DWI) and contrast Enhanced MR imaging (CE-MRI) changes for<br />

assessing early treatment response to IAT in hepatocellular carcinoma.<br />

Methods: This study included 177 lesions <strong>of</strong> HCC in 107 patients (85 Male,<br />

mean age 64 years) with BCLC A (19) B (44) C (36) D (8) treated by IAT. All<br />

patients had pre-IAT and 3-4 weeks follow up MRI with DWI and CE-MR.<br />

Tumors were segmented using semi automated s<strong>of</strong>tware to provide volumetric<br />

functional analysis <strong>of</strong> DWI and CE- MRI as well as percent tumor<br />

burden. Statistical analyses include paired t-test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log<br />

rank test and multivariate analysis with cox model. Results: There was<br />

significant increase in volumetric ADC and significant decrease in volumetric<br />

arterial (AE) and venous (VE) enhancement after IAT. Patients with<br />

tumor burden <strong>of</strong> � 10% had improved survival compared to patients with<br />

high tumor burden <strong>of</strong> �10% (log rank p �.008 ) This survival benefit was<br />

larger among patients with tumor burden <strong>of</strong> � 10% who demonstrated an<br />

increase in volumetric ADC (�20%. Overall survival (OS) 33.5 mo) and<br />

decrease in volumetric VE (�50% OS 35.2 mo) compared to patients with<br />

high tumor burden �10% who no favorable response in ADC ( OS 14.1 mo)<br />

or VE (OS 16.5 mo) (Log rank p � .001) . In multivariate analysis factors<br />

associated with favorable prognosis were: increased ADC, (Hazard Ratio<br />

(HR) � 0.44, 95% CI �0.24 - 0.80) decreased VE, (HR � 0.43, 95% CI �<br />

0.22 - 0.84) and BCLC A and B (HR � 0.31, 95% CI �0.18 - 0.54).<br />

Conclusions: Volumetric functional analysis <strong>of</strong> DWI and CE-MR are reliable<br />

imaging biomarkers <strong>of</strong> treatment response and tumor necrosis were able to<br />

differentiate responders and non responders. Early assessment <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

response by volumetric functional MRI predicts prognosis in patients<br />

undergoing IAT in HCC.<br />

Visit abstract.asco.org and search by abstract for the full list <strong>of</strong> abstract authors and their disclosure information.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!